Reps Probe ₦1.32 Billion 'Fake Agency' Scandal as Critics Slam Gbajabiamila's Exclusion from Inquiry - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Reps Probe ₦1.32 Billion ‘Fake Agency’ Scandal as Critics Slam Gbajabiamila’s Exclusion from Inquiry

Published

on

Reps Probe ₦1.32 Billion 'Fake Agency' Scandal as Critics Slam Gbajabiamila's Exclusion from Inquiry

Reps Probe ₦1.32 Billion ‘Fake Agency’ Scandal as Critics Slam Gbajabiamila’s Exclusion from Inquiry

The House of Representatives has launched a formal investigation into how an unestablished agency, the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council (PFIPC), secured a ₦1.32 billion allocation in the 2026 Appropriation Act, even as some lawmakers and public affairs analysts question the credibility of the probe over the decision not to invite President Bola Tinubu’s Chief of Staff, Femi Gbajabiamila.

Speaker Tajudeen Abbas inaugurated the ad hoc committee today at the National Assembly Complex in Abuja, with the panel scheduled to hold its first public hearing in line with Sections 88 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution, which empower the National Assembly to investigate matters relating to public institutions and the management of public funds . The investigation follows the arrest of self-proclaimed PFIPC Director-General, Adeyemi Adeniyi, who is accused of orchestrating the inclusion of the agency in the 2026 budget despite its non-existence .

The controversy has drawn significant public attention after it emerged that the PFIPC was never legally established by the Nigerian government and had no basis under any law, presidential instrument, executive approval, or other lawful government authorization . President Bola Tinubu had earlier directed the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) to conduct a thorough investigation into the activities of the PFIPC, ordering the anti-corruption agency to submit a comprehensive report within 30 days . The ICPC has been directed to investigate allegedly forged appointment letters, the use of false claims of presidential appointment to obtain official recognition, and the opening of multiple bank accounts in the names of purported government agencies using allegedly forged documents .

The ad hoc committee, chaired by Yusuf Gagdi, has been tasked with investigating how the PFIPC found its way into the national budget with a whopping N1,302,978,784 allocation, comprising N802,978,783 for personnel costs, N200,000,001 for overheads, and N300,000,000 for capital expenditure . According to the presidency, the PFIPC was never established by the federal government, yet it reportedly secured office space within the Federal Secretariat in Abuja and operated bank accounts with the Central Bank of Nigeria . The panel will trace the budgetary provision from the executive’s proposal through the legislative process to identify the exact stage at which the allocation was introduced and determine whether any government processes were compromised .

READ ALSO:

A notice signed by Gagdi has invited several top government officials to appear before the committee, including the Ministers of Budget and Economic Planning, Finance, Industry, Trade and Investment, Justice, and Foreign Affairs . Others summoned include the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, the Chairmen of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the ICPC, the Auditor-General for the Federation, the Fiscal Responsibility Commission, the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Director-General of the Department of State Services, and the Inspector-General of Police . Civil society organisations, professional bodies, development partners, and members of the public have also been invited to submit memoranda relating to the committee’s terms of reference .

However, the committee’s decision not to invite either Gbajabiamila or Adeniyi has drawn sharp criticism, with some lawmakers questioning the transparency of the investigation. A member of the committee, speaking on condition of anonymity, expressed disappointment over the omission, arguing that the two central figures in the controversy should have been among the first witnesses called. “From the notice, you will see that the two central figures are not invited. I mean Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi. There is an obvious attempt to exempt Gbajabiamila, and that is an attempt by the committee to clear him. From the notice of invitation, there is already a bias,” the lawmaker said .

Public affairs analyst Jackson Ojo also faulted the decision, arguing that inviting the Chief of Staff was necessary to ensure a transparent investigation. “The committee is starting on the wrong footing. They should have invited the Chief of Staff to clear his name. As important as the invited government officials are to the investigation, they are not as important as Gbajabiamila. The man taken into custody mentioned the Chief of Staff. So, why is he not part of those to field questions from the lawmakers?” he asked .

The controversy erupted after Adeniyi Adeyemi, who presented himself as the PFIPC Director-General, was arrested by police operatives in Osun State following a bench warrant issued by the Federal High Court in Abuja . Adeniyi had failed to appear for his arraignment on an eight-count charge bordering on conspiracy, forgery, and impersonation . Police forensic analysis confirmed that the signature of the President’s Chief of Staff, Femi Gbajabiamila, on the disputed appointment letter had been forged . Adeniyi is accused of forging presidential letterheads and fabricating requests for office accommodation purportedly originating from the State House .

The scandal deepened after Adeniyi allegedly claimed he paid ₦100 million through proxies to Gbajabiamila to facilitate the establishment of the agency . Gbajabiamila has denied the allegations and filed a N15 billion defamation suit against Adeniyi, seeking N10 billion in general damages, N5 billion in aggravated damages, and an order compelling him to publish a retraction and apology in five national newspapers . Both the Presidency and the Office of the Chief of Staff have denied the allegation, with Gbajabiamila stating he had never met Adeniyi .

The Nigerian Guild of Investigative Journalists (NGIJ) has called for an independent panel of inquiry, arguing that the scale of the allegations suggests official backing beyond the actions of a few individuals. The Guild noted that an account was reportedly opened for the council at the Central Bank of Nigeria, the agency was captured in the 2026 Appropriation Bill, office accommodation was allocated within the Federal Secretariat Complex, and more than 300 personnel, including eight directors, were reportedly recruited to work for the council . These developments, if established through investigation, suggest that the activities attributed to the council went far beyond the actions of a few individuals and may have involved approvals or support from influential actors within government . The Guild maintained that no public official, irrespective of rank or political influence, should be insulated from investigation where credible allegations exist .

Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu revealed during plenary that he had personally met representatives of the disputed organisation after his office received what appeared to be an official government letter. According to Kalu, the correspondence identified the organisation as both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PEAC/PFIPC) and carried the Presidency’s insignia, a Federal Secretariat address, and a “.gov.ng website . He said the delegation appeared more interested in taking photographs than discussing policy matters during the meeting . Meanwhile, the Senate has resolved to await the outcome of the ICPC investigation before proceeding with its own legislative probe .

Reps Probe ₦1.32 Billion ‘Fake Agency’ Scandal as Critics Slam Gbajabiamila’s Exclusion from Inquiry

Loading

Education

Nigerian Young Academy, LASU to Host 16th International Conference on Convergent Research

Published

on

Nigerian Young Academy, LASU to Host 16th International Conference on Convergent Research

Nigerian Young Academy, LASU to Host 16th International Conference on Convergent Research

Five-day event to bring together academics, policymakers, industry leaders to explore interdisciplinary solutions to global challenges

LAGOS — The Nigerian Young Academy (NYA), in collaboration with Lagos State University (LASU), will host its 16th International Conference and General Assembly from 16 to 20 August 2026 at the LASU Ojo Campus, Lagos, the organisers have announced.

The conference, themed “Convergent Research for Global Impact: Integrating Knowledge, Innovation and Policy,” will convene academics, researchers, policymakers, industry leaders, development partners, and civil society organisations from Nigeria and around the world to examine how interdisciplinary research can address complex societal and global challenges.

According to a press release issued by the Academy, the conference aims to showcase cutting-edge research, strengthen collaboration among emerging and established scholars, and promote evidence-based policies that support sustainable development. It underscores the Nigerian Young Academy’s commitment to advancing research excellence, innovation, and leadership.

The five-day programme will feature keynote and plenary sessions, lead paper presentations, oral and poster presentations, scientific awards, networking opportunities, and a pre-conference workshop on “Building Research Capacity in the AI Era: Grant Writing and Practical Data Analysis Using R.”

READ ALSO:

Discussions will span a broad range of themes, including sustainable development, public health systems, disease prevention, urban resilience, smart cities, energy systems, environmental policy, human-centred technology, rural development, food security, agribusiness, ethics in convergence science, and the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning in governance, planning, and risk assessment.

Keynote and Hosts

The conference keynote address will be delivered by Professor Akin Abayomi, Lagos State Commissioner for Health. Professor Temitope Onuminya, President of the Nigerian Young Academy, will host the event, while Professor Ibiyemi I. Olatunji-Bello, Vice-Chancellor of Lagos State University, will serve as Chief Host.

Call for Abstracts and Registration

Researchers are invited to submit abstracts of no more than 250 words between 1 March and 14 June 2026, while submissions for poster presentations will remain open until 24 July 2026. The conference is open to participants from Nigeria and abroad.

According to the Chairman of the Local Organising Committee, Associate Professor Abdul-Azeez Adeyemi Anjorin of Lagos State University, the conference provides an important platform for researchers, professionals, and policymakers to exchange ideas, foster partnerships, and develop innovative solutions that can shape the future of research, innovation, and public policy.

Scholars, students, professionals, and stakeholders across academia, government, industry, and civil society are encouraged to participate. Registration details and additional information are available through the Nigerian Young Academy website.

About the Nigerian Young Academy

The Nigerian Young Academy (NYA) is Nigeria’s foremost interdisciplinary academy for outstanding early-career researchers and professionals. Established in 2010 by the Nigeria Academy of Science, with the support of the Nigeria Academy of Education and the Nigeria Academy of Engineering, the Academy promotes research excellence, leadership, interdisciplinary collaboration, and public engagement.

The NYA is affiliated with the International Science Council, the Global Young Academy, and the Network of African Science Academies (NASAC). Through its conferences, awards, publications, and capacity-building initiatives, the Academy supports the development of young researchers and contributes to national and global development through science, scholarship, and innovation.


For further information, contact:

Dr. Abdulmalik Salman
Conference Organising Committee, Nigerian Young Academy (NYA)
Email: amas2k7@gmail.com
Telephone: +2347039632128
Website: https://nigerianyoungacademy.org

 

Nigerian Young Academy, LASU to Host 16th International Conference on Convergent Research

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Trump smuggled out of Turkey in catering truck over Iran threat

Published

on

Trump smuggled out of Turkey in catering truck over Iran threat

Trump smuggled out of Turkey in catering truck over Iran threat

US president secretly transferred from Air Force One to military jet before flying to Britain

WASHINGTON — United States President Donald Trump was reportedly smuggled out of Turkey in an airport catering truck after American intelligence agencies received information suggesting a credible threat against his life.

The extraordinary security operation was reportedly carried out after Trump attended engagements in Ankara, with officials taking elaborate measures to conceal his movements from potential attackers.

According to reports, Trump initially boarded Air Force One in full view of journalists and other observers at the Ankara airport, creating the impression that the presidential aircraft would take him directly out of Turkey.

However, the aircraft reportedly served as a decoy.

Trump and a small number of aides were subsequently moved from the presidential aircraft inside a large airport catering vehicle and taken to a smaller US military aircraft, reportedly a C-32A.

The president was then flown secretly to Britain, where he reportedly landed at RAF Mildenhall.

The unusual operation was said to have been prompted by intelligence concerning a possible Iranian threat against Trump.

Security officials reportedly feared that hostile actors could track the president’s movements and target his aircraft, prompting them to introduce an elaborate deception plan.

READ ALSO:

The original Air Force One reportedly continued separately, reinforcing the impression that Trump was still travelling aboard the presidential aircraft.

The operation underscores the extraordinary lengths to which US security agencies can go to protect a sitting president when intelligence points to a potential threat.

The White House has not publicly released detailed information about the alleged threat or confirmed all the details of the reported evacuation operation.

However, administration officials have repeatedly acknowledged that Trump faces serious security threats and that protective agencies would take necessary measures to safeguard him.

The reported use of a catering vehicle has generated widespread interest because presidential movements are normally highly coordinated and closely monitored.

Security experts say the use of decoy aircraft, concealed transfers and sudden changes in travel arrangements can make it more difficult for hostile actors to establish the president’s exact location.

The incident also comes against the backdrop of heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran, with concerns over possible attacks against senior US officials.

Trump’s reported secret departure from Turkey therefore illustrates the continuing security challenges surrounding the US presidency, particularly when the president travels internationally.

While the full details of the operation remain classified, the reported episode has highlighted the sophisticated measures employed by American authorities to prevent potential threats from tracking the president’s movements.

 

Trump smuggled out of Turkey in catering truck over Iran threat

Loading

Continue Reading

News

South Africa Visa Applications Double From Nigerians Despite Xenophobia Concerns – Envoy

Published

on

South Africa Visa Applications Double From Nigerians Despite Xenophobia Concerns – Envoy

South Africa Visa Applications Double From Nigerians Despite Xenophobia Concerns – Envoy

South Africa’s Consul-General in Nigeria, Prof. Bobby Moroe, has revealed that visa applications from Nigerians have nearly doubled in recent months, dismissing reports that South African missions have stopped issuing visas to Nigerians and insisting the country remains safe for travellers. Despite ongoing concerns over xenophobic attacks targeting Nigerians and other African migrants in South Africa, interest in travelling to the country has surged, according to the diplomat. Moroe made the disclosure during an interview with Nigeria Info FM on Sunday, emphasising that South Africa remains open for tourism, business and other forms of travel.

Moroe sought to allay fears over the safety of Nigerians travelling to South Africa, describing reports that diplomatic missions had suspended visa issuance as “untrue”. In his words: “I just want to give reassurance that South Africa is open for business, South Africa is open for tourism, and South Africa is open for any other form of visit. And it is also untrue to suggest that South African missions in Nigeria do not offer visas to Nigerians anymore. But I can assure you and the listeners, that it is safe to travel to South Africa.” The Consul-General disclosed that visa applications have increased significantly, with the Lagos consulate alone processing between 100 to 130 applications daily.

This reassurance from Moroe comes amid renewed concerns over xenophobic violence in South Africa, where Nigerians and other African migrants have been targeted in pockets of violence across Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal and parts of the Western Cape. The attacks, often fuelled by claims of job competition and criminality, have led to looting of foreign-owned shops, assaults and forced displacements, sparking outrage in Nigeria and across the continent. In response to the escalating violence, the Federal Government facilitated the repatriation of over 1,400 Nigerians who were stranded or feared for their safety in South Africa. Repatriated Nigerians have since warned compatriots against migrating to South Africa, describing the country as unsafe for foreigners. Earlier in June 2026, the government had announced plans to repatriate more than 1,000 citizens through a voluntary repatriation programme, following a similar action by Ghana.

READ ALSO:

In a separate interview, Moroe rejected claims that xenophobia is prevalent in South Africa, stating that the government condemns attacks on both citizens and foreigners regardless of immigration status. The diplomat went further to argue that the term “xenophobia” has become unfairly associated with South Africa, noting that when similar incidents occur elsewhere, they are labelled differently. “There’s no xenophobia in South Africa,” he said when questioned about recurring reports of violence against foreign nationals.

The surge in visa applications may also be attributed to streamlined processes introduced after a January 2023 forum, which have reduced turnaround times significantly. Under the new arrangements, qualifying Nigerian businesspeople can now be granted five-year multiple-entry visas, making travel more convenient for frequent visitors. Moroe urged prospective travellers to obtain necessary visas before departure and comply with South Africa’s immigration laws, advising: “It is everybody’s responsibility to ensure that before you travel, you ensure that you have your visa, you comply with the immigration laws of the country, you become a good ambassador of your country.” He also cautioned Nigerians to familiarise themselves with South African laws, understand their rights and know the locations of law enforcement agencies in case of emergencies, adding: “When you get to South Africa, you know and understand your rights, but you must also familiarise yourself with the laws of the country. You choose places that you want to visit… and ensure that you also are familiar with the location of law enforcement agencies, just in case something happens.”

The Consul-General’s position on xenophobia has, however, been challenged by former Enugu State lawmaker Okey Onoh, who described Moroe’s denial as contradicting documented reports of attacks and discrimination against African migrants in South Africa. Onoh cited reports by advocacy groups, including Xenowatch, which have recorded hundreds of alleged xenophobic incidents annually, and criticised anti-immigrant groups including Operation Dudula. In a sharp rebuke, Onoh declared: “Keep your South Africa, we keep our Nigeria,” calling for greater protection of African migrants and urging African countries to reconsider their engagement with South Africa.

Despite these tensions and the contrasting narratives, Moroe expressed confidence that bilateral visits between both countries would continue to grow, stressing that South Africa valued its relationship with Nigeria and that people-to-people ties between the two nations remain active. Nigerian DJs perform in Johannesburg, South African gospel artists play in Lagos, students study in Cape Town and traders do business in Aba — these are the everyday connections that bind the two countries, mission officials noted, underscoring the deep and enduring links that persist even amid diplomatic friction and security concerns.

South Africa Visa Applications Double From Nigerians Despite Xenophobia Concerns – Envoy

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending