Presidency, Makinde clash over UN probe into Oriire school abduction - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Presidency, Makinde clash over UN probe into Oriire school abduction

Published

on

ADC accuses Makinde administration of removing Adegoke, Atiku campaign billboard in Oyo
Governor of Oyo State, Engr. Seyi Makinde

Presidency, Makinde clash over UN probe into Oriire school abduction

The rescue of 39 pupils and seven teachers abducted from schools in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State has sparked a fresh political disagreement between the Presidency and Governor Seyi Makinde, following the governor’s call for an independent international investigation into the circumstances surrounding the kidnapping and the victims’ prolonged captivity.

The victims, who were abducted by suspected Ansaru terrorists on May 15, 2026, regained their freedom on July 10 after spending 56 days in captivity in remote parts of the Oyo National Forest. Their release followed a coordinated intelligence-led rescue operation involving multiple Nigerian security agencies.

Although Nigerians have welcomed the safe return of the victims, Governor Makinde has insisted that the rescue should not mark the end of the matter, arguing that the incident raises serious questions that deserve transparent answers.

In a statewide broadcast after receiving the rescued pupils and teachers, the governor announced plans to seek an independent investigation involving relevant United Nations agencies, international human rights organisations and other accountability bodies.

According to Makinde, the objective is not to undermine Nigeria’s security institutions but to establish the full truth behind the incident and restore public confidence in the country’s security architecture.

“The reunion of these children and teachers with their families does not mark the end of this painful chapter. It marks the beginning of another responsibility—our collective responsibility to establish the truth,” the governor said.

He maintained that because the responsibility for national security rests with the Federal Government under Nigeria’s Constitution, Nigerians deserve a comprehensive explanation of how dozens of schoolchildren and teachers were abducted, held for nearly two months and eventually rescued.

Makinde called for a transparent investigation into whether there were institutional failures, operational lapses, negligence or any form of collusion that may have contributed to the incident or prolonged the victims’ captivity.

READ ALSO:

 

He also announced plans to strengthen security across communities bordering the Old Oyo National Park, including tighter surveillance of access routes, improved intelligence gathering and stronger collaboration between local communities and security agencies.

However, the Presidency strongly rejected the governor’s proposal, describing it as unnecessary and politically motivated.

Reacting to Makinde’s comments, the Special Adviser to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, dismissed the governor’s position as baseless.

Speaking on the controversy, Onanuga questioned what the Federal Government would gain by allowing innocent schoolchildren and teachers to remain in captivity.

“What will any government or anybody profit from subjecting the children and teachers to such trauma for days?” he asked.

The presidential spokesman said it would take “a very bad mind” to suggest any conspiracy surrounding the rescue operation, adding that the successful mission should instead be celebrated as a major achievement by Nigeria’s security agencies.

“If somebody is reading any conspiracy into that, it is only somebody who has a very dark mind,” Onanuga stated.

The Presidency reiterated that the rescue resulted from weeks of painstaking intelligence gathering and close collaboration among the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA), the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC), the Nigerian Army, Nigeria Police Force, Department of State Services (DSS), Nigerian Air Force, Amotekun Corps, local hunters and other members of the Joint Interagency Task Force.

Security officials disclosed that investigators gradually dismantled the terrorists’ logistics network, monitored communication channels and cut off supply routes before successfully securing the victims’ release without a large-scale military assault that could have endangered their lives.

The operation, however, came at a heavy cost.

Among those who paid the supreme sacrifice was Lieutenant Felix Ademe Isaac, a Nigerian Army officer who was killed after his convoy struck an improvised explosive device during an earlier phase of the rescue mission.

The rescued victims have since narrated harrowing experiences in captivity, revealing that they survived mainly on cocoyam, noodles and water from a nearby stream, while children were beaten whenever they cried, male teachers were chained and blindfolded, and the group was repeatedly forced to embark on dangerous nighttime treks through thick forests whenever the kidnappers suspected security operatives were closing in.

Security analysts say the disagreement between the Oyo State Government and the Presidency reflects differing perspectives on accountability rather than the success of the rescue operation itself.

While some believe an independent inquiry could help identify security gaps, improve intelligence coordination and strengthen Nigeria’s response to future kidnapping incidents, others argue that existing constitutional institutions are capable of reviewing the operation without external involvement.

Political observers also note that the disagreement comes amid heightened political tensions ahead of the 2027 general elections, although both the Presidency and Governor Makinde have insisted their positions are driven by national interest rather than partisan considerations.

Meanwhile, the rescued pupils and teachers are receiving medical attention, trauma counselling and rehabilitation, while security agencies continue efforts to track down and prosecute all members of the terrorist network responsible for the abduction.

Presidency, Makinde clash over UN probe into Oriire school abduction

Loading

News

2027 Elections: INEC Reveals Why Pantami, Adebutu, Others Were Excluded

Published

on

2027 Elections: INEC Reveals Why Pantami, Adebutu, Others Were Excluded
Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Chairman Prof. Joash Ojo Amupitan

2027 Elections: INEC Reveals Why Pantami, Adebutu, Others Were Excluded

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has explained why some political parties and their governorship candidates were excluded from the final list for the 2027 elections, citing failure to comply with the statutory requirement to submit membership registers before conducting valid party primaries.

The commission said the decision followed a Supreme Court judgment delivered on September 24, 2026, which upheld the constitutionality of relevant provisions of the Electoral Act, 2026, requiring political parties to submit their membership registers within a prescribed period.

The explanation comes amid complaints from affected political parties and candidates following the publication of INEC’s final list of governorship candidates, which omitted several prominent opposition figures.

Among those affected are Isa Ali Pantami, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship candidate in Gombe State, and Ladi Adebutu, the party’s candidate in Ogun State.

Pantami’s name was missing despite his emergence from a court-ordered rerun of the PDP governorship primary in Gombe, while Adebutu and his running mate were also absent from the list.

In a statement issued on Tuesday, October 13, INEC National Commissioner and Chairman of its Information and Voter Education Committee, Mohammed Kudu Haruna, said the commission applied the Supreme Court’s decision when finalising the list.

The judgment arose from an appeal filed by INEC against an earlier Court of Appeal decision that had nullified Sections 77(5)–(7) of the Electoral Act, 2026.

The Supreme Court upheld the provisions, which require political parties to submit their membership registers as a prerequisite for valid party primaries.

READ ALSO:

It also upheld INEC’s timetable requiring parties to submit their registers between April 21 and May 10, 2026.

According to the commission, the apex court held that parties that failed to comply with the statutory requirements were ineligible to sponsor candidates for the elections.

INEC said it was consequently required to give effect to the judgment in accordance with Section 287(1) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, which requires compliance with decisions of superior courts.

The commission added that the final lists of presidential and National Assembly candidates had already been published on September 12, 2026, before the Supreme Court delivered its judgment.

The omissions have triggered reactions from affected political parties, with the PDP saying it was engaging INEC over the absence of its candidates in Gombe and Ogun states.

The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has also raised concerns over the omission of some of its governorship candidates, while other affected political groups have indicated their intention to pursue available remedies.

The development has heightened concerns among opposition parties as preparations continue for the February 6, 2027, governorship elections.

INEC, however, said political parties that believe their candidates were wrongly omitted from the final list have 14 days from the date of publication to notify the commission.

It fixed October 24, 2026, as the deadline for such notifications under Section 32(2) of the Electoral Act, 2026.

The commission reaffirmed its commitment to transparency, adherence to the rule of law and the credibility of the electoral process.

The next steps by affected parties will determine whether the omissions can be resolved through the commission’s notification procedure or other legal avenues available to them.

 

2027 Elections: INEC Reveals Why Pantami, Adebutu, Others Were Excluded

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Shell Exits Nigeria’s Gas Distribution Business, Sells Stake to Vaaris Energy

Published

on

Shell Exits Nigeria’s Gas Distribution Business, Sells Stake to Vaaris Energy

Shell Exits Nigeria’s Gas Distribution Business, Sells Stake to Vaaris Energy

Shell Petroleum B.V. has agreed to sell its entire interest in the Shell Nigeria Gas Group to indigenous energy company Vaaris Energy Limited, marking another major shift in the international oil giant’s business portfolio in Nigeria.

The agreement, announced on Tuesday, October 13, 2026, covers Shell’s domestic gas distribution business in the country. The financial terms of the transaction were not disclosed in the announcement.

The proposed sale will transfer Shell’s interest in the gas distribution group to Vaaris Energy, a Nigerian-owned company seeking to expand its presence in the country’s oil and gas industry.

The transaction represents another adjustment to Shell’s Nigerian operations as the company focuses on selected oil, gas and integrated energy projects.

Shell’s latest move follows its earlier exit from onshore oil production through the sale of its interest in the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited (SPDC) to the Renaissance consortium. That transaction was completed in March 2025 after receiving the necessary regulatory approvals.

However, the two transactions involve different parts of Shell’s Nigerian business. The earlier deal covered its onshore oil-producing subsidiary, while the latest agreement concerns its domestic gas distribution operations.

READ ALSO:

Following the SPDC sale, Shell retained other interests in Nigeria, including its deepwater oil and gas operations and its participation in Nigeria LNG Limited. The company also continued operating its domestic gas distribution business, which is now expected to come under Vaaris Energy’s ownership once the latest transaction is completed.

Shell said the proposed divestment aligns with its strategy of simplifying its global portfolio and concentrating investment on projects expected to deliver stronger returns.

Elohor Aiboni, Shell’s country chair in Nigeria, said the company would continue to focus on its strategic deepwater and integrated gas positions in the country.

For Vaaris Energy, the proposed acquisition offers an opportunity to strengthen its position in Nigeria’s natural gas market and expand its participation in the domestic energy value chain.

The company is a privately held Nigerian energy business with interests across the oil and gas sector. However, details of its plans for the acquired business, including any operational changes or investment commitments, were not disclosed in the announcement.

The financial value of the transaction and the precise timeline for completion were also not made public in the information available at the time of reporting.

The deal comes as Nigeria seeks to increase domestic gas utilisation, improve energy supply and attract investment into its gas infrastructure. Gas distribution plays an important role in connecting producers with industrial users and other customers that rely on natural gas for their operations.

The implications of the acquisition for Nigeria’s domestic gas market will depend on the completion of the transaction and how Vaaris Energy manages and develops the business under its ownership.

Shell’s agreement with Vaaris therefore marks another change in the ownership of a significant energy asset in Nigeria, while allowing the international company to maintain its focus on other strategic oil and gas interests in the country.

Shell Exits Nigeria’s Gas Distribution Business, Sells Stake to Vaaris Energy

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Delta Tragedy: Man Allegedly Kills Wife, Dies by Suicide After Land Dispute

Published

on

Delta Tragedy: Man Allegedly Kills Wife, Dies by Suicide After Land Dispute
Delta Tragedy: Man Allegedly Kills Wife, Dies by Suicide After Land Dispute

A domestic dispute allegedly involving the sale of landed property and accusations of infidelity has left a couple dead in Agbarho community, Ughelli North Local Government Area of Delta State, leaving their four children without either parent.

The incident reportedly occurred on Owiri Street in Agbarho, where the man allegedly attacked and killed his wife before later dying by suicide after ingesting a poisonous substance.

According to a report published by Vanguard on Tuesday, October 13, 2026, the tragedy followed a disagreement between the couple over landed property and alleged infidelity. However, the full circumstances surrounding the confrontation have not been independently established.

A source quoted in the report said the man was reportedly angered by allegations concerning his wife’s fidelity and the sale of his landed property. The precise sequence of events leading to the couple’s deaths remains unclear.

A neighbour reportedly said the couple had experienced repeated physical confrontations before the incident, suggesting that tensions within the household may have persisted for some time. However, details of the earlier clashes and whether the authorities had previously been alerted have not been confirmed.

READ ALSO:

The deceased man’s elder brother also reportedly expressed shock over the deaths, saying he was not fully aware of what had triggered the fatal confrontation. He confirmed that the couple had four children, with the eldest said to be about 21 years old, but declined to disclose their identities.

A senior police officer at the Agbarho Division reportedly confirmed the incident, saying officers evacuated the bodies to a morgue as investigations began. The officer also indicated that no formal complaint had been lodged by the families as of the time of the report.

Attempts to obtain further comments from the Delta State Police Command’s spokesperson, SP Bright Edafe, were reportedly unsuccessful before the report was published.

The deaths have left the couple’s four children facing the loss of both parents, adding to the devastating consequences of the incident. The circumstances surrounding the reported property dispute, the allegations of infidelity and the events immediately preceding the deaths remain subject to investigation.

The tragedy highlights the potentially devastating consequences of unresolved domestic conflict. Disagreements involving marital relationships, property ownership and land sales should be addressed through peaceful dialogue, appropriate support and lawful channels. Violence is never an acceptable way to resolve such disputes.

 

Delta Tragedy: Man Allegedly Kills Wife, Dies by Suicide After Land Dispute

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending