Biden gets praise, criticism for calling Russia's actions in Ukraine 'genocide' - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Biden gets praise, criticism for calling Russia’s actions in Ukraine ‘genocide’

Published

on

U.S. President Joe Biden

President Joe Biden is getting both praise and criticism after doubling down on describing Russian President Vladimir Putin’s actions in Ukraine as “genocide” — the first time he’s used the term since the invasion began nearly 50 days ago — even as Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for weeks has claimed that is what’s happening on the ground.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki defended his use of the term, as she did when Biden called Putin a “war criminal” and when he said “cannot remain in power,” saying Wednesday the president was simply expressing “what he feels.”

“The president was speaking to what we all see, and what he feels as clear as day in terms of the atrocities happening on the ground, as he also noted yesterday,” Psaki said, before tempering his use of the term. “Of course, there will be a legal process that plays out in the courtroom but he was speaking to what he has seen on the ground, what we have all seen in terms of the atrocities on the ground.”

Pressed directly on whether Biden’s comments might conflict with the U.S. policy, Psaki dismissed concerns and repeated the requirement of a “legal process” which can sometimes take years.

“He was not getting ahead of that. He was speaking on what he feels he sees on the ground,” she said.

“I do not think anybody is confused about the atrocities we are seeing on the ground — and different leaders around the world describe it in different ways,” Psaki added later on. “It is unquestionable that what we are seeing is horrific, the targeting of civilians, hospitals, children. The president was calling it like he sees it, and that is what he does.”

READ ALSO:

State Department spokesperson Ned Price gave a similar line at his briefing Wednesday, saying Biden used the term based on “impressions that he has seen and that we all have seen,” but noted the U.S. is working with international lawyers to determine if Russia’s crimes meet the legal threshold.

During prepared remarks in Iowa Tuesday blaming inflation and gas prices on “Putin’s price hike,” Biden said, for the first time, “Your family budget, your ability to fill up your tank, none of it should on hinge on whether a dictator declares war and commits genocide half a world away.”

His use of the word raised questions among Washington reporters about whether it was an ad-libbed moment or a policy shift from the White House — until Biden later insisted he meant exactly what said.

“Yes, I called it genocide,” Biden told reporters after his remarks. “Because it has become clearer and clearer that Putin is just trying to wipe out the idea of even being able to be a Ukrainian. And the evidence is mounting. It’s different than it was last week, the more evidence is coming out of the — literally, the horrible things that the Russians have done in Ukraine and we’re going to only learn more and more about the devastation.”

Genocide is defined as an act “committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group,” according to the United Nations’ Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Biden went on to acknowledge the U.S. government has an internal, legal process for designating whether genocide has occurred but still stood by what he indicated was his opinion.

“We’ll let the lawyers decide internationally whether or not it qualifies, but it sure seems that way to me,” Biden added.

Zelenskyy has argued — and pleaded — for weeks that Russia has met this definition and called on Western leaders to use the same term, so was quick to applaud Biden’s comments as “true words of a true leader.”

The Kremlin, meanwhile, blasted the comment as Putin indicated this week indicated his invasion won’t stop until his goals are met and said peace talks with Kyiv had reached a “dead end.”

“We consider this kind of effort to distort the situation unacceptable,” Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters Wednesday. “This is hardly acceptable from a president of the United States, a country that has committed well-known crimes in recent times.”

It’s not clear how many Western leaders will go as far as Biden and Zelenskyy — or what will take for them to reach the same conclusion.

READ ALSO:

No other Western nations have made the determination, aside from Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas tying Russia’s crimes to the term in a tweet. French President Emmanuel Macron suggested Wednesday he’s more “careful” with his words than the American president, saying only that “war crimes” have been confirmed.

“So far, it has been established that war crimes were committed by the Russian army and that it is now necessary to find those responsible and bring them to justice,” Macron told France 2 in an interview.

“I am very careful with some terms [genocide] these days,” he added. “I’m not sure the escalation of words is helping the cause right now.”

Asked directly by ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Mary Bruce about Macron’s criticism Wednesday, Psaki declined to comment.

Macron also rebuked Biden’s language last month, when asked about Biden calling Putin a “butcher” and saying he “cannot remain in power” during remarks in Warsaw.

“I wouldn’t use those terms, because I continue to speak to President Putin,” Macron said in another interview with France 3. “Because what do we want to do collectively? We want to stop the war that Russia launched in Ukraine, without waging war and without escalation.”

Biden stood by his words then, saying he was “expressing moral outrage” but also clarified that he wasn’t “articulating a policy change” amid some fallout.

It’s unclear now what pushed Biden to change his stance on using the term “genocide” — because asked directly last week if he thought the atrocities documented in Bucha were genocide, he said no.

“I got criticized for calling Putin a war criminal. Well, the truth of the matter, you saw what happened in Bucha,” Biden said on April 4. “He is a war criminal — but we have to gather the information, we have to continue to provide Ukraine with the weapons they need to continue to fight, and we have to gather all the detail so this could be an actual — have a war crime trial. This guy is brutal. What’s happening in Bucha is outrageous, and everyone sees it.”

Asked directly, “You agree this is genocide?”

“No, it is a war crime,” Biden replied.

White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan followed Biden’s comment the same day by saying the administration had not yet seen the “systematic deprivation of life” necessary to meet the definition of genocide.

“This is something we, of course, continue to monitor every day. Based on what we have seen so far, we have seen atrocities, we have seen war crimes. We have not yet seen a level of systematic deprivation of life of the Ukrainian people to rise to the level of genocide,” Sullivan said.

ABC

Loading

International

China Denies Supplying Iran Intelligence Linked to Attack That Killed US Troops

Published

on

China Denies Supplying Iran Intelligence Linked to Attack That Killed US Troops

China Denies Supplying Iran Intelligence Linked to Attack That Killed US Troops

China has rejected as “groundless” reports that Chinese entities supplied Iran with satellite imagery of a US military base in Jordan before and after an Iranian missile attack that killed three American troops in July.

The denial followed a report by The Wall Street Journal, which cited unnamed US officials as saying that Iran obtained high-resolution satellite images of the Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, where US forces are stationed, from Chinese entities.

The July 17 Iranian missile attack on the base killed three US Army soldiers and injured four others, according to US officials cited in the report.

The US officials reportedly linked the satellite imagery to the Iranian attack but did not identify the Chinese entities involved. Importantly, the report did not accuse the Chinese government of directly ordering, coordinating or facilitating the strike.

Chinese officials have rejected the allegation and demanded evidence, maintaining that Beijing complies with international law and opposes what it described as unfounded accusations.

The development has nevertheless raised fresh questions in Washington over the growing strategic relationship between China and Iran, particularly amid the wider US-Iran conflict and continuing tensions between Washington and Beijing.

The report said the satellite images were obtained before and after the attack, potentially giving Iran detailed information about the military facility and helping it assess the impact of its strikes.

READ ALSO:

US officials have previously expressed concern about China’s technological and satellite-related links with Iran. Washington sanctioned three China-based satellite companies in May over allegations that they supported Iran’s military operations.

The latest report has intensified scrutiny of the role of commercial and private Chinese entities in providing technology or imagery that could potentially enhance Iran’s military capabilities.

However, US President Donald Trump has sought to play down the significance of the latest allegations.

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday, Trump was asked whether he would raise the issue with Chinese President Xi Jinping during their expected meeting in the United States.

Rather than directly addressing whether Beijing should be held responsible, Trump compared Chinese intelligence-gathering activities with those of the United States.

Trump also maintained that he has a good relationship with Xi, saying the Chinese leader had behaved reasonably well and that Washington and Beijing had likewise conducted themselves reasonably.

The comments come as the United States and China attempt to manage several areas of tension, including trade, technology, national security and China’s relationship with Iran.

The allegations are particularly sensitive because the reported transfer of imagery occurred before an attack that resulted in the deaths of American service members.

The Iran missile strike in Jordan was part of the broader conflict involving Iran and the United States, which has increasingly drawn in regional actors and raised concerns about the security of American military personnel and facilities across the Middle East.

The Wall Street Journal report, according to Reuters, could not immediately be independently verified. It also did not establish that Chinese authorities themselves provided the imagery or that Beijing had prior knowledge of the Iranian attack.

The distinction is significant because evidence that individual Chinese companies or entities supplied commercial satellite imagery would not, by itself, establish direct involvement by the Chinese government.

The controversy comes ahead of a potential meeting between Trump and Xi, with the two leaders expected to meet in the United States on September 24, although Beijing had not officially confirmed the meeting as of Monday.

China’s denial and Trump’s decision to downplay the allegation could help prevent the issue from becoming a major diplomatic confrontation ahead of the anticipated meeting.

For now, the central question remains whether Chinese commercial entities provided the imagery to Iran and, if so, what information was transferred and whether it materially contributed to the Iranian operation that killed the three US troops.

The allegations are likely to remain under scrutiny as Washington assesses the extent of Chinese support for Iran and its possible implications for US military operations in the Middle East.

China Denies Supplying Iran Intelligence Linked to Attack That Killed US Troops

Loading

Continue Reading

International

‘Completely False’ — Moreno Denies Using AI to Prepare Games

Published

on

Robert Moreno has begun his interim tenure as South Korea’s coach with a denial of one of the more unusual controversies attached to his coaching career, claims that he used ChatGPT to help prepare his teams for matches.

The Spanish coach, who arrived in South Korea this weekend, was asked about the allegation as he began work with the national side.

Moreno was accused by Russian media earlier this year of heavily relying on artificial intelligence during his spell at Sochi, where he left in September 2025 following a poor run of results.

He has consistently rejected the claim.

Moreno said the reports were “completely false” and argued that his use of technology had been misrepresented.

His explanation comes as he takes over a South Korean side attempting to recover from a turbulent World Cup campaign. The team crashed out in the group stage, leading Hong Myung-bo to resign and leaving the Korea Football Association under pressure over both the team’s performance and its previous recruitment process.

The KFA appointed Moreno as a temporary replacement rather than immediately committing to a permanent coach. He is expected to lead the team through six international matches, beginning with September and October friendlies against Ecuador, Uruguay, Venezuela and Uzbekistan.

His first squad includes veteran captain Son Heung-min, who now plays for Los Angeles FC, as well as Lee Kang-in and Kim Min-jae.

Moreno said he wants his tenure to be about more than results, with the immediate goal of rebuilding the relationship between the national team and its supporters.

I want to make Korean football fans happy,” he said.

For now, however, the AI controversy remains part of the baggage surrounding his appointment, something Moreno appears keen to put behind him as he begins the task of rebuilding South Korea’s national team.

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Trump Downplays Report of Chinese Satellite Help to Iran

Published

on

US President Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump has played down a report alleging that Chinese entities supplied Iran with satellite imagery of a US military base in Jordan before and after a deadly Iranian missile strike.

The report, published by The Wall Street Journal, said US officials had linked high-resolution satellite imagery provided by Chinese entities to Iran’s July 17 attack on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base, where three American soldiers were killed and four others injured.

Trump, however, appeared to dismiss the significance of the allegation while speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday.

When they say that China spies on us, I say you’re right, and we spy on them too,” he said, adding that the two countries essentially engage in similar intelligence activities.

The report has not established that Beijing directly authorised or participated in the alleged transfer. US officials cited by the Journal did not identify the Chinese entities involved, while Chinese officials reportedly rejected the allegation and asked Washington to provide evidence.

The development comes as Washington and Beijing prepare for a potentially sensitive meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, expected to take place at the White House on September 24.

The US has previously accused Chinese companies of assisting Iran’s military capabilities. Washington sanctioned three China-based satellite firms in May over alleged support for Iran’s military operations.

Despite the latest dispute, Trump struck a conciliatory tone when discussing Xi, saying the Chinese leader had “behaved reasonably well” and that the US had done the same.

Trump’s response leaves the satellite imagery allegations unresolved, with Beijing denying involvement and Washington yet to publicly identify the companies allegedly involved.

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending