News
#EndSARS report: Lagos govt defends White Paper
-
Oyebode, Adegboruwa, others kick
-
Prosecution of those indicted likely, says Malami
Mixed reactions have continued to trail the Lagos State government White Paper on the report of the #EndSARS Judicial Panel of Inquiry (JPI).
Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice Moyosore Onigbanjo (SAN) maintained that the report on the Lekki shooting was unreliable.
But, legal luminary Prof. Paul Ananaba (SAN) dismissed the controversy over the report as unnecessary, saying that government should be held accountable for the White Paper.
He said the White Paper should be implemented to forestall a reoccurrence of the 2020 protests.
Ananaba said: “I am not interested in controversy. People have died, people have been wounded, even if it is one person in Nigeria who died in the Lekki Toll Gate protest, it is worth something, it is worth attention of everybody. I am interested in making sure that we don’t have a second occurrence of that event. Government should implement the white paper and let us move on.”
On the rejection of the invitation for ‘A Walk for Peace” extended to #EndSARs campaigners and celebrities by Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu, Ananaba said the only thing desirable now is peace in the land.
He said: “I am in support of peace. Peace is important at any point. Because of peace, even things that have not been resolved can be looked into. Having conflict in the society, seriously, I don’t support it. I think we should hold government accountable and make sure that they remain within the peace circle.
“When people are peaceful and working together, they can achieve more. Some of the things that even the white paper would not do, peace can do it. I will encourage everybody to let us move forward, embrace the course of peace, peace walk, peace gathering, in the course of peace, we would achieve more.”
A panel member Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa (SAN) declined comment, saying that no member of the panel was informed of the release of the White Papers by the government. He also said neither were they given copies of the documents.
In a statement titled “#EndSARS panel report: the siege is over”, the lawyer accused the government of creating the wrong impression of financial impropriety against panel members to distract the public.
Adegboruwa said: “For the records, the panel relied upon the evidence of witnesses, documents tendered before it and the goodwill of the people of Nigeria, throughout its assignment.
“It is painful for me and the panel that the government is creating the wrong impression of financial impropriety as a tool of distraction when the Panel had a Secretariat that managed all its funds, through the Ministry of Justice.
“Although I served on the panel free of charge without collecting a dime, I know as a fact that other members served sacrificially, giving up their time, families and careers for a whole year.
“At the appropriate time, we will respond to all the inaccuracies, the coverups and the inconsistencies contained in the White Papers released by the government.
“Assuredly, nothing can ever cover the truth. What happened at the Lekki Toll Gate on October 20, 2020, was already in the public domain, those who received the bullets knew what happened and the doctors that treated them knew what happened. The panel reports only confirmed what most Nigerians already knew.”
Former Vice President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Monday Ubani faulted the White Paper.
He said: “Lagos State failed to meet its own expectations. The whitepaper failed all expectations and I am sorry to say that Lagos State has lost the most golden opportunity to show itself as a humane government.
“No wound has been healed by this white paper. The white paper I am sorry to say is ‘stained’.”
Onigbanjo justified the White Paper and argued that the report and recommendations of the Justice Doris Okuwobi-led panel on shooting at Lekki Toll Gate were contrary to the evidence provided.
READ ALSO:
- Police arraign 12 women for alleged use of ‘Juju’ to disrupt road project
- Stop divisive, bare-faced publicity stunts, be patriotic — Presidency warns SERAP
- Biafra: Ejiofor gives update on treasonable felony trial of Nnamdi Kanu as IPOB cancels ‘sit-at-home’
He maintained that the state complied with the laws and the weight of evidence presented at the Judicial Panel of Inquiry to reach a decision on panel’s reports.
The commissioner said the positions of the Lagos State Government as stated in the White Paper was based on evidences, especially that of the Pathologist, Prof. John Obafunwa, who said only three of the bodies that he conducted post-mortem examination on during the EndSARS protests were from Lekki, and out of them, only one had gunshot injury.
Onigbanjo spoke during a Morning Show interview programme on Arise Television to discuss the White Paper released by Lagos State Government on the report of the Judicial Panel of Inquiry on Police Brutality and the Lekki Toll Gate incident of October 20, 2020 in Lagos.
He said the inconsistencies and contradictions in the leaked reports of the Judicial Panel of Inquiry on Lekki incidents that nine people died at Lekki Tollgate last year made the panel’s finding on deaths at the tollgate unreliable, saying that for a finding that somebody died at a scene to be acceptable, there must be no doubt.
He said: “The position of Lagos State Government is based on the findings of the panel itself. So, it is not that Lagos State Government just conjured things from the air. We went through the report and what we saw particularly in reference to the death of nine persons is that they found the evidence of the Pathologist, Prof. Obafunwa, who conducted an autopsy on all the bodies picked up all over Lagos during the protests, not just at Lekki Tollgate but statewide, credible and there was no evidence to the contrary.
“Prof. Obafunwa said that of all the bodies he conducted autopsies on, three came from Lekki and out of the three only one had gunshot injuries. And the panel then said we believe you, we accept your evidence because there is nothing to the contrary. So, in law, if you put that on the imaginary scale, it means what Prof. Obafunwa said outweighs every other evidence before the panel.”
Onigbanjo also debunked the allegations that the Judicial Panel of Inquiry made no reference to policemen nor took them into consideration.
“They (JPI) issued two reports. The report that leaked only dealt with the issues from the Lekki Toll Gate. There is another report which they issued which was not leaked; that report deals with all the EndSARS petitions that were about 253 in number and of the 253, policemen also brought their own petitions and in that report, the panel awarded a sum of about N36.2million to the policemen who were affected one way or the other by the protests.
“So, to be fair to them, they did consider the plights of the policemen too. And even if you look at most of their recommendations, they are for better welfare for the police, better equipment, more training, psychological evaluations, so they took them into consideration,” he said.
The attorney-general also denied the allegations that Lagos State Government was put under pressure by the Federal Government to discredit the panel’s report, adding that at no time did the state government encourage personal attacks against any member of the Judicial Panel of Inquiry.
READ ALSO:
- Omicron: Travel ban discriminatory, Ramaphosa hits western leaders
- #EndSARS: Fake news peddlers mislead Wikipedia into claiming 120 died at Lekki
- Omicron hits Saudi Arabia, first reported case in Arab world
He said: “The Federal Government never put the Lagos State government under any pressure to discredit the panel or anybody. If you check the records, nobody from Lagos State government discredited the panel. In fact, they submitted the report on the 15th of November, 2021, the governor praised them and thanked them for the job they did.
“Even yesterday, in his speech, which he made before the White Paper was released, he thanked them again. So, nobody from the Lagos State government directly or indirectly, has sought to discredit members of the panel. We appreciate the job they did for almost 13 months. We do not condone such attacks on anybody.
“I think we have conducted ourselves in such a manner that we strive to always do what is right. We complied with the law; we set up the panel. So, if we didn’t even want the panel, there are so many ways it could have been stopped. They asked for an extension, we gave them. The initial funding was N200 million; they exhausted it and asked for more, we gave them.
“We appointed independent-minded people into the panel. And the panel itself said in its report that they give credit to the Lagos State government for allowing them to be completely independent. Lagos State government has fulfilled all its promises to the public. We set up an independent panel, we said we will release a White Paper and we did. We have complied with the law all the way.”
On Governor Sanwo-Olu’s plan for a Peace Walk, Onigbanjo said the government will persuade civil society members to change their minds.
He said: “The government will seek to persuade them to change their minds, because ultimately, we all thrive in peace. There is no government that wants to see a war-torn city, a war-torn state or even a state in which there is so much tension.
The Center for Leadership and Good Governance and Movement for Justice lamented the destruction of public assets during the protests.
The group said in a statement: “Despite the glaring inconsistencies and falsehood, that characterized the report of the judicial panel, we cannot but appreciate the governor of Lagos, Mr Babajide Sanwo-Olu, for accepting the report, and proceeding to release a white paper consideration of the panel’s report, with the clear intention to execute the credible recommendations of the panel.”
The group urged the Lagos State government to focus on reform by stopping abusive police practices, ensuring justice for victims and overhauling law enforcement.
Lagos State Government’s counsel at the panel, Abiodun Owonikoko (SAN), said the white paper passed the test of fairness and integrity.
He said: “It is, however, noteworthy that only one recommendation out of the 32 in the JPI report was rejected outrightly. It is unprecedented in many respects; starting from public acceptance of the independence and non-interference in the work of the panel.
“I score the white paper high on fairness to all concerned, balanced and rigorous interrogation of findings made in the report in a manner which may not be too surprising if it finds endorsement by the courts in the event any of the accepted recommendations (or as modified) were challenged by way of judicial review.
“The standard applied by the government in reviewing the findings raised the quality of the eventual decision to a level which May pass muster in a court of law – it mitigated the weakness of the original report that was not premised on legal test of evidential credence.
“In a court of law, the proof of those findings will be strictly evaluated in accordance with law on admissibility – and nobody will be bound by the findings of the panel .
“For instance, because the panel was not bound by law of evidence, and did not apply it during hearing, most pieces of evidence received were hearsay with notable exceptions of expert testimonies of pathologist and forensic scientists.
- READ ALSO:
- 7 ‘ritual killers’ arrested in Ogun
- Father, grandfather arrested for allegedly raping 13-yr-old daughter in Osun
“Regrettably, crucial findings were based on hearsay evidence while advantage was not taken of expert testimonies to resolve conflict and contradictions in testimonies of witnesses.
“Findings of the panel on criminal allegations were not based on proof beyond reasonable doubt, understandably.
“But in a court of law where those allegations are to be established whether in a civil proceedings or criminal trials of those recommended for prosecution, the test to be applied is proof beyond reasonable doubt.
“No prosecution will risk such a trial satisfied that it can be proved by that degree of credibility. The time constraints which beleaguered the panel might excuse this defect in the report – but government has done well to open fresh windows for victims to pursue their unresolved claims through the office of DPP.
“It is also a welcome development that the Lagos State Government did not overreach itself of play to the gallery by taking positions on the rather explosive and emotive matters more appropriately suited to be addressed by the Federal government as falling within the exclusive competence of the executive branch at the federal level.
“I want to believe that if the accepted recommendations that fall within the remit of the state government are faithfully implemented, the exercise and good work of the panel will not have been in vain.
“If the Federal Government can likewise adopt the open-minded approach of Lagos State Government to address the portions on recommendations remitted to them, we would perhaps come out a better country trusted by a greater majority of its citizenry.”
The Nation
![]()
News
NLC Backs ₦500 Petrol Demand, Workers Propose ₦500,000 Salary
NLC Backs ₦500 Petrol Demand, Workers Propose ₦500,000 Salary
The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has backed demands by public-sector workers for the Federal Government to reduce the price of petrol to ₦500 per litre, while the workers have proposed a minimum monthly salary of ₦500,000 for Grade Level 01, Step 1 officers under a new public-service salary structure.
The demands were contained in a letter by the Trade Union Side of the Joint National Public Service Negotiating Council (JNPSNC) to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, amid renewed concerns over rising fuel prices and the worsening cost-of-living crisis.
The workers gave the Federal Government until September 30, 2026, to respond to their demands, which cover petrol prices, wage awards, salary reviews and negotiations for a new wage structure.
The JNPSNC called for an intervention capable of bringing the petrol pump price down to ₦500 per litre, arguing that the rising cost of fuel has significantly increased transportation expenses and contributed to higher prices of food and other essential goods and services.
The demand comes amid another increase in petrol prices in Nigeria, with pump prices rising in several parts of the country following higher crude oil prices in the international market.
The labour movement has argued that the impact of rising fuel costs extends beyond motorists, as increased transportation and energy expenses raise the cost of moving agricultural produce, manufacturing goods and other commodities.
The NLC has therefore called for measures to cushion workers and households from the effects of the latest price increases.
On wages, the JNPSNC proposed a new salary structure under which a Grade Level 01, Step 1 public servant would earn ₦500,000 monthly.
The figure is important because it is a proposal by the workers, not an approved national minimum wage.
The proposed ₦500,000 salary is also specifically linked to the public-service salary structure being sought by the JNPSNC ahead of January 2027. It should not be presented as though the Federal Government has agreed to increase Nigeria’s statutory national minimum wage to ₦500,000.
READ ALSO:
- UK Student Visa: 63 Countries Exempt From Proof of Funds, Nigeria Excluded
- Lagos Intensifies Surveillance as Adulterated Palm Oil Raises Food Safety Concerns
- Saudi Arabia Rejects Nigeria’s Request for More 2027 Hajj Slots
Nigeria’s current statutory national minimum wage remains ₦70,000 per month, following the 2024 wage agreement and legislation.
The workers are seeking negotiations for a new wage structure while also asking for an immediate Wage Award for employees at the Federal, State and Local Government levels as a short-term response to current economic pressures.
The proposed wage award is separate from the longer-term salary review and any future agreement on the national minimum wage.
The JNPSNC wants the National Salaries, Incomes and Wages Commission (NSIWC) to begin discussions with labour representatives and other stakeholders on the proposed wage award and salary adjustments.
The workers said rising inflation, transportation costs, food prices, housing expenses, healthcare costs and education fees had reduced the purchasing power of existing salaries.
They also called for salaries and allowances across the public service to be reviewed upward and for future salary adjustments to take inflation into account.
According to the workers, linking periodic salary reviews to inflation would help prevent employees’ earnings from losing substantial purchasing power between major wage negotiations.
The labour side also demanded subsidised transportation and affordable housing for public servants as part of measures to ease the pressure on workers.
On the petroleum sector, the workers backed calls for greater availability of crude oil in naira to local refineries, arguing that increased domestic refining and local crude supply could reduce exposure to international oil-market shocks.
The NLC has previously advocated measures to strengthen local refining and improve domestic energy security as part of efforts to reduce pressure on consumers.
The workers also rejected the idea of relying mainly on food palliatives to address the hardship, arguing that temporary relief does not adequately compensate for the loss of purchasing power caused by higher transportation and living costs.
They instead called for measures that would address the underlying drivers of the rising cost of living.
The latest demands come as the downstream petroleum market faces renewed price pressure despite increased domestic refining capacity.
Higher international crude prices have raised input costs for refiners, contributing to increases in the wholesale and retail prices of petrol.
The development has renewed debate over how much protection Nigeria’s expanding domestic refining capacity can provide against global oil-price movements.
For organised labour, however, the immediate concern is the effect of higher fuel prices on workers and households.
The JNPSNC expects the Federal Government to respond to its demands by September 30, while also looking ahead to negotiations for a new salary and wage framework from January 2027.
The council has indicated that it expects the President’s forthcoming Independence Day address to address some of the concerns raised by workers.
The proposed ₦500,000 salary therefore remains a labour demand awaiting negotiation and possible government consideration. It is not the current national minimum wage and does not mean that all Nigerian workers are automatically entitled to ₦500,000 monthly.
Similarly, the proposed ₦500 petrol price is a demand for government intervention and does not represent the current regulated or prevailing pump price across Nigeria.
The labour demands reflect growing pressure from organised workers for government action as households and businesses contend with higher fuel prices, transportation costs and living expenses.
NLC Backs ₦500 Petrol Demand, Workers Propose ₦500,000 Salary
![]()
News
MURIC Warns FG: Any Move Against Atiku Now Lacks Tact
MURIC Warns FG: Any Move Against Atiku Now Lacks Tact
The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has warned the Federal Government against any move to arrest, interrogate or otherwise take action against former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar over a fresh petition before the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, saying such a step at this time could send the wrong signal to Nigerians.
The warning came as the controversy over a renewed call for the EFCC to investigate allegations dating back to Atiku’s tenure as Vice-President intensified, with opposition figures and the petitioner trading sharply different arguments over the matter.
In a statement issued on Tuesday, September 22, 2026, MURIC Founder and Executive Director, Professor Ishaq Akintola, said the government should exercise caution, particularly with the 2027 general elections approaching.
According to MURIC, the renewed allegations have assumed greater sensitivity because Atiku is now the presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress and a leading opposition figure.
“We warn that such an attempt at this point in time will send the wrong signal to Nigerians,” the group said, adding that with the 2027 elections “at the doorsteps,” the Federal Government should carefully consider the consequences of any action against the former Vice-President.
MURIC described any such move as lacking tact and “short” of emotional intelligence, while urging the government to avoid conduct that could create the impression that state institutions were being used against political opponents.
The organisation also warned against what it described as a damaging “body language” capable of portraying Nigeria as a “banana republic.”
MURIC said that although the country had already lost some ethical ground, its democratic values and norms remained important safeguards that should not be compromised.
“Our corporate image in the global community is sinking fast,” the group added.
READ ALSO:
- JAMB Allows Candidates to Change Lost SIM, Email Addresses
- How Nigerians Can Get Federal High Court Affidavit Online Without Visiting Court
- Plateau Violence: Several Killed as Fresh Attacks Trigger Mass Exodus
The statement followed renewed controversy over a petition by former House of Representatives member, Ehiozuwa Agbonayinma, asking the EFCC to revisit allegations concerning Atiku’s activities while he was Vice-President.
Reports indicate that the petition relates to allegations investigated by the EFCC between 2005 and 2006. Agbonayinma reportedly gave the anti-graft agency a 14-day ultimatum to act and threatened legal action if the commission failed to respond.
Former Senator Dino Melaye has strongly opposed the renewed petition, describing it as an attempt to “resurrect the dead.” Melaye argued that the matter had previously been dealt with and questioned the basis for bringing it back almost two decades later.
The dispute, however, has escalated beyond the original petition, with Agbonayinma hitting back at Melaye and challenging him to produce documentary evidence for his claim that the allegations had been investigated and dismissed.
In a statement reported on September 20, Agbonayinma insisted that he was asking the EFCC to perform its statutory responsibility and argued that the substance of the allegations should be addressed rather than his personality or political affiliation.
“You cannot defend Atiku Abubakar from an EFCC petition by attacking me,” Agbonayinma was quoted as saying, while urging the anti-graft agency to determine whether the allegations warranted further investigation.
The renewed controversy has also brought attention to the distinction between a petition seeking investigation and a finding of criminal guilt. The existence of a petition does not, by itself, establish that the person named in it committed an offence.
There is also a historical legal dimension to the allegations. Reports on the previous proceedings state that a Lagos State High Court set aside an EFCC administrative indictment against Atiku in December 2006, while no criminal conviction against him resulted from the allegations.
Atiku has continued to deny wrongdoing and has challenged anyone with credible evidence against him to present it through the appropriate legal channels.
Meanwhile, there was no confirmed announcement from the EFCC, as of the latest reports reviewed, that it had arrested Atiku or formally invited him over the fresh petition. A separate and more recent EFCC investigation reported on September 20 concerns individuals connected to allegations surrounding the Mambilla Power Project, which is distinct from the 2005–2006 allegations at the centre of the present political dispute.
The MURIC intervention has therefore added a fresh dimension to an increasingly heated political controversy, with the organisation urging the Federal Government to exercise restraint and protect public confidence in Nigeria’s democratic institutions.
With the 2027 elections approaching, the dispute over the renewed EFCC petition is expected to remain a significant political issue, particularly if the anti-graft agency decides to take further steps.
For MURIC, however, the timing of any action is crucial. The organisation wants the Federal Government to ensure that whatever steps are taken by law-enforcement agencies are grounded in due process and do not create the perception of political persecution.
The group’s central warning is that Nigeria must guard its democratic reputation and avoid actions that could further erode public confidence in its institutions at a particularly sensitive period in the nation’s political calendar.
MURIC Warns FG: Any Move Against Atiku Now Lacks Tact
![]()
News
NiMet Predicts Thunderstorms, Rain Across Nigeria Till Wednesday
NiMet Predicts Thunderstorms, Rain Across Nigeria Till Wednesday
The Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NiMet) has predicted thunderstorms and rainfall across several parts of Nigeria from Monday to Wednesday.
The agency, in its weather outlook released on Sunday, also warned that strong winds could occur ahead of thunderstorms in some areas.
For Monday, NiMet expects thunderstorms and light rain over parts of Taraba and Kebbi during the morning. Later in the day, moderate rainfall is expected across several areas in the North-East, Kaduna, Taraba and Kebbi.
In the North-Central region, parts of Niger State could experience thunderstorms and light rain in the morning, while most parts of the region may record thunderstorms with moderate rainfall by afternoon or evening.
The southern states are also expected to experience wet conditions. NiMet forecasts cloudy skies in the morning, with isolated thunderstorms and light rain over parts of Bayelsa, Rivers, Akwa Ibom and Cross River. More thunderstorms and light rain are expected later in the day.
Tuesday and Wednesday Forecast
On Tuesday, the northern region is expected to have patches of cloud in the morning, with thunderstorms and light rain possible in parts of Taraba.
By afternoon or evening, most parts of the region could experience thunderstorms accompanied by moderate rain.
In the North-Central, parts of the Federal Capital Territory, Niger, Nasarawa and Plateau states are expected to receive thunderstorms and moderate rainfall later in the day.
Southern areas, including parts of Ebonyi, Enugu, Abia and the South-South, may also experience thunderstorms and light rain.
NiMet expects more widespread rainfall on Wednesday, particularly across northern and North-Central states. Borno, Bauchi, Gombe, Kaduna, Adamawa and Taraba are among the areas listed for morning thunderstorms and moderate rain.
The agency also forecasts thunderstorms and moderate rainfall across much of the South later on Wednesday.
NiMet advised residents to secure loose objects and take precautions against strong winds. Motorists were urged to avoid driving during heavy rainfall, while residents were advised to disconnect electrical appliances during thunderstorms and stay away from tall trees.
Airline operators were also advised to obtain airport-specific weather information when planning flights.
NiMet Predicts Thunderstorms, Rain Across Nigeria Till Wednesday
![]()
-
metro3 days agoOyo Police: Student Who Died by Suicide Was Charged With Assault, Not ₦8,000 Debt
-
International1 day ago18 Suspects Transferred to US Over 2021 Killing of Haitian President Moïse
-
metro2 days agoIrreconcilable Developments: Wedding Cancelled 24 Hours Before Ceremony
-
metro1 day agoMy Heart Has Always Been Home With You — Tinubu’s Powerful Message to Oluremi at 66
-
Auto2 days agoAbuja Demand Rises as Jetour Brings X70 Plus Experience to FCT
-
Politics2 days ago2027: NDC Predicts Wider Obi Victory Over Tinubu in Lagos
-
Sports1 day agoMessi Fires Stunning 75th Career Free-Kick to Reach 930 Goals in Inter Miami Draw
-
Sports2 days agoEnough Is Enough: Muslim Supporters Demand Change of New Man United Owners
