metro
Pros, cons of Lagos landlord and tenancy bill (Source: The Nation)
Pros, cons of Lagos landlord and tenancy bill (Source: The Nation)
The Lagos State House of Assembly on August 14 held a public hearing on the new landlord and tenancy bill.
The bill titled “A Bill for a Law to Regulate the Relationship between Landlords and Tenants in Lagos State including the Procedure for the Recovery of Premises and for connected purposes” which has passed second reading and is awaiting the assent, seeks to reduce constant frictions between landlords and tenants and set standards for estate agents.
The bill, seeks to reform housing laws and protect both tenants and landlords.
It also seeks to redefine the legal framework governing tenancy agreements, rights, responsibilities, and the processes for eviction in the state.
The bill stated that:
• All agents must register with LASRERA.
• Collecting rent from multiple tenants for one property is now a criminal offence.
• Maximum agent fee: 5%.
• No more than three months’ rent in advance for monthly tenancies and one year for annual tenancies. Violations attract fines or jail time.
• No need for “Notice to Quit” if tenant owes rent beyond the grace period. Just a 7-day eviction notice required.
• Tenants must show proof of rent and utility payment to file or appeal cases.
• Disputes can now be heard online to save time and increase access.
• Tenants can take landlords to court over unreasonable rent hikes, and can’t be evicted while the case is ongoing.
If passed into law, it will ensure that all stakeholders – tenants, landlords, and agents – understand their rights and obligations.
Past Landlords and Tenants Law
This would not be the first time that Lagos is putting in place a law to regulate relationship between landlords, tenants and estate agents.
READ ALSO:
- Fear grips Osogbo community as man found murdered after morning prayers
- Breaking: Dembele wins 2025 Ballon d’Or
- Trump’s H-1B visa policy threatens Nigerian tech workers, others
In 2011, then Governor Babatunde Raji Fashola put in place a law to govern landlords, tenants and agents relationship.
The Lagos State Tenancy Law of 2011, aimed to protect tenants from exploitation by establishing rules for rent payment, receipts, and peaceful enjoyment of premises. The law sets limits on rent collection (6 months for monthly tenants, 1 year for yearly tenants), mandates rent receipts, and outlines penalties for violations. The law’s application was restricted in areas like Apapa, Ikeja GRA, Ikoyi, and Victoria Island.
Key Aspects of the 2011 Tenancy Law
The 2011 tenancy law in Lagos emphasised limitations to rent payment in the state.
Under the law, landlords or their agents, for instance, cannot demand or receive rent exceeding six months from a monthly tenant or one year from a yearly tenant.
Tenants also have the right to quiet enjoyment of the property and the right to a receipt for rent payments among others.
Pre-2011 Law
In the period prior to year 2011, Lagos was primarily governed by the Rent Control Law, which applied to the entire state and regulated landlord-tenant relationships, particularly concerning rent payment and recovery.
While the specific provisions of the Rent Control Law are not detailed , it was however aimed to provide a legal framework for these relationships. The law was eventually superceeded by the 2011 Tenancy Law which was more comprehensive and introduced stricter regulations on rent payments, receipt issuance, security deposits, and eviction.
Given the peculiarity of Lagos State and past attempts, can the new 2025 landlord and tenats law be effectively enforced?
Reactions to the new Lagos landlord. Tenants and agent bill have been mixed.
Some tenants welcomed the development, arguing that agents exploit vulnerable Nigerians by charging unauthorised fees and inflating rents. Some however approached the issue with caution.
READ ALSO:
- Aitana Bonmati wins Women’s Ballon d’Or third time in row
- BREAKING: Details of Fubara closed-door meeting with Tinubu emerge [VIDEO]
- Ballon d’Or: Lamine Yamal wins Kopa trophy second time in row
A builder, Lateef Rufai, stressed that many landlords are inaccessible without intermediaries, and warned that sidelining agents could drive some into social vices. He suggested creating a legal framework to regulate and separate credible agents from exploitative ones.
Agents themselves have defended their work, saying they provide valuable services in connecting landlords and tenants. Some argued that high inflation and rising demand for housing were the real drivers of escalating rents, not agency fees. An agent in Abakaliki pointed out that rents for one-room apartments in the city have doubled since early 2025, blaming economic pressures rather than the activities of middlemen.
Bill pro landlords
A landlord, Odion Efe, said the bill was pro landlords and that government should think through the social implications of the bill. He said that it’s anti development and wondered how a government that didn’t contribute positively to his building his house but instead made it very difficult by their cumbersome and costly approval payments and high cost of building would decide for him how to charge his tenants.
He said :”All over the world, a lot of technical or legal safeguards are placed in tenancy laws in ways that make it appear unfair to landlords.. But even at that you don’t make the law pro tenants because everyone prays to be a landlord. My take is that the law is anti- development and shouldn’t be encouraged.
A landlady, Mrs. Obianuju Okoro, said tenants will choose to pay her bill or wait for the Governor’s house as she knows what she went through to build the house with her husband.
She said there was no way she could collect one year rent from a first-time tenant, she wondered how she would recoup her investment even in 20 years.
Bill in interest of tenants
Also, Ojediran Isiaka and Stanley Obia hailed the law as being in the best interest of tenants. They accused some landlords as being shylocks who would prefer to recoup their investment in a year.
They also commented on how some callous landlords eject their tenants through kangaroo methods and said the law was in order as it would check such inhuman acts.
Lawyers’ reaction
Lawyers who reacted to the bill argued that its success depended on enforcement. They included Professor of law, Emeka Chianu, a former Commissioner of Ogun State Judiciary Service Commission, Abayomi Omoyinmi, Ige Asemudara and a former Deputy Speaker of Ogun State House of Assembly, Chief Edwards Ayo-Odugbesan
Rent control not workable
Prof. Chianu, a lawyer and author, stated that rent control was a waste of time and resources. He said when economics collides with the law, parliament makes the latter kowtow.
READ ALSO:
- Aitana Bonmati wins Women’s Ballon d’Or third time in row
- BREAKING: Details of Fubara closed-door meeting with Tinubu emerge [VIDEO]
- Ballon d’Or: Lamine Yamal wins Kopa trophy second time in row
According to him, even under military rule rent control didn’t work. He narrated a personal experience.
“I rented an apartment as a teenager in the late 1970s. Rent Control Edict was stringently enforced in Lagos then. I paid what the landlord compelled me to pay but he issued receipts in accordance with the Edict and insisted that I should kneel to collect the receipts from him. I had no problem with the kneeling as he was in his 60’s. But this brief account says a lot”.
In my landlord and tenant books there are several English cases where tenants joined in subterfuge to circumvent rent control statutes.
Estate agents problematic
Omoyinmi noted that landlords and tenants laws have undergone several reforms in the last three decades in Lagos. He said going by the peculiarity of the state of Lagos, there was for effective enforcement.
According to him, the agents have become very problematic for would-be tenants. He said cases abound where agents collect rents from prospective tenants and disappear with such payment or even failed to provide accommodation. He said there was need for proper regulation for agents as proposed.
He said the act of collecting rents from multiple prospective tenants for none available property knowingly was itself a crime. The courts have always not been in support of where a landlord unreasonably hikes rents, and thereby wanting to eject a tenant on the basis of refusal to pay such hike, the court has discretion to refuse such attempt to eject a tenant where it could be shown that the landlord has hiked rent unreasonably.
Omoyinmi said the peculiarity of Lagos had always been a contributory factor to non effective enforcement of landlord and tenants law in the past, except where such cases were determined in the court.
Landlord’s, tenants’ cases work on consensus
On most cases the landlord and tenant are in consensus on agreement outside the provisions of the laws for better and workable understanding among the duo.
Lagos is where tenants who at all cost want a roof over their heads may have no choice than to accept what is agreed by the landlord, hence, enforcement may pose difficulty where parties have both agreed not to abide by the provisions of the law which may not be practicable under the circumstances they found themselves. This may ultimately be one of those laws if passed and assented to may be difficult to enforce for lack of cooperation among stakeholders.
Law will address endless litigation
He noted that there had been situations where tenants held their landlords to ransom with litigation up to the Supreme Court without paying rents. This law will address such situation. We have seen high-handed landlords who do all sorts. We have seen what the agents are doing with their commissions and how some disappear with people’s money. The law will address it. So, it is a giant stride to have such law.
READ ALSO:
- Obasanjo did everything to retain power – Usman Bugaje
- Viral video: ICAN probes alleged impersonation during exam
- Six suspects arrested over killing of police officers in Benue
Enforcement key to success of law
Omoyinmi, however, stressed that enforcement was key to the success of the law. The people should be ready first of all. Then the agencies will do their own. Without a ready people, the law enforcement institutions will be acting in vain. Our courts are up to it. LASRERA will do its own.
“I am not worried about the enforcement. I am worried about Lagosians. Are they ready for the change? Are they ready to enforce their rights? Are they ready to embrace a new regime? Once Lagosians are prepared, the enforcing agencies and institutions will do their works. Most of the failures we complain about are actually the people’s failure and not of the agencies. We must embrace progress”, he said.
Tenancy law serious
Asemudara described the bill as a welcome development. According to him, Lagos is fast growing and the laws must catch up with the growth. Every growing city or state in the world takes its tenancy laws seriously.
Law will address litigation
“We have had a situation where tenants held their landlords to ransom with litigation up to the Supreme Court without paying rents. This law will address such situation. We have seen high-handed landlords who do all sorts. We have seen what the agents are doing with their commissions and how some disappear with people’s money. The law will address it. So, it is a giant stride to have such law.
Asemudara also argued that enforcement was key.
“I believe we can all do it. The people should be ready first of all. Then the agencies will do their own. Without a ready people, the law enforcement institutions will be acting in vain. Our courts are up to it. LASRERA will do its own.
Lagosians must embrace new law
He, however, expressed worry over enforcement of the law. “I am not worried about the enforcement. I am worried about Lagosians. Are they ready for the change? Are they ready to enforce their rights? Are they ready to embrace a new regime? Once Lagosians are prepared, the enforcing agencies and institutions will do their work. Most of the failures we complain about are actually the people’s failure and not of the agencies. We must embrace progress”, he said.
Chief Ayo-Odugbesan a Lagos-based property and land litigation expert, noted that there are many changes in the new law when compared to that of 2011 law.
He said the law has statewide application compared to the former 2011 which law applies only to a sectional part of the state.
He noted that the most important aspect of this new law is that it regulates the agencies. It also attempts to eliminate quack agencies.
Why LASRERA registration
He noted that apart from property agents in Lagos State, no other state has the property agents business, booming as much as it is in Legos State.
So, towards this purpose, the bill or the law has decreed that all Lagos State Real Estate Agents dealing with any tenancy matters in Lagos state must register with the Lagos State Real Estate Regulatory Authority (LASRERA).
READ ALSO:
- Dembele tipped to win 2025 Ballon d’Or holding today
- Israel: Netanyahu blows hot, insists no Palestinian state
- Senator Natasha faces cybercrime charges, trial holds Oct 20
“So, if you don’t register with this agency, you are liable to forfeit the agency fee you have collected upon complaint. You will also be penalized by the government for up to two years and you pay up to N1 million damages as penalty. So, you can see that this is aradical departure from what is obtained in the past.
Thirdly, there is red caps. You cannot collect rent for more than three months for quarterly tenants, six months rent for half year tenants , one month rent from one month tenants and one year from yearly tenants.
“In the past where you say you pay three years in advance, I think with this law, you will be committing an offence. So this provision protects both the tenant and the property owner, otherwise called the landlords.
Faster eviction of defaulting tenants
Chief Ayo-Odugbesan also noted that the bill made provision for faster eviction or tenants who are in default or want to not paying their rents. But at the same time, it protects tenants in the way that no landlord can wake up one day and just double direct and say,’ if you don’t pay, get out of my house’.
He said if a tenant has a feeling of that, he is liable to file complaint and the landlord will be sanctioned. If a tenant has been enjoying a particular facility in your premises, you cannot just wake up one day and deny that tenant of that facility . May be you say the tenant is not paying, you cannot just go and remove his window, remove his door, his ceiling or roofing. You will be committing a criminal offence and you will be penalized under this new law.
Obligations on landlords
This law also imposes a lot of obligations on the tenant to pay the rent as at when due and to cooperate with the landlord.
Also, there are things that for instance, the external fittings, the common areas,, the power supply, permanent fixtures, the roofing, the fencing, the gate, the water supply, the landlord is supposed and expected to ensure they are well maintained as at when necessary..
Withholding tax
There is now an obligation on the rental income. In the past, landlords will collect rents and use the way they want. Now there is withholding tax which had been in existence. This law now seek to enforce it with penalty. But I think this law now seeks to enforce it with strict penalty.
Also, the law makes a provision for instance, if there is service charges, if there are some services in the premises, maybe water supply, generators supply, common cleaning, common sanitation, what you call services. If there are services rendered in a premises, then these should be covered by separate agreement with the tenants.
Also the landlord’s expected to remit account of the service charge that you collect from the tenants after six months.
Deposits
There is also a portion of the security deposit and damages in some properties. These should be refunded to you at the end of your tenancy, provided that you do not commit any breach. You are to collect your money back provided or you do not damage anything.
Ayo_Odugbesan noted that the law is a radical departure from the old law pointing out that there is provision re-entry during pendency of the suit.
“The law protects both the landlord and tenants while the matter is in court. The landlord is not supposed to do anything until the matter is resolved. The same apply also to the tenant. So, the law is very protective.
“The bill also made provisions for use of forms in filing your case . The beauty of this law is that it has provision for virtual hearing. You can apply for virtual hearing if you cannot come to court for one reason or the other
“The court even has power to sit on weekends and public holidays with the consent of parties or their counsel.
“The law made provision for mediation in case there are parties willing to subject themselves to mediation. The court upon filing the suit, with consent of parties, will refer the matter to a mediator, that is the Citizen Mediation Centre or the Multidoor courthouse or any other available dispute resolution center. With consent of parties, judgment reached at such mediation center will be binding and the result of such alternative dispute resolution agreement will be endorsed and accepted by the court as a judgment in the matter.
“So, by and large, I think it’s a beautiful and lovely legislation especially at this time considering the unwholesome activities being conducted by both landlords and tenants.
“For example, you find out in Lagos, when a tenant wants to leave a premises, instead of surrendering it to landlord, they will go ahead and rehire you to a new person, and collect high rent from the person and be paying the landlord, the old rent.I think this is not healthy and this law has made provision for such situations.
“So the law is commendable and I want to enjoy all landlords in Lagos State and all tenants, to honour same so as to get a worthy and, healthy tenancy situation in all parts of Lagos State”, he said.
Pros, cons of Lagos landlord and tenancy bill (Source: The Nation)
![]()
metro
South African Woman Jailed 25 Years for Smuggling 5.75kg Heroin into Nigeria
South African Woman Jailed 25 Years for Smuggling 5.75kg Heroin into Nigeria
A Federal High Court in Abuja has sentenced a 38-year-old South African woman, Will Jessica Ann, to 25 years in prison for importing 5.75 kilogrammes of heroin into Nigeria through the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja.
Justice Obiora Egwuatu handed down the sentence after Ann pleaded guilty to charges brought against her by the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA).
The defendant was sentenced to 15 years on the first count and 25 years on the second count, with both terms ordered to run concurrently. This means she will serve a maximum of 25 years, rather than 40 years.
The case dates back to July 6, 2026, when NDLEA operatives intercepted Ann during the inward clearance of passengers arriving on Qatar Airways Flight QR1433 from Doha at the Abuja airport.
Ann was travelling with her three-year-old son when she was stopped by anti-narcotics officers.
READ ALSO:
- Adunni Ade Reveals Christian Fans Unfollowed Her After Publicly Identifying as Muslim
- Jetour Set to Storm Abuja Show with Rugged Luxury T2
- 25 Universities, Teaching Hospitals Get Solar Power Under REA Programme
According to details presented in court, the NDLEA said Ann initially denied having any checked-in luggage. However, operatives reportedly established that two suitcases containing the illicit substance carried baggage tags corresponding with the claim tags attached to her passport.
The agency said the two suitcases contained 14 large blocks of heroin, weighing a total of 5.75kg.
Ann reportedly admitted ownership of the luggage and told investigators that she had travelled from Cambodia through Doha before arriving in Abuja.
During the proceedings, the prosecution also told the court that Ann had admitted to conspiring with Jan Coenraad De Jager, a South African man who remains at large.
She was subsequently arraigned on a two-count charge bordering on conspiracy and unlawful importation of heroin under the relevant provisions of the law.
Ann pleaded guilty to the charges in August, prompting the prosecution to present the facts of the case before the court proceeded to sentencing.
The court was told that the seized heroin had an estimated street value of about ₦103.5 million, based on an estimated value of approximately ₦18 million per kilogramme.
Ann pleaded for leniency, expressed remorse and promised not to engage in drug trafficking again. She also told the court that she did not know there were illicit drugs in the bags.
After considering the facts of the case, Justice Egwuatu sentenced her to 15 years on Count One and 25 years on Count Two, directing that the sentences run concurrently.
The court also ordered that the seized heroin should be destroyed if the convict does not appeal within the period prescribed by law.
The case is part of the NDLEA‘s efforts to intercept illicit drug consignments being brought into Nigeria through international airports and other entry points.
The seizure at Abuja airport, followed by the defendant’s guilty plea and conviction, has resulted in the 25-year custodial sentence imposed by the Federal High Court.
South African Woman Jailed 25 Years for Smuggling 5.75kg Heroin into Nigeria
![]()
metro
Kaduna Troops Rescue Two-Year-Old Boy From Kidnappers, Search for Mother Continues
Kaduna Troops Rescue Two-Year-Old Boy From Kidnappers, Search for Mother Continues
A two-year-old boy is back with his family after troops rescued him from suspected kidnappers in Kaduna State.
Jafaru Baba was abducted with his mother from Ungwan Nungu village in Sanga Local Government Area. Troops later recovered the child after tracking the kidnappers to an area around Tayu Village.
The rescue followed intelligence received by security forces about the movement of the abductors and their victims.
According to security sources cited by security analyst Zagazola Makama, troops launched the operation at about 4pm on Wednesday, September 16.
READ ALSO:
- Gaza Building Collapse Kills 21, Including Eight Children
- Niger Mosque Abductions: Terrorists Execute 30 of 500 Captive Muslim Worshippers
- OAU Investigates Death of Final-Year Student as Police Begin Probe
They searched Tayu High Grounds, Tayu Village and surrounding parts of Sanga LGA. The operation later brought the troops into contact with the suspected kidnappers.
A gunfight followed, forcing the abductors to retreat into the bush. In the process, they left the toddler behind.
The troops quickly secured Jafaru and later handed him over to his father.
Security sources said the troops fired 17 rounds of 7.62mm ammunition during the confrontation.
Meanwhile, the search has not ended. Security personnel are still combing the area for the child’s mother, who remains in the kidnappers’ custody.
They are also pursuing the suspects who fled after the encounter, as efforts continue to rescue the woman and bring those responsible for the abduction into custody.
Kaduna Troops Rescue Two-Year-Old Boy From Kidnappers, Search for Mother Continues
![]()
metro
Niger Mosque Abductions: Terrorists Execute 30 of 500 Captive Muslim Worshippers
Niger Mosque Abductions: Terrorists Execute 30 of 500 Captive Muslim Worshippers
MINNA, NIGERIA – The mass abduction of worshippers from mosques in Niger State has escalated dramatically, with armed terrorists reportedly executing some of the hundreds of captives seized during Friday prayers. The Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, travelled to Niger State on Saturday to assess the security situation and ordered reinforced rescue operations.
The attacks occurred on Friday, 21 August 2026, at approximately 2pm. Police spokesperson Wasiu Abiodun confirmed that armed men simultaneously attacked mosques in four communities – Dekara, Kpenya, Sabon-Gida and Gidan-Zana – in the Borgu Local Government Area, while Muslims were observing Friday prayers. Witnesses described scenes of chaos. A Dekara resident, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the terrorists surrounded the mosque shortly after prayers began. “As soon as the imam said ‘Assalamualaikum’, the bandits surrounded the mosque and took people away.” Local residents estimate that more than 60 people were abducted from Dekara Central Mosque alone. In Gbezhin community, no fewer than 100 people remained unaccounted for as of Sunday evening. The terrorists later released a video claiming to hold approximately 500 captives, including women and children, with the sound of children crying audible in the footage.
On Saturday, the terrorists issued a warning to surrounding communities, ordering residents to vacate their homes within 30 minutes and threatening: “We will kill anyone we meet when we return.” Those threats appear to have been carried out. A Dekara resident told Daily Trust: “We received information that some of the abducted worshippers have been killed, but we do not know the exact number. Soldiers and vigilantes have moved to recover the bodies, but all routes accessible to security personnel have been planted with improvised explosive devices.” The Niger State chapter of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), through its chairman, Bishop Bulus Dauwa Yohanna, confirmed that approximately 30 worshippers who attempted to flee were shot dead by the gunmen. This figure corresponds with reporting by NPO Reports.
READ ALSO:
- OAU Investigates Death of Final-Year Student as Police Begin Probe
- 57-Year-Old Man Arrested Over Sexual Abuse of Stepdaughter in Edo
- US-Based Nigerian Lawyers Disbarred: Full List of Fraud, Theft and Misconduct Cases
The continuing violence and execution threats have triggered mass displacement. Resident Usman Musa told journalists that more than 200 residents from Gbezin had fled to neighbouring Benin Republic for safety. Another resident added that approximately 230 residents from Gidan-Zana and Sabon-Gida were taking refuge in Gawungi, inside Benin, while others had fled to Kwara State to stay with relatives.
Among those abducted are several prominent community figures. According to Ismaila Yahaya, the 90-year-old village head of Ka’ada was among those taken. He is the biological father of the District Head of Dekara and had only recently been released from a previous kidnapping. The violence in Borgu Emirate has not been confined to the mosque attacks. The Niger State Government confirmed that Alhaji Ahmed Yusuf, the village head of Galla, was killed by armed men at his residence. Governor Mohammed Umaru Bago expressed condolences, describing the killing as evidence of the bandits’ “extreme arrogance”.
Amid the escalating crisis, Inspector-General of Police Olatunji Disu visited Niger State on Saturday, 29 August, meeting with Deputy Governor Yakubu Garba at the Government House in Minna. He conveyed his condolences to the families of the victims and pledged that “the safe rescue of the kidnapped victims and bringing the perpetrators to justice remains the focus of current operations”. Disu has ordered the deployment of elite reinforcements to Niger State, including counter-terrorism units, tactical squads and the police air wing. Assistant Inspector-General of Police Victor Olaiya of Zone 7 has been dispatched to coordinate rescue efforts. Addressing officers at the Niger State Police Command, the Inspector-General said: “Nigerians are watching to see the police do what is right. I am not here for ceremony, but to bring a strong message of support to officers and soldiers working under difficult conditions.”
The Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) described the attacks as “heinous and barbaric”, calling on the Federal Government to “move beyond sporadic rescue operations” and establish a permanent, intelligence-driven and community-centred security architecture. The Christian Association of Nigeria’s Niger State chapter urged the government to provide adequate security at places of worship nationwide, stressing that “an attack on any place of worship is an attack on the sanctity of worship and a threat to the wider community”. Amnesty International also urged Nigerian authorities to secure the safe release of the abducted worshippers, noting that at least 1,100 people were abducted in the country between January and April 2026, with the actual figure likely to be far higher.
As of press time, the Niger State Government said it had not received any contact or demands from the kidnappers. Information Commissioner Obed Nuhu, speaking in a television interview, said the attacks were suspected to have been carried out by Lakurawa and Boko Haram elements, though the exact number of victims remained unverified.
Niger Mosque Abductions: Terrorists Execute 30 of 500 Captive Muslim Worshippers
![]()
-
Politics3 days ago2027: Northern Lecturers Back Tinubu, ASUU Disowns Endorsement
-
Sports2 days ago‘I Was Never the Chosen One’ — Dembele Responds to Mbappe
-
International1 day agoIslamic Council Condemns Attempted Attack on Holy City of Mecca
-
metro2 days agoLagos Power Outage: Ikeja Electric Blames TCN as Businesses, Homes Groan
-
News1 day agoKeep Politics Out of My Office — Ogbomoso Grand Chief Imam Warns Politicians, Bloggers
-
Education2 days agoJAMB Moves 2027 UTME Time — Here’s What Candidates Need To Know
-
Politics2 days ago2027: APC Governors Reject Wike’s Rainbow Coalition, Insist on Party Loyalty
-
News2 days agoI Wanted to Disgrace Tinubu — Omokri Reveals What He Discovered at Chicago Varsity
