Palestinians urge world to end Israel’s illegal occupation after ICJ ruling - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Palestinians urge world to end Israel’s illegal occupation after ICJ ruling

Published

on

A protester draped in a Palestinian flag holds up a sign in solidarity with Gaza outside the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands, on May 24, 2024 [Johanna Geron/Reuters]

Palestinians urge world to end Israel’s illegal occupation after ICJ ruling

Activists and legal experts in the West Bank say Friday’s ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which has found that Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories is unlawful, will do little to improve life for Palestinians.

Other states must now apply collective pressure on Israel to end its rule over Gaza and the West Bank, including annexed East Jerusalem, if the situation there is to change, they say.

The world’s highest court concluded on Friday – with 12-3 judges in favour – that Israel is forcibly displacing Palestinians from their lands, exploiting water sources, annexing large swaths of the occupied territory “by force” and is violating the right of Palestinians to “self-determination”.

The ICJ also ruled that Israel must stop all building of settlements in the West Bank and should compensate Palestinians for human rights violations in the occupied territory.

The ruling is a non-binding advisory opinion, which was sought by the United Nations General Assembly in 2022, seeking to clarify the legal implications of Israel’s occupation of the West Bank.

The ICJ called on the UN – especially the Security Council and General Assembly – to take action to bring Israel’s unlawful occupation to a “rapid” end.

However, Zainah el-Haroun, the spokesperson for Al-Haq, a Palestinian nonprofit organisation based in the West Bank that monitors human rights violations, said previous ICJ rulings have not led to global action against Israel.

She referenced the ICJ’s 2004 advisory opinion that found Israel’s separation wall and settlements on occupied Palestinian land illegal. Settlements have not only remained in the West Bank since the ruling, but the number of Israeli settlers living there has also risen from 250,000 in 1993 to more than 700,000 in 2023.

READ ALSO:

“These rulings mean nothing if third states and the international community fail to hold Israel accountable,” she told Al Jazeera.

“The ICJ has ruled that Israel’s occupation is unlawful and must end immediately. Third states must ensure the full and total realisation of the Palestinian people to self-determination and sanction Israel’s illegal occupation, which breaches international law,” she added.

Little to celebrate

Palestinian activists in the West Bank said they cannot celebrate the ICJ’s ruling when the situation across the occupied territory is worse than ever before.

They cited Israel’s war in Gaza, which has killed at least 38,848 Palestinians – the vast majority of them civilians – and has rendered the enclave uninhabitable. Gaza is also witnessing an outbreak of diseases such as polio and cholera while nearly the entire population is struggling to survive food shortages brought on by Israel’s siege of the enclave.

Israel’s war on Gaza followed Hamas-led attacks on military outposts and communities in southern Israel on October 7, in which 1,139 people were killed and 251 taken captive.

The global attention – and shock – over Israel’s war ever since has distracted attention from its settlement expansion in the West Bank, observers said.

“A year ago, a ruling like this would have been great. We all would have thought this was a great step forward,” said Tasame Ramadan, a human rights activist from the West Bank city of Nablus. “But right now, the priority is a permanent ceasefire [in Gaza] and an end to the occupation.”

Mohamad Alwan, a Palestinian rights activist monitoring settler attacks in the West Bank, expressed a similar wariness about what the ruling will mean on the ground.

He said that while he recognises the ruling hurts Israel’s image abroad, there is no way for the court to apply or enforce it.

In addition, Alwan said he is pessimistic about whether states will take action against Israel after the ruling. He cited perceived indifference to the ICJ’s binding order in January, in which the court called on Israel to scale up aid and prevent further harm to civilians in Gaza after concluding that “the rights of Palestinians were at risk” under the Genocide Convention.

“In my opinion, this decision will have no immediate impact on the situation on the ground,” he told Al Jazeera.

READ ALSO:

“However, in the long run, there might be an impact. The world has seen now how Israel kills people and kills children, and their views are changing about Israel and its occupation.”

‘Nakba is where it all started’

Palestinian activists stressed that the ICJ’s advisory ruling on Friday must be understood in the context of the Nakba, or “Catastrophe”, of 1948 when Zionist militias expelled about 750,000 Palestinians from their lands to create the state of Israel.

Diana Buttu, a Palestinian legal expert, said she wished the ICJ had referenced the Nakba to highlight the historic pattern of Israel’s behaviour in the occupied territory.

“While I’m happy about the outcome of this case, I also think that this focus just on the West Bank and Gaza ignores the bigger picture of the origins of this situation and the ways in which Israel was created, which was through the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians,” Buttu told Al Jazeera.

She criticised the Palestinian Authority (PA), which governs large swaths of the West Bank and represents the Palestinian people internationally, for how the issue of Israel-Palestine is typically framed by and within the global community.

She accused the PA of having long given up advocating for stateless Palestinians to be able to exercise the right of return to their former homes and lands lost during the Nakba or calling for an end to the discrimination that Palestinian citizens of Israel face.

Experts and activists have previously attributed the PA’s shortcomings to the Oslo Accords, the first of which was signed in 1993 by then-Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and then-Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin on the lawn of the White House.

“The PA a long time ago took a position that it is all about the two-state solution and ending occupation, so their entire discourse has just been about that,” Buttu said.

Ramadan agreed on the importance of centring the Nakba whenever speaking about Israel’s settlements expansion and its war in Gaza.

“The Nakba is where this all started. How can we not mention the cause of the issue and where this all started? This is not the right way to address an issue like this,” she said.

“We would definitely like to see the international community recognise the Nakba, recognise all the people we lost in 1948 and to recognise the consequences of the Nakba that we are still living through today.”

 

Palestinians urge world to end Israel’s illegal occupation after ICJ ruling

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA

International

Israel Questions Pakistan’s Credibility as Mediator in US‑Iran Ceasefire Talks

Published

on

Donald Trump, Arif Alvi and Benjamin Netayahu
Donald Trump, Arif Alvi and Benjamin Netayahu

Israel Questions Pakistan’s Credibility as Mediator in US‑Iran Ceasefire Talks

Israel has publicly doubted Pakistan’s role as a mediator in the ongoing United States–Iran ceasefire negotiations, describing Islamabad as “not a credible player” in the diplomatic process. The comments from Israel’s ambassador to India, Reuven Azar, come ahead of scheduled direct talks between U.S. and Iranian officials in Islamabad on April 11, reportedly to be attended by U.S. Vice President JD Vance.

Azar acknowledged that the United States may have strategic reasons for using Pakistan’s facilitation, but he emphasized that Israel’s primary concern remains the removal of Hezbollah’s terrorist infrastructure in southern Lebanon. He highlighted recent Israeli air operations that reportedly eliminated over 250 Hezbollah operatives and reiterated that disarming the group south of the Litani River is essential to protect Israeli communities.

READ ALSO:

Drawing parallels with past U.S. diplomatic efforts, Azar compared Pakistan’s mediation to previous roles played by Qatar and Turkey in negotiating truces in Gaza, suggesting such mediators were sometimes selected for convenience rather than effectiveness. He stressed that Israel’s objective is to remain closely aligned with the United States on the substance and outcome of any regional agreement.

Regarding the U.S.–Iran ceasefire, Azar expressed support for the two-week truce while noting that Israel considers Lebanon outside its scope. He warned that continued Iranian and Israeli military actions in Lebanon could jeopardize the fragile agreement, potentially destabilizing the Strait of Hormuz and broader Middle East security.

The ceasefire talks themselves remain delicate. While Pakistan has positioned itself as a facilitator, Tehran has acknowledged Islamabad’s role but continues to insist on substantive agreements over nuclear development, missile programs, and regional security obligations. Meanwhile, Israel maintains a firm stance that its operations in southern Lebanon are necessary to neutralize threats from Hezbollah.

The diplomatic dispute over Pakistan’s credibility highlights deep divisions among key stakeholders in the region, underscoring the challenges in maintaining a fragile truce while addressing the security concerns of multiple actors. Observers will closely monitor whether the upcoming Islamabad talks can reconcile these differences and produce a sustainable agreement.

Israel Questions Pakistan’s Credibility as Mediator in US‑Iran Ceasefire Talks

Continue Reading

International

Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei

Published

on

Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei

Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei

Thousands of Iranians took to the streets across major cities, including Tehran, Urmia, and Gorgan, on Thursday to honour the late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. His death has become a pivotal moment in the ongoing Middle East conflict, and the rallies combined mourning, political messaging, and public solidarity.

The nationwide tribute began precisely at 9:40 a.m. local time, the exact moment Khamenei was killed on February 28 at his Tehran residence in what Iranian authorities described as U.S.–Israeli airstrikes. The attack also claimed the lives of several senior Iranian figures and triggered a series of retaliatory actions, escalating tensions across the Gulf and involving multiple regional actors.

Crowds carried portraits of the long-serving leader, who presided over Iran’s political and ideological direction for nearly four decades. Analysts note that the rallies were not only acts of public mourning but also demonstrations of internal cohesion and state continuity during a period of geopolitical strain. The displays served to reinforce loyalty and resilience in the eyes of both domestic audiences and external observers.

READ ALSO:

Despite these public displays, there is uncertainty surrounding Iran’s leadership visibility. His successor, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, has yet to make a public appearance since before the conflict escalated. This absence has raised questions within diplomatic and political circles about the consolidation of authority in Tehran and the future direction of the country’s leadership.

The absence of a formal state funeral further underscores the disruption caused by the war. Security conditions and ongoing military tensions have prevented Iran from organising a centralised burial ceremony, highlighting the impact of the conflict on domestic affairs and governance.

The rallies thus served a dual purpose: beyond mourning the late leader, they acted as a strategic show of unity, signalling resilience to external adversaries while reinforcing internal political continuity. Public mobilisations like these remain a critical indicator of Tehran’s ability to maintain cohesion during times of crisis.

As the conflict continues, Iran’s internal dynamics, leadership visibility, and public mobilisation will be closely watched by analysts as key measures of stability and state authority. The commemorations demonstrate that, even amid uncertainty and regional tension, the government can still orchestrate nationwide expressions of solidarity.

Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei

Continue Reading

International

UN Chief Condemns Israeli Airstrikes in Lebanon

Published

on

Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres
UN Secretary‑General António Guterres

UN Chief Condemns Israeli Airstrikes in Lebanon

The United Nations has strongly condemned a wave of Israeli airstrikes in Lebanon that killed and injured hundreds, including civilians, amid a fragile ceasefire in the Middle East. UN Secretary‑General António Guterres expressed deep concern over the mounting civilian toll and warned that ongoing military activity threatens efforts to maintain peace and stability in the region.

In a statement released Wednesday, Guterres offered condolences to the people of Lebanon and wished a swift recovery to the injured. He emphasized that international humanitarian law must be respected, urging all parties to halt hostilities and pursue diplomatic solutions. “There is no military solution to the conflict,” he said, stressing the importance of protecting civilians and infrastructure.

The airstrikes on April 8, 2026, marked some of the heaviest bombardments in Lebanon since tensions escalated between Israel and Hezbollah in recent weeks. Lebanese authorities reported hundreds of casualties in Beirut’s southern suburbs, the Bekaa Valley, and southern towns, with significant civilian losses.

READ ALSO:

The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, described the attacks as “nothing short of horrific” and called for independent investigations into potential violations of international law, highlighting the devastating impact on civilians and infrastructure.

The strikes occurred shortly after a US‑Iran ceasefire took effect, which did not formally include the Lebanon theater, raising fears that hostilities could escalate further. International reactions have been swift, with countries such as Spain condemning Israel’s actions and urging adherence to international law.

The UN has called for immediate restraint and stressed that protecting civilian lives and upholding humanitarian standards must remain a priority as tensions continue to simmer in the region.

UN Chief Condemns Israeli Airstrikes in Lebanon

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending