Natasha challenges defamation charges, slams FG for double standards - Newstrends
Connect with us

metro

Natasha challenges defamation charges, slams FG for double standards

Published

on

Lawmaker Representing Kogi Central, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan
Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan

Natasha challenges defamation charges, slams FG for double standards

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, on Monday, launched a strong legal offensive against the Federal Government, describing the criminal defamation charges filed against her as a brazen act of political persecution and an exhibition of double standards by the Federal Government.

While the Federal Government was quick to file charges against her based on the complaint of Senate President Godswill Akpabio, the Kogi senator argued in a preliminary objection seeking the dismissal of the six counts filed against her by the Attorney General of the Federation that the same government disregarded her own prior petitions against Akpabio.

The charges were filed under the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2024, in response to requests by Akpabio and ex-Kogi State governor Yahaya Bello for remarks she reportedly made during a public address and a television interview.

Her arraignment on June 20 received widespread attention, with many opposition figures claiming that the prosecution was politically motivated.

She was granted a self-recognition bond after pleading not guilty.

The case, FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025, is being prosecuted by Mohammed Abubakar, the Federation’s Director of Public Prosecution.

On Monday, Natasha filed preliminary objections before both the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory and the Federal High Court, challenging the courts’ jurisdiction and insisting that the Attorney-General of the Federation lacks locus standi to prosecute what she described as a private defamation case.

Her defense team, led by four Senior Advocates of Nigeria—Prof. Roland Otaru (SAN), Dr. E. West-Idahosa (SAN), J.J. Usman (SAN), and M.J. Numa (SAN), maintained that the allegations were “unconstitutional, frivolous, and designed to intimidate opposition voices.”

READ ALSO:

The defense also presented documents demonstrating that her comments fell within the scope of public conversation and media commentary, emphasizing that charging her statements as crimes was contrary to democratic standards.

Her lawyers maintained that “defamation matters are inherently civil in nature and that attempting to criminalize them constitutes intimidation, suppresses free speech, and represents a misuse of the criminal justice system.”

Natasha also accused the authorities of selective justice, claiming that while her pleas regarding threats to her life by the complainants were ignored, the same institutions quickly brought charges against her.

She claims that the disparity violates her constitutional rights, “particularly Section 42, and represents discriminatory prosecution because of my opposition political affiliation.”

The accusations revolve around her claim that Akpabio ordered Bello’s assassination in Kogi State, which she allegedly uttered during a public gathering in Ihima on April 4, 2025, and later reiterated in a television appearance.

Prosecutors claim the remarks were false, malicious, and might incite violence, harm lives, and disrupt public order.

Her defense team has requested the courts to dismiss the allegations at the preliminary stage, claiming that allowing the case to progress would not only squander taxpayer funds but also erode the justice system’s legitimacy.

Her harsh reaction came only hours after the Federal High Court in Abuja delayed the case to October 20, citing an objection submitted by her counsel, Ehiogie West-Idahosa (SAN).

Meanwhile, a coalition of women’s rights organizations has pushed the dispute between Natasha and the Senate to the United Nations, alleging Senate leadership of gender discrimination.

The Womanifesto Network, which represents over 350 organizations, filed a formal complaint with UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women and Girls, Reem Alsalem, on Monday, claiming that the Senate’s actions violate Nigeria’s obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, which the country ratified in 1985.

“This is about the integrity of our democracy. If a senator can be silenced for reporting harassment, what hope do ordinary women have?” asked the group’s convener, Dr. Abiola Akiyode-Afolabi.

The complaint requests that the UN put pressure on Nigeria’s government and Senate to quickly reinstate Natasha in accordance with a Federal High Court order, as well as to conduct an impartial inquiry into her harassment claims.

The petition’s signatories include Amnesty International Nigeria, FIDA Nigeria, Baobab for Women’s Human Rights, Women in Management, Business, and Public Service (WIMBIZ), and Stand to End Rape.

The activists cautioned that the Senate’s unwillingness to follow the court ruling sends a harmful message to women in politics.

“This case shows that sexual harassment in politics isn’t just a personal violation—it’s a threat to women’s participation in governance,” the petition states.

As of press time, the UN Special Rapporteur has yet to comment.

Natasha went public on February 20 with charges that Akpabio harassed her, which Akpabio has fiercely denied. Days later, the Senate’s Ethics and Privileges Committee recommended a six-month suspension, alleging violations of parliamentary procedures.

Civil society groups were outraged by the suspension, which stripped her of her salary, security, and access to the chamber, calling it vindictive and unjust.

On July 4, the Federal High Court in Abuja declared the suspension illegal and ordered her reinstatement.

However, the Senate has rejected her return, claiming that the judgment contained no binding reinstatement order and is still “under litigation.”

Natasha challenges defamation charges, slams FG for double standards

metro

Court Orders Final Forfeiture of Jeremiah Useni’s UK Property to FG

Published

on

Former FCT Minister, Jeremiah Useni
Former FCT Minister, Jeremiah Useni

Court Orders Final Forfeiture of Jeremiah Useni’s UK Property to FG

The Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the final forfeiture of a UK property linked to late former FCT Minister, Jeremiah Useni, to the Federal Government, in a ruling that reinforces Nigeria’s push to recover suspected illicit assets.

Delivering judgment on Tuesday, Binta Nyako granted the application filed by the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB), declaring that the property was reasonably suspected to have been acquired with proceeds of unlawful activities. The forfeited asset is located at No. 79, Randall Avenue, Neasden, London NW2 7SX, in the United Kingdom.

The court held that evidence presented by the CCB showed a clear mismatch between Useni’s legitimate earnings while in public office and the value of the London property. According to the agency, findings from its Financial Investigation and Forensic Accounting Unit (FIFAU) revealed that the late minister’s declared income could not justify the acquisition, indicating the likelihood of undeclared or illicit funds.

READ ALSO:

Before the final ruling, the court had granted an interim forfeiture order on November 20, 2025. Following this, a public notice was published inviting anyone with interest in the property to contest the forfeiture. However, no individual or organisation filed any claim within the stipulated timeframe, paving the way for the final forfeiture order. The case, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2333/2025, listed the administrators and executors of Useni’s estate, alongside the property itself, as respondents.

In a related development, the United Kingdom’s First-Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber), in case REF/2023/0155, had earlier ruled that Useni was the beneficial owner of the property. The tribunal found that the property was acquired under a fictitious identity, a move aimed at concealing ownership.

Ownership claims by individuals identified as “Ms Tali Shani” and senior lawyer Mike Ozekhome were dismissed by the tribunal. The court held that documents presented to support the claims were fraudulent and unreliable, further strengthening the case for forfeiture.

Counsel to the CCB, Sufyan Ahmad, anchored the application on provisions of the Proceeds of Crime (Recovery and Management) Act, 2022 and the 1999 Constitution (as amended). In her ruling, Justice Nyako stated that the forfeiture aligns with Nigeria’s legal framework on asset recovery and serves the interest of justice, particularly in cases involving suspected proceeds of corruption.

The judgment underscores the Federal Government’s intensified efforts to trace, recover, and reclaim illicit assets held both locally and abroad. It also highlights increasing collaboration between Nigerian authorities and international legal systems in tackling financial crimes and corruption-linked assets.

Court Orders Final Forfeiture of Jeremiah Useni’s UK Property to FG

Continue Reading

metro

Teen alleges torture by stepmother, loses hand

Published

on

Teen alleges torture by stepmother, loses hand

A 19-year-old boy, identified as Friday, has accused his stepmother of subjecting him to torture that resulted in the amputation of one of his hands.

Friday’s account was made public in a viral video shared by Nigerian content creator Lucky Udu.

The teenager alleged that the incident occurred while his father was away, during which his stepmother accused him of having an inappropriate relationship with her and demanded that he confess.

He claimed she threatened him with a knife when he denied the allegation.

Friday further alleged that he was taken to a man who accused him of witchcraft and subjected him to torture, including burning his hands over charcoal.

He said his injuries later became infected, but his stepmother allegedly refused to take him to a hospital and instead forced him to continue working.

According to him, a passerby who noticed his condition alerted the police, leading to his rescue and the arrest of the stepmother.

He was subsequently taken to a specialist hospital where doctors amputated his hand due to the severity of the damage.

The incident has generated reactions on social media, with many Nigerians calling for justice and stronger protection for vulnerable children.

Authorities have yet to issue an official statement on the matter.

Teen alleges torture by stepmother, loses hand

Continue Reading

metro

Cars Torched as South Africans Protest Alleged Nigerian ‘Igbo King’ Coronation

Published

on

Cars Torched as South Africans Protest Alleged Nigerian ‘Igbo King’ Coronation

Cars Torched as South Africans Protest Alleged Nigerian ‘Igbo King’ Coronation

Violence erupted on Monday in KuGompo City, Eastern Cape, South Africa, following the reported coronation of a Nigerian national as a traditional king, prompting the Nigerian High Commission to issue a 10-point safety advisory urging Nigerians in the country to prioritise safety and maintain a low profile.

According to the advisory titled “Advisory to All Nigerians Living in the Republic of South Africa,” citizens were urged to exercise caution, limit movement, avoid interactions with unfamiliar persons, and suspend socio-cultural activities to reduce the risk of becoming targets amid rising tensions. The circular also advised Nigerians to respect local laws and customs and refrain from posting inflammatory content on social media that could escalate the situation.

What began as a peaceful protest over the alleged installation of Solomon Eziko as Igwe Ndigbo quickly escalated. Videos and images of the coronation circulated widely, sparking anger among residents and civic groups. Protesters torched vehicles, vandalised properties, and clashed with law enforcement. Police reportedly deployed teargas and rubber bullets to disperse the crowds, while fire services worked to contain the blazes.

READ ALSO:

A man was stabbed during the unrest and taken to hospital. Authorities clarified that the victim was not linked to the demonstration, though some civic groups claimed one of their members was injured and also struck by a vehicle.

Several groups, including ActionSA, the Patriotic Alliance, and the civic movement March and March, joined traditional leaders in condemning the alleged coronation as illegal and unconstitutional.

  • Athol Trollip, ActionSA Eastern Cape leader, said: “There is no constitutional provision for any foreigner, legal or illegal, to coronate themselves in the Eastern Cape. We support existing local kings, not Nigerian kings.”
  • Steve Motale, Patriotic Alliance spokesperson, said: “We condemn this fake coronation. Even the Nigerian High Commissioner has denounced it.”

The Royal House of AbaThembu also denied involvement, calling social media claims linking King Buyelekhaya Dalindyebo to the coronation false and misleading.

The unrest follows recent anti-migrant protests in South Africa, where residents demanded stricter immigration policies targeting Nigerians and other foreign nationals. Analysts say the protests reflect broader xenophobic tensions and concern over foreign influence on local traditional structures.

The Federal Government of Nigeria continues to monitor the situation closely, urging citizens in South Africa to remain law-abiding, cautious, and vigilant until stability returns.

Cars Torched as South Africans Protest Alleged Nigerian ‘Igbo King’ Coronation

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending