How Electoral College, not popular votes, picks US president - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

How Electoral College, not popular votes, picks US president

Published

on

Former President Donald Trump and United States Vice President Kamala Harris

How Electoral College, not popular votes, picks US president

Although the United States prides itself on being the world’s preeminent democracy, where each person can have their say about who should be president, the Constitution calls for states to choose “electors” who do the actual electing.

This is known as the Electoral College.

This includes the first presidential election in 1789, won by George Washington; there have been 59 U.S. elections.

In all but five, two in this century, the president has won both the popular votes and the Electoral College votes.

In 2000, Democratic candidate Al Gore garnered 543,895 more votes nationwide than Republican George W. Bush.

But in a contentious race that went all the way up to the Supreme Court, the judges decided to end a recount in Florida, giving the state’s then 25 electoral votes to Bush.

This took Bush past the magic number of 270 electoral votes and ensured him the presidency.

In 2016, when Donald Trump was elected, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by a much bigger margin, receiving 2.9 million more votes nationwide.

But Trump became president because he garnered 304 electoral votes to Clinton’s 227.

If the number of electoral votes is tied, then the election is decided by the newly elected House of Representatives.

– How the electoral votes work –

Each state is allotted electors equal to their number of representatives in Congress.

This means there are 538 electors in total: 435 representatives and 100 senators, plus three for the District of Columbia.

If a candidate wins 270 electors or more, therefore, he or she wins the presidency.

In 48 states, the candidate with the most votes, however slim the margin, wins all the state’s electoral votes.

Maine and Nebraska do things differently and allocate electoral votes by individual congressional districts.

Some critics regard the Electoral College as an anachronism and would replace it with a national popular vote.

They say that the Electoral College makes a mockery of the “one person, one vote” system the country extols.

Furthermore, it causes candidates to concentrate their campaigns primarily on a handful of swing states where the vote could go either way, turning the majority of voters elsewhere in the country into bystanders.

But proponents say the reverse would happen if the president were elected by the popular votes.

Then candidates would concentrate their campaigning in the big states—California, Texas, and New York—and voters in smaller states would be the onlookers.

But what really do the two major candidates in the U.S. presidential election represent?

Kamala Harris is the first woman, first black person, and first person of South Asian descent to be vice president of the United States.

After four years in the second highest office, she now wants to make history again by holding the top job.

She received President Joe Biden’s blessing when he stepped back from being the Democratic candidate just three months ago, triggering her whirlwind campaign.

Harris was born on Oct. 20, 1964, in Oakland, California. She often touts her middle-class upbringing to voters: her father Donald migrated from Jamaica to study economics; her mother Shyamala, a cancer researcher and civil rights activist, came from India.

They married in 1963 and separated when Harris was 5 years old.

Harris, 60, has largely played down her gender and race. But she has said that India is an important part of her life.

When she and her younger sister Maya were children, their mother travelled with them to India almost every other year to see relatives there—and to instill in them a love of Indian food.

Shyamala died of colon cancer in 2009. Harris rarely speaks of her father, who went on to become a professor at Stanford University. She once told an interviewer that they are not close.

Harris became the first black district attorney of San Francisco in 2002, and later she served for six years as California’s attorney general.

When she moved to the U.S. Senate in 2017, she used her experience as a prosecutor to make her mark at high-profile hearings by grilling witnesses, from Trump officials to Supreme Court nominees.

Harris met her partner Doug Emhoff, an entertainment lawyer, relatively late in life.

A friend set up a blind date for the two of them in California, where they were living at the time in 2013.

They married the following year.

Emhoff has two adult children from his first marriage: Cole and Ella.

As the first husband of a vice president, Emhoff is also the first “Second Gentleman” of the United States.

Should Harris win and become the first woman to ever hold the presidency, he would be the very first “First Gentleman.”

Donald Trump’s rise to the U.S. presidency, which he held from 2017-2021, upset many assumptions and taboos, but perhaps just as surprising is that he has brushed off two impeachments, a criminal conviction, and several other threats to contend again for the White House.

His come-from-behind win against Hillary Clinton in 2016, by claiming outsider status and promising to bring a businessman’s acumen for dealmaking to the White House, shocked the U.S. political system and fundamentally changed the Republican party.

In 2024, four years after losing to Joe Biden, he still casts himself as the man to shake up U.S. politics by taking on the corrupt elites.

All the while he has kept his brash campaign style, prone to riffing on theories well outside the mainstream, and rarely shying away from an opportunity to personally insult or belittle his opponents.

If Trump wins, the 78-year-old would be the oldest person in U.S. history elected president.

Born June 14, 1946, he was the fourth of five children of Frederick Trump, a real estate magnate who bequeathed a small New York empire to his family.

At age 13, Trump’s parents sent him to a military academy.

The future president went on to study at Fordham University and then the University of Pennsylvania’s prestigious Wharton School of Business.

After graduating from Wharton, he joined his father’s business and, in 1974, became its president and renamed it the Trump Organisation.

Investments in hotels, casinos, golf courses, luxury apartments, and beauty pageants followed.

As the star of the TV reality show “The Apprentice,” he relished delivering bad news to failed contenders, telling them curtly, “You are fired.”

Trump dipped into politics from time to time but seemed galvanised under the administration of Barack Obama and morphed into a right-wing populist.

He loudly peddled the lie that Obama was not born in the United States.

Trump’s critics, which include several high-profile members of his first administration, have cast him as chaotic, divisive, and a threat to democracy.

General John Kelly, his former chief of staff, recently likened him to a “fascist.”

His rhetoric has been crude and dark at rallies, veering from crass insults to false claims and menacing warnings, like his suggestion this month he could use the military to handle what he called “the enemy from within.”

Like in 2016, his 2024 campaign has put an anti-immigration stance front and centre.

In 2016, he said some Mexican immigrants were rapists and murderers; this year he baselessly accused Haitian immigrants of eating pets in the town of Springfield, Ohio.

A line repeated by his vice presidential pick, Ohio Senator J. D. Vance.

How Electoral College, not popular votes, picks US president

(NANFeatures)

Loading

International

UN Adopts New World Map Showing Africa Bigger, US Smaller in Landmark 2026 Vote

Published

on

UN Adopts New World Map Showing Africa Bigger, US Smaller in Landmark 2026 Vote

UN Adopts New World Map Showing Africa Bigger, US Smaller in Landmark 2026 Vote

The United Nations General Assembly has approved a historic resolution encouraging countries to adopt a new world map that more accurately reflects the true size of continents — a move that makes Africa appear significantly larger while shrinking North America and Europe. The United States was the only nation to vote against it.

On September 4, 2026, the UN General Assembly passed the resolution with 164 votes in favour, 6 abstentions, and just one opposed — the United States. The six countries that abstained were Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Serbia, Lithuania, and Estonia. The resolution, spearheaded by the West African nation of Togo and backed by the African Union, encourages governments, schools, and technology companies to phase out the centuries-old Mercator projection in favour of the Equal Earth projection developed in 2018. Togo’s Foreign Minister Robert Dussey, who presented the resolution, declared: “A fair world begins with a fair map.”

The resolution seeks to correct a distortion that has shaped global perceptions for over 450 years. The Mercator projection was created in 1569 by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator specifically for maritime navigation. While it preserves accurate angles and directions, it severely distorts land area proportions: regions near the poles appear much larger than they actually are, while equatorial regions appear smaller. The most glaring example of this distortion is the comparison between Africa and Greenland. On a standard Mercator map, the two landmasses appear roughly the same size. In reality, Africa is 14 times larger than Greenland — Africa covers about 30.3 million square kilometres, while Greenland covers just 2.1 million. Advocacy groups point out that Africa could contain the United States, China, India, Japan, Mexico, and most of Europe within its area and still have space left.

READ ALSO:

The Equal Earth projection, developed by cartographers Bojan Savric, Bernhard Jenny, and Tom Patterson in 2018, preserves the relative surface areas of continents while maintaining recognisable shapes. Under this new projection, Africa appears in its true massive scale — dramatically larger than in the familiar Mercator map. North America and Europe, by contrast, appear noticeably smaller. “Equal Earth preserves the relative surface areas of continents and, as much as possible, shows their shapes as they appear on a globe,” cartographer Bojan Savric told AFP in 2025. “Correcting the map means restoring to continents in the minds of people the reality of the true dimensions,” said Togo’s Foreign Minister Robert Dussey. He stressed that the campaign is “not directed against any nation, region, or civilization” but serves a “universal goal: to promote knowledge based on scientific rigour, respect for truth, and the equal dignity of peoples.”

American representatives dismissed the resolution as a distraction from pressing global issues. Speaking before the vote, US representative Yaryna Ferencevych argued that “such resolutions and the ideological agenda they promote hinder the work of this institution and lead to a decline in its credibility.” She urged member states to reject the text and focus instead on “genuine issues of international peace, prosperity, or good relations between nations.” Despite the US objection, the resolution passed overwhelmingly. It carries no legal force and does not mandate the replacement of existing maps — rather, it encourages institutions to educate the public on the limitations of flat maps and to adopt more accurate representations. The resolution “in no way challenges the use of the Mercator projection for maritime and aerial navigation, for which it remains fully suited,” the Togolese ministry said in a statement.

African leaders hailed the vote as a significant victory for continental representation. The African Union Mission to the UN welcomed the resolution as a “significant step towards ensuring that the map of the world reflects Africa’s true scale and place in the world.” Togo’s Dussey announced that Togo would become the first country to replace its geography textbooks with the new maps by the end of 2026, and the nation plans to engage with African Union members and other supporters to promote adoption globally. France, a co-sponsor of the resolution, expressed strong support. Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said in a speech at the Sorbonne: “Changing the map obviously won’t change the world… but correcting a distorted representation is itself an act of truth.” The advocacy group “Unfiltered Africa,” which promotes the Equal Earth map, welcomed the UN decision, stating: “We hope to see accurate maps in schools, textbooks, newsrooms, businesses, and the digital platforms used by billions of people every day.”

UN Adopts New World Map Showing Africa Bigger, US Smaller in Landmark 2026 Vote

Loading

Continue Reading

International

US Strikes Three Iranian Oil Tankers in Retaliation for Missile Attack on Navy Ships

Published

on

US Strikes Three Iranian Oil Tankers in Retaliation for Missile Attack on Navy Ships

US Strikes Three Iranian Oil Tankers in Retaliation for Missile Attack on Navy Ships

Tensions in the Gulf of Oman escalated dramatically on September 5, 2026, as the United States military struck and disabled three Iranian crude oil carriers, following missile and drone attacks by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) on U.S. Navy warships patrolling regional waters.

The confrontation began when the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched ballistic missiles toward two U.S. Navy warships operating in the region. According to U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), an American aircraft carrier and a guided-missile destroyer successfully evaded multiple Iranian attacks, with no American personnel harmed. The IRGC claimed, however, that its missiles struck and damaged both vessels, forcing them to withdraw from the area.

In response to what it described as “unprovoked” Iranian attacks, CENTCOM forces permanently disabled two Iranian crude oil carriers—the M/T Downy off the coast of Kharg Island and the M/T Stark 1 near Jask. American forces also completely destroyed the unladen crude oil carrier M/T Kylo, also known as the “Noxen,” in the Gulf of Oman, striking it at multiple critical locations after the crew was directed to abandon ship. The U.S. military later released video footage showing the vessel sinking into the Gulf of Oman.

READ ALSO:

According to CENTCOM, the three tankers were part of a multibillion-dollar Iranian “shadow network” allegedly used to finance the IRGC and its regional proxy groups. The command noted that Iran has no means to defend these vessels. CENTCOM Commander Adm. Brad Cooper issued a stark warning to the IRGC, stating: “Let the message to the IRGC be clear: If you shoot at two of our ships, we will impose an even higher economic cost —taking out three of yours. We will not hesitate to defend American forces, and if necessary, destroy Iran’s limited and exposed oil fleet.”

U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth also issued a direct warning to Tehran via social media: “It’s simple: if Iran shoots at US ships, we will destroy (and sink) their oil tankers. All they have to do is not shoot at @USNavy. Iran’s oil tanker fleet is defenceless — Iran has no navy or air force. Our planes, ships & subs can strike them all.” The strikes marked the first reported U.S. attacks on Iranian oil tankers in the Persian Gulf since the beginning of the conflict, adding a new dimension to the confrontation and raising concerns over the security of Iran’s maritime energy infrastructure.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry strongly condemned the U.S. attacks, describing them as “illegal and irresponsible” and a continuation of U.S. military aggression, naval blockade, and economic warfare against Iran. The ministry stated that the actions constituted a violation of Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter, a war crime, and a threat to international peace and security, adding that the consequences would rest with the United States and its allies. A senior Iranian military official, Brigadier General Habibollah Sayyari, said Iran had withstood attacks despite facing an adversary with extensive technological and military capabilities, describing the conflict as a test of will and endurance. The IRGC warned that continued U.S. military action would draw “heavier” responses from Iran’s armed forces.

Following the attacks, the U.S. Embassy in Bahrain issued a security alert urging American citizens in Bahrain and across the region to exercise heightened vigilance and prepare for possible flight cancellations, airspace closures, and other travel disruptions amid heightened regional tensions.

The latest clashes have cast new doubt on the already fragile ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran, which had been announced on April 8, 2026, through Pakistani mediation. The U.S. has maintained its naval blockade of Iranian ports since April 13, with CENTCOM stating that more than 70 oil tankers are currently being prevented from entering or leaving Iranian ports, with the capacity to transport over 166 million barrels of Iranian oil worth an estimated $13 billion. As both sides accuse each other of violations and vow further retaliation, the risk of a wider military escalation remains high.

US Strikes Three Iranian Oil Tankers in Retaliation for Missile Attack on Navy Ships

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Trump’s Peace Envoys Arrive in Moscow as Russia Bombs Ukraine Airports Overnight

Published

on

Trump's Peace Envoys Arrive in Moscow as Russia Bombs Ukraine Airports Overnight

Trump’s Peace Envoys Arrive in Moscow as Russia Bombs Ukraine Airports Overnight

Trump’s special negotiators arrive with a peace proposal as Russian strikes target Kyiv’s airports overnight, prompting Ukraine’s leader to accuse Moscow of trying to derail the diplomatic mission.

US President Donald Trump‘s envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner landed in Moscow on Saturday for high-stakes talks aimed at ending more than four years of war in Ukraine. Their plane touched down at Vnukovo Airport at 12:52 pm local time, where they were met by Russian presidential envoy Kirill Dmitriev, who shared photos of the meeting on social media with the caption, “Welcome to Moscow Peacemakers.” The diplomatic push comes as Russian strikes hit Kyiv’s two airports overnight, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky accusing Moscow of trying to disrupt the envoys’ visit. Zelensky stated on X that the attacks were “a reaction to the discussions and preparations for the possibility of the US side using an aircraft to travel to Ukraine.” He added there would be “no threats to diplomacy” from the Ukrainian side. The Russian strikes were “demonstrative,” Zelensky said, and targeted both Kyiv and Boryspil airports “for the first time in a while.”

Trump described Witkoff and Kushner as “two great negotiators” and confirmed they are bringing “a proposal to end the war.” However, he declined to say whether the plan involves Ukraine ceding territory, adding only: “We have an idea for peace.” The visit marks the first trip to Kyiv by Witkoff and Kushner since Trump returned to office last year and promised to bring the war to an end. Both envoys have made several trips to Moscow, with their last visit taking place on January 22, when they held four hours of late-night talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin. After their talks in Moscow, the envoys are expected to travel to Kyiv on Sunday. This would be an unusual move, as Ukrainian airspace has been closed since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, with foreign leaders typically traveling to Kyiv by train from Poland. However, plans for the delegation to arrive by plane have been thrown into doubt. A Ukrainian lawmaker, Aleksey Goncharenko, said two old Soviet Yak-40 passenger planes were struck at Zhulyany airport, suggesting the strike was intended as a “signal” to Washington ahead of the visit. A source told Reuters that discussions on the Ukraine portion of the trip were still ongoing, adding: “The Russians don’t want them to visit Kyiv and are trying to make them change the plan.”

READ ALSO:

Zelensky reported that Russia struck both Kyiv and Boryspil airports overnight, describing the attacks as “deliberate” and “for the first time in a while.” Separately, a Russian strike on a civilian target in the Dnipro region killed four people and wounded five in the southeastern city of Kamianske. Russian forces also struck the headquarters of Ukraine’s SBU security service in central Kyiv on Friday, with Zelensky stating the attack was aimed at the office of the agency’s acting chief. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga described the incident as a “major escalation.” Despite the attacks, Zelensky proposed observing a ceasefire with Russia for the duration of the US envoys’ trip. “There will be no airstrikes on our part, and Russia must reciprocally ensure a ceasefire — without its own airstrikes — for the duration needed to conduct these talks,” he said in his evening address. In what may be a partial response to that proposal, Putin ordered a 72-hour pause in strikes on Kyiv starting at midnight Saturday, the Kremlin announced. “Putin has ordered that no strikes be carried out against Kyiv for three days,” presidential spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told Tass, tying the decision to preparations for the envoys’ planned visit to the Ukrainian capital.

The renewed push for diplomacy comes as Russia and Ukraine intensify long-range missile and drone attacks, driving up civilian casualties to levels not seen since the start of the conflict. Peace efforts have stalled in part because of Washington’s war with Iran. Moscow and Kyiv last held peace negotiations under US mediation earlier this year, when they held three rounds of peace talks in January and February. Negotiations have since been paused. Russian officials have signaled they are not in the mood for compromise. Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told state media that “the US administration must take into account the realities on the ground,” where the situation is changing not in Kyiv’s favor. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the position that Putin set out two years ago – that Ukraine should cede the entire territory of four regions claimed by Russia and abandon its plan to join NATO – was “unshakeable.” Putin himself said on Thursday there was a chance of reaching an agreement to end the war, but he added that Kyiv’s warning to foreign airlines to avoid Russian airspace amounted to a threat that would make talks more difficult. This is not the first attempt at diplomacy. Witkoff and Kushner have traveled repeatedly to Moscow in previous efforts, including three rounds of US-mediated talks earlier this year in Abu Dhabi and Geneva. Their latest effort comes more than a week after a rare visit to Moscow by CIA director John Ratcliffe, who warned Russia against any attack on NATO member states, according to US media. Earlier this week, the United States welcomed the Russian finance minister at a G20 gathering in North Carolina.

Trump’s Peace Envoys Arrive in Moscow as Russia Bombs Ukraine Airports Overnight

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending