Opinion
Trump’s threats to Nigeria are reckless, infantilising and dangerous, by Halimah Nuhu Sanda
Trump’s threats to Nigeria are reckless, infantilising and dangerous, by Halimah Nuhu Sanda
In the past few days, the world has once again witnessed the recklessness that has come to define President Donald Trump’s approach to foreign relations. On October 31, 2025, his administration placed Nigeria on the United States’ list of “Countries of Particular Concern,” alleging severe violations of religious freedom. Barely 24 hours later, he went further, threatening to cut all aid and assistance to Nigeria and even hinted at possible military action if the Nigerian government failed to stop what he called “the killing of Christians.”
This sequence of events is disturbing not only for its tone but also for its ignorance of Nigeria’s complex social realities. It is one thing to express concern about human rights, but it is another to distort facts and issue threats to a sovereign country. Nigeria’s issues are not religious; they are social, economic, and structural. The violence that has afflicted parts of our nation affects Christians and Muslims alike. To isolate it as an anti-Christian campaign is not only false but dangerously simplistic.
The truth is there is no policy of persecution in Nigeria. Our Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. Nigerians of all faiths live, work, and worship together. In the North, there are Christians in every community. In the South, there are Muslims in every city. We intermarry, trade, and build together. To suggest that one group is being systematically targeted by the Nigerian state is a blatant misrepresentation of facts. It undermines the collective suffering of all Nigerians who have fallen victims to violence, regardless of their faith.
President Trump’s language was not just reckless; it was inflammatory. To threaten another country with military action and to speak of Nigeria in such contemptuous terms betrays a complete lack of diplomatic discipline. No responsible leader should speak like that about a partner nation. His words sounded less like the considered statement of a statesman and more like the outburst of an angry child who believes shouting will solve everything.
For many Nigerians, this latest episode is not surprising. Trump’s first term in office was marked by similar disregard for international norms. His administration imposed travel bans that included Nigeria, halted many cooperative development programmes, and disrupted the activities of USAID, the very agency through which the U.S. channels most of its humanitarian assistance. In January 2025, he again suspended several USAID operations under the guise of an aid review. So, when he now threatens to cut all aid to Nigeria, one must ask: which aid exactly is he referring to? If the programmes were already paused by his own order, then this threat is hollow, more political than practical.
READ ALSO:
- Police probe officer over alleged extortion, intimidation of Lagos couple
- U.S lawmakers push sanctions on Nigerian governors, others over ‘Christian genocide’ claims
- Cooking gas price sells at N1,200 per kg
It is important to recall that Nigeria’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Yusuf Maitama Tuggar, has been one of the few African diplomats who have spoken firmly and clearly about Nigeria’s right to make independent decisions. When he declared months ago that Nigeria would not accept deportees from the United States without due process, his words carried the weight of sovereignty. Many observers now believe that Trump’s recent hostility is partly a reaction to that boldness. Nigeria has refused to be bullied, and that seems to irritate a man who thrives on intimidation.
But Nigeria must not respond in anger. We must respond with maturity. The Nigerian government has rightly rejected the claim that our nation is intolerant of Christians. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Ambassador Tuggar have restated Nigeria’s commitment to religious freedom and to protecting all citizens, regardless of faith. The Foreign Ministry’s response was measured and diplomatic, reminding the world that Nigeria’s conflicts are rooted in terrorism, poverty, and competition for resources, not religion. That is the truth.
The real tragedy in all of this is that the U.S. president has chosen to exploit a complex humanitarian issue for political theatre. By framing Nigeria’s struggles in religious terms, he fuels division, encourages extremists, and undermines efforts toward peace. Violence in Nigeria has never respected religion. Boko Haram, ISWAP, and bandit groups have killed both Muslims and Christians. Villages have been attacked not because of what people believe but because of where they live or how vulnerable they are. To suggest that Nigeria’s government condones or promotes such acts is a grave insult to the thousands of Nigerian security personnel who have died fighting these same terrorists.
The tone of Trump’s statement also reeks of arrogance. To threaten a proud African nation with invasion in the twenty-first century is beyond comprehension. Nigeria is not a colony. It is a democratic nation with institutions, laws, and a vibrant civil society. It may have its challenges, but it has earned its place as Africa’s largest democracy and a regional leader in peacekeeping and mediation. For the leader of another country to talk about “going in guns blazing,” as Trump reportedly said, is not only undiplomatic but dangerously provocative.
READ ALSO:
- Otedola donates N4 Billion to Augustine University, awards N10 million to physically-challenged graduate
- NiMet forecasts dust haze, thunderstorms across Nigeria
- Community leader killed in Benue ambush amid rising insecurity
The United States has long presented itself as a friend of Nigeria, but friendship must be based on mutual respect. True partnership is built through dialogue, not threats. If the American government truly cares about Nigerian lives, then it should support initiatives that strengthen our economy, promote education, and improve security cooperation in ways that respect Nigeria’s sovereignty. Empty threats and public humiliation will achieve nothing but resentment.
This latest episode should serve as a reminder to Nigerians that our destiny cannot depend on foreign validation. We must define our narrative, own our struggles, and find our solutions. Outsiders will always interpret our story through the lens of their own interests. Today it is religious freedom; tomorrow it may be something else. The real question is: how long will we let others misrepresent who we are?
Nigeria is far from perfect, but we are not what Trump describes. We are a resilient people, diverse yet united by shared hopes. The world must understand that our challenges are not born of intolerance but of inequality, governance failures, and economic strain. Reducing them to religion is an insult to both Christians and Muslims who have worked together for peace and progress.
Donald Trump’s comments are beneath the dignity of his office. They do not reflect the spirit of cooperation that has defined U.S.–Nigeria relations for decades. His words were reckless, unfounded, and unbecoming of a leader who claims to value global stability. Nigeria will not be intimidated by bluster. We remain open to engagement, but we will not tolerate disrespect.
History will remember this moment not for his threats but for how Nigeria stood firm in the face of them. Ours is a nation that has weathered greater storms. This, too, will pass. And when it does, the world will remember that Nigeria did not bow, did not panic, and did not lose its composure. We met arrogance with dignity, provocation with restraint, and lies with truth. That is the Nigerian way.
Trump’s threats to Nigeria are reckless, infantilising and dangerous, by Halimah Nuhu Sanda
Opinion
Oshiomhole: Behold the 13th disciple of Christ
Oshiomhole: Behold the 13th disciple of Christ
Opinion
AFCON 2025: Flipping Content Creation From Coverage to Strategy
AFCON 2025: Flipping Content Creation From Coverage to Strategy
By Toluwalope Shodunke
The beautiful and enchanting butterfly called the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) emerged from its chrysalis in Khartoum, Sudan, under the presidency of Abdelaziz Abdallah Salem, an Egyptian, with three countries—Egypt, Sudan, and Ethiopia—participating, and Egypt emerging as the eventual winner.
The reason for this limited participation is not far-fetched. At the time, only nine African countries were independent. The remaining 45 countries that now make up CAF’s 54 member nations were either pushing Queen Elizabeth’s dogsled made unique with the Union Jack, making supplications at the Eiffel Tower, or knocking at the doors of the Palácio de Belém, the Quirinal Palace, and the Royal Palace of Brussels—seeking the mercies of their colonial masters who, without regard for cultures, sub-cultures, or primordial affinities, divided Africa among the colonial gods.
From then until now, CAF has had seven presidents, including Patrice Motsepe, who was elected as the seventh president in 2021. With more countries gaining independence and under various CAF leaderships, AFCON has undergone several reforms—transforming from a “backyard event” involving only three nations into competitions featuring 8, 16, and now 24 teams. It has evolved into a global spectacle consumed by millions worldwide.
Looking back, I can trace my personal connection to AFCON to table soccer, which I played alone on concrete in our balcony at Olafimihan Street—between Mushin and Ilasamaja—adjacent to Alafia Oluwa Primary School, close to Alfa Nda and Akanro Street, all in Lagos State.
Zygmunt Bauman, the Polish-British sociologist who developed the concept of “liquid modernity,” argues that the world is in constant flux rather than static, among other themes in his revelatory works.
For the benefit of Millennials (Generation Y) and Generation Z—who are accustomed to high-tech pads, iPhones, AI technologies, and chat boxes—table soccer is a replica of football played with bottle corks (often from carbonated drinks or beer) as players, cassette hubs as the ball, and “Bic” biro covers for engagement. The game can be played by two people, each controlling eleven players.
I, however, enjoyed playing alone in a secluded area, running my own commentary like the great Ernest Okonkwo, Yinka Craig, and Fabio Lanipekun, who are all late. At the time, I knew next to nothing about the Africa Cup of Nations. Yet, I named my cork players after Nigerian legends such as Segun Odegbami, Godwin Odiye, Aloysius Atuegbu, Tunji Banjo, Muda Lawal, Felix Owolabi, and Adokiye Amiesimaka, among others, as I must have taken to heart their names from commentary and utterances of my uncles resulting from sporadic and wild celebrations of Nigeria winning the Cup of Nations on home soil for the first time.
While my connection to AFCON remained somewhat ephemeral until Libya 1982, my AFCON anecdotes became deeply rooted in Abidjan 1984, where Cameroon defeated Nigeria 3–1. The name Théophile Abéga was etched into my youthful memory.
Even as I write this, I remember the silence that enveloped our compound after the final whistle.
It felt similar to how Ukrainians experienced the Battle of Mariupol against Russia—where resolute resistance eventually succumbed to overwhelming force.
The Indomitable Lions were better and superior in every aspect. The lion not only caged the Eagles, they cooked pepper soup with the Green Eagles.
In Maroc ’88, I again tasted defeat with the Green Eagles (now Super Eagles), coached by the German Manfred Höner. Players like Henry Nwosu, Stephen Keshi, Sunday Eboigbe, Bright Omolara, Rashidi Yekini, Austin Eguavoen, Peter Rufai, Folorunsho Okenla, Ademola Adeshina, Yisa Sofoluwe, and others featured prominently. A beautiful goal by Henry Nwosu—then a diminutive ACB Lagos player—was controversially disallowed.
This sparked outrage among Nigerians, many of whom believed the referee acted under the influence of Issa Hayatou, the Cameroonian who served as CAF president from 1988 to 2017.
This stroll down memory lane illustrates that controversy and allegations of biased officiating have long been part of AFCON’s history.
The 2025 Africa Cup of Nations in Morocco, held from December 21, 2025, to January 18, 2026, will be discussed for a long time by football historians, raconteurs, and aficionados—for both positive and negative reasons.
These include Morocco’s world-class facilities, the ravenous hunger of ball boys and players (superstars included) for the towels of opposing goalkeepers—popularly dubbed TowelGate—allegations of biased officiating, strained relations among Arab African nations (Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia, and Morocco), CAF President Patrice Motsepe’s curt “keep quiet” response to veteran journalist Osasu Obayiuwana regarding the proposed four-year AFCON cycle post-2028, and the “Oga Patapata” incident, where Senegalese players walked off the pitch after a legitimate goal was chalked off and a penalty awarded against them by DR Congo referee Jean-Jacques Ndala.
While these narratives dominated global discourse, another critical issue—less prominent but equally important—emerged within Nigeria’s media and content-creation landscape.
Following Nigeria’s qualification from the group stage, the Super Eagles were scheduled to face Mozambique in the Round of 16. Between January 1 and January 3, Coach Eric Chelle instituted closed-door training sessions, denying journalists and content creators access, with media interaction limited to pre-match press conferences.
According to Chelle, the knockout stage demanded “maximum concentration,” and privacy was necessary to protect players from distractions.
This decision sparked mixed reactions on social media.
Twitter user @QualityQuadry wrote:
“What Eric Chelle is doing to journalists is bad.
Journalists were subjected to a media parley under cold weather in an open field for the first time in Super Eagles history.
Journalists were beaten by rain because Chelle doesn’t want journalists around the camp.
Locking down training sessions for three days is unprofessional.
I wish him well against Mozambique.”
Another user, @PoojaMedia, stated:
“Again, Eric Chelle has closed the Super Eagles’ training today.
That means journalists in Morocco won’t have access to the team for three straight days ahead of the Round of 16.
This is serious and sad for journalists who spent millions to get content around the team.
We move.”
Conversely, @sportsdokitor wrote:
“I’m not Eric Chelle’s biggest supporter, but on this issue, I support him 110%.
There’s a time to speak and a time to train.
Let the boys focus on why they’re in Morocco—they’re not here for your content creation.”
From these three tweets, one can see accessibility being clothed in beautiful garments. Two of the tweets suggest that there is only one way to get to the zenith of Mount Kilimanjaro, when indeed there are many routes—if we think within the box, not outside the box as we’ve not exhausted the content inside the box.
In the past, when the economy was buoyant, media organisations sponsored reporters to cover the World Cup, Olympics, Commonwealth Games, and other international competitions.
Today, with financial pressures mounting, many journalists and content creators seek collaborations and sponsorships from corporations and tech startups to cover sporting events, who in turn get awareness, brand visibility, and other intangibles.
As Gary Vaynerchuk famously said, “Every company is a media company.” Yet most creators covering AFCON 2025 followed the same playbook.
At AFCON 2025, most Nigerian journalists and content creators pitched similar offerings: on-the-ground coverage, press conferences, team updates, behind-the-scenes footage, analysis, cuisine, fan interactions, and Moroccan cultural experiences.
If they were not interviewing Victor Osimhen, they were showcasing the stand-up comedy talents of Samuel Chukwueze and other forms of entertainment.
What was missing was differentiation. No clear Unique Selling Proposition (USP). The result was generic, repetitive content with little strategic distinction. Everyone appeared to be deploying the same “Jab, Jab, Jab, Hook” formula—throwing multiple jabs of access-driven content in the hope that one hook would land.
The lesson is simple: when everyone is jabbing the same way, the hook becomes predictable and loses its power.
As J. P. Clark wrote in the poem “The Casualties”, “We are all casualties,” casualties of sameness—content without differentiation. The audience consumes shallow content, sponsors lose return on investment, and creators return home bearing the “weight of paper” from disappointed benefactors.
On November 23, 1963, a shining light was dimmed in America when President John F. Kennedy was assassinated.
As with AFCON today, media organisations sent their best hands to cover the funeral, as the who’s who of the planet—and if possible, the stratosphere—would attend. Unconfirmed reports suggested that over 220 VVIPs were expected.
While every newspaper, radio, and television station covered the spectacle and grandeur of the event, one man, Jimmy Breslin, swam against the tide. He chose instead to interview Clifton Pollard, the foreman of gravediggers at Arlington National Cemetery—the man who dug John F. Kennedy’s grave.
This act of upended thinking differentiated Jimmy Breslin from the odds and sods, and he went on to win the Pulitzer Prize in 1986.
Until journalists and content creators stop following the motley and begin swimming against the tide, access will continue to be treated as king—when in reality, differentiation, aided by strategy, is king.
When every journalist and content creator is using Gary Vaynerchuk’s “Jab, Jab, Jab, Hook” template while covering major sporting events, thinkers among them must learn to replace one jab with a counterpunch—and a bit of head movement—to stay ahead of the herd.
Toluwalope Shodunke can be reached via tolushodunke@yahoo.com
Opinion
“Christian Genocidization” of the Kaiama massacre, By Farooq Kperogi
“Christian Genocidization” of the Kaiama massacre, By Farooq Kperogi
“Christian Genocidization” of the Kaiama massacre, By Farooq Kperogi
Kperogi is a renowned Nigerian columnist and United States-based professor of Journalism
-
metro21 hours agoIKEDC Sets Feb 20 Deadline for Customers to Submit Valid IDs or Face Disconnection
-
Education22 hours agoSupreme Court Affirms Muslim Students’ Right to Worship at Rivers State University
-
metro3 days agoFormer NAHCON Chief Explains Why He Stepped Down, Denies Conflicts
-
Business2 days agoDangote Refinery Slashes Petrol Price to ₦774, Ends PMS Bonus Window
-
Business1 day agoNaira Could Trade Below ₦1,000/$ With Dangote Refinery at Full Capacity — Otedola
-
metro2 days agoKwara, Katsina Bloodshed: TMC Condemns Attacks, Dismisses ‘Jihadist Preacher’ Claims
-
metro3 days agoGovernor Peter Mbah Orders Closure of Bet9ja Operations in Enugu
-
News2 days agoTrump Approves Deployment of 200 U.S. Soldiers to Support Nigeria’s Fight Against Terrorists


