Politics
Supreme Court can accept fresh evidence, Atiku tells Tinubu
Supreme Court can accept fresh evidence, Atiku tells Tinubu
Presidential Candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar, has told President Bola Tinubu that the Supreme Court can accept fresh evidence of alleged forgery in his challenge of the outcome of the February 25 election.
The Supreme Court will on Monday commence hearing in the appeals by the three political parties challenging the election with a major ruling to focus on the leave by Atiku to file copies of the deposition of the Chicago State University (CSU) in USA on Tinubu’s diploma to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
Tinubu’s lawyers had asked the apex court not to entertain the fresh 32-page depositions as they were brought outside the 180 days provided by the Electoral Act, 2022 for the hearing of the petition against the February 25 presidential election.
In the reply to the application for leave filed by Atiku, counsel to Tinubu, Wole Olanipekun (SAN) submitted that the apex court lacked the necessary jurisdiction to receive and decide on the fresh evidence at this stage of the appeal.
READ ALSO:
-
UN chief, U.S President thank Qatar Emir for release of 2 American citizens
-
Pregnant Mistress: My husband vowed to kill me and get away with it — Battered Ekiti lecturer
-
BREAKING: JAMB announces date for UTME sales of Form 2024/2025
But the lead counsel to Atiku, Chris Uche (SAN) said contrary to Tinubu’s submission, “there is no such constitutional limit of 180 days on the lower court to hear and determine a presidential election petition, such that can rob this honourable court to exercise its power in any manner whatsoever.”
According to Uche, the constitution is both the grundnorm of the land which supersedes any other legislation, and the time limit for determining election disputes involving assembly and governorship, at the lower tribunals does not in Section 285(6) apply to the Court of Appeal, and by extension, the Supreme Court.
“Thereafter, the constitution was intentional and deliberate in setting the 180 days limit only for election tribunals, and not for the Court of Appeal. On the other hand, when it came to appeals, the constitution clearly and expressly extended the same to the Court of Appeal.
“The constitution clearly excluded Court of Appeal in the preceding subsection,” he submitted
He cited Section 233 subsections (1) and (2)(e)(i) of the constitution which provides that, “The Supreme Court shall have jurisdiction, to the exclusion of any other court of law in Nigeria, to hear and determine appeals from the Court of Appeal.
“An appeal shall lie from decisions of the Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court as of right in the following cases – (e) decisions on any question – (i) whether any person has been validly elected to the office of President or Vice President under this constitution.”
Politics
ADC Leadership Crisis Deepens as Rival Faction Protests at INEC Headquarters
ADC Leadership Crisis Deepens as Rival Faction Protests at INEC Headquarters
A fresh wave of internal crisis has hit the African Democratic Congress (ADC) as a rival faction of the party, led by Nafiu Bala Gombe, staged a protest on Thursday at the headquarters of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in Abuja.
The demonstrators, who gathered in significant numbers, called on a separate faction reportedly aligned with prominent political figures—including David Mark, Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, and Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso—to desist from interfering in the party’s internal affairs.
Leading the protest, Nafiu Bala Gombe insisted that the integrity and independence of the ADC must be preserved, warning against what he described as external influence and imposition of leadership within the party structure.
READ ALSO:
- UN Chief Condemns Israeli Airstrikes in Lebanon
- Iran Warns of Sea Mines in Strait of Hormuz, Offers Alternative Routes for Ships
- ADC Leadership Crisis Deepens as Rival Faction Protests at INEC Headquarters
He was joined by a member of the House of Representatives, Leke Abejide, who represents a constituency in Kogi State. Abejide echoed concerns over what the group termed attempts to destabilise the party through parallel leadership claims.
The protesters urged INEC to uphold the rule of law by strictly adhering to a recent court ruling concerning the party’s leadership dispute. They specifically called on the electoral body to maintain the “status quo ante bellum”—a legal term referring to the state of affairs before the emergence of the current conflict—pending final resolution of the matter.
Chanting solidarity songs and carrying placards, the group emphasised the need for transparency, judicial compliance, and neutrality in the commission’s handling of party affairs.
The development marks a further escalation in the ADC’s internal wrangling, raising concerns about the party’s stability ahead of future political engagements.
ADC Leadership Crisis Deepens as Rival Faction Protests at INEC Headquarters
Politics
Court Stops ADC Congress, Orders Status Quo in Leadership Row
Court Stops ADC Congress, Orders Status Quo in Leadership Row
A High Court in Katsina State has issued an interim order restraining key members of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) from parading themselves as officials of the party in the state and barred the conduct of any party congress pending the determination of a suit before the court.
The order followed an ex parte motion filed by Usman Wamba, who claims to be the legitimate Katsina State Chairman of the ADC. Wamba approached the court to challenge what he described as attempts by rival party members to usurp his position and authority.
In a ruling delivered by Justice A. K. Tukur on April 7, 2026, the court restrained Lawan Batagarawa and Babangida Ibrahim Mahuta from presenting themselves as leaders or stakeholders of the ADC Katsina chapter. They were also prohibited from conducting any party activities or organising congresses until the motion on notice is fully heard and determined.
READ ALSO:
- US Evacuates Embassy Staff in Nigeria, Lists 23 States as ‘Do Not Travel’
- #OccupyINEC: ADC Protests in Abuja, Demands INEC Chairman’s Resignation
- South African Protesters Force Closure of Nigerian-Owned Nightclub
The court further restrained the national leadership of the ADC and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from recognising, supervising, or participating in any congress organised by the defendants in Katsina State. Justice Tukur ordered all parties to maintain the status quo concerning leadership and activities of the party in the state.
Additionally, the court granted Wamba leave to serve the defendants outside Katsina State, including in Abuja, via courier. The substantive hearing of the motion has been scheduled for April 15, 2026.
ADC’s Katsina State legal adviser, Barrister Mustapha Shiru Mahuta, confirmed receipt of the court order, saying the party’s legal team was reviewing it and preparing for further actions.
The injunction comes amid a protracted leadership crisis within the ADC Katsina chapter, which has seen rival factions claiming legitimate authority ahead of congresses intended to position the party for the 2027 general elections. The court’s ruling effectively halts all planned congresses at ward, local government, and state levels in Katsina.
Political analysts note that the case highlights how internal party disputes can escalate into legal battles, disrupting organisational structures and delaying preparations for wider political engagement.
Court Stops ADC Congress, Orders Status Quo in Leadership Row
Politics
#OccupyINEC: ADC Protests in Abuja, Demands INEC Chairman’s Resignation
#OccupyINEC: ADC Protests in Abuja, Demands INEC Chairman’s Resignation
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) led a massive protest in Abuja on Tuesday under the hashtag #OccupyINEC, calling for the resignation of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Chairman, Professor Joseph Amupitan. The party accused INEC of partisanship, constitutional violations, and interference in internal party affairs, actions it says threaten Nigeria’s democratic process.

ADC Protests in Abuja
The demonstration began at the Maitama Roundabout and drew a host of prominent political figures, including former Senate President David Mark, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, former Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola, Labour Party 2023 presidential candidate Peter Obi, former Kano State Governor Rabiu Kwankwaso, and ex-Kogi West Senator Dino Melaye. Their presence highlighted the seriousness of the protest and amplified public attention.
ADC leaders accused the INEC Chairman of overstepping his constitutional authority, especially in matters related to court rulings and party leadership disputes. According to the party, INEC’s actions — including publicly interpreting court judgments — encroach on the judiciary’s exclusive powers and undermine the credibility of the electoral system.
READ ALSO:
- South African Protesters Force Closure of Nigerian-Owned Nightclub
- Lookman Stars as Atletico Madrid Beat 10-Man Barcelona 2-0
- Imported Petrol 12% Cheaper Than Dangote Fuel – World Bank
The protest also comes amid ongoing internal ADC disputes, which INEC has been accused of complicating by attempting to influence or reverse prior decisions regarding the party’s leadership structure. ADC insists that all internal processes were transparent and had been acknowledged by INEC in sworn affidavits.
During the demonstration, ADC presented six formal demands to INEC:
- Immediate resignation or removal of the INEC Chairman.
- Withdrawal of “offensive” correspondence sent to the party.
- Formal apology from INEC.
- Clear commitment to non-interference in political party affairs.
- Restoration of public trust in the electoral process.
- Implementation of reforms to ensure neutrality and transparency in future elections.
The party warned that failure to comply would trigger legal action and civic mobilisation, including judicial proceedings to hold the commission accountable. “The integrity of Nigeria’s democracy cannot and will not be sacrificed on the altar of institutional compromise,” ADC stated.
The protest saw supporters carrying placards and banners highlighting support for ADC leadership and denouncing perceived INEC bias. Party leaders emphasized that their action is aimed at protecting Nigeria’s democratic values ahead of the 2027 general elections.
#OccupyINEC: ADC Protests in Abuja, Demands INEC Chairman’s Resignation
-
metro2 days agoFG Deports US Missionary Alex Barbir Over Alleged Role in Nigeria Insecurity
-
Entertainment2 days agoVeteran Nollywood Actor Davis Ofor ‘Clarus’ of New Masquerade Dies at 85
-
metro1 day ago2026 NYSC Batch A Stream II: Registration, Swearing-In Dates Announced
-
Africa11 hours agoECOWAS Recruitment 2026: Over 30 Job Vacancies Open for Nigerians (How to Apply)
-
metro2 days agoLagos Announces Partial Road Closures for Project Commissioning
-
Entertainment1 day agoSaheed Osupa Defends Juju Use Amid Backlash From Islamic Clerics
-
Politics16 hours agoCourt Stops ADC Congress, Orders Status Quo in Leadership Row
-
News2 days agoIran Lists Tough Conditions for Peace Talks with US


