metro
Falana slams Wike on houses for FCT judges, says it’s unconstitutional
Falana slams Wike on houses for FCT judges, says it’s unconstitutional
Human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, SAN, yesterday, once again flayed the construction of houses for judges and justices by the Ministry of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), saying the action is unconstitutional.
Speaking on a programme on Channels Television, he said the action is an embarrassment to the Judiciary which ought to maintain its independence as one of the three arms of government in Nigeria.
It would be recalled that in September, the Federal Executive Council (FEC) approved the construction of 40 housing units for judges and justices in the FCT.
FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike, revealed this to State House correspondents after the 18th Council meeting, which was chaired by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, at the Aso Rock Villa, Abuja.
He said the decision was part of the government’s Renewed Hope Housing agenda to provide secure and convenient accommodation for judicial officers.
Of the 40 units to be constructed in the Katampe District, 20 will be allocated to the FCT High Court, 10 to the Federal High Court, and 10 to the Court of Appeal.
The land on which the houses would be built was seized by the FCT administration from the construction giant, Julius Berger Nigeria.
Nothing wrong with what I did – Wike
Speaking yesterday during a media chat, the FCT minister denied allegations the building of the houses for judges in Abuja was aimed at “pocketing them for political gains”.
READ ALSO:
- Israel-Palestinian conflict: Two-state solution is a deception, says Gumi
- Court sacks Ondo LP candidate, two days to governorship poll
- FBI raids home of crypto platform Polymarket CEO, after accurate prediction of Trump win
Wike insisted that the project was approved in the 2024 budget, and that he was only performing his duty by implementing it.
He said the building of the judges’ quarters was not his policy but part of welfare packages that President Tinubu designed for the judges to promote the independence of the judiciary.
Wike said Tinubu asked him, ‘Where are the judges living? They have no homes and are, therefore, open to political manipulations and for me as a president, who wants to guarantee the independence of the judiciary, judges must have their homes’.
“I am not Mr. President; I am only lucky to be appointed as a minister under this administration and who is in the position to implement his policies. Mr. President said, look, this is what he wants; come up and see what we can do.
“It was approved by Mr. President, sent to the National Assembly in the 2024 budget that there should be construction of judges and justices’ quarters; that they should move judges from where they are renting houses, living among criminals.
“It is in the budget of 2024, appropriated by the National Assembly, assented to by Mr. President which is a law. What is the problem? I am only the implementer,” he said.
Wike further insisted that there was nothing wrong even if it was his idea to construct homes for judges, adding that he did something similar as governor of Rivers State.
Falana counters minister
Speaking on Channels Television’s Politics Today last night, Mr. Falana maintained that such action was not good for the Judiciary.
“As a member of the body of benchers, there is provision for it under the current democratic dispensation. There are three arms of the government, the Judiciary, the Executive and the Legislature. Each of them today enjoys financial autonomy; in fact, there are three judgments of the Federal High Court to the effect that the judiciary is financially autonomous.
“One of them was obtained by my friend, and the other by the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN). Those judgments were disobeyed. When President Muhammadu Buhari also tried to recognise the independence and financial autonomy of the Judiciary via Executive Order at the tail end of 2020, governors also went to court and the Supreme Court declared it illegal. But the National Assembly and all the states’ Houses of Assembly later amended the provisions of the constitution to declare in Section 23, that all the funds of the Judiciary every year at the federal level shall pass to the National Judicial Council (NJC).
“For the states, the budget of the Judiciary, the money would be given to the heads of courts.
“So, if you want to buy cars, build houses, they are to be carried out from the budget of the Judiciary. The minister did not answer the question which was to the effect that; can you give houses to the judges before whom you have cases? Because, justice must not just be done, it must be seen to have been done.
“And people in the Executive must stop embarrassing the Judiciary. Now, look at the contradictions; it is more like the governor of Kaduna, Zamfara, Cross River or Lagos State coming to give federal judges houses in Abuja; no!
“The Minister of FCT operates like a state governor by virtue of Section 299 of the Constitution. So, he cannot say ‘I am going to build 40 houses: 10 have gone to the Federal High Court, 10 to the FCT High Court and 10 have gone to the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. No!” he said.
Mr. Falana further stated: “Because you are a minister of the federal government like a state governor, your budget is limited towards the affairs of the Federal Capital Territory. So, you cannot as the head of the FCT be dishing out cars and houses to the judges in the Federal High Court, Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.
“Secondly, you have cases before these courts. On the theory of equality before the law, you cannot be seen to be giving cars or houses to judges who are going to determine your cases. And that is why the autonomy of the Judiciary has now been constitutionalised.
“In 2024, what was initially budgeted for the judiciary was N116 billion, but when the National Assembly was convinced on the need for houses and cars for judges and so on and so forth, the budget was increased to N345 billion.
“So, our judges don’t have business going to the Executive to get cars and houses for them. We must now have to operate under the law. Under the constitution, there is no provision for it”, he affirmed.
Falana slams Wike on houses for FCT judges, says it’s unconstitutional
![]()
metro
US Intensifies Military Training for Nigerian Troops in Bauchi
US Intensifies Military Training for Nigerian Troops in Bauchi
American forces have intensified military training for Nigerian troops in unmanned aircraft systems, combat casualty care, and other critical battlefield skills as part of a broader security cooperation mission aimed at strengthening Nigeria’s operational capacity against terrorism and other security threats.
The training is being conducted at Operating Location Bauchi in Bauchi State, with the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM) confirming that the exercises are designed to share military expertise, strengthen partner capacity, and build relationships between service members from both nations. According to AFRICOM, the programme covers Combat Lifesaver and Tactical Combat Casualty Care instruction, weapons familiarisation, camouflage, water treatment and testing, explosive ordnance disposal, small-unit tactics, and unmanned aircraft systems training. Captain Gabriel Feingold, a logistics officer assigned to the US Army Southern European Task Force, Africa, and operations officer at Operating Location Bauchi, explained that the training programme was developed based on areas Nigerian commanders identified as beneficial. “We bring them a list of several different training topics, and they select what they think would be most beneficial for them,” Feingold said.
READ ALSO:
- Awujale: Fusengbuwa Ruling House sues Abiodun, kingmakers over stalled selection
- “He Must Be Mad” — Oyedepo Slams Sheikh Jingir Over Claim Nigeria Is an Islamic Nation
- Two Killed, Three Officers Injured as Gunmen Attack Police Patrol in Osun
Unmanned aircraft systems generated particular interest among Nigerian forces, with Sergeant Mark Murphy, an intelligence analyst assigned to the 13th Combat Sustainment Support Battalion, leading approximately 10 members of the Nigerian Air Force Special Forces Regiment through the training. The session began with about 45 minutes of classroom instruction before the Nigerian personnel received hands-on training on operating the aircraft. Murphy also taught the participants techniques for employing unmanned aircraft systems and incorporating intelligence gathered through the platforms into military operations. “They were really excited with being able to get hands-on time with it,” Murphy said, adding that the Nigerian personnel expressed interest in receiving further training on the system.
Beyond technical and operational skills, the joint exercises have created opportunities for American and Nigerian service members to build relationships and improve interoperability. Feingold noted that the interactions were particularly valuable at the lower levels of both forces. “It helps build relationships between Soldiers and the partner force, especially at the lower levels,” he said. According to AFRICOM, US and Nigerian personnel also participate in basketball and volleyball when operational commitments and weather permit, providing additional opportunities to strengthen their relationship. Sergeant Murphy observed that the training made interaction easier, saying, “Now it’s a lot easier to interact with them. They come up, they say hi to me, they talk about the training that we did.”
The Bauchi training represents a continuation of the broader US-Nigeria security partnership. In July 2026, AFRICOM disclosed that the US had withdrawn most troops deployed to Nigeria for a specific counterterrorism operation, while retaining an intelligence-sharing and security cooperation arrangement with the Nigerian military. The US has approximately 200 military personnel and several MQ-9 Reaper drones at the Bauchi airbase for training, intelligence, and support functions in the fight against jihadist militants in northern Nigeria. Additional training opportunities are being developed at Operating Location Bauchi as both sides continue identifying areas where their personnel can share expertise and train together.
US Intensifies Military Training for Nigerian Troops in Bauchi
![]()
metro
Awujale: Fusengbuwa Ruling House sues Abiodun, kingmakers over stalled selection
Awujale: Fusengbuwa Ruling House sues Abiodun, kingmakers over stalled selection
The Fusengbuwa Ruling House of Ijebu-Ode has taken Ogun State Governor Dapo Abiodun, the state government and members of the Awujale Afobaje/Kingmakers Council to court over the stalled process of selecting the next Awujale and Paramount Ruler of Ijebuland.
The suit, filed at the Ogun State High Court sitting in Ijebu-Ode, is seeking judicial orders compelling the relevant authorities to allow the succession process to resume and be completed in accordance with the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021.
The case, dated August 21, 2026, was filed by the Chairman of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House, Abdulateef Owoyemi; Deputy Chairman, Adedokun Ajidagba; and Vice Chairman, Prof Fassy Yusuf.
The defendants include Governor Abiodun; the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Oluwasina Ogungbade (SAN); the Ogun State Executive Council; Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, Ganiyu Hamzat; the Secretary of Ijebu-Ode Local Government; and its chairman, Dare Alebiosu.
Nine members of the Awujale Afobaje/Kingmakers Council are also named as defendants. They are Sonny Kuku, Rasheed Adesanya, Oluwaranti Osifeso, Jimi Lawal, Abimbola Okenla, Kunle Ogunade, Agboola Alausa, Adebisi Adaran and Ayotunde Odulaja.
The legal dispute stems from the prolonged process of finding a successor to the late Awujale of Ijebuland, Oba Sikiru Kayode Adetona, who died on July 13, 2025, at the age of 91 after a 65-year reign.
The Fusengbuwa Ruling House maintains that the succession process was properly initiated after Ijebu-Ode Local Government notified it on December 2, 2025, that it was its turn to produce a candidate under the rotational arrangement governing the Awujale stool.
READ ALSO:
- “He Must Be Mad” — Oyedepo Slams Sheikh Jingir Over Claim Nigeria Is an Islamic Nation
- Two Killed, Three Officers Injured as Gunmen Attack Police Patrol in Osun
- IGP to launch NPF Vigilant App, MTN CUG Network to strengthen tech-driven policing
The family subsequently held its nomination meeting on January 12, 2026, which it said was within the 14-day period prescribed by Section 16 of the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021.
According to the claimants, 95 princes and princesses were nominated during the exercise, with the completed list forwarded to the nine-member kingmakers’ council on January 19, 2026.
The ruling house contends that the submission of the list marked the completion of its statutory responsibility and paved the way for the kingmakers to commence the next stage of the process — selecting a preferred candidate from the nominees.
However, the claimants allege that the kingmakers were prevented from meeting less than 24 hours after receiving the nomination list.
They alleged that police officers entered the Awujale Palace after midnight on January 20, 2026, and locked the premises, thereby preventing the kingmakers from convening to continue the selection process.
The ruling house is now asking the High Court to determine whether the Ogun State Government had the legal authority to order or facilitate the alleged closure of the palace and prevent the kingmakers from carrying out their statutory responsibilities.
It also wants the court to determine whether the state government had the power under the Ogun State chieftaincy law to suspend the nomination or selection process for the Awujale stool.
The claimants further argue that the ruling house had fully complied with its legal obligation after completing its nomination exercise within the prescribed period.
They are asking the court to determine whether the kingmakers, after receiving the 95-name nomination list, became legally obligated under Sections 16(1)(e) and (f) of the law to select a candidate and forward the name to the Ogun State Executive Council.
The ruling house is also relying on Section 22 of the law in asking the court to determine whether the Executive Council is required to act on a candidate selected and presented by the kingmakers.
The claimants are seeking a declaration that they should not be compelled to reopen, repeat or recommence the nomination exercise after completing it in accordance with the prescribed procedure.
They are also asking the court to declare that the Awujale kingmakers must proceed with the selection of a candidate from the submitted list and forward the name to the appropriate government authority.
Among the reliefs sought is an order directing the kingmakers to reconvene within seven days of judgment and complete the selection process.
The ruling house is further seeking an injunction restraining the Ogun State Government and security agencies from interfering with the succession process.
It wants the court to declare the alleged locking of the Awujale Palace unlawful, ultra vires the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021, and contrary to the claimants’ right to fair hearing.
The legal action follows an earlier decision by the state government to suspend the succession exercise amid concerns over security, alleged bribery and financial inducement.
The Fusengbuwa Ruling House, however, disputes the basis for those concerns and says no evidence or formal petition substantiating the allegations was presented to it.
The claimants further contend that investigations by the police and the Department of State Services (DSS) did not establish wrongdoing by the ruling house.
The dispute has already affected planned engagements between the kingmakers and prospective candidates. The selection process was halted after security authorities became involved, while aspirants were subsequently directed to appear before the DSS for screening.
The case now places the respective powers and responsibilities of the ruling house, Awujale kingmakers and Ogun State Government before the court.
Counsel for the claimants, led by Olusegun Otayemi, argued in the originating summons that the state’s chieftaincy law establishes a sequential process involving nomination, selection and approval, which should be followed once the process has been validly commenced.
The ruling house is therefore asking the court to clarify whether any government authority has the power to interrupt the statutory process after the relevant stages have been completed.
The outcome of the case could determine the future of the current Awujale succession process, including whether the 95-name nomination list remains valid and whether the kingmakers can proceed with the selection of a successor to Oba Adetona.
It could also provide judicial clarification on how the provisions of the Ogun State Obas and Chiefs Law 2021 should be applied in the appointment of the next Awujale.
The case adds a significant legal dimension to the prolonged search for a successor to one of Nigeria’s most prominent traditional rulers, as stakeholders in Ijebuland await further developments from the court.
Awujale: Fusengbuwa Ruling House sues Abiodun, kingmakers over stalled selection
![]()
metro
“He Must Be Mad” — Oyedepo Slams Sheikh Jingir Over Claim Nigeria Is an Islamic Nation
-
metro2 days agoLagos Police arrest five suspected telecom vandals, recover truckload of iron rods
-
Entertainment2 days agoVeteran Nollywood Actor Taiwo Hassan ‘Ogogo’ Dies at 66 After Cancer Battle
-
metro1 day agoMUSCOYS Honours Pioneering Educationist with Commendation Award
-
Politics2 days agoOpposition Unity Cracks as Atiku, Obi, Kwankwaso Diverge on 2027 Strategy Against Tinubu
-
metro2 days agoLagos Moves to Tackle Housing Deficit, Inaugurates 2026 World Habitat Day Committee
-
metro2 days ago2027: Over 500 Northern Muslim Clerics Endorse Tinubu for Second Term
-
Politics2 days ago2027: Alfindiki tackles Atiku over Tinubu’s FBI records
-
Politics2 days agoAtiku to FBI: Don’t Shield Tinubu With Secrecy – Nigerians Are Already Paying With Their Lives
