"Close Your Mouth": Amaechi, Sowore, Obi Clash Over Fuel Subsidy in Heated NBA Debate - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

“Close Your Mouth”: Amaechi, Sowore, Obi Clash Over Fuel Subsidy in Heated NBA Debate

Published

on

"Close Your Mouth": Amaechi, Sowore, Obi Clash Over Fuel Subsidy in Heated NBA Debate
Peter Obi, Omoyele Sowore and Rorimi Amaechi

“Close Your Mouth”: Amaechi, Sowore, Obi Clash Over Fuel Subsidy in Heated NBA Debate

The 66th Annual General Conference of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, turned into a fiery political battleground on Monday as three prominent political figures engaged in a heated exchange over fuel subsidy removal, governance records, and Nigeria’s political future ahead of the 2027 elections. The panel session, which was one of the major highlights of the conference themed “Beyond Limits,” brought together presidential hopefuls including Omoyele Sowore of the African Action Congress (AAC), Rotimi Amaechi, Vice Presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), and Peter Obi of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), who offered competing solutions to Nigeria’s worsening economic and governance challenges. What began as a policy debate quickly escalated into shouting matches, personal attacks, and sharp exchanges as the politicians traded barbs over their records in public office.

Omoyele Sowore, the AAC presidential candidate, opened the debate by asserting his long-standing opposition to fuel subsidy removal, accusing past and present leaders of shifting positions at the expense of ordinary Nigerians. “If there’s anyone who has been consistent about non-removal of fuel subsidy, it has been me. And it took Amaechi and his principal almost 10 years to catch up with me. They have now reversed their position on fuel subsidy,” Sowore declared. Sowore challenged the economic justification for the policy, arguing that the real beneficiaries of subsidy removal were political elites and state governors rather than the masses. “The question about subsidy is, who are you subsidising? You are subsidising the elite. You are subsidising the governors. The only people who are doing well since they removed subsidy are the governors of states,” he said. He also rejected the impression that subsidy removal was a new policy, recalling that previous administrations had removed or attempted to remove subsidies while promising Nigerians better economic conditions. “I was a student in 1989, they removed subsidy. In 1990, they removed subsidy. They said Nigeria will be better. We are in 2026, they are still removing subsidy,” Sowore said. Referencing an earlier comment by Amaechi, Sowore noted: “I love one thing that Amaechi said. He said, apart from Sowore and Adebayo, the rest of us have been in government and we have failed. They have no business coming back. You guys should be apologising to the Nigerian people.”

READ ALSO:

A visibly frustrated Amaechi quickly interjected, cutting Sowore off mid-sentence to refute the characterization of his remarks. “Stop lying. Stop lying, Sowore. I said, judge us by our achievements,” Amaechi fired back. Unfazed by the interruption, Sowore turned his sights directly to Amaechi’s record as a former governor of Rivers State and former Minister of Transportation. “When it comes to subsidy, right? Transportation policy is important. We have a former governor of Rivers State here, Amaechi, who built a rail line that went nowhere. If that rail line was working, subsidy would have been working for the people of Rivers State,” Sowore argued. Responding, Amaechi defended his record as governor and as former Minister, highlighting his administration’s construction of roads, primary schools, and major rail projects like the Lagos-Ibadan and Abuja-Kaduna railways. The ADC vice-presidential candidate quipped: “Where are Rivers lawyers? Let them take Sowore around and show him what I did as a former Governor.” Amaechi asked lawyers from Lagos, Ogun, and Kaduna states to confirm if the railway systems were still working in their states, noting that the Lagos-Ibadan railway was operational during his tenure and questioning why it was not working under President Bola Tinubu. When Sowore interjected again, Amaechi lost his cool and declared: “Moreover, Sowore, when politicians are talking, close your mouth.”

Turning his criticism to Peter Obi, Sowore alleged that Obi had failed to subsidise education during his tenure as Anambra State governor. “Peter Obi did not subsidise education in his state. Lecturers and doctors went on strike for 13 months. You may like him as a person, but he did not perform as a governor. That is the truth,” Amaechi said. Amaechi also argued that transportation policy should form part of the conversation around fuel subsidy, and he defended his own record as Minister of Transportation, saying the Lagos-Ajaokuta railway was operational during his tenure. He also used the opportunity to issue a broader challenge to Nigerians, urging voters to judge politicians by competence rather than ethnic or sectional loyalties. “A coalition should be based on performance. And I speak to you, you should do a referendum. We have all served in government. Atiku has served in government, Peter Obi has served in government, I have served in government and others. Assess us by our last performance and choose,” he said. He warned that Nigeria would continue to struggle with underdevelopment if Nigerians continued to vote along ethnic lines without considering the past performance of candidates. “Don’t just go because you are from Ikwerre or you are from Omoku and choose your own. No! That’s why we are running down,” Amaechi said.

READ ALSO:

Peter Obi, presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), defended the necessity of removing fuel subsidy, maintaining that while he supports the policy, his administration would have executed it differently to directly benefit citizens. “I subscribe and I maintain that you need to remove subsidy. Mismanagement of the proceeds should not be the reason for not removing it,” Obi said. Obi argued that the problem was not the policy itself but the failure of government to properly utilise the resources saved from it. “What we should have done is that when we remove subsidy, we would have given the people alternative usage for the subsidy. What we have today is that that removal and the attendant resources being recovered are also being mismanaged and stolen,” he said. Citing reported savings of approximately N16 trillion from the subsidy removal, Obi noted that just five per cent of that amount—about N800 billion—could be used to build primary healthcare centres across all 8,809 wards in Nigeria. He also suggested that the savings could have been added to Nigeria’s sovereign wealth fund to generate long-term returns. “If they had saved the money and decided to do like any other country, we would have had $10 billion added to the sovereign wealth fund, which, if you add it today, we will be getting about $10 billion every month, which we can use for a purpose,” Obi said. Obi also emphasised that a Nigerian economy driven by production rather than consumption would work wonders for the country. “Nigeria is poor today because it is not a productive country. Some of us might not be aware that two years ago, Ukraine, which is at war, gave us grain. We are hungry today because Nigeria is not a productive country,” he said.

The drama took an interesting turn when a young lawyer at the conference challenged Amaechi’s reported claim that Sowore could not win a presidential election, arguing that opposition politicians should unite and suggesting that Peter Obi remains the most popular among the contenders. The intervention highlighted the growing appetite among Nigerians for a coalition of opposition forces ahead of the 2027 elections. The NBA conference thus provided one of the earliest major platforms for 2027 presidential hopefuls to publicly test their competing positions on governance, economic management, and accountability, setting the stage for a potentially intense political contest ahead of the general elections. The clash over fuel subsidy—a policy that has significantly impacted the cost of living for millions of Nigerians—remains a central dividing line among the candidates, with Sowore opposing it outright, Obi supporting it but criticising its implementation, and Amaechi arguing for accountability and performance-based governance.

“Close Your Mouth”: Amaechi, Sowore, Obi Clash Over Fuel Subsidy in Heated NBA Debate

Loading

Politics

‘Mad People’: Presidency Fires Back at Amaechi Over Tinubu Re-Election Remarks

Published

on

‘Mad People’: Presidency Fires Back at Amaechi Over Tinubu Re-Election Remarks
Former Rivers State governor and African Democratic Congress (ADC) vice-presidential candidate Rotimi Amaechi

‘Mad People’: Presidency Fires Back at Amaechi Over Tinubu Re-Election Remarks

The Presidency and the Edo State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) have criticised former Rivers State governor Rotimi Amaechi after he declared that only “mad people” would vote for President Bola Tinubu in the 2027 general election.

Amaechi, the African Democratic Congress (ADC) vice-presidential candidate, made the remark on Thursday, October 8, 2026, during an ADC town hall meeting in Benin City, Edo State, where he urged residents to reject Tinubu’s re-election bid.

The former transportation minister also accused supporters campaigning for Tinubu of having questionable motives, linking their support for the President to the hardship Nigerians have experienced under his administration.

“They are going about saying, ‘Vote Tinubu, vote Tinubu.’ Only thieves will vote for Tinubu,” Amaechi said.

He added that the 2027 election would reveal how many Nigerians he described as “mad” would support the President.

“If Edo people vote for Tinubu, that means Edo people are mad. If you are not mad, Tinubu should not win here,” he said.

Amaechi’s comments drew a sharp response from Temitope Ajayi, Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, who described the former governor as a careless and irresponsible speaker.

Ajayi questioned Amaechi’s credibility, accusing him of making inflammatory statements for political purposes rather than engaging in constructive debate about the country’s challenges.

The presidential aide also referred to Amaechi’s recent comments about his late mother, arguing that the former governor had inappropriately used a family tragedy to criticise the administration.

READ ALSO:

Amaechi had alleged that the economic hardship associated with Tinubu’s policies made it difficult for him to afford the medication his mother needed before her death. His mother, Ezinne Amaechi, died on July 16, 2026, at the age of 89.

Ajayi challenged Amaechi’s account by referring to expenses he said the former governor had incurred on his family, including his daughter’s education in the United Kingdom and his mother’s funeral. He argued that these expenditures contradicted the financial difficulties Amaechi had described.

The presidential aide also questioned Amaechi’s political influence, citing his previous role as director-general of former President Muhammadu Buhari’s presidential campaigns in 2015 and 2019.

According to Ajayi, the APC failed to secure 10 per cent of the votes in Rivers State during those elections, despite Amaechi’s prominent position in the campaign organisation.

He argued that the former governor’s electoral record raised questions about his ability to attract votes for the ADC and described him as a potential burden on the opposition party’s presidential ticket.

Ajayi further said the Presidency did not consider every political statement worthy of an official response, but maintained that Amaechi’s remarks deserved scrutiny.

The Edo APC also rejected the former governor’s comments, insisting that residents were capable of making independent decisions about whom to support in the 2027 election.

The party’s Publicity Secretary, Peter Uwadiae-Igbinigie, said Amaechi was entitled to his opinion but argued that voters should not be insulted because of their political preferences.

He described Edo residents as politically informed and defended their support for Governor Monday Okpebholo and the APC.

Uwadiae-Igbinigie also defended Tinubu’s economic reforms and pointed to what he described as infrastructure development in Edo State as reasons voters should consider supporting the President.

He dismissed the ADC as a collection of politicians whose influence had declined, while expressing confidence that Tinubu would receive substantial support in the state.

The Edo APC spokesman said the party had set a target of 2.5 million votes for Tinubu in Edo State in the 2027 presidential election, attributing the target partly to the relationship between the state government and the Federal Government.

Amaechi’s criticism of Tinubu comes amid mounting political debate over the administration’s economic policies, particularly the removal of petrol subsidies and the resulting pressure on household spending.

The former governor has repeatedly criticised the President’s economic direction, arguing that rising living costs have made life increasingly difficult for Nigerians. His latest remarks reflect the ADC’s efforts to challenge the ruling party ahead of the next general election.

The Presidency and the Edo APC, however, have focused their responses on Amaechi’s language, personal credibility and political record rather than accepting his characterisation of Tinubu’s supporters.

The exchange highlights the increasingly confrontational tone of political debate ahead of the 2027 election, with both the ruling party and opposition figures using public appearances to challenge each other’s policies, records and electoral appeal.

As campaigning gathers momentum, the disagreement also raises questions about the place of personal attacks in political communication and whether debates over economic policy can remain focused on the issues affecting voters.

Ultimately, Edo residents and other Nigerian voters will determine their preferred candidates at the ballot box in 2027.

‘Mad People’: Presidency Fires Back at Amaechi Over Tinubu Re-Election Remarks

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: ADC Vows to Collate, Share Polling-Unit Results Despite INEC Warning

Published

on

2027: ADC Vows to Collate, Share Polling-Unit Results Despite INEC Warning
Bolaji Abdullahi

2027: ADC Vows to Collate, Share Polling-Unit Results Despite INEC Warning

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has vowed to independently document, collate and share polling-unit results during the 2027 general elections, despite a warning from the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) against the publication of privately collated results.

The ADC said its plan is aimed at protecting votes cast for its candidates and ensuring that results announced at the end of the electoral process reflect the figures recorded at polling units.

The party’s National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, said the ADC recognised INEC’s statutory responsibility to collate and officially declare election results, but maintained that citizens and political parties have the right to collect and share information, including election results.

Abdullahi’s position followed a recent warning by INEC Chairman, Professor Joash Amupitan, against the sharing of privately collated election results.

The ADC argued that independently gathering and publishing polling-unit figures does not prevent INEC from carrying out its constitutional responsibility to conduct the election, collate official results and declare winners.

Under Nigeria’s electoral system, INEC conducts the official collation and declaration process through various levels, from the Registration Area and Local Government Area to state and, for the presidential election, the national level.

READ ALSO:

The ADC said its independent collation would provide its candidates and supporters with their own record of results from polling units and allow them to compare those figures with results emerging through the official process.

The party has previously said its decision was influenced by the 2023 general elections, when concerns arose over the electronic transmission of results to the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV).

Abdullahi had said the party would no longer rely solely on INEC to protect its votes, arguing that political parties must put their own mechanisms in place to monitor results from polling units through the collation process.

The ADC has also raised concerns about the appointment of Returning and Collation Officers for the 2027 elections.

In September, the party called on INEC to review the use of academics who had openly expressed support for political candidates in sensitive electoral positions.

It argued that people who had publicly taken partisan positions should not subsequently be assigned responsibilities involving the collation of results or declaration of winners in elections contested by their preferred candidates.

The party urged INEC to publish the names of proposed Returning and Collation Officers ahead of the elections to allow political parties and members of the public to raise concerns about possible conflicts of interest.

The latest dispute has placed renewed focus on the distinction between independent election monitoring by political parties and the official collation and declaration of results, which remains the responsibility of INEC.

The ADC maintains that its planned collection and publication of polling-unit figures is intended to promote transparency and protect its votes, rather than replace INEC’s official declaration.

As preparations for the 2027 elections intensify, the disagreement highlights the growing debate over how political parties, election observers and citizens should independently monitor results while preserving INEC’s legal authority over the official electoral process.

2027: ADC Vows to Collate, Share Polling-Unit Results Despite INEC Warning

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

Killings, Hardship: Northern Islamic Clerics Tell Tinubu to Drop 2027 Ambition

Published

on

Killings, Hardship: Northern Islamic Clerics Tell Tinubu to Drop 2027 Ambition
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu

Killings, Hardship: Northern Islamic Clerics Tell Tinubu to Drop 2027 Ambition

More than 1,000 northern Islamic clerics have called on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to abandon his ambition to seek re-election in 2027, citing persistent killings, kidnappings, terrorism and economic hardship across the country.

The clerics made the demand in a communiqué issued after a national conference in Kano titled “An Assessment of the State of the Nation under President Tinubu and the 2027 General Elections.”

The conference was organised under the Ko Da Naka platform in collaboration with the AFAQ Educational Foundation.

The clerics expressed particular concern over worsening insecurity in the North-West, where communities have continued to face attacks, kidnappings and other forms of violence.

They urged the Federal Government to take stronger and more effective measures to protect lives and property, warning that the security situation should be a major consideration in determining who Nigerians support in the 2027 elections.

The clerics also asked Tinubu to reconsider his plan to seek another term in office.

They said that if the President decides to contest despite what they described as the country’s worsening security and economic challenges, Nigerians should reject his candidacy at the polls.

The group said political leaders must be judged by their performance in office rather than party affiliation, ethnic identity or regional interests.

READ ALSO:

The clerics also criticised key economic policies of the Tinubu administration, including the removal of the fuel subsidy, changes to the foreign exchange regime, increases in electricity tariffs and ongoing tax reforms.

They argued that the policies had contributed to rising living costs and increased pressure on households, businesses and vulnerable Nigerians.

According to the clerics, the government should review policies that have increased the cost of living and focus more on improving citizens’ welfare.

They also raised concerns about the continued migration of skilled Nigerian professionals, including doctors, teachers and engineers, to other countries.

The clerics attributed the trend partly to poor working conditions, inadequate facilities, unemployment and economic pressures, urging the government to create better opportunities for professionals to remain in Nigeria.

They further called on Islamic scholars and religious leaders to remain independent and speak against wrongdoing regardless of the political party, ethnicity or religion of those involved.

The clerics urged Nigerians to place national interest above religious, ethnic and political considerations when choosing leaders in 2027.

They said voters should assess political candidates based on their competence, integrity, experience and policies rather than relying solely on party loyalty.

The intervention comes as political parties and presidential aspirants intensify preparations for the 2027 general elections, with insecurity, economic hardship and governance expected to feature prominently in the political debate.

The clerics’ position adds another voice to the growing scrutiny of the Tinubu administration as political activities ahead of the 2027 presidential election gather momentum.

Killings, Hardship: Northern Islamic Clerics Tell Tinubu to Drop 2027 Ambition

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending