Understanding the concept and implications of Tawassul - Newstrends
Connect with us

Opinion

Understanding the concept and implications of Tawassul

Published

on

Bismillaahir Rahmaanir Raheem. In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Exceptionally Merciful.

(a). Meaning of التَّوَسُّلْ

التَّوَسُّلُ
is an Arabic word which connotes التقرُّب إلى الله تعالى بما يحبُّه ويرضاه “Seeking closeness to Allāh, the Most High through means that are beloved and acceptable to Him.” It is a variation of الوسيلة which, literally implies “means”, “a pathway”, “access”, or “nearness.”

(b). Legality of التَّوَسُّلُ

التَّوَسُّلْ
is a form of Ibādah (worship) in Islām. This is because one of the features of Ibādāt (acts of devotion) is that, ” Allah loves it, and is pleased with it.” This is evident in the definition of the term عبادة by شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية رحمه الله تعالى When he said:

العبادة اسم جامع لكل ما يحبه الله ويرضاه من الأقوال والأعمال الظاهرة منها والباطنة

“Ibādah is is a compound word that connotes everything that is beloved and pleasant to Allāh, be it spoken words or actions, the apparent and the hidden.”

Whenever Allāh loves a thing, and He is pleased with it, He recommends it to His servants as an act of worship. It is for this reason that we find in Qur’an 5:35 the command to seek الوسيلة “closeness” to Allāh. He says:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اتَّقُوا اللَّهَ وَابْتَغُوا إِلَيْهِ الْوَسِيلَةَ
وَجَاهِدُوا فِي سَبِيلِهِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُفْلِحُون

“O you who have believed, fear Allāh and seek nearness to Him, and strive in His cause that perchance you may be prosperous.”

Similarly, while condemning the actions of unbelievers who abandon Allāh (who is closer to them than their jugular veins) and invoke others than Him (that are far away, weak and incapable of anything), Allāh says:

أُولَٰئِكَ الَّذِينَ يَدْعُونَ يَبْتَغُونَ إِلَىٰ رَبِّهِمُ الْوَسِيلَةَ أَيُّهُمْ أَقْرَبُ وَيَرْجُونَ رَحْمَتَهُ وَيَخَافُونَ عَذَابَهُ ۚ إِنَّ عَذَابَ رَبِّكَ كَانَ مَحْذُورًا

“Those (deities) whom they invoke (other than Allāh) seek closeness to (Allāh) their Lord, (striving as to) which of them is closer? And they hope in His mercy and fear His punishment. Surely, the punishment of your Lord is greatly feared.” (Qur’an 17:57)

READ ALSO:

In the hadīth, the Prophet ﷺ urge the believers to plead with Allāh to grant him (the Prophet ﷺ) الوسيلة. He said:

من قال حين يسمع النداء اللهم رب هذه الدعوة التامة، والصلاة القائمة، آت محمد الوسيلة والفضيلة وابعثه مقاماً محموداً الذي وعدته، حلت له شفاعتي يوم القيامة( رواه البخاري في صحيحه) زاد البيهقي في آخره )إنك لا تخلف الميعاد( بإسناد حسن)

“Whoever says, after the completion of the Adhān: “O Allāh, Lord of this most perfect call, and of the Prayer that is about to be established, grant to Muhammad the favor of nearness (to You) and excellence and a place of distinction, and exalt him to a position of glory that You have promised him.”, my intercession is guaranteed for him on the day of recompense. (Al-Bayhaqee added the statement “Surely, You do not break your promise” in his own narration)

(c). Permissible forms of التَّوَسُّلْ

The manner in which people make التَّوَسُّلُ today has made it imperative to distinguish between what is permitted as a form of التَّوَسُّلُ and what is not permitted, so that truth seekers may stick to that which is correct based on available proofs.

i. التوسل بالشهادة والإيمان Seeking closeness to Allāh with one’s faith and belief (in all the articles of faith): It is permissible in Islām, to seek closeness to Allāh using one’s faith and belief in Him, and in all the articles of faith. For instance, while making supplication, one is permitted to say, O Allāh, accept my supplication because I believe in You, or Your Prophet(s), Book(s), the Day of Judgement, or Qadar. One can also make التَّوَسُّلُ with one his belief in the oneness of Allāh and Messengership of Muhammad (upon him be peace). That is, one can say, “Yā Allāh, grant my request because I believe that You are one, without any partner. Or because of my belief in the Messengership of Muhammad, et cetera.

The evidence for this abound in the Qur’ān. Some of the supplications made using this criteria include:

(رَبَّنا آمَنَّا فاكتبنا مع الشاهدين)

“Our Lord! We believe, so write us down with the witnesses (of truth) Q. 5:83

الذين يقولون ربنا إننا آمنا فاغفر لنا ذنوبنا وقنا عذاب النار

“Those who say: Our Lord! Surely we believed, therefore forgive us our sins and save us from the chastisement of the fire.” Q. 3:16

Other examples are in Q. 3:53, 193, 10:85, 23:109, 28:53, et cetera.

From the hadīth, it was narrated on the authority of بُرَيدة بن الحصيب that the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ once heard heard a Sahābi (companion) supplicating and saying:

اللهم إني أسألك بأني أشهد أنك أنت الله لا إله إلا أنت الأحد الصمد الذي لم يلد ولم يولد ولم يكن له كفوا أحد.

“O Allāh! I ask thee because I testify that thou art Allāh, there is no deity worthy of worship except thee, the One and independent that neither begot nor is begotten, and there is none like Him.”

The Prophet ﷺ said:

لقد سأل الله باسمه الذي إذا سئل به أعطى وإذا دُعي به أجاب

“Indeed, he has supplicated to Allāh with His name which, if used to invoke Him, he responds and grants requests.”

ii. التوسل بأسماء الله وصفاته: Making التوسل with the names and attributes of Allāh سبحانه وتعالى. In the noble Qur’ān, we are told that Allāh has beautiful names and attributes, and that we should use them to invoke Him. In Qur’an 7:180, Allāh, our Lord says:

وَلِلَّهِ الْأَسْمَاءُ الْحُسْنَىٰ فَادْعُوهُ بِهَا ۖ وَذَرُوا الَّذِينَ يُلْحِدُونَ فِي أَسْمَائِهِ ۚ سَيُجْزَوْنَ مَا كَانُوا يَعْمَلُونَ

“And to Allāh belong the beautiful names, invoke Him with them. And leave (the company of) those who practice deviation concerning His names. They will be recompensed for what they’ve been doing.”

READ ALSO:

What the above verse implies is that one can invoke Allāh using either His names or attributes as mentioned in the Qur’ān and Sunnah. This is why our pipus predecessors would say in their Qunūt:

اللَّهُمَّ إِنّا نَسْأَلُكَ بِكُلِّ اسْمٍ هُوَ لَكَ، سَمَّيْتَ بِهِ نَفْسَكَ، أَوْ أَنْزَلْتَهُ فِي كِتَابِكَ، أَوْ عَلَّمْتَهُ أَحَداً مِنْ خَلْقِكَ، أَوْ اسْتَأْثَرْتَ بِهِ فِي عِلْمِ الغَيْبِ عِنْدَكَ

“O Allāh! We ask You with all the names that belong to You: The ones that You named Yourselves with, or revealed in Your Book, or taught any of Your servants, or kept in the knowledge of the unseen with You… ”

However, there is a need to make a clarification here. Some Muslims have completely misunderstood and misconstrued the injunction in this verse to mean chanting a particular name of Allāh several ten, hundred or thousand times. E.g. Yā Allāh! Yā Allāh!! Yā Allāh!!! (one or ten or hundred thousand times)! Or simply Allāhu! Allāhu!! Allāhu !!!

This is unfounded and preposterous. It’s like one’s children gathering themselves together and shouting “daddy”!” daddy”!! “daddy”!!! several times without saying anything, while one is seated directly in front of them. Thus, the most appropriate manner is to say something like, “Yā Allāh! I seek your intervention in this matter because you’re my creator who has power over all things.” or “Yā Razzāq (the provider)” urzuqnī” (provide for me) because none can provide for me except thee!

iii. Making التوسل with one’s incapacity, fault, remorse, weakness and dire need of the mercy of Allāh. This implies praying to Allāh citing one’s urgent need of His favours, mercies and blessings as means of appealing to Him. This is done mostly when one is in a precarious situation such as poverty, sickness, fear of evil, calamity of death, hopelessness, et cetera. In the noble Qur’ān, we find several examples of this form of التَّوَسُّلُ especially among the Prophets and Messengers of Allāh. For instance, when Prophet Ādam عليه السلام was tricked by the Shaytān to disobey Allāh, he sought Allāh’s forgiveness by showing remorse and distress. Allāh says:

قَالَا رَبّنَا ظَلَمْنَا أَنْفُسنَا وَإِنْ لَمْ تَغْفِر لَنَا وَتَرْحَمنَا لَنَكُونَنَّ مِنْ الْخَاسِرِين

“Both (Ādam and his wife) cried out: ‘Our Lord! We have wronged ourselves. If You do not forgive us and do not have mercy on us, we shall surely be among the losers.” (Q.7:23)

Two things can be deduced here: One, they both showed remorse, and two, they exposed their dire need for Allāh’s forgiveness and mercy. Making التوسل in this manner is one of the most pleasing deeds to Allāh because it shows one’s utmost humility and weakness in front of the ultimate power of Allāh.

Another example is the case of Prophet Zakariyyah عليه السلام when he was in dire need of an heir to inherit him and continue with his Da’wah. He prayed to Allāh, using his physical weakness due to old age, as well as his fears as التَّوَسُّلُ. He said:

قَالَ رَبِّ إِنِّي وَهَنَ الْعَظْمُ مِنِّي وَاشْتَعَلَ الرَّأْسُ شَيْبًا وَلَمْ أَكُن بِدُعَائِكَ رَبِّ شَقِيًّا وَإِنِّي خِفْتُ الْمَوَالِيَ مِن وَرَائِي وَكَانَتِ امْرَأَتِي عَاقِرًا فَهَبْ لِي مِن لَّدُنكَ وَلِيًّا يَرِثُنِي وَيَرِثُ مِنْ آلِ يَعْقُوبَ ۖ وَاجْعَلْهُ رَبِّ رَضِيا

He said, “My Lord, indeed my bones have weakened, and my head has filled with white, and never have I been in my supplication to You, my Lord, unhappy. And indeed, I fear the successors after me, and my wife has been barren, so give me from Yourself an heir. Who will inherit me and inherit from thefamily of Jacob. And make him, my Lord, pleasing (to You.)” (Q. 19-4-6)

READ ALSO:

A third example is that of Prophet Yūnus عليه السلام who abandoned his people even before Allāh commanded him to leave. As a punishment, Allāh got him trapped in the belly of a whale until he cried out using his remorse and weakness as التَّوَسُّلُ. Allāh says:

وَذَا النُّونِ إِذ ذَّهَبَ مُغَاضِبًا فَظَنَّ أَن لَّن نَّقْدِرَ عَلَيْهِ فَنَادَىٰ فِي الظُّلُمَاتِ أَن لَّا إِلَٰهَ إِلَّا أَنتَ سُبْحَانَكَ إِنِّي كُنتُ مِنَ الظَّالِمِينَ

And (mention) the man of the fish, when he went off in anger and thought that We would not decree anything upon him. And he called out within the darknesses, “There is no deity except You; exalted are You. Indeed, I havebeen of the wrongdoers.” (Q.21:87)

A fourth example was when Prophet Nūh عليه السلام was belied and threatened by his people, and he invoked Allāh, using his distressed condition as التَّوَسُّلُ to Him. Allāh says:

كَذَّبَتْ قَبْلَهُمْ قَوْمُ نُوحٍ فَكَذَّبُوا عَبْدَنَا وَقَالُوا مَجْنُونٌ وَازْدُجِرْ فَدَعَا رَبَّهُ أَنِّي مَغْلُوبٌ فَانتَصِرْ

“The people of Noah denied before them, and they denied Our servant and said, “A madman,” and he was repelled. So he invoked his Lord, “Indeed, I am overpowered, so help.” (Q.54:9-10)

From the hadīth, we find the narration by Shaddād bn ‘Aws as a very relevant example here. The Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم said:

سَيِّدُ الِاسْتِغْفَارِ أَنْ تَقُولَ اللَّهُمَّ أَنْتَ رَبِّي لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا أَنْتَ خَلَقْتَنِي وَأَنَا عَبْدُكَ وَأَنَا عَلَى عَهْدِكَ وَوَعْدِكَ مَا اسْتَطَعْتُ أَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنْ شَرِّ مَا صَنَعْتُ أَبُوءُ لَكَ بِنِعْمَتِكَ عَلَيَّ وَأَبُوءُ لَكَ بِذَنْبِي فَاغْفِرْ لِي فَإِنَّهُ لَا يَغْفِرُ الذُّنُوبَ إِلَّا أَنْتَ

“The greatest form of seeking Allāh’s forgiveness is to say, ‘O Allāh, You are my lord, there’s no deity but You. You are my Creator, and I am Your servant. You…forgive me. No one forgives sins except You”

In summary, it is permissible to invoke Allāh with prayers like, “Yā Allāh! Grant my request because none but You can grant it.” Or “pave a way for me out of this predicament because I am weak and incapable of anything.” etc

This is why we say the following prayer in our Qunūt:

ونؤمن بك ونتوكل عليك ، أنت الغني ونحن الفقراء إليك ، أنت القوي ونحن الضعفاء إليك

“… We believe in You and rely on You. You’re the Self-Sufficient and we are in dire need of Your wealth. You’re the Powerful, and we are weak unto thee. . . ”
[08:16, 21/10/2022] Sirnucy Lafiagi: iv. Making Tawassul with righteous deeds: This is another form of permissible invocation sanctioned by the Prophet ﷺ. As Muslims, we firmly believe that all our deeds, whether good or bad are being recorded by angelic scribes who have been assigned by Allāh to do so. Allāh says:

وَإِنَّ عَليكُمْ لَحافِظِينَ كِرامًا كاتِبِين يَعْلَمُونَ ما تَفْعَلُون

“And most surely, there are keepers over you; honourable scribes; they know all that ye do.”

أَمْ يَحْسَبُونَ أَنَّا لَا نَسْمَعُ سِرَّهُمْ وَنَجْوَاهُمْ ۚ بَلَىٰ وَرُسُلُنَا لَدَيْهِمْ يَكْتُبُون

“Or do they think that We do not know what they conceal and their secret discourses? Nay! Our Apostles are with them writing down (their deeds).

مَّا يَلْفِظُ مِن قَوْلٍ إِلَّا لَدَيْهِ رَقِيب عَتِيد

“He utters not a word, but there is with him a watcher at hand.” (Q. 50:18)

The implication of the verses quoted above is that none of our deeds is done in vain. They are all documented in a divine record book by perfect writers who can never make mistakes. It is this same record that shall be brought before every being on the day of resurrection as a proof for or against.

These deeds are credited into our respective SAVINGS ACCOUNT with Allāh, the Most High. He observes us closely, and considers our requests before Him based on our piety, sincerity and uprightness. Although sometimes, He ignores all of those and blesses us anyways, despite our gross inadequacies. Such is the incomprehensible nature of Allāh. يَفعلُ ما يَشاء (He does what He wills). He is فَعَّالٌ لِما يُريد.

When Prophet Yūnus عليه السلام invoked Allāh from the belly of the whale in which he was trapped, Allah says:

“Had he not been one of those that glorify (my exalted name), he would have been trapped in its belly till the day of resurrection.” (Q. 37:143-144)

What this implies is that, Yūnus benefitted from his previous deeds. Imagine if he had nothing in his account of deeds with Allāh? Could he have been saved from this calamity?

It is for this reason that it is permitted for a Muslim to occasionally draw from this account whenever he is in need. It is similar to taking loan from a cooperative society or bank where one keeps money for the rainy day. However, one fundamental difference between this aspect and the cooperative/bank example is that in the former, drawing such loans does not diminish nor exhaust one’s deeds/rewards لا في الدنيا ولا في الآخرة (neither in this world, nor in the hereafter).

A Muslim can consistently invoke Allāh, using his good deeds as الوسيلة: means. For instance, one can say,

اللهم إني أسألك بإيماني بك، وبتوكلي عليك، وبثقتي بك، وببري لوالدي، وبأدائي الأمانة، وما أشبه ذلك

“Ya Allah! I ask Thee with my firm belaying You, my reliance on You, my trust in You, my obedience to my parents, my trustworthiness, et cetera.”

The evidence for this is found in Sahīh Al-Bukhārī in a long hadīth popularly known as حديث أصحاب الغار “hadīth of the companions of the cave/hole”. In summary, three people were trapped in a cave where they had hidden because of wind and downpour. No sooner than they entered the cave had a huge stone rolled from top of the mountain and blocked the entrance. So, after the rains had stopped, each of them had to invoke Allāh, using his good deeds as means of drawing closer to Him.

The first man used his obedience and servitude to his parents as الوسيلة; the second man used his leaving of Zinā for the sake of Allah; and the third man used his trustworthiness. In the end, all were saved.

In summary, it is proper for a Muslim to pray to Allāh saying something like, “I have just offered Subh prayer for Your sake, kindly grant my request.” Or “Accept my request because I have fasted/am fasting for your sake.” Or “save me from this calamity because of the Sadaqah which I gave this morning to the less privileged.” Or “make my children righteous because I was/am righteous to my parents.”, et cetera.

Dr. Sanusi Lafiagi is a lecturer in Department of Islamic Studies, Al-Hikmah University Ilorin

Loading

Advertisement

Opinion

Saudi Executions: Truth Behind Viral Kissing Claim

Published

on

Saudi Executions: Truth Behind Viral Kissing Claim

A Muslim scholar, Mallam Ibrahim Agunbiade, has urged the public to exercise caution over viral claims that two Bangladeshi nationals executed in Saudi Arabia were a married couple killed for kissing inside the Grand Mosque in Makkah, saying available official information does not establish the allegation.

In an article dated October 22, 2026, Agunbiade, a member of Al-Rabwa Islamic Propagation in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, said the execution of the two Bangladeshis on October 14 had generated widespread controversy, particularly on social media, where claims about the circumstances of their deaths circulated without sufficient verification.

He said the Saudi Ministry of Interior announced that the individuals, identified as Nazrul Islam Abdul Basir and Siti Akhtar, also known as Sweety Akhtar, had been convicted of committing an indecent act inside a mosque in Makkah and sentenced to death under ta’zir, a category of punishment determined under the applicable Islamic legal framework.

According to Agunbiade, the Saudi authorities stated that the judgments had received the necessary judicial approval and that a royal order had authorised the executions.

However, he noted that the ministry’s announcement did not specify the precise act for which the two were convicted or state that they were executed for kissing on the forehead, as alleged in viral social media posts.

The scholar said the distinction was important because claims that the deceased were a married couple who had been punished for kissing inside the Grand Mosque had not been substantiated by the publicly available official statement.

Citing a report published by Bangladesh’s The Daily Star on October 20, Agunbiade said a confidential consular memorandum reportedly indicated that the two were not married but had worked as cleaners for the same company in Saudi Arabia.

He added that the memorandum reportedly stated that Nazrul was detained in August 2023 under Saudi Arabia’s cybercrime law, while Sweety was detained the following day over an allegation of adultery.

Agunbiade said the available information did not explain how the earlier allegations related to the offence subsequently cited in the Saudi government’s execution announcement.

READ ALSO:

He further disclosed that Nazrul’s parents had told Bangladeshi media that their son was unmarried and that the family did not know the woman involved.

The Bangladeshi government has reportedly requested copies of the court judgments and further clarification from Saudi authorities, according to the account presented by the scholar.

He said the documents would be important in establishing the precise offences, the evidence considered by the courts and the circumstances surrounding the convictions.

Until the judgments and additional official explanations become available, Agunbiade advised the public against presenting the claims that the pair were newlyweds or were executed specifically for kissing inside the mosque as established facts.

Islamic teachings on the sanctity of mosques

Beyond the controversy surrounding the executions, Agunbiade emphasised that Islam attaches great importance to the sanctity of mosques and appropriate conduct in places of worship.

He cited Qur’an 72:18, which states: “And the mosques are for Allah, so do not invoke anyone along with Allah.”

According to him, the verse underscores the sacred purpose of mosques as places devoted to the worship of Allah.

He also referred to a narration in Sahih Muslim concerning the purposes of mosques, including the remembrance of Allah, prayer and the recitation of the Qur’an.

Agunbiade said Muslims should respect these sacred spaces and avoid behaviour that distracts worshippers or undermines their religious purpose.

However, he cautioned against using religious teachings to justify the circulation of unverified allegations or drawing conclusions about a criminal case without sufficient evidence.

Qur’an warns against spreading unverified information

The scholar said the controversy also highlighted the importance of verifying information before sharing it, particularly when reports involve criminal allegations, religious sensitivities and the lives of individuals who can no longer respond to claims made about them.

He cited Qur’an 49:6, which instructs believers to investigate information brought by an unreliable source before acting upon it.

The verse states: “O you who believe, if a rebellious person comes to you with information, investigate it.”

READ ALSO:

Agunbiade also cited a narration in the introduction to Sahih Muslim, commonly numbered Hadith 5, which warns that a person may be considered a liar if they narrate everything they hear.

He said the teachings were particularly relevant in an era when sensational claims could spread rapidly across social media platforms, often reaching large audiences before journalists or other responsible parties had established their authenticity.

According to him, journalists, religious commentators and members of the public have a duty to distinguish verified facts from allegations, speculation and unconfirmed accounts.

He warned that repeating a claim without checking its authenticity could mislead the public, damage reputations and inflame religious or social tensions.

Calls for clarification should not be confused with rejection of justice

Agunbiade also addressed questions surrounding the judicial proceedings that resulted in the executions, saying the reported request by the Bangladeshi government for copies of the judgments and further clarification deserved attention.

He cited Qur’an 16:90, which states that Allah commands justice and excellence, to underline the importance of fairness and accountability.

The scholar argued that seeking clarification about a criminal case should not automatically be interpreted as rejecting a court’s judgment.

Rather, he said, understanding the precise offence, the evidence presented and the circumstances of the proceedings was essential to an informed assessment of the case.

He also cautioned against drawing conclusions from the timing of the executions alongside international political developments, saying that the coincidence of events did not, by itself, establish a connection.

Any such suggestion, he maintained, would require credible supporting evidence.

Facts must be separated from speculation

Agunbiade concluded that the information presented in the Saudi Ministry of Interior’s announcement established that two Bangladeshi nationals had been executed after being convicted of an indecent act inside a mosque in Makkah.

However, he stressed that the announcement, as described in his article, did not substantiate the viral claim that the two were a married couple executed specifically for kissing on the forehead inside the Grand Mosque.

He called for responsible reporting and urged the public to avoid treating unverified social media narratives as confirmed accounts of the case.

The scholar said respect for the sanctity of mosques should go hand in hand with respect for truth, justice and responsible journalism.

As questions remain about the precise offence and the circumstances of the proceedings, the full court judgments and further official clarification from the relevant authorities would be necessary to establish a more complete account of the case.

The allegations circulating online should therefore be distinguished from the information confirmed in the publicly described official announcement, pending the release of further details.

Saudi Executions: Truth Behind Viral Kissing Claim

Loading

Continue Reading

Opinion

OPINION: Who Still Needs the NYSC? — By Bola Bolawole

Published

on

Bola Bolawole

OPINION: Who Still Needs the NYSC? — By Bola Bolawole

The recent abduction of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members travelling from Ibadan, Oyo State, to orientation camps in the South-East and South-South has once again raised a difficult question: does Nigeria still need the NYSC in its present form?

The question is not new, but the latest incident has made it more urgent.

On October 1, two buses conveying NYSC members and other passengers from Ibadan to Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, and Bende, Abia State, were attacked by suspected armed men in Imo State. The police subsequently reported that 10 victims had been rescued, while efforts continued to establish the exact number of people still in captivity.

If the abducted young Nigerians travelled from Ibadan, some of them could be from Oyo and neighbouring South-West states, although victims may also have come from other parts of the country. The incident should therefore concern Nigerians collectively.

Governors whose citizens are affected should not leave the matter entirely to the Federal Government. Even where they do not directly control the police or military operations, they can support affected families, communicate with them and provide whatever assistance falls within their powers.

Questions over police handling

There are also serious questions about how information concerning the operation was handled.

The Imo State Commissioner of Police, CP Audu Bosso, disclosed that security operatives had located the kidnappers’ camp but were unable to immediately advance because intelligence indicated that the area had been mined with explosives. He also spoke about the use of drones and preparations for further operations.

That raises an important question about the disclosure of sensitive operational information while a rescue operation is still ongoing.

Security agencies must communicate with the public, but such communication should not inadvertently expose operational strategies, locations or vulnerabilities that could assist criminals.

The media, too, must exercise responsibility. The desire to break news or attract traffic should never override the safety of victims or security personnel.

Why was NYSC established?

The National Youth Service Corps was established by Decree No. 24 of May 22, 1973, following the Nigerian Civil War.

According to the NYSC, the scheme was created to promote national unity and develop common ties among Nigerian youths. Its broader purpose was to encourage young Nigerians to serve communities outside their immediate cultural and geographical environments.

The idea was understandable.

Nigeria had just emerged from a devastating civil war. The wounds were still fresh, distrust among different sections of the country was considerable, and there was an urgent need to rebuild bridges.

READ ALSO:

 

The NYSC was therefore conceived as an instrument of reconciliation, integration and national development.

But more than five decades later, we must ask whether the circumstances that gave birth to the scheme still exist in the same form — and whether the scheme is achieving its original objectives.

Fifty-three years later, what has changed?

The NYSC has undoubtedly produced benefits.

Millions of young Nigerians have lived and worked outside their home states, interacted with people from different ethnic and religious backgrounds and contributed to communities through their primary assignments and community development projects.

For many Nigerians, NYSC remains one of the few institutions where young people from different parts of the country experience Nigeria beyond their immediate environments.

But the challenges have also become enormous.

Over the years, corps members have died in road accidents while travelling to their places of primary assignment or during their service year. More recently, insecurity, terrorism, banditry and kidnapping have introduced an additional and frightening dimension to the risks confronting young Nigerians serving their country.

The latest abduction therefore forces us to ask:

For how long should young graduates be compelled to travel long distances and serve in places where their safety cannot be guaranteed?

And more importantly:

Is the present structure of the NYSC still the best way to promote national unity?

Has the NYSC achieved its central objective?

After more than five decades of the NYSC, Nigeria continues to struggle with ethnic suspicion, regional grievances and demands for greater autonomy or restructuring.

The emergence of groups such as MASSOB and IPOB in the South-East, alongside various self-determination and restructuring movements in other parts of the country, suggests that the challenge of national cohesion has not disappeared.

The South-West, too, has witnessed the emergence of different groups advocating varying forms of restructuring and self-determination.

These developments do not necessarily mean that the NYSC has failed. National integration is far more complicated than a single government programme.

But they should compel policymakers to examine whether the original model remains adequate for today’s Nigeria.

Reform rather than sentiment

The answer may not necessarily be to abolish the NYSC overnight.

There may be a strong case for fundamentally reforming it.

A modern national service programme could place greater emphasis on skills acquisition, technology, entrepreneurship, healthcare, education, disaster response and community development.

The compulsory nationwide posting system could also be reviewed, particularly where security conditions make deployment dangerous.

Nigeria should not continue doing something simply because it has been done for 53 years.

At the same time, we should not discard an institution simply because it has weaknesses. The real question should be: what works, what no longer works, and what should replace it?

Time to rethink government agencies

The NYSC debate should also be part of a broader conversation about the cost and effectiveness of government institutions.

Nigeria has numerous Ministries, Departments and Agencies whose functions sometimes overlap, while some institutions have become largely ineffective.

The Federal Government should therefore revisit recommendations on restructuring and rationalising government agencies, including the Oronsaye reforms.

The objective should not merely be cutting institutions for the sake of cutting them. It should be about creating a leaner, more efficient government that delivers better services to Nigerians.

Who still needs the NYSC?

That is ultimately the question.

The NYSC was born out of the circumstances of post-Civil War Nigeria. Its founders wanted young Nigerians to develop common bonds and a stronger sense of national identity. Those objectives remain desirable.

But the Nigeria of 2026 is not the Nigeria of 1973.

Our security challenges are different. Our population is different. Our economy is different. Our young people face different challenges. Technology has transformed communication and interaction.

The government must therefore have the courage to ask whether the NYSC should continue unchanged, be radically reformed, or eventually replaced with a more effective national service framework.

What we cannot continue to do is expose young Nigerians to avoidable danger simply because a policy was created more than half a century ago.

National unity is important. But so is the safety and dignity of the young Nigerians who are expected to serve the nation.

Bola Bolawole, a former Editor of PUNCH Newspapers, Chairman of its Editorial Board and Deputy Editor-in-Chief, writes columns for Nigerian newspapers.

Source note: The opinion is adapted for Newstrends.ng from Bola Bolawole’s October 7, 2026 article. The NYSC’s official account confirms that the scheme was established by Decree No. 24 of May 22, 1973, principally to promote national unity and common ties among Nigerian youths.

OPINION: Who Still Needs the NYSC? — By Bola Bolawole

Loading

Continue Reading

Opinion

Nigeria — My Country of Destiny

Published

on

Nigeria — My Country of Destiny
Mrs Bolatito Ajibode

Nigeria — My Country of Destiny

A speech delivered by Mrs Bolatito Ajibode, Convener, Independence Day Fiesta, at Landmark Events Centre, to mark Nigeria’s 66th Independence Anniversary

Nigeria is my country of destiny.

It is not a coincidence that I was born here. God had me in mind when He blessed this land.

It is not a coincidence that this prosperous land is populated by people of different cultures; hence, our tongues and tribes differ. We call it PRODIVA — Prosperity in Our Diversity.

The Lord finished the work of creation and should be praised for loading us with the benefits of arable soil, mineral-rich land, solid minerals, oil and gas, and a market of over 200 million people. Many are yearning for these endowments and have come to our land to explore and exploit them.

Our endowments are beckoning on us for exploration. The few who have taken up the challenge, like Dangote, are smiling to the bank by converting our huge deposits of limestone into cement and refining our crude oil into petroleum products. He has taken Nigeria to the global stage, and we are all proud of him as our brother.

We, however, need more Dangotes.

Last year, we had our maiden edition at Muri Okunola Park, where we challenged ourselves to do more by building a side hustle in addition to our 9-to-5 jobs.

We urged ourselves to:

  1. Start small from where we are and grow.
  2. Explore the vast resources of this country to create wealth.

I am happy to say that we have positive testimonies from those who have started their side hustles, making extra income and contributing to the total income of Nigeria.

READ ALSO:

Having laid a solid foundation last year, our goal this year is to cement it and contribute, individually and collectively, to the per capita income of Nigeria.

The desired growth of Nigeria can only come as we add value to the wealth of the nation in our own little corners.

That is the only variable we can control because the other variable — population — is outside our control.

We are typically excited about our young population and proudly rejoice that Nigeria is projected to become one of the five most populous countries in the world by 2050.

The question we need to ask is: How do we house, feed and clothe this growing population?

Certainly, having a young population is good, but it can also become an easy path to poverty and insecurity if we are not deliberate about growing national wealth and baking a bigger national cake.

Yes, our business environment is tough and unstructured. It raises the entry barrier because many are not ready to weather the storm. Those who are able to stay and thrive in this tough business environment have overcome the challenges, and some of them are here with us today.

A deep appreciation to our keynote speaker, Mrs Chinwe Ezenwa, the Managing Director of Lee Look Bags, who has been in the business of Ankara and Aso-Oke fabric bags for four decades. We look forward to drinking from her fountain of knowledge this morning.

Also in our midst is our brother, Mr Ola Awakan, the Director-General of the Nigerian Tourism Development Authority, who has used literature and poetry to deliver compelling indigenous stories from the heart. He has come with his team all the way from Abuja to honour us.

During the panel session today, we will hear the success stories of our panelists and also interact with them during the networking session.

In line with the theme of the year, we would like us to consider:

  • Low-hanging fruits in our business environment;
  • Low-technology business ideas;
  • Businesses that are authentic and unique to us;
  • Commercialising our indigenous values and ideas in food, clothing, arts and drama.

We need to own and dominate this space!

Today, we have in this room great men and women who have taken these indigenous values and ideas to the global stage.

They will share their PRODIVA stories and inspire us.

I believe their insightful stories will also challenge the invited students from Yaba College of Technology, the University of Lagos and Lagos State University.

The idea is to catch them young. 😍

Please note: the Independence Day Fiesta is not about storytelling alone. We are also going to have fun.

We have about four performances, including spoken-word poetry, drama, drumming, music performances and Naija music with good lyrics.

We will also break out for lunch to enjoy various Naija cuisines.

It is my prayer that, at the end of the session, we will all have our takeaways and begin to water the seed of prosperity in our diversity.

Once again, thank you for coming. Please relax and have fun.

Nigeria — My Country of Destiny

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending