Opinion
Lord, have Messi on Fury and bless Ngannou (2), by Tunde Odesola
Lord, have Messi on Fury and bless Ngannou (2), by Tunde Odesola
A counteroffensive ignited by Alexis Mac Allister from the right of the Argentine midfield finds Messi, who gave a two-touch twisty flick to a speeding Julian Alverez, whose intelligent pass returns the ball to Allister, who measured a diagonal pass across the French defence line to locate Angel Di Maria who stabbed in a sublime second goal.
For 70 minutes, Argentina was in control, and France was in a coma with their talisman, Kylian Mbappe, locked in the cooler.
France had their first shot on target in the 71st minute. Then, substitute Kolo Muani, who replaced Ousmane Dembele, burst forth with youthful energy to beat the ageing and tired Nicolas Otamendi who pulled back Muani in the 18-yard box. Penalty!
Mbappe fired a low shot to the far right of Argentina goalie, Emiliano Martinez, whose fingertips failed to keep the ball out. Goooal! 2-1. 80th minute. The French were back the next minute when Marcus Thuram found Mbappe with a sweet dink in the Argentina box, and the rejuvenated PSG superstar made no mistake, volleying the ball into the left of Argentina’s post. 2-2!
The cat with nine lives, Messi, pounced in the 108th minute of the extra time to make it 3-2, blasting in a rare right-foot shot inside the 16-yard box after goalkeeper Hugo Lloris’ point-blank save, sending the 88,966-capacity Lusail Stadium on fire.
Argentina idol, Diego Armando Maradona, fooled the world during the 1986 Mexico World Cup quarterfinal match against England when he scored his infamous ‘Hand of God’ goal to send La Albiceleste en route to a second World Cup glory. English players, including Gary Lineker, John Barnes and goalkeeper Peter Shilton protested but Tunisian referee, Ben Nasser, had no Video Assistant Referee to consult. So, the goal stood. After the dubious first goal, Maradona produced a breathtaking second goal, dribbling past half of the English team right from outside his own centre-circle and slotting home FIFA’s ‘Goal of the Century’ inside the box with his left foot.
But Polish referee Szymon Marciniak didn’t see the ‘Hand of God’ in the 116th minute of the Qatar 2022 World Cup final, he saw the hand of Gonzalo Montiel stop a shot from Mbappe and he rightly awarded a penalty. Again, Mbappe stepped forward to send Martinez the wrong way, scoring all his three penalties in the final to the right of the keeper and sending the game into a pulsating penalty shootout. 3-3!
READ ALSO:
-
Two killed as suspected herdsmen clash with vigilantes in market
-
Mummy Calm Down: Police confirm death of mum, arrest husband
-
ICPC deploys operatives to monitor off-cycle elections in Bayelsa, Imo, and Kogi States
Keeper Martinez aka Dibu weaved his name into World Cup folklore as he saved Kingsley Coman’s penalty and Aurelien Tchouameni missed while Messi, Paredes Leandro, Lucas Ocampus, and villain-turned-hero Montiel delivered the coveted trophy with the last kick of the game, sending Lloris on a wild goose chase leftward.
In the final analysis, Argentina came tops in the vital statistics of the game with 54% possession to France’s 46%, 10 shots on goal to 5 for France, 20 to 10 shot attempts, 6 to 5 corner kicks, and taking the lead on all three occasions.
But no matter what Ádámò does, he can never please the citizens of the Land of Àkámárà. Even if he gets another horse and he and his son ride one each, the people of Àkámárà would blame him for an impudent display of wealth.
I have many anti-Messi friends who are citizens of the Land of Àkámárà. They include Nigeria’s Ambassador to Mexico, Adejare Bello; a former Editor of PUNCH, Chiawo Nwankwo; childhood friend and banker, Victor Olowogorioye; former spokesperson for ex-Governor Olagunsoye Oyinlola, Kayode Oladeji; and a former colleague, Femi Adepoju. Look, it’s not only men that populate Àkámárà. There are women there, too. One of them is the smashing General Manager, Corporate Services, PUNCH Nigeria Limited, Mrs Folakemi Gbemutor, whose love for Real Madrid is conc. Despite all Messi had done to win his 8th Ballon d’Or, she still believes her team’s former icon, Ronaldo, is superior with his five Ballons d’Or haul. Even though my maths is struggling, I think 8-5 remains 3, abi?
Well, Juju music superstar, Chief Commander Ebenezer Obey, said it all in his parable of the man and his son journeying on their horse: there’s nothing you can do to please Àkámáràns. I asked another Àkámáràn, Stanley Adiele, a friend, why he didn’t want Messi to win the World Cup, he said, “It’s going to hurt my brand.” Adiele’s brand is not superior football prowess, it’s Ronaldo and his ebbing career.
A good number of anti-Messi fans queued behind Manchester City lightning striker, Erlin Haaland. Let’s consider the optics. Like Haaland, Messi won a treble of Ligue 1, French Super Cuo and the Father of All Trophies, the World Cup. Unlike no other player, Messi won 29 Man-of-the-Match awards to Haaland’s 17, meaning that he impacted more on the game than Haaland. Though Haaland scored more goals than Messi (52 to 37), Àkámáràns should be reminded that a Soviet goalkeeper, Lev Yashin, won the award in 1963.
Therefore, the Ballon d’Or isn’t an award for goal-scoring alone but for the overall impact a player has on his team. Messi spearheaded the most thrilling World Cup final in history, emerging as the best player of the tournament at 35! Without Haaland, City would have swept the stakes in Europe and England but Argentina, without Messi, would have returned home empty-handed. In the season, Messi had 25 assists to Haaland’s 9. Messi was way ahead of Haaland in other parameters such as Dribbles: 149 to 19; Key Passes: 140 to 37; Tackles: 40 to 8; Big Chances Created: 45 to 13. Yet, Àkámáràns won’t stop saying both the World Cup and the Ballon d’Or were rigged in Messi’s favour.
READ ALSO:
-
Kano research centre moves to end medical tourism among Nigerians, begins clinical services
-
Tension as gunshots rock 2 Jewish schools in Canada
-
(BREAKING) Kogi guber poll : Military arrests Navy Commander, 10 other personnel
Do not be fooled, there are Àkámáràns in the white man’s land, too. They dealt a bad hand during the heavyweight boxing fight between British world champion, Tyson Fury, and Cameroonian mixed martial artist, Francis Ngannou, who turned professional boxer recently.
Watching the slugfest, it was obvious that Fury got more than he bargained for in Ngannou, who knocked him down in the third round with a left hook. The booing of the judges’ verdicts at the end of the fight shows the fans’ belief as to where the pendulum of victory should have swung. From rounds one to seven, (David) Ngannou stood toe-to-toe, in my estimation, against the Goliath of England, winning at least four of the seven rounds. The referees also gave Round 8 to Ngannou. With the Round 3 knockdown, the fight should have been awarded to Ngannou even if Fury won the other five rounds of the 10-round encounter.
David had to cut off Goliath’s head, lift it high up and feed it to the birds of the sky. This is boxing, Ngannou couldn’t do so, so he lost. If it was a mixed martial arts fight, Fury the Giant would’ve been levelled in the third round.
Let me tell you why Ngannou can never be declared winner except he yanks off Fury’s head. Declaring Ngannou, a ‘greenhorn’ in professional boxing, the winner of the bout would have greatly diminished boxing in the eyes of the world. How can a newcomer mixed martial artist defeat boxing’s biggest champion in his first professional boxing fight?
I watch wrestling for comic relief because it’s not a true test of strength. Boxing is seen worldwide as a sweet science that tests strength, wit, brains and guts. Mixed martial arts, since its emergence in the 1990s, has, no doubt, gained global acclaim, sharing the stage with boxing.
If Ngannou was declared winner over Fury, MMA would’ve enjoyed an increased popularity, a situation likely to challenge boxing’s position as the king of combat sports.
An Ngannou victory would also have changed the direction of the heavyweight boxing fights in the pipeline as Fury would have no choice but to stake his titles against Ngannou, putting on hold other possible fights.
Ngannou cannot just come from nowhere and pour san-san for boxing garri. E gbe kinni yi wa, Fury lokan. It’s Fury’s turn, not Ngannou’s yet.
Concluded.
Email: tundeodesola2003@yahoo.com; Facebook: @Tunde Odesola; X: @Tunde_Odesola.
Published in The PUNCH, on Friday, November 10, 2023.
Lord, have Messi on Fury and bless Ngannou (2), by Tunde Odesola
Opinion
El Rufai’s Arise News mind game with Ribadu, By Farooq Kperogi
El Rufai’s Arise News mind game with Ribadu, By Farooq Kperogi
El Rufai’s Arise News mind game with Ribadu, By Farooq Kperogi
Opinion
Oshiomhole: Behold the 13th disciple of Christ
Oshiomhole: Behold the 13th disciple of Christ
Opinion
AFCON 2025: Flipping Content Creation From Coverage to Strategy
AFCON 2025: Flipping Content Creation From Coverage to Strategy
By Toluwalope Shodunke
The beautiful and enchanting butterfly called the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) emerged from its chrysalis in Khartoum, Sudan, under the presidency of Abdelaziz Abdallah Salem, an Egyptian, with three countries—Egypt, Sudan, and Ethiopia—participating, and Egypt emerging as the eventual winner.
The reason for this limited participation is not far-fetched. At the time, only nine African countries were independent. The remaining 45 countries that now make up CAF’s 54 member nations were either pushing Queen Elizabeth’s dogsled made unique with the Union Jack, making supplications at the Eiffel Tower, or knocking at the doors of the Palácio de Belém, the Quirinal Palace, and the Royal Palace of Brussels—seeking the mercies of their colonial masters who, without regard for cultures, sub-cultures, or primordial affinities, divided Africa among the colonial gods.
From then until now, CAF has had seven presidents, including Patrice Motsepe, who was elected as the seventh president in 2021. With more countries gaining independence and under various CAF leaderships, AFCON has undergone several reforms—transforming from a “backyard event” involving only three nations into competitions featuring 8, 16, and now 24 teams. It has evolved into a global spectacle consumed by millions worldwide.
Looking back, I can trace my personal connection to AFCON to table soccer, which I played alone on concrete in our balcony at Olafimihan Street—between Mushin and Ilasamaja—adjacent to Alafia Oluwa Primary School, close to Alfa Nda and Akanro Street, all in Lagos State.
Zygmunt Bauman, the Polish-British sociologist who developed the concept of “liquid modernity,” argues that the world is in constant flux rather than static, among other themes in his revelatory works.
For the benefit of Millennials (Generation Y) and Generation Z—who are accustomed to high-tech pads, iPhones, AI technologies, and chat boxes—table soccer is a replica of football played with bottle corks (often from carbonated drinks or beer) as players, cassette hubs as the ball, and “Bic” biro covers for engagement. The game can be played by two people, each controlling eleven players.
I, however, enjoyed playing alone in a secluded area, running my own commentary like the great Ernest Okonkwo, Yinka Craig, and Fabio Lanipekun, who are all late. At the time, I knew next to nothing about the Africa Cup of Nations. Yet, I named my cork players after Nigerian legends such as Segun Odegbami, Godwin Odiye, Aloysius Atuegbu, Tunji Banjo, Muda Lawal, Felix Owolabi, and Adokiye Amiesimaka, among others, as I must have taken to heart their names from commentary and utterances of my uncles resulting from sporadic and wild celebrations of Nigeria winning the Cup of Nations on home soil for the first time.
While my connection to AFCON remained somewhat ephemeral until Libya 1982, my AFCON anecdotes became deeply rooted in Abidjan 1984, where Cameroon defeated Nigeria 3–1. The name Théophile Abéga was etched into my youthful memory.
Even as I write this, I remember the silence that enveloped our compound after the final whistle.
It felt similar to how Ukrainians experienced the Battle of Mariupol against Russia—where resolute resistance eventually succumbed to overwhelming force.
The Indomitable Lions were better and superior in every aspect. The lion not only caged the Eagles, they cooked pepper soup with the Green Eagles.
In Maroc ’88, I again tasted defeat with the Green Eagles (now Super Eagles), coached by the German Manfred Höner. Players like Henry Nwosu, Stephen Keshi, Sunday Eboigbe, Bright Omolara, Rashidi Yekini, Austin Eguavoen, Peter Rufai, Folorunsho Okenla, Ademola Adeshina, Yisa Sofoluwe, and others featured prominently. A beautiful goal by Henry Nwosu—then a diminutive ACB Lagos player—was controversially disallowed.
This sparked outrage among Nigerians, many of whom believed the referee acted under the influence of Issa Hayatou, the Cameroonian who served as CAF president from 1988 to 2017.
This stroll down memory lane illustrates that controversy and allegations of biased officiating have long been part of AFCON’s history.
The 2025 Africa Cup of Nations in Morocco, held from December 21, 2025, to January 18, 2026, will be discussed for a long time by football historians, raconteurs, and aficionados—for both positive and negative reasons.
These include Morocco’s world-class facilities, the ravenous hunger of ball boys and players (superstars included) for the towels of opposing goalkeepers—popularly dubbed TowelGate—allegations of biased officiating, strained relations among Arab African nations (Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia, and Morocco), CAF President Patrice Motsepe’s curt “keep quiet” response to veteran journalist Osasu Obayiuwana regarding the proposed four-year AFCON cycle post-2028, and the “Oga Patapata” incident, where Senegalese players walked off the pitch after a legitimate goal was chalked off and a penalty awarded against them by DR Congo referee Jean-Jacques Ndala.
While these narratives dominated global discourse, another critical issue—less prominent but equally important—emerged within Nigeria’s media and content-creation landscape.
Following Nigeria’s qualification from the group stage, the Super Eagles were scheduled to face Mozambique in the Round of 16. Between January 1 and January 3, Coach Eric Chelle instituted closed-door training sessions, denying journalists and content creators access, with media interaction limited to pre-match press conferences.
According to Chelle, the knockout stage demanded “maximum concentration,” and privacy was necessary to protect players from distractions.
This decision sparked mixed reactions on social media.
Twitter user @QualityQuadry wrote:
“What Eric Chelle is doing to journalists is bad.
Journalists were subjected to a media parley under cold weather in an open field for the first time in Super Eagles history.
Journalists were beaten by rain because Chelle doesn’t want journalists around the camp.
Locking down training sessions for three days is unprofessional.
I wish him well against Mozambique.”
Another user, @PoojaMedia, stated:
“Again, Eric Chelle has closed the Super Eagles’ training today.
That means journalists in Morocco won’t have access to the team for three straight days ahead of the Round of 16.
This is serious and sad for journalists who spent millions to get content around the team.
We move.”
Conversely, @sportsdokitor wrote:
“I’m not Eric Chelle’s biggest supporter, but on this issue, I support him 110%.
There’s a time to speak and a time to train.
Let the boys focus on why they’re in Morocco—they’re not here for your content creation.”
From these three tweets, one can see accessibility being clothed in beautiful garments. Two of the tweets suggest that there is only one way to get to the zenith of Mount Kilimanjaro, when indeed there are many routes—if we think within the box, not outside the box as we’ve not exhausted the content inside the box.
In the past, when the economy was buoyant, media organisations sponsored reporters to cover the World Cup, Olympics, Commonwealth Games, and other international competitions.
Today, with financial pressures mounting, many journalists and content creators seek collaborations and sponsorships from corporations and tech startups to cover sporting events, who in turn get awareness, brand visibility, and other intangibles.
As Gary Vaynerchuk famously said, “Every company is a media company.” Yet most creators covering AFCON 2025 followed the same playbook.
At AFCON 2025, most Nigerian journalists and content creators pitched similar offerings: on-the-ground coverage, press conferences, team updates, behind-the-scenes footage, analysis, cuisine, fan interactions, and Moroccan cultural experiences.
If they were not interviewing Victor Osimhen, they were showcasing the stand-up comedy talents of Samuel Chukwueze and other forms of entertainment.
What was missing was differentiation. No clear Unique Selling Proposition (USP). The result was generic, repetitive content with little strategic distinction. Everyone appeared to be deploying the same “Jab, Jab, Jab, Hook” formula—throwing multiple jabs of access-driven content in the hope that one hook would land.
The lesson is simple: when everyone is jabbing the same way, the hook becomes predictable and loses its power.
As J. P. Clark wrote in the poem “The Casualties”, “We are all casualties,” casualties of sameness—content without differentiation. The audience consumes shallow content, sponsors lose return on investment, and creators return home bearing the “weight of paper” from disappointed benefactors.
On November 23, 1963, a shining light was dimmed in America when President John F. Kennedy was assassinated.
As with AFCON today, media organisations sent their best hands to cover the funeral, as the who’s who of the planet—and if possible, the stratosphere—would attend. Unconfirmed reports suggested that over 220 VVIPs were expected.
While every newspaper, radio, and television station covered the spectacle and grandeur of the event, one man, Jimmy Breslin, swam against the tide. He chose instead to interview Clifton Pollard, the foreman of gravediggers at Arlington National Cemetery—the man who dug John F. Kennedy’s grave.
This act of upended thinking differentiated Jimmy Breslin from the odds and sods, and he went on to win the Pulitzer Prize in 1986.
Until journalists and content creators stop following the motley and begin swimming against the tide, access will continue to be treated as king—when in reality, differentiation, aided by strategy, is king.
When every journalist and content creator is using Gary Vaynerchuk’s “Jab, Jab, Jab, Hook” template while covering major sporting events, thinkers among them must learn to replace one jab with a counterpunch—and a bit of head movement—to stay ahead of the herd.
Toluwalope Shodunke can be reached via tolushodunke@yahoo.com
-
metro3 days agoIKEDC Sets Feb 20 Deadline for Customers to Submit Valid IDs or Face Disconnection
-
Education3 days agoSupreme Court Affirms Muslim Students’ Right to Worship at Rivers State University
-
News2 days agoAso Rock Goes Solar as Tinubu Orders National Grid Disconnection
-
metro2 days agoLagos Police Launch Manhunt for Suspect in Brutal Ajah Murder
-
Business3 days agoNaira Could Trade Below ₦1,000/$ With Dangote Refinery at Full Capacity — Otedola
-
metro3 days agoArmy University Professor Dies in Boko Haram Captivity After Nearly One Year
-
International3 days agoTrump Halts Minnesota Immigration Crackdown After Fatal Shootings, Protests
-
Sports2 days agoLookman Shines as Atlético Madrid Hammer Barcelona 4-0


