Tribunal: Jandor’s counsel accuses WAEC official of compromising evidence – Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

Tribunal: Jandor’s counsel accuses WAEC official of compromising evidence

Published

on

Abdulazeez Adediran popularly known as Jandor

Tribunal: Jandor’s counsel accuses WAEC official of compromising evidence

Mr. Clement Onwuenwunor (SAN), the lead counsel for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship candidate in Lagos State, Mr Abdulazeez Adediran,  has accused the West African Examination Council (WAEC) official of compromising evidence in his testimony.

The official was subpoenaed by the court to give evidence on the controversy surrounding the qualification of Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu.

Onwuenwunor accused Mr Olaolu Adekanmbi, the WAEC official, who was subpoenaed by the tribunal at his instance, of not being truthful in his evidence.

The petitioner’s counsel told the tribunal that the evidence of the witness was adverse to its earlier findings after a search on WAEC’s online result verification portal which had allegedIy indicated the absence of the governor’s names and result on it.

Jandor’s counsel also applied to the tribunal for leave to cross examine the witness in order to challenge the accuracy of the WAEC official’s evidence.

READ ALSO:

“There is a major conflict between what the witness has just brought and what we earlier tendered which was also issued by WAEC.

“Our search before the polls had discovered that the governor had no result on WAEC’s portal and now this witness is bringing something different which contradicts their earlier position.

“He is not being a witness of truth.

“He has also refused to give more evidence on what he presented, and said the council does not produce hard copy of certificates or retain duplicate certificates,” he said.

Ealier, the witness had presented a document bearing a May/June O’level result with the name of the governor issued in 1981 by Ijebu Ife Community Grammar School.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that three member tribunal headed by Justice Arum Ashom admitted the document among the list of exhibits before it, into evidence.

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) counsel, Mr Adetunji Oyeyipo (SAN), described the petitioner’s grouse as a storm in a teacup.

He said: “This witness has made two contradictory statements.

“There is nothing to warrant treating him as a hostile witness.

“At the very best, he has only given evidence not palatable to my learned friend.

READ ALSO:

“We urge you to refuse the application of the petitioner,”

Dr Muiz- Banire (SAN) representing Sanwo-Olu and his deputy, Obafemi Hamzat, who were the second and third respondents in the petition, also aligned himself with INEC’s position.

“Exhibit P36 is a product of one Ijebu Ife community Grammar School, not WAEC while exhibit b2 is a product of one Grandex Ventures Ltd., not WAEC.

“No one has led evidence to establish the authenticity of that portal so the attachment to it is totally unreliable.

“No witness has even testified on the said Grandex, section 230 of the Evidence Act does not avail the petitioner the right to seek leave of court to declare the witness hostile,” Banire said.

However, Labour party and its candidate, Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour, urged the Tribunal to grant the petitioner’s request.

They argued that the witness was being hostile to the truth and exhibited animosity.

The Tribunal, in its ruling,  held that the petitioner could not cross-examine the witness and that the exhibit containing the findings from the portal could not be linked to WAEC directly.

The tribunal, thereafter, ordered other counsel to cross examine the WAEC official.

The witness told the tribunal during cross examination that the governor was found to have been entitled to a certificate issued by the school in question and that the online portal did  not exist as at 1981.

He said: “Since there was no portal in 1981, this master list of 581 candidates that sat for the exam at the school is the primary information that will be fed into the result verification portal.

“I think electronic registration of candidates started in 2004.

“For migrating results, we have three portals and the council does not retain duplicate copies of certificates.”

The tribunal adjourned until July 4 for continuation of hearing.

Tribunal: Jandor’s counsel accuses WAEC official of compromising evidence

(NAN)

Politics

Omisore Slams APC Disqualification, Calls Screening Panel Report “A Huge Joke”

Published

on

Sen. Iyiola Omisore

Omisore Slams APC Disqualification, Calls Screening Panel Report “A Huge Joke”

Former National Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Senator Iyiola Omisore, has condemned his exclusion from the party’s Osun governorship primary, describing the decision as “a huge joke” and alleging that the screening panel acted with partisanship, bias, and procedural lapses.

Speaking to journalists after appearing before the APC Appeal Committee on Saturday in Abuja, Omisore said the panel’s report lacked credibility and was influenced by external pressure. The APC screening panel had earlier disqualified Omisore and six other aspirants over alleged failure to meet certain requirements.

Omisore insisted that neither he nor the other affected aspirants had been formally informed of any wrongdoing.
“That panel report is the biggest joke of the year. It is unfortunate that partisanship has been taken beyond politics. We know the panel produced multiple reports, and the one submitted to the secretariat was not the original,” he said.

READ ALSO:

He further alleged that the panel chairman privately admitted facing pressure to disqualify major aspirants in favour of a preferred candidate.
“The chairman told us he was under pressure. Unfortunately, we are all victims of this,” Omisore stated.

Questioning the panel’s claim that the aspirants lacked the required number of nominators, Omisore argued that the party leadership has full access to the membership register and should have verified the information.
“He who alleges must prove,” he added.

The senator expressed confidence that the APC National Working Committee (NWC) would overturn the disqualification, stressing that the issues raised in the report revealed deeper divisions within the Osun APC.
“Even the committee’s own report said the party is factionalised and at risk of losing the election. So what exactly are we talking about?” he queried.

Omisore confirmed that all seven disqualified aspirants would appear individually before the appeal panel, insisting that the process must reflect fairness, transparency, and due process.

Omisore Slams APC Disqualification, Calls Screening Panel Report “A Huge Joke”

Continue Reading

Politics

PDP Crisis Deepens as Turaki Faction Seeks Judge’s Recusal Over Alleged Bias

Published

on

PDP Crisis Deepens as Turaki Faction Seeks Judge’s Recusal Over Alleged Bias

The faction of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) loyal to Kabiru Turaki has filed a motion requesting Justice Joyce Abdulmalik to withdraw from presiding over a major lawsuit challenging the party’s leadership. The application, led by senior lawyer Chris Uche (SAN), argues that circumstances surrounding the handling of the suit have created a reasonable apprehension of bias.

The case originally stems from a suit filed by a rival PDP bloc aligned with FCT Minister Nyesom Wike and led by acting National Chairman Mohammed Abdulrahman.

In the motion, the Turaki group is seeking two orders:

  1. For Justice Abdulmalik to recuse herself due to perceived lack of impartiality; and
  2. For the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court to reassign the matter to another judge.

Uche cited Section 36(1) of the 1999 Constitution, which guarantees the right to a fair hearing, asserting that his clients fear they may not receive an unbiased trial. He recalled that the 5th to 25th defendants previously petitioned Chief Judge John Tsoho, asking that no PDP-related dispute be assigned to Justice Abdulmalik or two other judges due to “past antecedents and perceived partisanship.”

Despite this, the suit filed on November 21, 2025, was assigned to Justice Abdulmalik and, by November 25, resulted in an ex parte order that Uche described as “curious” and similar to orders previously issued by Justice James Omotosho in related PDP matters. He argued that although some prayers were declined on record, the judge “granted even more far-reaching orders,” raising concerns about fairness.

READ ALSO:

Uche insisted that judicial proceedings “must not only be fair but must manifestly appear to be fair,” noting that reassigning the case would safeguard public confidence in the process.

Meanwhile, the rival PDP faction is seeking injunctions preventing the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from recognising any address for the party other than the one currently on its records. They are also asking the court to stop the Turaki-led group from presenting itself as the authentic representatives of the PDP.

The plaintiffs further want the court to compel INEC, the Inspector-General of Police, the FCT Police Command, and the DSS to enforce earlier judgments delivered by Justices James Omotosho and Peter Lifu on PDP disputes.

During Friday’s hearing, Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN) appeared for the plaintiffs, Chris Uche (SAN) for the 5th to 25th defendants, and Mimi Ayua represented the police. With parties confirming that all processes had not been received, Justice Abdulmalik adjourned the matter to January 14, 2026.

Later that day, a second suit filed by the Turaki-led PDP group came up. Terkaa Aondo (SAN) represented the plaintiffs, while Ken Njemanze (SAN)—appearing for those seeking to be joined, including Mohammed Abdulrahman, Sen. Samuel Anyanwu, and Sen. Mao Ohuabunwa—noted that he had not been served. The judge fixed January 16 for hearing pending applications.

In the second suit, the plaintiffs—PDP, National Chairman Kabiru Turaki, and National Secretary Taofeek Arapaja—are asking the court to order security operatives to vacate the party’s Wadata Plaza headquarters in Abuja.

PDP Crisis Deepens as Turaki Faction Seeks Judge’s Recusal Over Alleged Bias

Continue Reading

Politics

Osogbo Youth Group Condemns APC Over Disqualification of Adegoke SAN

Published

on

Osogbo Youth Group Condemns APC Over Disqualification of Adegoke SAN

The Osogbo Progressive Youths Movement (OPYM) has issued a strongly worded statement criticizing the All Progressives Congress (APC) leadership over the disqualification of AbdulRasheed Adekunle Adegoke, SAN, from a recent party screening exercise.

In a press release signed by its convener, Comrade Jimoh Oyekola Ajayi, the group described the decision as a “political statement” aimed not only at the aspirant but at the entire Osogbo community. According to OPYM, the disqualification sends a message that despite the city’s long-standing loyalty and electoral contributions to the APC, its people are not considered worthy of leadership positions within the party.

Ajayi stated that Osogbo has consistently delivered votes and stood firmly with the APC “through every storm,” only to be sidelined at a critical moment when fairness was expected. He accused the party hierarchy of reinforcing a pattern of marginalization that has left Osogbo feeling “rejected and undervalued.”

The group also took a swipe at individuals within and outside the city who were said to be celebrating the disqualification. OPYM described such actions as betrayal, warning that “history has a long memory” and would not forget those who worked against the collective interest of Osogbo.

Despite the setback, OPYM maintained that the movement for equity and political inclusion remains unwavering. The organization emphasized that although it has accepted the screening outcome peacefully, it rejects what it sees as a broader attempt to reduce Osogbo’s political relevance in the state.

“We have not accepted that Osogbo must remain second-class in a state it has helped build with sweat, loyalty, and sacrifice,” the statement read.

The group reaffirmed its support for Adegoke SAN, praising him for his courage in bringing long-standing grievances to the fore. It also reiterated its commitment to advocating for fairness and justice within the political landscape.

“Osogbo will not fold its arms while others dictate our political destiny,” Ajayi declared.

The statement concluded with affirmations of solidarity for Adegoke, the people of Osogbo, and the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Osogbo Youth Group Condemns APC Over Disqualification of Adegoke SAN

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending