Trump Escalates Harvard Dispute, Seeks $1 Billion in Damages

Trump Escalates Harvard Dispute, Seeks $1 Billion in Damages

U.S. President Donald Trump has escalated his legal and political dispute with Harvard University by seeking $1 billion in damages, following months of tensions over federal probes into the Ivy League institution. The announcement, made via Trump’s platform Truth Social, marks a major intensification of a conflict that has drawn national attention.

Trump accused Harvard of “spreading nonsense” and failing to address serious issues raised by his administration, including allegations that the university was too tolerant of anti-Semitic content and failed to protect Jewish students during pro-Palestinian protests. He described previous settlement offers, including one for about $500 million, as “inadequate” and insisted that a billion-dollar damages claim was necessary to address what he claims are legal violations.

READ ALSO:

• Spain Plans Social Media Ban for Children Under 16 to Enhance Online Safety
• French Father, Nine Others Charged Over Alleged Rape of Drugged 5-Year-Old Boy
• JAMB Halts Exam Town Selection for Ekiti UTME Candidates

The dispute traces back to federal investigations into Harvard’s campus climate, administrative policies, and research programs. The Trump administration has previously attempted to pressure the university by freezing federal research funds and threatening to revoke grants, while Harvard has defended itself in court, citing academic freedom, free speech, and institutional autonomy.

Though some other U.S. universities, such as Columbia and Brown, have settled related federal disputes, Harvard has resisted financial settlements. The university has yet to respond publicly to Trump’s billion-dollar claim, and legal experts note that the case could set a significant precedent if it proceeds in federal court.

The high-profile confrontation highlights ongoing tensions between federal authorities and elite universities, particularly regarding campus policies, ideological conflicts, and federal oversight. Observers say the outcome could influence how universities handle politically sensitive issues and federal scrutiny in the years ahead.