IPMAN leader backs police action against factional president – Newstrends
Connect with us

Business

IPMAN leader backs police action against factional president

Published

on

President of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, Alhaji Sanusi Abdu Fari, has called for calm among members of group in the face of leadership crisis.

He expressed support for the police intervention in trying to oust a factional president of the association, to allow those legally recognized as executive members o the association to run the affairs of the group.

He was reacting to the alleged invasion of the office of the IPMAN reportedly occupied by Elder Chinedu Okoronkwo, who also claims to be the president.

In a statement signed by the National  Publicity Secretary and Public Relations Officer of IPMAN, High Chief Ukadike Chinedu, the president said the police had only followed due process to ensure the tenets of democracy and rule of law prevailed over sheer force, impunity and falsehood.

The IPMAN boss described Okoronkwo as an impostor, who had continued to cry wolf over a monumental lie they had tried to perpetuate since December 14, 2018 when the Supreme Court delivered a judgment in the IPMAN leadership crisis.

He declared that Okoronkwo had continued to impersonate the national president since 2014, challenging him and his team to point out one line in the judgment of the apex court which affirmed him as IPMAN’s president.

But Okoronkwo said he remained the authentic president of IPMAN, based on the Supreme Court judgement of December 14, 2018 wherein he was declared the winner of the case between him and Lawson Obasi, the erstwhile president of IPMAN.

Okoronkwo wondered where Fari, who claimed to be the president of IPMAN, was drawing his strength from, stressing that his name was never joined as a party to the suit between him and Obasi Lawson.

“Now, where is Fari coming from? I defeated Obasi, his master. Based on the judgement of the court, Obasi has paid N2m through his lawyer to me. Not only that, after all these Supreme Court judgement, last year 2020, Obasi went to court in Abuja here, based on that Calabar matter,  to say I am an impostor, the court dismissed his matter,” he said.

Fari’s statement read in part, “The National President of IPMAN, Alhaji (Engr.) Sanusi Abdu Fari, and members of his executive speaking through the National Publicity Secretary/ Public Relation Officer, High Chief Ukadike Chinedu, said the NEC members are grateful to President Muhammadu Buhari, GCFR, the Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Inspector-General of Police, the management of the NNPC and the FCT police command for showing abiding respect for due process and rule of law.

“Most unfortunately, true to their name and antics, one Elder Chinedu Okoronkwo and his band of impostors have continued to bleat about and cry wolf over a monumental lie they have tried to perpetuate since 14th December, 2018 when the Supreme Court delivered judgment in the IPMAN leadership crisis.

“We hereby challenge Elder Chinedu Okoronkwo and his rabble-rousers to point out one line in the judgment of the apex Court which affirmed him and Alhaji Danladi Pasali as National President and National Secretary respectively of IPMAN. Nothing is further from the truth!

“A lie repeated a thousand times does not transform into truth. It is common knowledge that the judgment of the Supreme Court in Appeal No. SC/15/2018 was interpreted and applied by the Federal High Court, Calabar in a judgment delivered on 21st February, 2019 in Suit No. FHC/C/CS/3/2019.

“That judgment in conjunction with the judgment of the Supreme Court put to rest the leadership dispute in IPMAN as they affirmed the provision of the 1997 Constitution of the association that the Deputy National President automatically becomes the National President!

“The apex court stated the constitutive instrument to determine the tenure of office is the ipman constitution which provides three years tenure for national executive.

“It is worthy of note that following the judgment of the apex Court and the judgment of the Federal High Court, Calabar, the Hon. Attorney-General of the Federation and the Honourable Minister of State for Petroleum Resources wrote their respective letters dated 20th May, 2019 and 27th January, 2020 recognizing Alhaji (Engr.) Sanusi Abdu Fari as the National President of IPMAN.

“The Inspector-General of Police has merely followed due process and ensured that tenets of democracy and rule of law prevail over sheer force, impunity and falsehood. It is worthy to reiterate the obvious fact that Elder Chinedu Okoronkwo and his henchmen are impostors and they ought to know that their luck will sooner or later run out!

“Chinedu Okoronkwo has continued to impersonate the office of the national president since 2014 till date .

“We thank the police and other security agencies for their courage in tackling the challenges posed by these impostors and taking steps to make right that which has been wrong all along.

“We hereby call on all members of IPMAN to embrace peace and be law-abiding as we vow to continue to cooperate and work closely with the Federal Government and other stakeholders to ensure that peace prevails in the downstream sector of the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry.”

Auto

Appeal court takes over NURTW case as NIC withdraws

Published

on

Appeal court takes over NURTW case as NIC withdraws

The National Industrial Court has withdrawn from a case involving Alhaji Najeem Usman Yasin, Board of Trustees chairman of the National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW), and Alhaji Tajudeen Ibikunle Baruwa’s ambition to return as president of the union over lack of jurisdiction.

The industrial court’s decision was made to avoid conflict with the Court of Appeal, where the matter is already being heard.

Before the NIC announced its decision to hands-off the case, the defendants’ counsel, Mr. O.I. Olorundare SAN, had informed the court that the matter is currently before the Court of Appeal, Abuja division, and that the industrial court could not continue to adjudicate on the same matter.

The counsel cited authorities to support his claim, adding that the National Industrial Court does not have concurrent jurisdiction with the Court of Appeal.

The presiding judge, O.O. Oyewunmi, struck out the case, stating that the Appeal Court had taken over the matter and that the Industrial Court must respect the hierarchy of courts.

Alhaji Yasin and six others took the case to the Appeal Court, challenging the decision of the industrial court recognising a delegates’ conference held on May 24, 2023, where Baruwa was proclaimed as President of the union for a second term in office.

With the latest NIC judgement, both parties will now proceed to defend their positions at the Court of Appeal and await the final judgement.

Continue Reading

Business

Multichoice shuns court order, proceeds with increase of DSTV, Gotv packages

Published

on

Multichoice shuns court order, proceeds with increase of DSTV, Gotv packages

Despite the intervention of the CCPT, Multichoice Limited has proceeded to increase packages price for DSTV and GOTV as announce on Wednesday last week.

Newstrends had earlier reported that the corporation announced that the new rates will go into effect on Wednesday, May 1, 2024, in a statement.

Meanwhile, on Monday, MultiChoice Nigeria Limited was ordered by the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal (CCPT) in Abuja to suspend the planned prices and tariffs hike on packages and services.

READ ALSO:

The three-member tribunal, presided over by Saratu Shafii, gave the interim order following an ex-parte motion moved by Ejiro Awaritoma, counsel for the applicant, Festus Onifade.

News prices includes: DStv, Premium bouquet, the price moved from N29,500 to N37,000; Compact+ from N19,800 to N25,000; Compact from N12,500 to N15,700; Confam from N7,400 to N9,300, among others.

For GOtv users, Supa+ increased from N12,500 to N15,700; Supa moved from N7,600 to N9,600; Max from N5,700 to N7,200; Jolli, from N3,950 to N4,850, among others.

Multichoice shuns court order, proceeds with increase of DSTV, Gotv packages

Continue Reading

Business

As controversy over Maersk-FG port investment rages, Onanuga says no $600m deal signed

Published

on

As controversy over Maersk-FG port investment rages, Onanuga says no $600m deal signed


The Nigerian government and a shipping giant, Maersk, have not signed any investment agreement, Bayo Onanuga, special adviser on information and strategy to President Bola Tinubu, has said.
Onanuga was reacting to the controversy surrounding the reported sealing of a $600 million deal for the development of the nation’s seaports.
He said there was only talk “of possible investment in Nigeria” by Maersk.
Interestingly Onanuga had hinted about the deal in a tweet said to have been pulled down after the social media backlash.
After President Tinubu’s discussion with Maersk’s Chairman Robert Uggla on April 28, on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum Special Meeting in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, the presidency had released a statement announcing that the shipping company had pledged to inject $600 million into the Nigerian seaport industry.
“Danish shipping company, A.P Moller-Maersk plans $600m investment in Nigeria. Danish shipping and logistics company A.P Moller-Maersk has disclosed a planned investment of $600 million in Nigeria to accommodate more container shipping services in Nigerian ports,” Onanuga wrote on X.
In a statement, Tinubu’s spokesperson, Ajuri Ngelale, also said “President Tinubu meets Chairman of Danish shipping giant Maersk, secures $600 million investment in Nigerian seaport infrastructure.” He quoted Uggla as saying, “We believe in Nigeria, and we will invest $600m in existing facilities and make the ports accommodating for bigger ships.”
In response to this. Maersk officials have denied any such agreement and stress no deals have been signed.
Onanuga in a new report by TheCable, an online news platform admitted no agreement on investment had been reached by the two parties.
“I think the statement issued by Maersk did not talk about a deal. There was no deal according to that statement that I read.
“However, there was talk of investment,” the special adviser said.
“No document or agreement was signed, so there was no deal. But there was talk of a possible investment in the country.
“So, go and read the statement again. They never said any deal was signed between the Nigerian government and the Dutch company. There was nothing like that.”
Onanuga however said the shipping company did not expressly deny that there was an investment talk.
He said people are “unnecessarily giddy over nothing.

Continue Reading

Trending

Skip to content