News
Insecurity: US won’t relocate Africa Command to Nigeria, others, Pentagon replies Buhari
The United States has said there is no plan to relocate its Africa Command from its current base in Germany to Nigeria or any other part of Africa despite the worsening state of insecurity in the region.
The US gave the response barely two weeks after the President, Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd), appealed to the US government to consider relocating AFRICOM to Africa to assist Nigeria and other adjoining countries to combat worsening terrorism, banditry and other security crises.
The President made the plea in a virtual meeting with the US Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, on April 27.
Germany-based Africa Command (AFRICOM) is the US military headquarters that oversees its operations in Africa.
Buhari’s request followed a series of recent military casualties in Nigeria’s decade-long fight against Boko Haram terrorists, fresh expansion of the insurgents’ bases to Niger and Nasarawa states, and heavy wave of abductions and killings by bandits in the North.
Buhari said, “The security challenges in Nigeria remain of great concern to us and impacted more negatively, by existing complex negative pressures in the Sahel, Central and West Africa, as well as the Lake Chad Region.
“Compounded as the situation remains, Nigeria and her security forces remain resolutely committed to containing them and addressing their root causes.
“The support of important and strategic partners like the United States cannot be overstated as the consequences of insecurity will affect all nations, hence the imperative for concerted cooperation and collaboration of all nations to overcome these challenges.
“In this connection, and considering the growing security challenges in West and Central Africa, Gulf of Guinea, Lake Chad region and the Sahel, weighing heavily on Africa, it underscores the need for the United States to consider relocating AFRICOM headquarters from Stuttgart, Germany to Africa and near the Theatre of Operation.”
However, the US government on Thursday ruled out any plan to relocate AFRICOM from its current base in Germany to Nigeria or any part of Africa.
According to the United States Department of Defence’ Pentagon, previous studies have shown that the cost of relocating AFRICOM from Germany to Africa is very huge.
In an emailed response to Saturday PUNCH, the Pentagon said although it would continue to value Nigeria and other countries in Africa as important partners, the American government would not consider relocating AFRICOM to any part of the African continent at the moment.
This newspaper had asked if the US would consider Nigeria’s request to relocate AFRICOM to the continent.
The US Pentagon spokesperson, Ms Cindi King, said, “Although there is an ongoing Global Posture Review, the relocation of Combatant Command headquarters is outside the scope of its assessment. In the case of AFRICOM, previous studies have concluded that the cost associated with the relocation of this headquarters is significant and likely to incur the expense of other engagement opportunities and activities that more directly benefit our valued African partners.
“We greatly value the partnership with Nigeria and appreciate President Buhari’s recognition of the United States’ positive contribution to African peace and security, as well as other regional partners that have made similar past pronouncements. The United States remains committed to continuing our close partnership with African countries and organisations to promote security and stability.”
It’s ‘near impossible’ for America to accept Buhari’s invitation – Campbell, ex-US ambassador
Meanwhile, a former United States Ambassador to Nigeria, John Campbell, has listed reasons why it is “unlikely or near impossible” for the US government to relocate AFRICOM from Stuttgart in Germany to Nigeria or any part of the continent.
He said aside from the fact that the cost of doing so is very huge, the Nigerian military had proved to be a difficult partner for the US over the years.
In an emailed interview with Saturday PUNCH, Campbell, who is the Ralph Bunche Senior Fellow for Africa Policy Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, a Washington, DC-based think-tank, said, “From an American perspective, moving AFRICOM’s headquarters after 14 years in Stuttgart would be a major undertaking.
“However, should the AFRICOM headquarters move, it is unlikely – if not impossible – that it would be to Africa, with its logistical challenges. Some in the US Congress support moving AFRICOM’s headquarters to the United States as a cost-effective alternative. For example, South Carolina’s senators, both Republican, have advocated moving it to Charleston, the site of large US military installations.
“It is mostly a matter of money. Moving AFRICOM to Africa would require the construction of a sophisticated installation in areas where the basic infrastructure may not yet have been developed. Moving it to the United States would mean making use of already existing but underused installation (e.g., perhaps Charleston) that could be quickly and more cheaply expanded, if necessary.”
The ex-envoy, however, said Buhari’s request marked a reversal of Nigeria’s official opposition to AFRICOM plans to move it to the continent 14 years ago.
“The shift likely reflects the conclusion that the security situation in West Africa and Nigeria is out of control, spurring a willingness to consider options hitherto unacceptable. Buhari argued that AFRICOM’s headquarters should be closer to the theatre of operations. He also seemed to imply greater US involvement in West African security, including a kinetic dimension in the context of greater Western support for West Africa’s response to its security threats.”
He recalled that when President George W Bush established AFRICOM in 2007, a military-civilian hybrid command in support of Africa, African official reaction was largely hostile, seeing the effort as “neo-colonialist.”
Campbell said, “The Nigerian government took the lead in persuading or strong-arming other African states against accepting the AFRICOM headquarters, which was thereupon established at Stuttgart, Germany, already the headquarters of the European Command.
“In addition to opposing AFRICOM in the first place, the Nigerian military authorities have been largely uncooperative with the US military. Hence, the US military involvement in Nigeria, beyond limited training operations, is minimal, and the country does not host any American defence installations.
“Successive Nigerian governments have wanted to purchase sophisticated American military equipment but have rejected US oversight. In fact, Nigerian purchases of US military materials have been rare, despite their high-profile, ultimately successful purchase of 12 A-29 Super Tucanos – sophisticated aircraft.”
Why US can’t relocate AFRICOM troops from Germany to Nigeria –Chatham House fellow
Corroborating Campbell’s view, an Associate Fellow at the United Kingdom-based Chatham House, Matthew Page, said there was no prospect of the US relocating its AFRICOM HQ from Germany to any part of Africa.
Chatham House, also known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs, is an independent policy institute headquarters whose mission is to provide authoritative commentary on world events and offer solutions to global challenges.
Page said, “There is absolutely no prospect of this happening. A combatant command headquarters is an administrative node that requires enormous physical infrastructure and thousands of personnel (and their families) to sustain it. They need to be able to safely live, work, and send their children to school locally. The Nigerian government is unable to safeguard the lives of hard-working Nigerians, never mind a US military installation that would be a juicy target for a terrorist attack.
“With the exception of European Command and Africa Command – which for longstanding historical reasons are located and headquartered in Germany – all combatant commands are located in the United States. These commands do have forward elements and subordinate commands based in the theatre of operations, such as Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa (CJTF-HOA) based in Djibouti. But these typically are task-specific and have a light local footprint. The United States is not – and doesn’t want to be – an imperial power with permanent military outposts on the continent. Nor should African leaders be asking it to become one.”
Page, who was previously with the US Department of State’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research, further said, “I am sure the Biden administration was puzzled by President Buhari’s invitation, given that Nigeria has been a reluctant and difficult security partner for the United States. The Nigerian Army has long viewed US military engagement in West Africa with deep suspicion, shunning deeper ties and ignoring Washington’s calls for security sector reform and human rights improvements. Inviting AFRICOM to relocate to Nigeria is the equivalent of proposing marriage before going on a first date.”
Nigeria, other African leaders must take responsibility for citizens’ security – Expert
However, a counter-terrorism expert and Senior Researcher for the Lake Chad Basin Programme at the Institute for Security Studies, Dakar, Senegal, Dr Akinola Olojo, has said that Buhari and other African leaders must take responsibility for the security of their citizens, noting that the entire burden cannot be pushed on foreign countries.
He spoke against a backdrop of Nigeria and African countries getting US help in the fight against terrorists and other criminals in the region.
Olojo said, “The relocation of the United States Africa Command from Germany to Africa would depend on a number of factors anchored on the foreign policy priorities of the US in the current period. Beyond this, however, is the need for Nigeria (and African countries) to be sincere with a self-interrogation regarding whether the relocation of an external entity such as AFRICOM will address Africa’s challenges of insecurity.
“The ultimate burden of responsibility for ensuring the human security of African citizens lies on the leadership or governments in Africa. The presence of French troops supporting the G5 Sahel Joint Force for nearly a decade has not really solved the fundamental or root causes of the crisis affecting Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso. To be clear, there is nothing wrong with global partnerships when it comes to addressing insecurity. Besides, challenges such as violent extremism have a transnational character and in early 2020, the US and Kenya launched a joint terrorism task force. As long as such frameworks are mutually beneficial, this is good.
“However, the governments of Nigeria and countries in Africa must begin to live up to the responsibility entrusted to them by citizens. In other words, leadership in Africa must inspire and drive the process for implementing the different policy frameworks and national action plans which already exist on the continent.”
Meanwhile, a government official familiar with US operations said even if the US chose to relocate its AFRICOM to Nigeria or any part of the West Coast, it would come with its own challenges which might affect Nigeria or its neighbours adversely.
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to speak on the matter, said, “Bringing AFRICOM to Africa or Nigeria will be a major problem for Nigeria and the African continent. Bringing AFRICOM to Nigeria, for example, will be tantamount to inviting or attracting all the enemies of the US, including global terrorist organisations, to the host country. Such a host country will become a subject of attack from terrorist organisations.”
President Joe Biden had in February stopped the planned withdrawal of US troops from Germany that was ordered last year by the Donald Trump administration but had never actually begun, Associated Press reported.
Biden said the troops’ pullout would be halted until the US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin did a review of America’s troops presence around the globe.
Austin, he said, would ensure that “our military footprint is appropriately aligned with our foreign policy and national security priorities.”
In a statement, Austin said the US Department of Defence would conduct “a global force posture review of U.S. military footprint, resources, strategy and missions.”
The review, he said, “will inform my advice to the commander in chief about how we best allocate military forces in pursuit of national interests. The review will be led by the acting undersecretary of defence for policy, in close consultation with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.”
Last year, President Trump announced that he was going to pull out about 9,500 of the roughly 34,500 US troops stationed in Germany. The US has several major military facilities in the country, including Ramstein Air Base, the headquarters for US European Command and US Africa Command, and Landstuhl Regional Medical Centre, the largest American hospital outside the United States.
Trump’s order met resistance from Congress as well as from within the military, which has long relied on Germany as a key ally and base of operations. Trump announced the troop cuts after repeatedly accusing Germany of not paying enough for its own defence, calling the long time NATO ally “delinquent” for failing to spend two per cent of its GDP on defence, the alliance benchmark.
Austin hinted at a likely reconsideration of the order in a conversation with his German counterpart.
German officials believe the order will be rescinded by the new administration, and the German Defence Ministry said that in Austin’s call with his German counterpart, he “emphasised that Germany is highly valued as a station and that American soldiers feel very comfortable here.”
“The US continues to consider its presence in Germany as an important part of joint security,” the Defense Ministry said.
-Saturday Punch
![]()
News
Cocaine Trafficking: Court Denies KC Luxury Bail Over Missing Medical Certificate
The Federal High Court in Lagos has rejected the bail application of Nigerian businessman and social media influencer Afolabi Kazeem Michael, popularly known as KC Luxury, over alleged cocaine trafficking and money laundering, ruling that the defence failed to provide sufficient medical evidence to justify his release.
Justice Musa Kakaki delivered the ruling on Wednesday, October 28, 2026, holding that the application lacked the necessary medical certificate to establish special circumstances warranting bail on health grounds.
“There is no medical certificate to warrant the court to grant him bail,” the judge said.
He added that a defendant claiming to require special medical attention should provide an expert assessment explaining the condition and the need for the requested treatment.
KC Luxury’s lawyer, Emefo Etudo, had asked the court to release his client so he could receive specialised treatment at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH). The defence argued that his health had deteriorated and that he required medical attention beyond what was available at the facility where he was being held.
READ ALSO:
- After AfDB Tenure, Adesina Offers to Help Tinubu Drive Nigeria’s Growth
- Why Nigeria Needs Fresh $21.7bn Loan Despite Rising Debt Burden – Finance Minister
- Emeka Ike Loses ₦10bn Privacy Suit Against Wike’s Aide, INEC
The application followed concerns about the defendant’s health after he was brought to the court premises in an ambulance on October 23 while receiving oxygen.
During that proceeding, a nurse attached to the Police Hospital in Falomo, Lagos, told the court that KC Luxury had been admitted on October 7 and diagnosed with asthma and sepsis.
The nurse said the defendant remained inside the ambulance because he was receiving oxygen and could not safely be moved into the courtroom.
The defence also alleged that KC Luxury had suffered a collapsed lung and needed specialist care. However, the prosecution opposed the bail request, arguing that the medical evidence did not establish that his condition could not be managed while in custody.
In his ruling, Justice Kakaki reviewed the medical exhibits submitted by the defence but held that they did not sufficiently establish the special circumstances required to grant bail.
The judge also noted that the defence had failed to demonstrate a material change in circumstances that would justify reconsidering the application.
He questioned the argument that KC Luxury needed treatment at LUTH without sufficient evidence showing that the hospital or other available medical facilities could not adequately manage his condition.
Despite refusing bail, the court directed officials of the Ikoyi Custodial Centre to ensure that the defendant had unrestricted access to doctors and medical specialists for examination and treatment.
The judge also ordered an accelerated hearing of the case and adjourned proceedings until November 2, 2026, for the commencement of trial.
KC Luxury is standing trial alongside Boniface Freeman Ochoche Sule and Ikechukwu Ekugo Patriarch on a 22-count charge filed by the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA).
The charges include allegations of conspiring to export 184.5 kilogrammes of cocaine to the United Kingdom and money laundering. The defendants have pleaded not guilty.
According to the NDLEA, the cocaine was intercepted at a courier facility in Lagos before it could be exported. The agency also accused the defendants of involvement in financial transactions and asset acquisitions allegedly connected to the suspected drug operation.
The defendants have yet to be convicted, and the allegations remain before the court.
The latest ruling means KC Luxury will remain in custody while the criminal proceedings continue, with the court directing that his medical needs be addressed during detention.
Cocaine Trafficking: Court Denies KC Luxury Bail Over Missing Medical Certificate
![]()
News
After AfDB Tenure, Adesina Offers to Help Tinubu Drive Nigeria’s Growth
Former President of the African Development Bank (AfDB), Akinwumi Adesina, has declared his readiness to contribute to Nigeria’s development in any capacity deemed appropriate by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, while clarifying that he is not seeking a government appointment.
Adesina made the declaration on Tuesday after meeting Tinubu at the Presidential Villa in Abuja, where he briefed the President on his 10-year tenure at the continental development finance institution and its financial support for Nigeria.
The former AfDB president said his willingness to serve was motivated by patriotism and a sense of responsibility to his country, rather than a desire to secure a political position.
“I’m fully able to help Nigeria in any capacity. I’ve always had that. My heart is always at home,” he told journalists after the meeting.
He added that he was prepared to contribute wherever the President considered his experience and expertise useful.
“In any capacity that His Excellency feels I can help, I can help in anything. I’m not looking for a job. I’m not looking for anything. I’m just here to help,” Adesina said.
“It’s my country. I have a duty, an obligation and a responsibility to do so, and I will.”
Adesina briefs Tinubu on AfDB achievements
Adesina explained that the visit was an opportunity to formally inform Tinubu that he had completed his two terms as AfDB president and to present an account of the bank’s achievements during his leadership.
READ ALSO:
- Why Nigeria Needs Fresh $21.7bn Loan Despite Rising Debt Burden – Finance Minister
- Emeka Ike Loses ₦10bn Privacy Suit Against Wike’s Aide, INEC
- 2027: APC Chieftain Boasts Tinubu Will Defeat Atiku Even in His Polling Unit
He said the bank provided approximately $7 billion in financing to Nigeria between 2015 and 2025, compared with total financing of $11.1 billion since it began operations in Nigeria in 1971.
According to him, the financing provided during his decade at the helm represented approximately 63 per cent of the bank’s cumulative support to Nigeria over the period.
Adesina said Tinubu expressed satisfaction with the bank’s contributions and the projects supported during his tenure.
The former Nigerian minister of agriculture led the AfDB from 2015 until September 2025, completing two terms as the institution’s president. He was the first Nigerian to occupy the position.
Adesina commends Tinubu’s economic reforms
During the meeting, Adesina also commended Tinubu’s economic reforms, particularly the removal of the petrol subsidy and the harmonisation of foreign exchange windows.
He described the measures as difficult but important decisions, arguing that they were beginning to produce results in some areas of the economy.
According to him, foreign exchange availability had improved, portfolio investors were returning to the country, and inflation was trending downwards.
However, he acknowledged that prices remained high, meaning many Nigerians continued to face pressure from the cost of living.
Adesina also cited improved assessments from some international credit-rating agencies, which he said reflected changing perceptions of Nigeria’s economic outlook.
Despite these developments, he cautioned that economic stabilisation was only the beginning of a broader transformation process.
“You have to also now move from the issue of the reforms and stabilisation straight into structural transformation and also growth and prosperity,” he said.
He argued that Nigeria must now focus on translating economic reforms into stronger productivity, expanded economic opportunities and improved living standards.
Former AfDB chief urges focus on growth and prosperity
Adesina’s remarks place emphasis on the need to move beyond macroeconomic adjustments towards policies that deliver tangible benefits for households and businesses.
His comments come amid continuing debate over the impact of the Tinubu administration’s reforms, including the removal of fuel subsidies and changes to the foreign exchange market.
While the government has defended the measures as necessary to stabilise public finances and improve economic efficiency, higher living costs have remained a concern for many Nigerians.
Adesina did not announce any specific government role he was prepared to take up, and the Presidency did not announce an appointment following the meeting.
Instead, the former AfDB president reiterated his willingness to contribute his experience in development finance, agriculture and economic transformation whenever the President considered his services necessary.
After AfDB Tenure, Adesina Offers to Help Tinubu Drive Nigeria’s Growth
![]()
News
Why Nigeria Needs Fresh $21.7bn Loan Despite Rising Debt Burden – Finance Minister
Why Nigeria Needs Fresh $21.7bn Loan Despite Rising Debt Burden – Finance Minister
The Federal Government has defended its plan to secure about $21.7 billion in fresh external loans, saying additional financing is needed to bridge Nigeria’s infrastructure funding gap, support economic growth and finance critical development projects across the country.
The proposed borrowing plan, covering 2026 and 2027, comprises $20.52 billion and €1.045 billion, equivalent to approximately $21.7 billion.
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu submitted the request to the National Assembly, arguing that Nigeria requires substantial investment to address infrastructure shortages and sustain economic development.
The proposed facilities would support projects and programmes in power, transportation, healthcare, education, agriculture, water supply, security and employment generation, as well as reforms to public financial management.
According to the President, the projects underwent technical and economic evaluations and are expected to create jobs, promote skills acquisition and entrepreneurship, reduce poverty and strengthen food security.
He said external borrowing had become necessary because the financial resources required to close Nigeria’s infrastructure deficit exceeded what the government could adequately provide from existing funding sources.
The request is subject to legislative approval and has not yet received final authorisation.
Why the government says Nigeria needs more loans
The administration’s main argument is that inadequate infrastructure continues to constrain productivity, investment and economic growth. It maintains that borrowing can provide the capital needed to finance projects that would otherwise face funding delays.
READ ALSO:
- Emeka Ike Loses ₦10bn Privacy Suit Against Wike’s Aide, INEC
- 2027: APC Chieftain Boasts Tinubu Will Defeat Atiku Even in His Polling Unit
- Awujale Succession: Abiodun Promises New Ijebuland Monarch Before May 29, 2027
Electricity, transport networks, healthcare facilities, education and water infrastructure are among the sectors expected to benefit from the proposed financing.
The government also argues that investment in these areas could stimulate economic activities, improve access to essential services and generate employment across the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory.
However, the economic benefits will depend on whether the projects are completed on schedule, remain within budget and deliver returns sufficient to justify their financing costs.
Nigeria’s debt profile raises concerns
The proposed borrowing comes amid growing scrutiny of the country’s public debt.
Figures from the Debt Management Office show that Nigeria’s total public debt stood at ₦166.79 trillion at the end of June 2026, compared with ₦87.38 trillion in June 2023.
The increase has intensified debate over the government’s borrowing strategy, although the rise in the naira value of external debt has also been influenced by exchange-rate depreciation.
If the proposed facilities are fully approved and disbursed, they would add to Nigeria’s existing obligations, with the eventual impact depending on exchange rates, repayment terms and other changes in the debt stock.
Economists and business groups have therefore called for greater transparency about the individual projects to be financed, their costs, expected returns and repayment arrangements.
The Association of Small Business Owners of Nigeria has warned that new borrowing should be tied to projects capable of generating measurable economic benefits, including jobs, productivity and government revenue.
Questions over previous borrowing
The latest request has also prompted questions about the implementation of projects funded by earlier loans and the government’s outstanding obligations to contractors.
Senator Victor Umeh, who represents Anambra Central, questioned why contractors executing capital projects were still awaiting payment despite previous legislative approvals for borrowing.
He argued that the government needed to demonstrate how earlier facilities had been used and explain why budgeted projects remained underfunded.
Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, the presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress, also urged the National Assembly to suspend consideration of the request until the government provides comprehensive information about the projects, contractors, costs, loan terms and repayment obligations.
The concerns centre on whether additional borrowing will produce sufficient economic returns or increase the pressure on public finances without delivering commensurate development benefits.
National Assembly to scrutinise request
The President’s proposal has been referred to the relevant National Assembly committees for consideration.
The legislative review is expected to examine the proposed facilities and their intended uses before lawmakers decide whether to approve the request.
The government maintains that the financing is necessary to address infrastructure shortages and support development, while critics insist that the administration must demonstrate the value of previous loans and provide clearer details of the new projects.
Ultimately, the justification for the proposed $21.7 billion borrowing plan will depend not only on the infrastructure needs identified by the government but also on the terms of the loans, the transparency of project selection, the effectiveness of implementation and Nigeria’s ability to meet its repayment obligations.
Why Nigeria Needs Fresh $21.7bn Loan Despite Rising Debt Burden – Finance Minister
![]()
-
metro2 days agoCancelled Wedding: Man Sues Ex-Fiancée’s Father Over Unpaid ₦70,000 Dowry
-
Auto2 days agoCar of the Year, other top honours up for grabs as NAJA Awards race begins
-
Sports2 days agoKANE ENDS 25-YEAR WAIT! England Captain Wins 2026 Ballon d’Or After Stunning 73-Goal Season
-
metro3 days agoSchool Bus Driver Turns Kidnapper, Collects ₦503,000 Ransom, Rapes 14-Year-Old Delta Student
-
metro2 days agoIKEDC Blames National Grid for Two-Week Power Crisis in Ishaga, Oke-Ayo
-
metro1 day agoNigerian Navy Recruitment 2026: October 31 Deadline, Full Requirements and How to Apply
-
metro3 days agoMassacre in Taraba: Death Toll Soars to 48 as Fleeing Villagers Drown in Desperate Escape
-
metro2 days agoEFCC Busts Four Illegal Lithium Plants in Ogun, Arrests 14 Chinese Nationals
