2027: Tinubu’ll ‘eat Obi like biscuits’ without coalition — Okonkwo - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

2027: Tinubu’ll ‘eat Obi like biscuits’ without coalition — Okonkwo

Published

on

2027: Tinubu’ll ‘eat Obi like biscuits’ without coalition — Okonkwo
Kenneth Okonkwo and Peter Obi

2027: Tinubu’ll ‘eat Obi like biscuits’ without coalition — Okonkwo

Spokesperson for the Atiku Abubakar presidential campaign, Kenneth Okonkwo, has warned that President Bola Tinubu could defeat former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi in the 2027 presidential election if the opposition fails to unite behind a common platform and candidate.

Okonkwo said an opposition coalition remains the most realistic route to defeating Tinubu, arguing that individual opposition candidates would struggle to overcome the political strength of the incumbent if they contest the election separately.

He made the remarks during an interview with Ibeju Upgrade Media, while reacting to the emerging political alignments ahead of the 2027 election and the possibility of Obi challenging Tinubu.

Okonkwo was particularly dismissive of Obi’s chances of defeating Tinubu without a wider opposition alliance, including the possibility of Obi contesting alongside former Kano State Governor Rabiu Kwankwaso.

“Coalition is the only way out,” Okonkwo said, stressing the need for opposition parties and political actors to consolidate their support instead of entering the presidential contest separately.

He argued that a divided opposition could split the votes of Nigerians seeking an alternative to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and consequently give Tinubu an advantage at the polls.

Okonkwo was emphatic in his assessment of an Obi-Tinubu contest without a broader coalition.

“So, if Peter Obi goes against Tinubu alone, Tinubu will eat him like biscuits,” he said.

The former Labour Party chieftain also questioned whether Obi could secure sufficient support in northern Nigeria, particularly in Kano State, to mount a serious challenge against Tinubu without the backing of other major opposition blocs.

READ ALSO:

“Will Kano people accept Peter Obi? In 2023, when we had the opportunity, they did not accept him. In 2027, they will not accept him,” Okonkwo said.

His criticism also extended to Kwankwaso, whose political influence in Kano and the wider North-West has made him an important figure in discussions about opposition strategy ahead of 2027.

Kwankwaso was a major contender in the 2023 presidential election and has maintained a strong political base in Kano. His potential partnership with Obi has therefore attracted considerable attention among opposition supporters and political observers.

Okonkwo, however, dismissed the suggestion that Kwankwaso would significantly strengthen an Obi-led ticket.

“Kwankwaso has nothing to contribute to the ticket. Even in Kano, Kwankwaso has lost,” he said.

The comments come amid renewed efforts to construct a united opposition coalition capable of challenging the APC and Tinubu in the 2027 presidential election.

The debate over opposition unity has become one of the defining issues in Nigeria’s political landscape as major opposition politicians pursue different political strategies ahead of the election.

The G100 Opposition Coalition, led by former APC chieftain Salihu Lukman, has been pushing for opposition parties and political actors to work together and produce a common candidate capable of challenging the ruling party.

The coalition initiative is built around the argument that the opposition could improve its chances of defeating Tinubu by pooling its political structures, regional support bases and voters behind a single presidential candidate.

However, attempts to achieve such unity have faced significant challenges.

The major obstacle has been the presidential ambitions of leading opposition figures, including Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi, as well as disagreements over which political platform should provide the structure for a possible coalition.

Atiku is operating under the African Democratic Congress (ADC), while Obi has emerged as the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC).

Kwankwaso is expected to serve as Obi’s running mate on the NDC ticket, creating a political arrangement that has further complicated the search for a single opposition candidate.

The development has effectively created competing opposition camps ahead of the 2027 election, with Atiku and Obi pursuing separate presidential platforms while coalition advocates continue efforts to bring the different blocs together.

The current situation has revived memories of the 2023 presidential election, when the opposition vote was divided among several major candidates.

Tinubu won the 2023 election with 8,794,726 votes, while Atiku received 6,984,520 votes and Obi polled 6,101,533 votes. Kwankwaso also secured more than one million votes.

READ ALSO:

The figures have frequently been used by advocates of opposition unity to argue that a united opposition could pose a stronger challenge to the APC.

However, the combined votes of opposition candidates cannot automatically be treated as a prediction of what would happen if they contested the next election on a single ticket.

Voting patterns can change significantly between elections, while factors such as geographical distribution, voter turnout, party structures, campaign organisation and candidate popularity can determine the outcome.

Nigeria’s presidential election also requires a candidate to secure the highest number of votes while meeting the constitutional requirement for a spread of support across the states.

Nevertheless, the 2023 result remains a major reference point in the debate over whether the opposition should unite behind one candidate.

Obi attracted significant support in parts of southern Nigeria and among younger and urban voters, while Atiku maintained considerable support across several northern states.

Kwankwaso, meanwhile, demonstrated substantial strength in Kano and parts of the North-West.

Supporters of an opposition coalition believe combining these different voter bases could create a formidable national political force.

But the difficulty lies in determining which candidate would lead such an alliance and how the different political interests would be accommodated.

The G100 initiative has attempted to address this problem by encouraging opposition politicians to negotiate rather than allowing individual presidential ambitions to derail the possibility of a common front.

The process, however, remains complicated by the fact that Atiku and Obi already have established political structures and presidential tickets.

The ADC has also maintained that Atiku has the capacity to defeat Tinubu, with or without a broader coalition, although the party has expressed support for cooperation among opposition forces.

This position differs from the argument advanced by Okonkwo, who insists that the opposition’s best chance lies in presenting a united front.

His comments are particularly notable because of his political history with Obi.

Okonkwo was previously associated with Obi during his Labour Party presidential campaign but later joined Atiku’s political camp and became a spokesperson for the former vice-president’s presidential campaign.

His latest remarks therefore represent a significant criticism of his former political ally as the 2027 contest begins to take shape.

Okonkwo has also previously questioned Obi’s capacity to lead Nigeria and tackle the country’s economic and developmental challenges.

His latest intervention places the issue of opposition unity at the centre of his argument, rather than focusing solely on the individual strengths of the presidential contenders.

The political calculations surrounding the 2027 election have become increasingly complicated as the major opposition camps attempt to determine whether they can work together or must compete separately.

For the APC and Tinubu, a divided opposition could potentially make the presidential contest less difficult by preventing a single challenger from consolidating votes from different regions and political constituencies.

For opposition parties, the challenge is to determine whether their combined strength would be greater under a single candidate than under separate presidential campaigns.

The question is particularly important for Obi and Atiku, whose supporters have continued to debate which of the two politicians has the stronger national appeal and greater capacity to challenge Tinubu.

The emergence of the Obi-Kwankwaso ticket has added another layer to that debate.

While supporters believe the combination could strengthen Obi’s reach into northern Nigeria, critics such as Okonkwo argue that it would not be enough to defeat the incumbent without a broader alliance.

The G100 coalition is therefore faced with the difficult task of persuading the different opposition camps to put aside competing presidential ambitions and agree on a strategy that can command nationwide support.

Whether that happens before the 2027 election remains uncertain.

For now, Atiku and Obi remain on separate political platforms, while Tinubu continues to prepare for his re-election campaign.

Okonkwo’s “eat Obi like biscuits” remark has added a colourful dimension to the increasingly intense political debate, but beneath the phrase lies a much bigger question confronting Nigeria’s opposition: whether its leading political forces can unite behind one candidate or risk dividing their support in another presidential contest.

As political negotiations continue, the eventual structure of the opposition and the choice of presidential candidates could play a major role in determining the shape of the 2027 presidential election.

2027: Tinubu’ll ‘eat Obi like biscuits’ without coalition — Okonkwo

Loading

Politics

Buhari Feared Tinubu Presidency, Resisted Pressure to Back Him – Baba-Ahmed Claims

Published

on

Buhari Feared Tinubu Presidency, Resisted Pressure to Back Him – Baba-Ahmed Claims
National Chairman of the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP), Hakeem Baba-Ahmed

Buhari Feared Tinubu Presidency, Resisted Pressure to Back Him – Baba-Ahmed Claims

The National Chairman of the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP), Hakeem Baba-Ahmed, has claimed that former President Muhammadu Buhari had reservations about President Bola Ahmed Tinubu succeeding him in 2023, describing the current President as “bad news” for Nigeria.

Baba-Ahmed made the allegation at a summit organised by the Northern Elders Forum (NEF), where he criticised Tinubu’s administration and questioned the President’s handling of the country’s economic and political challenges.

According to him, Buhari resisted pressure from some political associates who wanted Tinubu to emerge as his successor after the 2023 general election.

“Even Buhari saw Tinubu as bad news for this country. In fairness to him, he is not around him. Buhari resisted some people who insisted it had to be Tinubu,” Baba-Ahmed said.

He did not identify the individuals who allegedly pressured Buhari or provide further details of the former President’s reported reservations about Tinubu’s candidacy.

Baba-Ahmed also revisited Tinubu’s declaration of “Emilokan”, a Yoruba expression meaning “it is my turn”, during the build-up to the 2023 presidential election, arguing that Nigerians should have examined the statement more critically.

“Nigerians ought to have known there was something wrong the day Tinubu said ‘It’s my turn’. Maybe we missed it,” he said.

Questioning the purpose behind the declaration, Baba-Ahmed argued that the presidency of a country with more than 200 million people should be about public service rather than the fulfilment of an individual’s political ambition.

The PRP chairman further accused the Tinubu administration of worsening the country’s difficulties, citing economic hardship and what he described as failures across key areas of governance.

READ ALSO:

He argued that the President should not prioritise his ambition for a second term over the welfare of Nigerians, insisting that the country needed a change in direction.

Baba-Ahmed also expressed confidence that Nigeria would overcome its current challenges, describing its people as resilient despite the economic and political difficulties confronting the nation.

“We are very resilient people. We have seen crises bigger than this, and we survived it. We survived this one, and we will survive this one,” he said.

On the 2027 general election, Baba-Ahmed disclosed that opposition parties were working towards a coalition to challenge Tinubu, adding that the alliance would seek to unite political interests behind a single candidate.

He urged Nigerians opposed to the President’s re-election bid to support whoever emerges as the coalition’s candidate.

Baba-Ahmed also called on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to ensure that the 2027 elections are credible and reflect the wishes of voters.

Tinubu succeeded Buhari on May 29, 2023, after winning the presidential election on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC). His administration has introduced major economic reforms, including the removal of petrol subsidies and changes to the foreign exchange system, which have generated sustained public debate over their impact on households and businesses.

Baba-Ahmed’s claim about Buhari’s alleged opposition to Tinubu’s emergence has not been independently established in the account of the summit. His remarks come amid growing political manoeuvring ahead of the 2027 elections and renewed criticism of the President’s performance by opposition figures.

Buhari Feared Tinubu Presidency, Resisted Pressure to Back Him – Baba-Ahmed Claims

 

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: Shehu Sani Breaks Silence on Claims Kwankwaso Is Working for Tinubu

Published

on

2027: Shehu Sani Breaks Silence on Claims Kwankwaso Is Working for Tinubu

2027: Shehu Sani Breaks Silence on Claims Kwankwaso Is Working for Tinubu

Former Kaduna Central senator Shehu Sani has defended Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso against allegations that the former Kano State governor is working to advance President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s re-election bid, blaming supporters of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) for what he described as a smear campaign following Kwankwaso’s political split with Peter Obi.

Sani made the remarks in a post on his verified X account while reacting to accusations by the ADC Presidential Campaign Council that Kwankwaso was undermining opposition efforts ahead of the 2027 presidential election.

“The ADC guys are still bitter about the Peter and Kwankwaso divorce, hence the smear that they are working for the ruling party or the President,” Sani wrote.

The former lawmaker argued that Obi and Kwankwaso were established politicians with independent political identities and should be allowed to make their own decisions about political alliances without facing hostility from former allies.

According to him, political figures should have the freedom to associate with political parties and coalitions of their choice or withdraw from them without being accused of working against the interests of the opposition.

“No consideration to the fact that they are all accomplished politicians with their own independent track records, and have the right to associate and disassociate,” he added.

READ ALSO:

Sani further criticised political groups that, in his view, attempt to control their members or punish them for choosing a different political direction.

“This is the price they will continue to pay for refusing to be supplementary, and disposable cargoes in someone’s container,” he stated.

He added: “Political parties shouldn’t be cultish groups where one can’t pull out in peace.”

The comments came after the ADC Presidential Campaign Council accused Kwankwaso, who is now the running mate to Obi under the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), of weakening the opposition through his criticism of former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar.

Kwankwaso had called on Atiku, the ADC’s presidential candidate, to step aside for Obi, prompting a strong reaction from the ADC campaign council.

In a statement, the council’s Director of Media and Publicity, Kola Ologbondiyan, described Kwankwaso’s intervention as reckless and self-serving, alleging that it could deepen divisions among opposition politicians and benefit Tinubu and the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

Ologbondiyan argued that opposition figures should concentrate on challenging the Tinubu administration rather than attacking one another or attempting to influence the choice of presidential candidates in rival parties.

The ADC campaign council also questioned Kwankwaso’s political calculations, alleging that his actions were driven by personal ambition and future political negotiations rather than a genuine effort to strengthen the opposition.

However, Sani’s response challenged the suggestion that Kwankwaso’s departure from the ADC-led opposition arrangement amounted to support for Tinubu. He maintained that political disagreements and changes in alliances should not automatically be interpreted as evidence of collaboration with the ruling party.

The disagreement reflects the growing tensions among opposition politicians as parties and political leaders position themselves for the 2027 elections.

Obi and Kwankwaso’s move to the NDC followed their departure from the ADC-led opposition coalition, which had sought to bring prominent political figures together behind a common platform to challenge Tinubu.

Their exit has complicated efforts to maintain a united opposition front, with competing presidential ambitions and disagreements over candidate selection continuing to shape political discussions.

For now, the allegations that Kwankwaso is advancing Tinubu’s interests remain a claim by the ADC campaign council, while Sani has publicly rejected that interpretation. Neither the accusation nor Sani’s response, on its own, establishes that Kwankwaso is secretly working with the President.

The exchange underscores the widening political differences among opposition figures as the race towards 2027 gathers momentum.

2027: Shehu Sani Breaks Silence on Claims Kwankwaso Is Working for Tinubu

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: Kwankwaso Signals Fuel Subsidy Comeback as NDC Vows to Crash Petrol Prices

Published

on

2027: Kwankwaso Signals Fuel Subsidy Comeback as NDC Vows to Crash Petrol Prices
Former Kano State governor and leader of the Kwankwasiyya Movement, Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso
2027: Kwankwaso Signals Fuel Subsidy Comeback as NDC Vows to Crash Petrol Prices

The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has signalled its willingness to consider restoring petrol subsidy if it wins the 2027 general election, with its vice-presidential candidate, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, promising to explore all necessary measures to reduce fuel prices and ease the economic hardship facing Nigerians.

Kwankwaso made the declaration during an interview on Channels Television’s Politics Today on Thursday, October 15, saying the party’s leadership was united on the need to make energy more affordable.

The former Kano State governor said he, the NDC presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and the party’s leader, Seriake Dickson, had aligned their positions on addressing the high cost of energy in the country.

According to Kwankwaso, the party would consider whatever measures were necessary to bring down petrol prices, including a possible return to fuel subsidy.

He argued that the cost of petrol had become a major burden on households and businesses, contributing to higher transportation fares, rising food prices and increased operating costs for companies.

The NDC candidate said an incoming government would need to examine available policy options to reduce the pressure on Nigerians, particularly low-income earners and small businesses struggling with the rising cost of living.

READ ALSO:

Kwankwaso also identified corruption and irregularities in the petroleum industry as issues that must be addressed to ensure Nigerians benefit from reforms in the sector.

He suggested that reducing waste and tackling abuses could help improve the management of public resources and support efforts to make petroleum products more affordable.

The comments reopen the debate over fuel subsidy removal, one of the most consequential economic decisions taken by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who announced the end of the policy during his inauguration on May 29, 2023.

The removal led to a sharp increase in petrol prices, with the effects spreading across transportation, food distribution, manufacturing and other sectors of the economy.

The Tinubu administration has defended the decision as part of broader economic reforms intended to reduce the government’s subsidy burden and redirect public funds towards other priorities. However, the resulting increase in living costs has remained a major concern for many Nigerians.

Kwankwaso’s statement suggests that the NDC would be prepared to revisit the policy if elected in 2027. However, the party has yet to publish a comprehensive framework explaining how a possible subsidy scheme would operate, how much it would cost or how the government would fund it without creating additional pressure on public finances.

Questions also remain about the proposed safeguards against corruption, the method of determining eligible beneficiaries and whether any intervention would involve a blanket subsidy or a more targeted arrangement.

The NDC’s position is expected to feature in the wider debate over economic policy ahead of the 2027 presidential election, as political parties outline their plans for addressing high petrol prices, inflation and the cost-of-living crisis.

For Nigerians facing elevated transportation and household expenses, the central issue will be whether the party can translate its promise of cheaper petrol into a practical, transparent and financially sustainable policy.

 

2027: Kwankwaso Signals Fuel Subsidy Comeback as NDC Vows to Crash Petrol Prices

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending