David Mark Scores Legal Victory as Supreme Court Voids ADC Status Quo Order - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

David Mark Scores Legal Victory as Supreme Court Voids ADC Status Quo Order

Published

on

Enugu ADC Chairman Found Dead Near Residence in Suspected Murder

David Mark Scores Legal Victory as Supreme Court Voids ADC Status Quo Order

The Supreme Court has nullified the controversial order that directed the African Democratic Congress (ADC) to maintain the status quo ante bellum in the party’s prolonged leadership crisis, ruling that the Court of Appeal exceeded its powers by issuing the directive after dismissing the substantive appeal before it.

In a unanimous judgment delivered by a five-member panel led by Justice Mohammed Lawal Garba, the apex court held that the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal acted without jurisdiction when it ordered all parties to maintain the existing situation despite already striking out the appeal filed by one of the rival factions within the party.

The Supreme Court described the order as “unnecessary, unwarranted and improper,” stressing that once the appellate court had dismissed the matter before it, it no longer possessed the authority to issue consequential directives affecting the internal affairs of the party.

The judgment followed an appeal filed by former Senate President Senator David Mark, who has been at the centre of the ADC leadership tussle alongside other party stakeholders. The apex court ruled in his favour in part, although it dismissed the aspect of the appeal challenging an earlier ex parte order of the Federal High Court relating to substituted service of court documents on parties involved in the dispute.

Despite voiding the Appeal Court’s directive, the Supreme Court ordered all parties to return to the Federal High Court for continuation of proceedings on the substantive suit filed by aggrieved members of the party challenging aspects of the ADC leadership structure and congress processes.

The ruling is expected to significantly affect the internal balance of power within the ADC and may influence the position earlier taken by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) regarding the party’s recognised leadership.

On April 1, INEC removed the names of Senator David Mark and former Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola from its official portal as the National Chairman and National Secretary of the ADC, respectively. The commission had said the decision was based on the Court of Appeal judgment and the order directing parties to maintain the status quo ante bellum pending the resolution of the dispute.

INEC subsequently announced that it would not recognise any faction of the party until the legal battle was conclusively determined by the courts.

Political observers say the latest Supreme Court ruling weakens the legal basis upon which the electoral commission relied in freezing recognition of the rival camps, although the final determination of the substantive leadership dispute still rests with the Federal High Court.

The ADC has in recent months faced deep internal divisions involving competing claims to leadership positions, disagreements over party administration, and legal battles over the control of party structures ahead of future political alignments and elections.

The Supreme Court’s intervention is expected to reshape the next phase of the dispute as the factions return to the lower court for full hearing of the matter.

 

David Mark Scores Legal Victory as Supreme Court Voids ADC Status Quo Order

 

Loading

Politics

“Clash of Egos”: Ayo Fayose Downplays Public Feud Between Wike and APC Governors

Published

on

Osun Poll: Fayose Says Federal Might Could Have Swayed Result If Deployed
“Clash of Egos”: Ayo Fayose Downplays Public Feud Between Wike and APC Governors

On Channels Television, the former Ekiti governor says tensions over the ‘Rainbow Coalition’ will not hurt President Tinubu’s 2027 prospects.

Former Ekiti State Governor Ayo Fayose has weighed in on the sharp exchange between Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister Nyesom Wike and the All Progressives Congress (APC) Governors’ Forum, characterizing the disagreement as a battle of individual egos rather than a genuine threat to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s 2027 re-election campaign.

Speaking Tuesday night during an appearance on Channels Television’s Politics Today, Fayose noted that public friction often surfaces when assertive leaders navigate complex multi-party arrangements.

The spat erupted after Imo State Governor Hope Uzodimma, speaking for the APC Governors’ Forum, announced that party executives would reject any outside alliance or coalition capable of diluting the party’s strength or challenging its candidates in upcoming elections.

Wike responded swiftly during a televised broadcast, describing the governors as politically lazy and clarifying that his “Rainbow Coalition” was created specifically to mobilize cross-party votes for the president rather than fight local battles on behalf of state governors.

Addressing the controversy, Fayose remarked that everyday Nigerians understand Wike’s outspoken personality just as they understand the institutional posture of the Governors’ Forum.

He insisted that the rhetorical crossfire has no direct bearing on the president’s electoral fortunes, observing that political leaders across the spectrum possess strong personal pride that occasionally spills into public view. Fayose maintained that practical grassroots voter mobilization will ultimately outweigh public posturing as the 2027 race draws nearer.

 

“Clash of Egos”: Ayo Fayose Downplays Public Feud Between Wike and APC Governors

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

Rainbow Coalition: Wike Fires Back at Uzodimma, APC Governors

Published

on

Wike to Governors: Account for Subsidy Funds, Stop Hiding Behind NGFWike to Governors: Account for Subsidy Funds, Stop Hiding Behind NGF
FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike

Rainbow Coalition: Wike Fires Back at Uzodimma, APC Governors

 

The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, has launched a fresh verbal attack on Imo State Governor and Chairman of the Progressive Governors Forum, Hope Uzodimma, following the APC governors’ rejection of his Rainbow Coalition.

The latest political exchange has deepened the disagreement over the shape of the 2027 political contest, with Wike insisting that his coalition is focused on mobilising support for President Bola Tinubu while allowing other political parties to field candidates in governorship and legislative elections.

The APC governors, however, have maintained that they would not support any political arrangement capable of weakening the party or adversely affecting its candidates.

Wike’s criticism became particularly sharp when he addressed Uzodimma’s position on the coalition.

The FCT Minister said the Imo governor was “lucky” that he was not a member of the APC, adding that he would not accept what he described as certain conduct within the ruling party.

Wike also rejected any suggestion that Uzodimma could determine whether he would join the APC, saying that if he ever decided to join the party, the Imo governor would not be the person to decide the matter.

The remarks followed a declaration by the APC Governors Forum that its members would not participate in, support or endorse any alliance or political arrangement that could undermine President Tinubu’s re-election, weaken the APC or adversely affect any of the party’s candidates.

Uzodimma made the position known after a meeting of APC governors in Abuja.

Wike has drawn a clear distinction between his support for Tinubu and support for APC candidates in other elections.

He said he had never promised that the Peoples Democratic Party would withdraw candidates from governorship, National Assembly or State House of Assembly elections in 2027.

His position is that members of the Rainbow Coalition can support Tinubu for the presidency while retaining their political affiliations and supporting candidates of their choice in other contests.

“What I said and stand for is that I will mobilise support for the re-election of the President,” Wike said.

He argued that Tinubu would not be contesting governorship, senatorial, House of Representatives or State Assembly elections, suggesting that support for the President should not automatically be interpreted as support for every APC candidate.

The APC governors have taken a different position.

Through the Progressive Governors Forum, they said they remained committed to the APC and its candidates and would not endorse political arrangements that could create competing interests or weaken the party’s electoral structure.

The governors’ position has placed Wike’s Rainbow Coalition at the centre of an emerging disagreement over how support for Tinubu should operate across party lines in the 2027 elections.

Wike also questioned Uzodimma’s argument by referring to the voting pattern in Imo State during the 2023 presidential election.

He argued that voters could support a presidential candidate while voting for candidates from another party in legislative contests.

Wike has used the 2023 voting pattern to reinforce his argument that political support does not necessarily have to follow a single party line across all electoral contests.

The exchange between Wike and Uzodimma adds another layer to the political debate surrounding the 2027 elections.

While the APC governors are emphasising party structure and support for APC candidates, Wike is advocating a cross-party arrangement centred specifically on Tinubu’s presidential bid.

The disagreement has therefore moved beyond a simple dispute over party membership and into a broader argument about whether politicians from different parties can jointly support a presidential candidate while maintaining separate positions in other elections.

For now, Wike says he remains in the PDP and has not promised to join the APC, while continuing to campaign for Tinubu’s re-election through the Rainbow Coalition.

 

Rainbow Coalition: Wike Fires Back at Uzodimma, APC Governors

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

Kaduna APC Calls for Probe Into Alleged Attacks, Vandalism

Published

on

Osun 2026: APC Inaugurates 292-Member Campaign Council, Declares Victory a Must
Kaduna APC Calls for Probe Into Alleged Attacks, Vandalism

The Kaduna State chapter of the APC has appealed for calm after reporting alleged attacks, vandalism and intimidation involving its members and party-related facilities.

The party wants the police and other security agencies to determine what happened and identify those responsible for any offences established by the evidence.

APC Publicity Secretary Sani Dan Azare said vehicles were allegedly damaged during an incident at party premises, while some members and supporters were reportedly assaulted or intimidated elsewhere in the state.

Rather than draw conclusions from the competing claims, the party asked security agencies to examine all credible leads and evidence before taking action.

The appeal comes as political activities intensify in Kaduna ahead of the 2027 elections. The state has already recorded a separate dispute involving ADC supporters and security operatives during a campaign-related walk, with the parties giving different accounts of the confrontation.

The APC said such incidents should not undermine what it described as progress made in reducing political, ethnic and religious tensions in the state.

It therefore urged political parties, candidates and supporters to conduct their activities peacefully and within the law.

Dan Azare also asked APC members and support groups to avoid retaliation, warning against any form of self-help.

Let the facts be established. Let due process prevail. Let the law take its course” the party said.

The APC added that anyone with relevant information should make it available to security agencies to help establish what happened and determine whether anyone should face legal action.

 

Kaduna APC Calls for Probe Into Alleged Attacks, Vandalism

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending