'Your Lords Are Being Kidnapped': VeryDarkMan Tells NBA Conference in Explosive Speech - Newstrends
Connect with us

metro

‘Your Lords Are Being Kidnapped’: VeryDarkMan Tells NBA Conference in Explosive Speech

Published

on

Social Media Influencer Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM)

‘Your Lords Are Being Kidnapped’: VeryDarkMan Tells NBA Conference in Explosive Speech

Social media influencer addresses insecurity at legal gathering, triggers sharp divide among Nigerians over elite institutions and public platforms.

The invitation of social media influencer Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), to the 2026 Annual General Conference of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, has ignited a fierce national debate, exposing deep divisions over who deserves a platform at Nigeria’s premier legal gathering. Otse appeared as a panellist on Tuesday, August 25, 2026, during a session focused on insecurity and the experiences of victims of violence, and was subsequently presented with a special award by the NBA—a recognition that has further polarised public opinion.

Addressing the controversy head-on, Otse explained that his invitation was not to lecture lawyers on legal matters but to share his firsthand experiences with insecurity across Nigeria. He told the gathering that there had been a lot of debate about why he was invited to the NBA conference, clarifying that he was not there to teach lawyers law but to share experience. He argued that insecurity had become a reality that even members of the legal profession could no longer ignore. Referring to the abduction of judges, the activist told the lawyers that this was not a topic of “may I, my lord” because their lords were being kidnapped. To substantiate his point, Otse cited the reported abduction of a judge travelling from Sokoto State, who he said was kidnapped in Kebbi on July 26 and spent about a week in captivity before regaining freedom.

During his session, Otse criticised what he described as inadequate media coverage of violent attacks. He stated that when the killings happened, the media had become lazy and did not really cover these killings and the results of these unknown gunmen. He told the conference that his perspective on insecurity came from direct exposure to the scenes of several attacks, describing witnessing the aftermath of a Sallah Day bombing in Borno State, alongside incidents linked to the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital and a post office. He recounted being the first respondent at Yelwata and also the first respondent when some women were killed some time ago, adding that he had seen blood and seen people burnt alive. On the June 13, 2025, attack on Yelwata in Guma Local Government Area of Benue State, which allegedly left more than 200 people dead and property worth millions destroyed, Otse claimed it was a retaliatory attack, stating that it was Fulani that attacked and that it was a retaliation because a Fulani boy was killed and these guys came back to attack. A prosecution witness in Federal High Court proceedings had previously testified that some disgruntled Fulani chiefs sponsored over 200 armed men to carry out the attack.

READ ALSO:

Otse also linked insecurity to political interests, alleging that stolen public funds are invested in cattle and that security officials profit from the ongoing crisis through increased funding. He accused police and security agencies of contributing to kidnapping through information allegedly obtained at checkpoints, citing the Abuja-Lokoja highway where numerous checkpoints have failed to prevent abductions. He alleged that everybody knows who is rich, who is poor, and everybody knows the people that belong to the middle class, claiming that information from routine vehicle checks could subsequently be passed to criminals. He told lawyers that he thought the root of insecurity was politics, arguing that the people who benefit from it are the ones who cause it: the government, the police, and the military men, while the people are the sacrificial lamb.

After his speech, the NBA presented Otse with a recognition award. The moderator said on behalf of the association’s president that the award was presented to him for being there with them and sharing his own experience, but added a caution that when he is attacked, he should not kill but report to the police. The recognition prompted the moderator to invite Otse and other officials for a photograph. The presentation came despite a military representative cautioning Otse against making claims he could not prove during his speech.

The recognition has attracted significant public attention, with supporters celebrating the award while critics questioned the NBA’s decision to honour the outspoken activist. Lawyer Jerry Chiemeke condemned the NBA’s decision, saying that when he got called to the Nigerian Bar in November 2013, having someone like Very Dark Man on a panel at the annual NBA Conference was not something he would have ever envisaged. He questioned who should be in next year’s lineup, mentioning Peller, Saida Boj, and Geh-Geh. Chiemeke added that the Gwagalada Johnny Bravo has a checkered history of cyberbullying, affray, stalking, and brazenly flouting court injunctions. He argued that Otse is no activist, and even if they wanted to accommodate vigilantes or civic advocates, he could name 20 people who would have been more fitting. He questioned why the NBA would extend a banquet invite to someone who constantly spits in its face, asking whether this was what the Bar had become and declaring that they had hit the nadir.

READ ALSO:

Ossai Ovie Success, a social media aide to the Delta State governor, berated the NBA for inviting Otse, saying that people who spent money and years in school, went to law school, sat for and passed bar exams, got called to the bar, and finally started working were then taxed and paid money in this hard economy to come for their conference and receive more knowledge from experienced people. He said that suddenly they arrived at the venue and discovered that the person paid to speak to them is a guy that sold penises on the internet, expressing his disappointment. The criticism has also referenced the NBA’s previous decision to invite singer Portable to perform at an annual conference, which was later reversed after public outrage. One commentator summed up the criticism by stating that the NBA inviting VeryDarkMan to sit on a security panel with the Inspector General of Police is the ultimate corporate surrender, arguing that thousands of lawyers paid massive registration fees to debate the rule of law while the leadership relies on an untrained internet activist to drive actual public accountability.

However, many Nigerians have rallied behind Otse, arguing that his views on insecurity reflect the reality of security for most Nigerians and that his influence commands respect beyond online criticism. One supporter wrote that they watched some of the video clips and agreed and were pleased for inviting him, adding that any lawyer that does not like that invitation does not know what he or she studied in school, explaining that after school of law, one needs to learn about real life and that he was invited to talk about real life experiences. Another supporter added that hope those criticising have received their own award or were they not even qualified to go on the podium, stating that this is VDM receiving award from people who matter and that everyone else crying online can continue, calling the haters toothless dogs who cannot bite. Another tweeted that the online hate is pure noise and that VDM’s real-world influence is unmatched, pointing out that seeing hundreds of NBA lawyers waiting in line just to get a photo with VeryDarkMan says everything. Others pointed out that lawyers at the venue crowded around Otse for photographs after his speech, with some channelling “VDM”.

A video circulating on social media captured the striking moment when lawyers crowded around Otse for photographs as he left the venue. The scene prompted further commentary about the disconnect between online criticism and in-person reception. One observer captured this sentiment by noting that the same people who spent years telling us pedigree is everything are now taking pictures with the man they called unserious, concluding that Nigeria will humble you. Another wrote about the country, asking what a country, and noting that just go viral and see yourself speak on top Nigerian platforms, observing that one does not even need to be an MSc or even BSc holder to speak on professional platforms, and that just getting money or going viral means Nigeria will always accommodate you.

The controversy has reopened questions about the NBA’s judgment and the role of non-traditional voices in elite institutional spaces. Supporters argued that field experience is valuable regardless of formal credentials. The conference, which began on August 21 and is scheduled to end on August 28, has brought together legal professionals to discuss issues affecting Nigeria’s legal system and society. Otse’s appearance has ensured that the conversation about who gets to speak on public platforms—and what qualifies as expertise—will continue long after the conference ends.

‘Your Lords Are Being Kidnapped’: VeryDarkMan Tells NBA Conference in Explosive Speech

Loading

metro

Xenophobia: Nigeria Evacuates 111 More Citizens From South Africa as Returnees Hit 2,037

Published

on

Xenophobia: Nigeria Evacuates 111 More Citizens From South Africa as Returnees Hit 2,037
Xenophobia: Nigeria Evacuates 111 More Citizens From South Africa as Returnees Hit 2,037

The Federal Government of Nigeria has evacuated another 111 distressed citizens from South Africa amid concerns over xenophobic and Afrophobic attacks, bringing the total number of Nigerians repatriated under the ongoing exercise to 2,037.

The latest batch, comprising 44 men, 23 women and 44 children, arrived in Lagos aboard South African Airways Flight SA060 on Thursday, October 8, 2026, according to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The returnees were received by officials of the ministry, the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NiDCOM), the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP), the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) and other relevant federal government agencies.

In a statement issued on Sunday, October 11, the ministry’s spokesperson, Oluwafemi Adeniyi, said the evacuation was fully funded by the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG) through its $265,854 donation to support the repatriation of 500 distressed Nigerians from South Africa.

READ ALSO:

The latest arrival brings to 318 the number of Nigerians whose one-way tickets have been funded by the church, leaving 182 tickets under its commitment yet to be covered.

The ministry said the latest flight was the 15th consular evacuation from South Africa since the exercise began on June 10, 2026.

Of the 2,037 Nigerians evacuated so far, 1,388 had their repatriation costs fully covered by the Federal Government, according to the ministry.

The government expressed appreciation to the RCCG, led by Pastor Enoch Adejare Adeboye, for its financial contribution towards bringing distressed Nigerians home.

The evacuation programme follows concerns over xenophobia and Afrophobia in South Africa, where Nigerians and other African nationals have faced reported hostility and attacks. The Nigerian government said it would continue engaging relevant stakeholders, including South African authorities, to address the situation and promote the safety and dignity of Nigerians living in the country.

The ministry also urged Nigerians still residing in South Africa to obey local laws, remain vigilant and prioritise their personal safety.

It advised citizens who require assistance to maintain contact with the Nigerian High Commission in Pretoria and the Consulate General in Johannesburg for consular support.

The government reiterated its commitment to protecting the welfare of Nigerians in the diaspora and providing timely assistance to citizens who find themselves in distress abroad.

With more Nigerians still undergoing verification and clearance for possible repatriation, the authorities are expected to continue coordinating with relevant agencies and partners to facilitate further evacuations.

 

Xenophobia: Nigeria Evacuates 111 More Citizens From South Africa as Returnees Hit 2,037

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

How Bauchi Court Jailed Three 21 Years Each for Abducting Seven Children

Published

on

Court Gavel

How Bauchi Court Jailed Three 21 Years Each for Abducting Seven Children

A Bauchi State High Court has sentenced three defendants to 21 years’ imprisonment each for criminal conspiracy, kidnapping and the abduction of seven children who were allegedly given new identities after being taken from their families.

The judgment was delivered on Wednesday, October 7, 2026, by Justice Farouq Sarki, following a trial involving 11 defendants. The case attracted attention because of allegations that the children, some of whom were as young as three years old, were taken from their biological families and given different names.

According to reports by Channels Television, the three defendants sentenced to prison terms were identified as Ruth Yarima, Chika Izuegbu and Abner Samuel. Each was sentenced to 21 years’ imprisonment without the option of a fine.

Two of the defendants were reportedly convicted on all 21 counts against them, while the third was found guilty on three counts. The court, however, discharged and acquitted the remaining eight defendants standing trial in the case.

The prosecution followed investigations into a suspected child-trafficking network whose activities reportedly involved children who disappeared from Bauchi State at different times between 2016 and 2023.

The investigation reportedly recorded a breakthrough in December 2023, when the Bauchi State Police Command arrested suspected members of the network. The arrests paved the way for the prosecution, which commenced in March 2024.

The children were subsequently rescued and reunited with their families, bringing relief to relatives who had spent years searching for them.

READ ALSO:

The case drew particular attention over allegations that the abducted children were assigned new names after being taken from their biological families. The children were identified in reports as Usman Adamu, Mahmud Bilyaminu, Muhammad Iliyasu, Aisha, Hafizu Hassan, Abdulmudanlib Sa’adu and Asiya Mukhtar.

According to the reports, their names were changed to Chibuke, Chibunna, Chibere, Chi’amaka, Ukechukwu, Ifeanyi Chukwu and Chioma, respectively. The children were reportedly between infancy and five years old when they were abducted.

The alleged renaming of the children was a particularly disturbing aspect of the case, as changing a child’s identity can complicate efforts by relatives and law enforcement agencies to establish the child’s origins and trace missing family members.

The Bauchi State Government welcomed the convictions, describing the judgment as an important step towards securing justice for the victims and their families.

The State Solicitor-General, Sabi’u Gumba, said the families had endured considerable emotional distress while trying to establish the whereabouts of their missing children. He highlighted the anguish parents experience when they do not know where their children are or whether they are safe.

Gumba also defended the sentences in view of the seriousness of the offences and the suffering allegedly caused by the abductions. The government urged parents, guardians and communities to remain vigilant and take appropriate measures to protect children against abduction, trafficking and other forms of exploitation.

Despite the convictions, the case may proceed to another stage of litigation, as defence lawyers indicated plans to challenge the judgment.

Ogbuchi Ben, counsel to the third defendant, said the defence intended to appeal the conviction, arguing that there was insufficient basis for the court’s decision against his client.

Florence Bwala, counsel to the second defendant, also noted that her client had the right to challenge the judgment at the Court of Appeal.

Any appeal would give the appellate court an opportunity to examine the grounds raised by the affected defendants in accordance with the law.

The Bauchi case highlights the challenges associated with child abduction and trafficking, as well as the importance of prompt reporting when a child goes missing. It also underscores the need for effective investigations, cooperation among law enforcement agencies and sustained efforts to protect minors from exploitation.

Parents and guardians are encouraged to report missing children promptly to the police and provide relevant identifying information that could assist investigations.

The convictions mark a significant development in the prosecution of those found guilty in the case, while the acquittal of the other defendants and the announced intention to appeal underline the importance of due process in the administration of criminal justice.

How Bauchi Court Jailed Three 21 Years Each for Abducting Seven Children

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

Tension in Kano as Phone Traders Confront Chinese Sellers Over Cheaper Phones

Published

on

Tension in Kano as Phone Traders Confront Chinese Sellers Over Cheaper Phones
Tension in Kano as Phone Traders Confront Chinese Sellers Over Cheaper Phones

Phone traders in Kano State have confronted Chinese nationals accused of selling mobile phones directly to consumers at lower prices, reigniting concerns over foreign competition and the survival of local retail businesses in Nigeria.

The confrontation, reportedly captured in a video circulating on social media on Saturday, October 10, 2026, saw aggrieved traders challenge a Chinese national over alleged direct sales in a local market.

In the footage, some traders warned the foreign sellers against continuing the disputed business activities, insisting that their presence and pricing practices were undermining local dealers.

The traders alleged that Chinese sellers were bypassing established distribution channels by selling phones directly to consumers rather than supplying Nigerian retailers, who traditionally buy from importers and wholesalers before reselling to the public.

They argued that foreign suppliers with direct access to manufacturers could offer lower prices, making it difficult for local dealers to compete and maintain their businesses.

The traders expressed concern that the alleged practice could reduce their sales, threaten jobs and undermine the livelihoods of people who depend on the mobile phone retail business.

However, the circumstances surrounding the confrontation remain unclear. The identities of those involved, the precise location of the incident and whether any formal complaint was filed have not been independently established. There was also no confirmed information about arrests or police intervention.

The Kano dispute comes amid growing tensions between Nigerian traders and Chinese business operators over the boundaries between wholesale distribution and direct retail sales.

READ ALSO:

A similar disagreement emerged in September at the Lagos International Trade Fair Complex, where members of the Auto Spare Parts and Machinery Dealers Association of Nigeria (ASPMDA) protested against what they described as direct retail activities by Chinese business operators.

The Lagos traders alleged that some foreign businesses were selling goods directly to consumers, putting local retailers at a disadvantage because of differences in purchasing power, supply chains and access to manufacturers.

The disagreement prompted discussions involving market representatives, the trade fair management board and security officials, who sought to prevent the dispute from escalating.

During efforts to resolve the Lagos disagreement, stakeholders called for clearer rules defining the respective roles of wholesalers and retailers. Representatives of the Chinese business community also indicated that businesses found engaging in prohibited activities should be reported for appropriate action.

The dispute has since highlighted wider concerns about foreign investment, fair competition and the protection of Nigerian small businesses.

Local traders argue that they need a level playing field to compete with businesses that source products directly from manufacturers. They also want authorities to clarify the conditions under which foreign operators can participate in Nigeria’s retail sector.

However, selling products at lower prices does not automatically establish wrongdoing. Determining whether a business has breached the law requires evidence of the relevant activities and the regulations governing its operations.

Consumers, meanwhile, may benefit from lower prices and greater choice when competition increases. The challenge for regulators is to ensure that competition remains lawful and fair while protecting consumers and supporting sustainable local enterprise.

The Kano confrontation has renewed calls for government agencies and market authorities to clarify Nigeria’s foreign trade and retail regulations, investigate credible complaints and provide mechanisms for resolving commercial disputes peacefully.

Authorities will also need to ensure that disagreements over business practices do not lead to intimidation, threats or violence against traders of any nationality.

For now, the central issue remains whether the alleged direct sales in Kano violate applicable regulations or market rules. An official response clarifying the circumstances of the incident would help establish the facts and determine whether further action is necessary.

 

Tension in Kano as Phone Traders Confront Chinese Sellers Over Cheaper Phones

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending