Why China is reluctant to fund Lagos’ fourth mainland bridge - Newstrends
Connect with us

metro

Why China is reluctant to fund Lagos’ fourth mainland bridge

Published

on

Why China is reluctant to fund Lagos’ fourth mainland bridge

With an estimated population of over 22 million and a landmass of just 3,575 square kilometres, Lagos currently has Nigeria’s highest vehicle density, with about 1.2 million registered vehicles. This represents over 30 per cent of the country’s total vehicle population.

Over the years, traffic congestion in the state has gone beyond inconvenience to become a structural barrier to economic growth, mental well-being, and environmental sustainability. A 2023 study by the Danne Institute for Research, a not-for-profit trust, revealed that Lagos loses a staggering N4tn annually due to severe traffic congestion. The report underscores the urgent need for interventions to mitigate the economic and social toll on residents.

The proposed Fourth Mainland Bridge aims to ease the heavy traffic on the existing Third Mainland Bridge and other key routes such as the Carter and Eko bridges. It is also expected to stimulate economic growth by opening new areas for development through improved connectivity.

Construction was initially planned to begin in the first quarter of 2024, with completion slated for 2027 — before the end of Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu’s tenure. However, execution has stalled. The project is structured as a public–private partnership (PPP), a long-term arrangement between a government and private sector entities, where private capital finances public projects up front and recoups investment through revenue from taxpayers and/or users over time.

A consortium of China’s state-owned firms is the preferred bidder for the Fourth Mainland Bridge project. THE WHISTLER learnt that China is reluctant to undertake high-cost projects with long payback periods that would require substantial upfront investment and years to recover funds. Instead, China prefers projects with minimal risk — to build and be paid for the work directly.

In 2023, the Lagos State Government announced that it had secured over $1.3bn in partnership deals with the African Export-Import Bank and Access Bank for the bridge and related infrastructure, including the 2nd Phase of the Blue Line rail from Mile 2 to Okokomaiko. In January, Governor Sanwo-Olu revealed that financiers were requesting a sovereign guarantee — a commitment from the Federal Government to secure funding for the bridge.

he governor stressed that Lagos is cautious about its debt profile, particularly amid currency fluctuations.

“We have looked at the financial sustainability of Lagos. Any development you want to do at that scale and you are subnational, you need to be able to look at your sustainability ratios.

“Everybody that has raised funding to help us develop that project—that’s a $2bn project—they aree asking for a sovereign guarantee.

“They are asking for you to get a commitment from the central government. So, we have not been able to push that,” Sanwo-Olu explained during an interview on TVC.

READ ALSO:

A consortium of China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation (CCECC) and China Railway Construction Investment Group (CRCCIG) is the preferred bidder for the Fourth Mainland Bridge PPP.

The Lagos State Government announced the CCECC-CRCCIG Consortium as the preferred bidder in December 2022.

The bidding process began in November 2019, with 52 responses received, out of which 32 were deemed responsive.

According to the former Special Adviser to the Governor on PPPs, Ope George, after evaluating the Request for Quotation (RFQ), six bidders advanced to the Request for Proposal (RfP) phase, with CCECC-CRCCIG eventually selected as the preferred bidder.

“You will recall that the Lagos State government commenced a Competitive Bidding process for the selection of a Concessionaire, by the issuance of the Request for Expressions of Interest (REOI) on 27th of November, 2019. A total of 52 responses were received with 32 being responsive,” George explained during a briefing.

“Subsequently, a Request for Quotation (RFQ) was issued on 10th February 2020 to the 32 eligible applicants and responses were received on 15th April, 2020 with a total of 15 responses. Upon evaluation, six bidders met the criteria to progress to the Request for Proposal (RfP) stage.”

George added that while the CCECC-CRCCIG Consortium emerged as the preferred bidder, the Mota-Engil (Nigeria & Africa), CCCC & CRBC Consortium was named the reserved bidder.

The PPP agreement includes a 40-year concession for the operator to run and maintain the bridge in order to recoup its investment.

China’s Real Estate Crisis

China’s real estate sector is in distress, with property prices on a downward spiral for the past four years. The sector, a key contributor to China’s GDP, has suffered a major downturn, leading to reduced revenues from land sales, higher costs from stimulus measures, and slowing economic growth. This has caused financial instability and strained local government finances.

The crisis has also affected the global economy — weakening trading markets, raising risks for foreign investors, and stressing the international monetary system. To address the problem, the Chinese government has introduced measures such as re-lending to commercial banks, lowering down-payment thresholds, reducing mortgage rates, and loosening qualification criteria for first-time buyers.

A PPP expert and Chairman of Altra Capital, John Davie, said the real estate crisis is dampening China’s appetite for investment risks overseas.

He noted that the Fourth Mainland Bridge project carries significant risks and that China’s domestic economic challenges are influencing its decisions abroad.

READ ALSO:

“China’s domestic demand remains weak due to a struggling property market and low consumer confidence which is putting strains on its willingness to take risks overseas, and the Fourth Mainland Bridge PPP does have huge risks attached,” Davie told THE WHISTLER.

“With China’s real estate sector trapped in a four-year crisis of oversupply and developer bankruptcies, local governments facing a mountain of debt, and consumers tightening their belts as unemployment rises, the government’s reliance on industrial investment amid the downturn is coming home to roost.”

Need For A Sovereign Guarantee

Davie explained that the Fourth Mainland Bridge project carries a high-risk profile and therefore requires a sovereign guarantee for execution.

He said that because the project has a long concession period, its financial returns are uncertain and not significantly better than its risks.

“The project is a very expensive piece of infrastructure with a concession period of 40 years, which suggests that it is not a clear winner financially. Many bridge PPPs are for 20 – 25 years so 40 years means the income is not as secure as it should be,” he said.

Davie noted that sovereign guarantees are often needed in Nigerian PPPs to attract private investment by mitigating risks that private investors cannot bear alone.

“Among these is the real issue of currency fluctuations on large long term projects which will require international finance; in this case Chinese investment – estimated to cost around $2.5bn which is unprecedented at this scale for a sub-national entity in Nigeria and potentially all of Africa,” he said.

It remains unclear what type of sovereign guarantee the Chinese are requesting for the Fourth Mainland Bridge. However, large PPP projects are typically financed through a Project Finance model.

A PPP expert, Dr Chukwuma Katchy, explained that in Project Finance, there is no collateral — if the project fails, the lenders lose their money. Therefore, lenders usually demand performance guarantees such as Demand Risk and MAGA (Material Adverse Government Action) guarantees.

He described a guarantee as an explicit additional layer of protection ensuring that certain obligations in the PPP contract will be honoured by the government or that damages will be paid.

“In reality, nobody can accurately predict the future, and so it is practically impossible for any reputable lender to finance a project without any form of guarantee, such as a performance guarantee,” Chukwuma told THE WHISTLER.

“Demand Risk guarantee simply requests the government to pay the difference between the estimated demand and actual demand if the actual demand falls below the estimated demand.”

He cited the Sydney Cross City Tunnel in Australia — a PPP project commissioned in 2005 — which had an estimated demand of 90,000 cars per day but recorded only 45,000, leading to bankruptcy within two years.

READ ALSO:

Chukwuma stressed that while sovereign guarantees cover all risks, they are not commonly used in PPPs except in fragile or conflict-affected states.

“Lenders will always require a Demand Risk guarantee for green field projects such as the Lagos Fourth Mainland bridge since a greenfield project is highly unpredictable. Lagos State Government should arrange with the Federal Government to provide a Demand Risk and a MAGA Risk Guarantees,” he added.

Bridge Background

The Fourth Mainland Bridge is a 37-kilometre structure with a design speed of 140 km/h. It will span from Abraham Adesanya in Ajah to the northwest, connecting to the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway through Owutu/Isawo in Ikorodu.

Proposed in 2006, the project is estimated to cost about $2.5bn. Upon completion, it is expected to be the longest bridge in Africa, featuring three toll plazas, nine interchanges, and a 4.5-kilometre lagoon crossing.

In May 2016, former Governor Akinwunmi Ambode signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with a consortium of firms and finance houses, including the Africa Finance Corporation (AFC), Access Bank, Julius Berger Nigeria Plc, Nigerian Westminster Dredging and Marine, J.P. Morgan, Hi-Tech Construction Limited, Eldorado Nigeria Limited, and Visible Asset Limited.

However, in May 2017, the government announced the cancellation of the deal, citing delays by the consortium in commencing the project.

Nigeria’s Debt To China

China is Nigeria’s largest bilateral creditor. According to data from the Debt Management Office (DMO) for Q1 2025, Nigeria owes China $5.16bn of its $6bn bilateral debt.

As of December 2024, the figure stood at about $5.3bn. France is Nigeria’s second-largest bilateral creditor, with $609m in loans.

Nigeria has obtained at least 17 Chinese loans for various capital projects and will continue servicing them until around 2038 — the maturity date for some of the loans.

In June 2020, the DMO reported that Nigeria’s borrowing from China stood at $3.121bn as of March 31, 2020, meaning the debt has risen by close to $2bn in five years.

PPP Challenges In Lagos

Past PPPs in Lagos have faced significant hurdles. A key example is the Lekki-Epe Expressway PPP, awarded in 2003. Although construction began in 2006, financial closure was not reached until two years later — a delay experts have described as a major flaw.

The project also faced strong public opposition to toll fees, as well as financial and regulatory challenges with the concession agreement. Consequently, the Lagos State Government eventually bought back the concession from the Lekki Concession Company (LCC).

This experience may explain China’s insistence on sovereign guarantees. Given the high-risk profile of the Fourth Mainland Bridge, the Federal Government is unlikely to provide such a guarantee at this time.

A Managing Consultant at James Daniel Consulting, Emeka Ibe, told THE WHISTLER that a sovereign guarantee is standard practice for a project of this magnitude.

He explained that since Lagos is a subnational entity, the Federal Government would need to provide a guarantee for the state.

“Lagos State Government is not Sovereign but a state of the Sovereign Nigeria, LASG government doesn’t have a central bank and all international payments must pass through CBN,” Ibe said.

“The request for a sovereign guarantee is a standard for international financiers in this type of project. This means that the Federal Government of Nigeria (Federal Ministry of Finance/ Debt Management Office will have to guarantee the Lagos State Government.”

Why China is reluctant to fund Lagos’ fourth mainland bridge

metro

Gunmen Abduct Five from Edo Health Centre, Demand ₦100 Million Ransom

Published

on

Edo State police spokesperson, ASP Eno Ikoedem
Edo State police spokesperson, ASP Eno Ikoedem

Gunmen Abduct Five from Edo Health Centre, Demand ₦100 Million Ransom

A kidnapping incident in Akoko‑Edo Local Government Area, Edo State, has left residents alarmed after five people were abducted from the Makeke Health Centre. The kidnappers have reportedly contacted families, demanding a ₦100 million ransom for the release of two of the victims.

The abductions occurred on February 8, 2026, targeting individuals seeking and providing medical services. The confirmed victims include Mrs. Gladys Okomayin, a nurse at the health centre; Miss Tope Oriloye, a female secondary school student; and Mr. Samuel Ilesanmi, who had brought his son for treatment. The names of the two other victims have not yet been released.

Eyewitnesses reported that the nurse was later abandoned in the bush as she could not keep pace with the kidnappers during their retreat. Following the incident, local hunters and vigilantes mobilised to comb the forests for the abducted individuals, but efforts to locate them were unsuccessful.

READ ALSO:

The kidnappers have demanded ₦100 million for the release of Miss Oriloye and Mr. Ilesanmi, heightening fears over a rising spate of kidnappings in Edo State and surrounding regions.

Mr. Omowumi Bode Ekundayo, National Coordinator of the Movement for the Advancement of Akoko Edo People, warned that the security situation is deteriorating, stressing that the area has become a gateway for criminal activities from neighboring states. He called on security agencies and state authorities to take urgent action to prevent further tragedies.

The Edo State Police Command, through Public Relations Officer Eno Ikoedem, confirmed the kidnappings and stated that investigations and rescue operations are ongoing. Authorities are working to ensure the safe return of the victims and apprehend those responsible.

This incident adds to Edo State’s growing security challenges, as communities continue to grapple with abductions and ransom demands across rural and semi-urban areas. Residents and local leaders have urged stronger police presence and rapid intervention strategies to tackle the kidnapping menace.

Gunmen Abduct Five from Edo Health Centre, Demand ₦100 Million Ransom

Continue Reading

metro

Ex-Acting AGF Nwabuoku Admits Diverting N868.4 Million to Private Firms

Published

on

Chukwunyere Anamekwe Nwabuoku

Ex-Acting AGF Nwabuoku Admits Diverting N868.4 Million to Private Firms

Chukwunyere Anamekwe Nwabuoku, the former acting Accountant-General of the Federation, has admitted in the Federal High Court in Abuja to authorising the transfer of N868.4 million in public funds from the Ministry of Defence to four private companies. The confession, made during cross-examination on Tuesday, marks a dramatic turn in the ongoing money laundering trial against the former senior public finance official.

The court, presided over by Justice James Omotosho, heard that the funds were transferred to Temeeo Synergy Concept Limited, Turge Global Investment Limited, Laptev Bridge Limited, and Arafura Transnational Afro Limited. Nwabuoku described the transactions in a written statement to the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) as for “classified security purposes.” However, this contradicted his earlier testimony in court, where he denied any links to the companies.

READ ALSO:

During cross-examination by prosecution counsel Ekele Iheanacho, SAN, Nwabuoku was confronted with his ICPC statement dated February 2, 2025, in which he admitted authorising the payments while serving as the Director of Finance at the Defence Ministry. The prosecution argued that there was no evidence that the funds were used for lawful security purposes, insisting that the transactions lacked proper documentation or justification.

Nwabuoku also addressed questions regarding his personal residence, claiming he purchased the property with legitimate earnings. However, he acknowledged a N64 million cheque issued by Mdavi Limited to City Gate Homes for the acquisition of the house, raising further questions about the source of funds.

He faces nine counts of money laundering linked to the N868,465,000, with the EFCC prosecuting the case. Earlier, the court dismissed his no-case submission, ruling that sufficient evidence existed for him to open his defence. The trial has highlighted alleged gaps in public finance management and accountability, particularly in senior government offices.

The case has been adjourned to February 27, 2026, for the adoption of written addresses by counsel, as the court continues to weigh evidence in one of Nigeria’s most high-profile anti-corruption trials.

The proceedings have attracted significant attention, reflecting growing public demand for transparency and the recovery of misappropriated public funds. Nwabuoku’s admission is expected to play a key role in the prosecution’s case and could influence how accountability measures are enforced in the management of federal resources.

Ex-Acting AGF Nwabuoku Admits Diverting N868.4 Million to Private Firms

Continue Reading

metro

Deji Adeyanju Mocks El-Rufai Over Alleged Arrest Plot

Published

on

Human rights lawyer Deji Adeyanju
Human rights lawyer Deji Adeyanju

Deji Adeyanju Mocks El-Rufai Over Alleged Arrest Plot

Human rights lawyer Deji Adeyanju has mocked former Kaduna State governor Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai following the latter’s claim that the Federal Government is planning to arrest and detain him upon his return to Nigeria.

El-Rufai had raised the alarm in a two-page document titled “Confidential Briefing Memo”, dated February 10, 2026, in which he expressed concerns about what he described as an anticipated politically motivated detention. The memo, reportedly sighted by BusinessDay, outlined alleged sustained pressure from security and anti-corruption agencies after his fallout with the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and his withdrawal from participating in President Bola Tinubu’s administration.

In the memo, the former governor said that since formally declining to serve in the Tinubu administration in August 2023 and subsequently resigning from the APC, he and his associates have faced repeated investigations.

“Since formally withdrawing my earlier acceptance to serve in the Tinubu administration in August 2023 and subsequently resigning from the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), my close allies and I have been subjected to repeated investigations by security and anti-corruption agencies,” he stated.

El-Rufai, who is reportedly outside the country, further alleged that several former officials who served in his administration, as well as business associates linked to him, have been unlawfully detained without charge for extended periods.

READ ALSO:

“Officials who served in my administration and business persons alleged to be associated with me have been unlawfully detained without charge for extended periods, including my Chief of Staff (50 days), a Senior Adviser (28 days), a commissioner (24 days), and a CEO (over 70 days and still detained). They are then arraigned on phantom charges, with judges influenced to deny bail or impose stringent conditions,” he claimed.

The former governor also recalled what he described as a similar attempt to prosecute him during the administrations of late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua and former President Goodluck Jonathan. According to him, efforts by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) between 2010 and 2013 failed after he was discharged and acquitted of an alleged abuse of office charge relating to land approvals while serving as Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.

“Despite years of intense, multi-agency investigation, no credible evidence has been presented against me, and no charges have been filed,” El-Rufai added.

On the alleged new plan to arrest him, he said he had received credible information indicating the certainty of detention upon his imminent return to Nigeria. He described the move as inconsistent with constitutional safeguards and Nigeria’s international obligations, while also alleging selective prosecution of opposition figures and sponsored media attacks aimed at damaging his reputation.

However, reacting via social media, Deji Adeyanju dismissed El-Rufai’s claims and accused him of hypocrisy, referencing his record while serving as Kaduna State governor.

“El-Rufai said they are planning to arrest him soon. El-Rufai arrested everyone who criticized him in Kaduna,” Adeyanju wrote.

He cited the case of Abubakar Idris, popularly known as Dadiyata, a government critic who was abducted in 2019 and has not been found since.

“His critic Dadiyata who was abducted in front of his wife and daughter disappeared till today without trace. The oppressors of yesterday are now comrades,” Adeyanju added.

As of the time of filing this report, there has been no official response from the Federal Government, the Presidency, or relevant security agencies regarding El-Rufai’s allegations of an impending arrest.

The development marks another chapter in the ongoing political tensions involving the former governor, who has recently been vocal about his disagreements with the current administration and internal dynamics within the APC.

Deji Adeyanju Mocks El-Rufai Over Alleged Arrest Plot

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending