Former presidential aide Reno Omokri has challenged claims that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s speech at the inauguration of the All Progressives Congress (APC) Presidential Campaign Council was pre-recorded, pointing to television coverage and footage he said showed the President delivering the address at the event.

Omokri argued that the presence of journalists, reported live broadcasts and footage showing Tinubu moving to the podium contradicted suggestions that the speech had been recorded before the inauguration.

The controversy followed questions raised by human rights lawyer Chidi Odinkalu, who expressed doubts about the circumstances surrounding the President’s appearance in the video of the event. Odinkalu questioned the camera work and transitions in the footage and called for additional recordings to establish what happened at the venue.

Responding to the allegation, Omokri cited coverage by television stations, including Arise Television, as part of his argument that Tinubu attended the inauguration and delivered his address in person.

According to Omokri, the footage showed Tinubu rising from his seat in the Banquet Hall of the Presidential Villa, walking to the presidential podium bearing the Coat of Arms and delivering his speech as cameras followed his movements.

He also pointed to shots showing the President’s empty seat after he stood up, different camera angles capturing him at the podium and footage of his interactions with attendees.

READ ALSO:

• ₦200m Fake Alcohol Packaging Uncovered as NAFDAC Raids Aba Market
• ₦130m Toyota Tundra Wrecked: Lagos Dealer Questions Police Over Suspect’s Release
• Fani-Kayode Counters Keyamo, Defends Atiku Over Nigeria Airways Collapse

Omokri further referred to exchanges involving Tinubu and some participants, including Senator Abdul’aziz Abubakar Yari, whom he identified as the Director-General of the Presidential Campaign Council.

The former presidential aide maintained that these details undermined the allegation that the President’s address had been pre-recorded. However, his arguments about the footage should be distinguished from independently established facts about the event.

In a separate report published on October 15, 2026, Premium Times said it had independently confirmed that Tinubu was physically present at the inauguration. The report provided an additional basis for assessing claims about the President’s attendance, beyond Omokri’s response.

Odinkalu’s concerns centred on what he described as unusual transitions and production-style camera work in the video. He challenged the organisers to release footage showing Tinubu walking to the podium and a wide-angle view of the hall to help clarify the circumstances surrounding the address.

The competing accounts have made the original footage central to the dispute. While evidence of Tinubu’s physical presence would challenge claims that he was absent from the venue, questions about how the address was recorded, edited and broadcast must be assessed against the available footage and other verifiable evidence.

Omokri also criticised those questioning the speech, arguing that critics of the administration should focus on examining the substance of Tinubu’s address rather than disputing whether it was delivered live.

He described the speech as well received and said it highlighted the administration’s economic performance and achievements.

According to Omokri, Tinubu used the occasion to discuss Nigeria’s economic performance, including claims of sustained gross domestic product (GDP) growth above four per cent, 14 consecutive cycles of trade surpluses and Nigeria’s contribution to global economic growth in 2025.

Omokri also referred to claims about the performance of the Nigerian stock market, which he said had been described as the most profitable in the world, citing Bloomberg.

These economic figures and assessments were presented as part of Omokri’s defence of the President’s address. They require separate examination against the relevant economic data and reporting and should not be treated as independently verified merely because they were cited in the political exchange.

The former presidential aide argued that opposition figures should scrutinise the administration’s economic claims and present alternative assessments of its performance rather than focus on the recording controversy.

He accused critics of failing to provide what he considered a substantive response to the President’s address and described the pre-recording allegation as disappointing.

The dispute has brought renewed attention to Tinubu’s APC campaign council inauguration, the circumstances surrounding his address and the wider political debate over the administration’s record.

Vice-President Kashim Shettima has launched a fresh attack on former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, declaring that he is “no Abraham Lincoln” while criticising him for addressing President Bola Ahmed Tinubu by his first name and questioning his proposed production subsidy policy ahead of the 2027 presidential election.

Shettima made the remarks on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, during the inauguration of the All Progressives Congress (APC) Presidential Campaign Council at the Banquet Hall of the Presidential Villa in Abuja.

The event provided an opportunity for the Vice-President to defend the Tinubu administration, challenge opposition figures and outline the ruling party’s arguments as preparations for the 2027 general election gather momentum.

Shettima argued that anyone aspiring to become Nigeria’s president should demonstrate maturity, discipline and respect for public institutions, even while criticising the incumbent administration.

“Those who want equity must come with clean hands. You can call him Bola. If you like, you can call him Adekunle. But the truth is that he is the President and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,” he said.

The Vice-President added that he would continue to address Atiku by his former official title despite their political differences.

“Your Excellencies, distinguished ladies and gentlemen, Atiku Abubakar. I will still respect him and call him his former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar,” Shettima said.

He subsequently compared Atiku with Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States, who is widely associated with the abolition of slavery in the country.

“But believe me, Atiku Abubakar, who has contested for the presidency of this country for the eighth time, is no Abraham Lincoln. He is more of Oginga Odinga,” the Vice-President said.

Oginga Odinga was a prominent Kenyan political figure who served as the country’s first vice-president. Shettima’s comparison formed part of his criticism of Atiku’s repeated presidential bids and political approach.

READ ALSO:

• 2027: We Know How to Stop Tinubu From Getting Second Term – Momodu
• Borno Woman Jailed Two Years for Sexual Exploitation of 16-Year-Old Girl
• Cosmetics Top Fake Products as NAFDAC Seals 179 Establishments, Arrests 52

The Vice-President maintained that the Nigerian presidency should not be regarded as an ordinary political prize, arguing that the office demands sound judgment, responsibility and respect for constitutional institutions.

“The presidency of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is not an ordinary political prize. It is the highest expression of constitutional authority in our country,” he said.

The dispute over the use of Tinubu’s first name has also attracted a response from Atiku’s camp. His aide on public communication, Phrank Shaibu, defended the former vice-president’s choice of words, arguing that “Bola” was the President’s name and that using it did not necessarily amount to disrespect.

The exchange highlights the increasingly sharp rhetoric between the ruling APC and opposition figures as political parties prepare for the next presidential election.

Shettima challenges Atiku over production subsidies

Beyond the disagreement over presidential protocol, Shettima questioned Atiku’s proposal for production subsidies, demanding explanations about how the policy would be financed and which competing government priorities might lose funding.

Atiku has advocated economic measures aimed at stimulating domestic production and easing pressure on consumers. His production subsidy proposal has become a point of contention between the opposition and the Tinubu administration.

Shettima argued that policy announcements must be accompanied by clear explanations of their costs, funding arrangements and expected benefits.

“This political season has become a masterclass in cinematic comedy,” he said.

The Vice-President continued: “Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s proposal for production subsidies raises questions that some changes cannot answer. Who pays? Who benefits? And which competing priorities must surrender their funding?”

“A change in ideological wardrobe cannot balance a national budget,” he added.

The APC Presidential Campaign Council has also challenged Atiku to explain the proposed subsidy’s funding source, spending limits, intended beneficiaries and safeguards against diversion or fraud. The council has questioned how the proposal would operate within Nigeria’s existing petroleum regulatory framework.

The disagreement raises important questions about the feasibility of fuel price relief, the cost of supporting domestic production and the government’s ability to balance economic assistance with other public spending needs.

READ ALSO:

• Nigeria Secures UN Human Rights Council Seat With 172 Votes
• Houthi Missile Targeting Riyadh Shot Down as Debris Injures Four, Damages 15 Homes
• Outrage as Israeli Settlers Torch Mosque, Burn Vehicle in Occupied West Bank

For the proposal to be properly assessed, details of its funding model, eligibility rules, implementation arrangements and expected impact on consumers and producers would need to be examined.

Vice-President questions opposition unity

Shettima also challenged opposition politicians over their ability to manage Nigeria’s competing interests, arguing that political leaders seeking to replace the APC government must demonstrate that they can work together.

“Meanwhile, those offering to rescue Nigeria cannot keep their own political households intact,” he said.

He questioned how opposition leaders could reconcile the interests of more than 200 million Nigerians if they struggled to resolve disagreements within their own political organisations.

“So I ask, if reconciling a few party leaders defeats you, how will you reconcile the interests of over 200 million citizens?” he asked.

The comments come amid political realignments ahead of the 2027 general election, with opposition figures seeking to build alliances capable of challenging the ruling party.

Shettima also criticised former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), over his economic proposals and claims concerning the 2023 presidential election.

He questioned whether policies adopted in other countries could be transferred directly to Nigeria without accounting for differences in population, institutions and economic conditions.

The Vice-President argued that claims about elections and economic performance should be supported by evidence, while defending the APC’s record in office.

Shettima defends Tinubu’s economic reforms

The Vice-President also defended the Tinubu administration’s economic reforms, particularly the removal of the petrol subsidy and changes to the foreign exchange system.

He maintained that the government had inherited serious fiscal and economic challenges and that its reforms were intended to address longstanding structural problems.

According to the administration’s position, the changes are designed to reduce distortions in public finances, improve economic stability and create conditions for sustainable growth.

However, the reforms have placed significant pressure on households and businesses, with the cost of living, transport expenses and food prices remaining important concerns for many Nigerians.

These pressures are likely to feature prominently in the 2027 election campaign, as opposition parties scrutinise the government’s performance and propose alternative economic policies.

For the APC, the challenge will be to demonstrate that its reforms are delivering tangible improvements in employment, purchasing power, investment and public services.

For the opposition, presenting credible and adequately funded alternatives will be central to persuading voters that a change in leadership would produce better economic outcomes.

Shettima’s remarks reflect the intensifying political exchanges ahead of the election, with the ruling party defending its record and opposition leaders challenging its policies and leadership.

Ultimately, the debate over Tinubu’s second-term bid, Atiku’s production subsidy proposal and the opposition’s ability to work together will place economic performance, leadership and policy credibility at the centre of the 2027 presidential contest.