Frustration as Gaza aid fails to reach most needy - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Frustration as Gaza aid fails to reach most needy

Published

on

Frustration as Gaza aid fails to reach most needy

PARIS: The trickle of food aid Israel allows to enter Gaza after nearly 22 months of war is seized by Palestinians risking their lives under fire, looted by gangs or diverted in chaotic circumstances rather than reaching those most in need, UN agencies, aid groups and analysts say.

After images of malnourished children stoked an international outcry, aid has started to be delivered to the territory once more but on a scale deemed woefully insufficient by international organizations.

Every day, AFP correspondents on the ground see desperate crowds rushing toward food convoys or the sites of aid drops by Arab and European air forces.

On Thursday, in Al-Zawayda in central Gaza, emaciated Palestinians rushed to pallets parachuted from a plane, jostling and tearing packages from each other in a cloud of dust.

“Hunger has driven people to turn on each other. People are fighting each other with knives,” Amir Zaqot, who came seeking aid, told AFP.

To avoid disturbances, World Food Programme (WFP) drivers have been instructed to stop before their intended destination and let people help themselves. But to no avail.

“A truck wheel almost crushed my head, and I was injured retrieving the bag,” sighed a man, carrying a bag of flour on his head, in the Zikim area, in the northern Gaza Strip.

Mohammad Abu Taha went at dawn to a distribution site near Rafah in the south to join the queue and reserve his spot. He said there were already “thousands waiting, all hungry, for a bag of flour or a little rice and lentils.”

“Suddenly, we heard gunshots….. There was no way to escape. People started running, pushing and shoving each other, children, women, the elderly,” said the 42-year-old. “The scene was truly tragic: blood everywhere, wounded, dead.”

READ ALSO:

Nearly 1,400 Palestinians have been killed in the Gaza Strip while waiting for aid since May 27, the majority by the Israeli army, the United Nations said on Friday.

The Israeli army denies any targeting, insisting it only fires “warning shots” when people approach too close to its positions.

International organizations have for months condemned the restrictions imposed by the Israeli authorities on aid distribution in Gaza, including refusing to issue border crossing permits, slow customs clearance, limited access points, and imposing dangerous routes.

On Tuesday, in Zikim, the Israeli army “changed loading plans for WFP, mixing cargo unexpectedly. The convoy was forced to leave early, without proper security,” said a senior UN official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

In the south of Gaza, at the Kerem Shalom border crossing, “there are two possible routes to reach our warehouses (in central Gaza),” said an NGO official, who also preferred to remain anonymous. “One is fairly safe, the other is regularly the scene of fighting and looting, and that’s the one we’re forced to take.”

Some of the aid is looted by gangs — who often directly attack warehouses — and diverted to traders who resell it at exorbitant prices, according to several humanitarian sources and experts.

“It becomes this sort of Darwinian social experiment of the survival of the fittest,” said Muhammad Shehada, visiting fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).

“People who are the most starved in the world and do not have the energy must run and chase after a truck and wait for hours and hours in the sun and try to muscle people and compete for a bag of flour,” he said.

Jean Guy Vataux, emergency coordinator for Doctors Without Borders (MSF) in Gaza, added: “We’re in an ultra-capitalist system, where traders and corrupt gangs send kids to risk life and limb at distribution points or during looting. It’s become a new profession.”

This food is then resold to “those who can still afford it” in the markets of Gaza City, where the price of a 25-kilogramme bag of flour can exceed $400, he added.

Israel has repeatedly accused Hamas of looting aid supplied by the UN, which has been delivering the bulk of aid.

READ ALSO:

The Israeli authorities have used this accusation to justify the total blockade they imposed on Gaza between March and May, and the subsequent establishment of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a private organization supported by Israel and the United States which has become the main aid distributor, sidelining UN agencies.

However, for more than two million inhabitants of Gaza the GHF has just four distribution points, which the UN describes as a “death trap.”

“Hamas… has been stealing aid from the Gaza population many times by shooting Palestinians,” said the office of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday.

But according to senior Israeli military officials quoted by the New York Times on July 26, Israel “never found proof” that the group had “systematically stolen aid” from the UN.

Weakened by the war with Israel which has seen most of its senior leadership killed, Hamas today is made up of “basically decentralized autonomous cells” said Shehada.

He said while Hamas militants still hunker down in each Gaza neighborhood in tunnels or destroyed buildings, they are not visible on the ground “because Israel has been systematically going after them.”

Aid workers told AFP that during the ceasefire that preceded the March blockade, the Gaza police — which includes many Hamas members — helped secure humanitarian convoys, but that the current power vacuum was fostering insecurity and looting.

READ ALSO:

“UN agencies and humanitarian organizations have repeatedly called on Israeli authorities to facilitate and protect aid convoys and storage sites in our warehouses across the Gaza Strip,” said Bushra Khalidi, policy lead at Oxfam.

“These calls have largely been ignored,” she added.

The Israeli army is also accused of having equipped Palestinian criminal networks in its fight against Hamas and of allowing them to plunder aid.

“The real theft of aid since the beginning of the war has been carried out by criminal gangs, under the watch of Israeli forces, and they were allowed to operate in proximity to the Kerem Shalom crossing point into Gaza,” Jonathan Whittall, Palestinian territories chief of the UN humanitarian office (OCHA), told reporters in May.

According to Israeli and Palestinian media reports, an armed group called the Popular Forces, made up of members of a Bedouin tribe led by Yasser Abu Shabab, is operating in the southern region under Israeli control.

The ECFR describes Abu Shabab as leading a “criminal gang operating in the Rafah area that is widely accused of looting aid trucks.”

The Israeli authorities themselves acknowledged in June that they had armed Palestinian gangs opposed to Hamas, without directly naming the one led by Abu Shabab.

Michael Milshtein, head of the Palestinian Studies Forum at the Moshe Dayan Center of Tel Aviv University, said many of the gang’s members were implicated in “all kinds of criminal activities, drug smuggling, and things like that.”

“None of this can happen in Gaza without the approval, at least tacit, of the Israeli army,” said a humanitarian worker in Gaza, asking not to be named.

Frustration as Gaza aid fails to reach most needy

ARAB NEWS

Loading

International

Israeli Actor, Flight Instructor Among Two Killed In California Plane Crash

Published

on

Israeli Actor, Flight Instructor Among Two Killed In California Plane Crash

Israeli actor and flight instructor Guy Kapulnik, 46, and his passenger, Taylor Laska, 33, have died after a light aircraft crashed into a field in California, United States.

The fatal crash occurred on Thursday, September 24, 2026, near Hesperia in San Bernardino County.

Emergency responders were alerted to the crash shortly before 10am after the small aircraft went down in an open field.

Both occupants were pronounced dead at the scene.

READ ALSO:

The aircraft, identified as a single-engine Aeronca 7AC Champion, crashed near Summit Valley Road and Telephone Canyon Road, about three miles from Hesperia Airport.

Authorities have launched an investigation into the incident, but the cause of the crash had not been established as of Wednesday.

Kapulnik was not only a pilot and flight instructor but also an actor who appeared in several Israeli and international film productions.

He trained at the Nissan Nativ Acting Studio in Jerusalem before building a career in the entertainment industry. His acting credits included Room 514, Salsa Tel Aviv, Watch Over Me and Lebanon.

After moving to Los Angeles, Kapulnik continued acting while pursuing his passion for aviation. He obtained his pilot’s licence and later became a certified flight instructor.

His aviation career saw him teach aspiring pilots, with friends and former students describing him as passionate about flying and committed to helping others learn.

Kapulnik had also previously served as an officer in Israel’s elite Unit 669, a specialised search-and-rescue unit.

His death has triggered an outpouring of tributes from friends, colleagues and people who knew him through aviation and acting.

Those who knew him remembered him as an adventurous and energetic man who pursued several passions throughout his life, including acting, flying and life at sea.

The passenger, Laska, was also killed in the crash.

Investigators from the relevant aviation authorities are continuing to examine the wreckage and circumstances surrounding the incident to determine what caused the aircraft to crash.

Kapulnik’s funeral is expected to take place in Israel.

Israeli Actor, Flight Instructor Among Two Killed In California Plane Crash

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Trump Can Resume Third-Country Deportations Temporarily, US Supreme Court Rules

Published

on

Trump Can Resume Third-Country Deportations Temporarily, US Supreme Court Rules

Trump Can Resume Third-Country Deportations Temporarily, US Supreme Court Rules

The US Supreme Court has temporarily cleared the way for President Donald Trump’s administration to resume deporting migrants to countries other than their own while the justices consider the legality of the policy.

The emergency order issued Tuesday temporarily suspends a lower-court restriction that required migrants facing third-country deportation to receive adequate notice and an opportunity to raise concerns about possible persecution or torture in the country to which they were being sent.

The Supreme Court’s action is not a final ruling on the legality of the deportation policy. Instead, it allows the Trump administration to proceed with the removals for now while the broader legal challenge moves forward.

The justices have agreed to hear arguments on the case in December, when they are expected to consider whether the policy violates migrants’ due-process rights and whether lower courts had the authority to impose restrictions on the deportations.

The dispute centres on the administration’s policy of sending migrants to third countries rather than returning them directly to their countries of citizenship. Such removals have been used where migrants cannot be returned to their home countries or where those countries refuse to accept them.

READ ALSO:

The Trump administration has defended the policy as an important immigration enforcement tool, saying receiving countries provide assurances that deported migrants will not be persecuted or tortured.

The legal challenge intensified after a federal judge in Boston ruled that migrants should have a meaningful opportunity to raise safety concerns before being removed to a third country. A federal appeals court subsequently upheld the requirement, prompting the administration to seek emergency intervention from the Supreme Court.

Tuesday’s order temporarily puts that lower-court restriction on hold. This means third-country deportations can continue for now, but the Supreme Court has not yet determined whether the administration’s policy complies with US law.

The Supreme Court’s unsigned emergency order did not provide an explanation for the decision. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson indicated that they would have left the lower-court restriction in place.

The administration has already deported more than 25,000 migrants to third countries, according to figures presented in the legal proceedings. The destinations have included countries in Latin America and Africa.

Government lawyers have argued that lower-court restrictions have created logistical difficulties for immigration authorities, including cancelled deportation flights and delays in carrying out removal orders.

Lawyers representing migrants, however, have challenged the policy on due-process and safety grounds, arguing that people facing removal should have an opportunity to explain why they fear persecution, torture or other serious harm in the countries where they are being sent.

The case therefore remains unresolved. The Supreme Court’s latest order merely allows the deportations to proceed temporarily while the court reviews the underlying legal questions.

The December hearing will give the justices an opportunity to consider the broader dispute and determine whether the administration can continue the policy under the legal framework being challenged.

Until that review is completed and a final ruling is issued, Tuesday’s action should be understood as a temporary suspension of the lower-court restrictions, rather than a final Supreme Court approval of Trump’s third-country deportation policy.

Trump Can Resume Third-Country Deportations Temporarily, US Supreme Court Rules

Loading

Continue Reading

International

US Judge Blocks Trump From Tying Counterterrorism Grants to Election Rules

Published

on

US Judge Blocks Trump From Tying Counterterrorism Grants to Election Rules
US President Donald Trump

US Judge Blocks Trump From Tying Counterterrorism Grants to Election Rules

A US federal judge has blocked the Donald Trump administration from conditioning counterterrorism grants for states and local governments on changes to how elections are administered.

US District Judge Amir H. Ali of the District Court for the District of Columbia issued the ruling on Monday, September 28, 2026, finding that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) exceeded the authority granted to it by Congress by attaching the election-related conditions to homeland security funding.

The case followed a lawsuit filed by Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee; Columbus, Ohio; and several Texas counties, including Harris, El Paso, Dallas and Travis counties.

The local governments challenged conditions FEMA had attached to its 2026 Homeland Security Grant Program, arguing that Congress authorised the programme to help communities prevent, prepare for and respond to terrorism and other security threats, rather than to regulate routine election administration.

The programme provides more than $1 billion in federal funding to state, local and tribal governments. Under the policy challenged in court, FEMA planned to withhold 20 per cent of certain grant awards until recipients complied with specified election-related requirements.

READ ALSO:

Among the requirements were plans to move away from voting systems that use QR codes or barcodes to count ballots and toward equipment that accepts hand-marked paper ballots.

Recipients also had to demonstrate that they conducted a manual audit of at least five per cent of ballots, reconcile the number of voters who participated in federal elections with the number of ballots cast, and use the Department of Homeland Security’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database to verify citizenship information in voter-registration records.

The conditions also covered citizenship verification for people working at polling places or operating election systems.

The Trump administration defended the requirements as measures intended to strengthen election security against threats including foreign interference and cyberattacks.

However, Judge Ali ruled that the disputed conditions were not sufficiently connected to the purpose of the counterterrorism grants and that Congress had not authorised FEMA to use the programme to impose the election-administration requirements.

In his 24-page ruling, Ali distinguished between measures designed to protect election infrastructure from security threats and requirements governing routine election procedures, such as ballot formats, voter-roll administration and election audits.

The ruling prevents the administration from conditioning the affected Homeland Security Grant Program funding on compliance with the challenged election requirements while the litigation continues.

A separate lawsuit brought by a coalition of states challenging similar conditions remains pending.

The case comes ahead of the November 3, 2026 US midterm elections, adding another legal dispute to the wider debate over the division of authority between the federal government and states in administering US elections.

The latest ruling does not determine whether the individual election-security measures are effective or appropriate as policy. Instead, it addresses whether FEMA had the legal authority to make compliance with those measures a condition for receiving counterterrorism funding.

The broader Homeland Security Grant Program remains in place, while the administration and the plaintiffs may pursue further legal proceedings.

US Judge Blocks Trump From Tying Counterterrorism Grants to Election Rules

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending