Tinubu slams Atiku over claims on Judiciary - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Tinubu slams Atiku over claims on Judiciary

Published

on

Tinubu slams Atiku over claims on Judiciary

Nigeria’s presidency has slammed former Vice President Atiku Abubakar for accusing the APC government, without proof, of intimidating the judiciary.

Presidential Spokesman, Dele Alake said Atiku’s latest allegation only showed that he has not fully recovered from the shock of defeat in the 25 February election.

Alake described Atiku’s allegation as laughable, mischievous, jejune, and another round of inanities that offend basic logic and rational thinking.

“In the ill-thought out and illogical statement, Alhaji Atiku accused the current administration of the governing APC of plotting to undermine the judiciary without providing any shred of evidence.

“Apart from innuendos, insinuations and outright lies contained in the said press statement, the former Vice President Atiku didn’t put forward any convincing argument to support his claims on how the President Tinubu-led administration and APC sought to undercut, undermine and compromise the judiciary.

READ ALSO:

“If the former Vice President believes in democracy and the sanctity of the Judiciary, as claimed, he would not engage in making spurious and wild allegations aimed at disparaging and discrediting an important arm of government that should serve as the bulwark for our democracy.

“He shamelessly resorted to this cheap attempt to intimidate and blackmail the Judiciary even when he is party to a case before the Presidential Election Petition Court.

“Let it be said that when it comes to matters of fighting for democracy and democratic ideals, rule of law and independence of Judiciary in Nigeria, President Bola Tinubu stands shoulder above Atiku Abubakar.

“When President Tinubu was leading the charge against the emasculation of the judiciary and promoting the sanctity of rule of law as the building block for good governance as Governor of Lagos State between 1999-2007, under a PDP central government, Alhaji Atiku was nowhere to be found.

“It is on record and to his eternal credit that President Tinubu, through the instrumentality of the law and Judiciary, successfully challenged many of the draconian and obnoxious decisions of the PDP-led Federal Government that trampled on the rights of the States as federating units. Lagos State under the leadership of the then Governor Tinubu won over 13 cases up to the Supreme Court against the hydra-headed PDP administration at the centre.

READ ALSO:

“No leader with such a sterling and enviable credential as a champion of rule of law, independence of judiciary like President Tinubu will ever contemplate undermining the Judiciary as alleged by Alhaji Atiku.

“President Tinubu won a free, fair and credible election. The February 25, 2023 Presidential election that produced him is the most transparent election ever conducted in Nigeria since 1999.

“President Tinubu and the APC absolutely have no reason to undermine the judiciary in the hope of any favourable judgement.

“His lawyers and that of APC have presented very solid defence of the result of the election and we are sure the judiciary will impartially deliver its ruling on the basis of points of law and evidence before it, not based on presumptuous speculations and unfounded accusations.

“Atiku Abubakar should be honourable enough as a statesman to allow the Judiciary perform its sacred duty without harassment and this resort to self-help.

“Attempting to discredit an important institution of State for selfish political end is disingenuous, shameful and unbecoming of a former Vice President of Nigeria. This desperation must stop”, Alake said.

Tinubu slams Atiku over claims on Judiciary

Loading

metro

Fatal NURTW Leadership Clash in Osun Leaves Two Dead; State Orders Park Shut Down

Published

on

Fatal NURTW Leadership Clash in Osun Leaves Two Dead; State Orders Park Shut Down

As Olalekan Oyeyemi is buried in Osogbo, authorities transfer murder probe to the State Criminal Investigation Department.

(more…)

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Peter Obi Rejects Anambra Debt Claims, Challenges Soludo Govt to Produce Evidence

Published

on

Peter Obi Rejects Anambra Debt Claims, Challenges Soludo Government to Produce Evidence

Peter Obi Rejects Anambra Debt Claims, Challenges Soludo Government to Produce Evidence

Former Anambra State Governor and 2027 presidential candidate Peter Obi has rejected claims that he left the state with unpaid financial obligations when he handed over power in 2014, challenging the Anambra State Government to identify any contractor, supplier, worker or pensioner who was owed money by his administration at the time.

Obi made the statement in response to renewed claims by the administration of Governor Chukwuma Soludo that the state is still servicing loans and other financial obligations inherited from previous administrations.

The dispute has opened a fresh political debate over Anambra’s debt profile, the financial obligations inherited by successive governments and the management of the state’s resources before and after Obi left office.

Obi, who governed Anambra between 2006 and 2013 before handing over to his successor in 2014, said he paid what was due during his tenure and left the state in a financially stable position.

He challenged the Soludo administration to provide evidence of any unpaid obligation incurred by his government that remained outstanding when he left office.

According to Obi, if the state government can identify any contractor, supplier, employee, pensioner or other beneficiary who was owed money by his administration at the time of the handover, he would be prepared to address the matter.

The former governor also said his administration left funds in government accounts, including an alleged ₦2.14 billion ecological fund balance, when he handed over power.

However, the claim regarding the ecological fund is from Obi’s camp and would require confirmation from the relevant official financial records.

READ ALSO:

The response followed comments by the Anambra Commissioner for Finance, Izuchukwu Okafor, who said the state was still repaying loans inherited from previous administrations.

Okafor said the Soludo administration had not obtained any commercial bank loan since it came into office in 2022, arguing that the government’s focus had been on reducing the state’s inherited financial obligations.

He said the state’s debt burden had been substantially reduced under Soludo and that the administration had also cleared inherited liabilities relating to contracts, gratuities and pensions.

The commissioner said some loans taken by previous administrations remain subject to repayment and deductions from the state’s federal allocations.

This distinction is at the centre of the current disagreement.

The Soludo administration is not necessarily claiming that Obi personally left unpaid bills to contractors or workers. Rather, the government is pointing to loans and other financial commitments inherited from successive administrations, some of which continue to be serviced.

Obi, on the other hand, is arguing that his administration settled the obligations that were due and payable when he left office and should not be held responsible for liabilities incurred by subsequent governments.

The issue has therefore raised questions about the difference between a state’s overall outstanding debt and debts that were specifically incurred by an individual administration.

Available public debt records have shown that Anambra had outstanding formal obligations around the period Obi left office. However, the political dispute centres on when particular obligations were incurred, which administration contracted them, when repayment became due and whether they should be described as unpaid debts inherited from Obi’s administration.

The Soludo administration has maintained that it inherited financial commitments from previous governments and has been working to reduce them.

The finance commissioner reportedly said the state’s domestic debt was now close to zero and that the government had reduced its overall debt burden significantly.

He also said the Soludo administration had not resorted to commercial bank borrowing since assuming office, presenting the reduction in liabilities as evidence of improved fiscal management.

The government has simultaneously highlighted investments in infrastructure and other projects while maintaining that debt reduction remains an important part of its financial strategy.

READ ALSO:

Obi’s camp, however, has questioned the basis for attributing current financial obligations to his administration.

The former governor has repeatedly presented his tenure as one characterised by fiscal discipline, savings and investment in infrastructure, education, healthcare and other sectors.

His supporters have pointed to the savings and financial reserves accumulated during his tenure as evidence that the state was handed over in relatively strong financial condition.

Critics of the former governor, however, argue that the financial position of a state cannot be assessed solely by looking at cash balances or the absence of unpaid bills because governments can inherit long-term obligations whose repayment extends beyond the tenure of the administration that contracted them.

That distinction is particularly relevant in Anambra, where governments have succeeded one another while continuing to service financial commitments made over several administrations.

The latest exchange has consequently shifted the political conversation from whether Anambra has debt to the more specific question of which administration incurred particular liabilities and whether those obligations were outstanding at the time of each handover.

The dispute also comes at a politically sensitive period, with Obi preparing for the 2027 presidential election under the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC).

Questions about his record as Anambra governor are likely to remain part of the political debate as the election approaches, particularly because his administration’s economic management has been a central part of his political narrative.

For Soludo, who is serving as Anambra governor, the emphasis has been on the state’s current fiscal position and the steps his administration says it has taken to reduce inherited liabilities while funding development projects.

For Obi, the priority is to establish that he did not leave unpaid obligations to contractors, workers, pensioners or other beneficiaries when he left office.

The former governor has therefore challenged the state government to publish specific records showing any outstanding obligation attributable to his administration at the point of handover.

The competing claims have yet to be resolved by an independent audit or judicial determination.

What remains clear is that Anambra’s debt debate involves more than a simple disagreement over whether the state owes money. It encompasses loans contracted by successive administrations, repayment schedules, inherited liabilities, outstanding contracts and the question of how political leaders should be held accountable for financial commitments made during their tenure.

As the exchange continues, official debt records, audited financial statements and handover documents could provide the clearest basis for determining the extent of liabilities inherited by each administration.

Until such records are independently reviewed, claims that Obi either left the state completely debt-free or was solely responsible for all of its inherited obligations should be treated with caution.

The latest dispute therefore leaves two competing narratives: Obi’s insistence that he paid what was due before leaving office, and the Soludo administration’s position that Anambra continues to service financial obligations inherited from previous governments, including loans dating back to earlier administrations.

With the 2027 election approaching, the controversy is likely to remain part of the wider political contest over Obi’s record in Anambra and his claims of fiscal discipline in government.

Peter Obi Rejects Anambra Debt Claims, Challenges Soludo Government to Produce Evidence

Loading

Continue Reading

News

We Must Build Beyond the Next Elections’ — Shettima

Published

on

We Must Build Beyond the Next Elections’ — Shettima

Vice-President Kashim Shettima has called on political leaders to look beyond election cycles and leave behind institutions that can continue to benefit Nigerians.

His remarks came at the Abuja presentation of Brigadier Musa Usman (1940–1991): Service and Impact, a book documenting the life and public service of the late military governor of the former North-Eastern State.

Represented by Aliyu Modibbo Umar, Shettima said leadership should be measured by the value that remains after an administration has left office.

We must recover the spirit of selflessness in public service,” he said, urging leaders to “build beyond the next elections and think beyond political boundaries.”

He listed reconstruction, agriculture, education, transport, energy, industrialisation, jobs, environmental restoration, peace and security among areas where leaders must take a long-term approach.

The Vice-President pointed to Musa Usman’s administration as an example of how development can outlive a political tenure. Usman governed the former North-Eastern State from 1967 to 1975, and the region he once administered now covers six states in the North-East.

Shettima said Usman played a major role in developing Maiduguri and establishing infrastructure and institutions that later administrations were able to build upon.

Governor Babagana Zulum, who spoke at the event, described Usman as a leader who combined effective governance with integrity, discipline and humility.

Zulum said the late governor’s contributions included investments in education, healthcare and infrastructure, as well as efforts to strengthen the region’s economy.

The book, written by journalists Mahmud Jega and Theophilus Abbah, also traces Usman’s military career and his rise to leadership at a young age. It was published to preserve his record and the history of the former North-Eastern State.

Shettima said preserving such history could help younger Nigerians understand that lasting public service is about strengthening institutions and improving lives, rather than simply holding office.

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending