How Electoral College, not popular votes, picks US president – Newstrends
Connect with us

International

How Electoral College, not popular votes, picks US president

Published

on

Former President Donald Trump and United States Vice President Kamala Harris

How Electoral College, not popular votes, picks US president

Although the United States prides itself on being the world’s preeminent democracy, where each person can have their say about who should be president, the Constitution calls for states to choose “electors” who do the actual electing.

This is known as the Electoral College.

This includes the first presidential election in 1789, won by George Washington; there have been 59 U.S. elections.

In all but five, two in this century, the president has won both the popular votes and the Electoral College votes.

In 2000, Democratic candidate Al Gore garnered 543,895 more votes nationwide than Republican George W. Bush.

But in a contentious race that went all the way up to the Supreme Court, the judges decided to end a recount in Florida, giving the state’s then 25 electoral votes to Bush.

This took Bush past the magic number of 270 electoral votes and ensured him the presidency.

In 2016, when Donald Trump was elected, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by a much bigger margin, receiving 2.9 million more votes nationwide.

But Trump became president because he garnered 304 electoral votes to Clinton’s 227.

If the number of electoral votes is tied, then the election is decided by the newly elected House of Representatives.

– How the electoral votes work –

Each state is allotted electors equal to their number of representatives in Congress.

This means there are 538 electors in total: 435 representatives and 100 senators, plus three for the District of Columbia.

If a candidate wins 270 electors or more, therefore, he or she wins the presidency.

In 48 states, the candidate with the most votes, however slim the margin, wins all the state’s electoral votes.

Maine and Nebraska do things differently and allocate electoral votes by individual congressional districts.

Some critics regard the Electoral College as an anachronism and would replace it with a national popular vote.

They say that the Electoral College makes a mockery of the “one person, one vote” system the country extols.

Furthermore, it causes candidates to concentrate their campaigns primarily on a handful of swing states where the vote could go either way, turning the majority of voters elsewhere in the country into bystanders.

But proponents say the reverse would happen if the president were elected by the popular votes.

Then candidates would concentrate their campaigning in the big states—California, Texas, and New York—and voters in smaller states would be the onlookers.

But what really do the two major candidates in the U.S. presidential election represent?

Kamala Harris is the first woman, first black person, and first person of South Asian descent to be vice president of the United States.

After four years in the second highest office, she now wants to make history again by holding the top job.

She received President Joe Biden’s blessing when he stepped back from being the Democratic candidate just three months ago, triggering her whirlwind campaign.

Harris was born on Oct. 20, 1964, in Oakland, California. She often touts her middle-class upbringing to voters: her father Donald migrated from Jamaica to study economics; her mother Shyamala, a cancer researcher and civil rights activist, came from India.

They married in 1963 and separated when Harris was 5 years old.

Harris, 60, has largely played down her gender and race. But she has said that India is an important part of her life.

When she and her younger sister Maya were children, their mother travelled with them to India almost every other year to see relatives there—and to instill in them a love of Indian food.

Shyamala died of colon cancer in 2009. Harris rarely speaks of her father, who went on to become a professor at Stanford University. She once told an interviewer that they are not close.

Harris became the first black district attorney of San Francisco in 2002, and later she served for six years as California’s attorney general.

When she moved to the U.S. Senate in 2017, she used her experience as a prosecutor to make her mark at high-profile hearings by grilling witnesses, from Trump officials to Supreme Court nominees.

Harris met her partner Doug Emhoff, an entertainment lawyer, relatively late in life.

A friend set up a blind date for the two of them in California, where they were living at the time in 2013.

They married the following year.

Emhoff has two adult children from his first marriage: Cole and Ella.

As the first husband of a vice president, Emhoff is also the first “Second Gentleman” of the United States.

Should Harris win and become the first woman to ever hold the presidency, he would be the very first “First Gentleman.”

Donald Trump’s rise to the U.S. presidency, which he held from 2017-2021, upset many assumptions and taboos, but perhaps just as surprising is that he has brushed off two impeachments, a criminal conviction, and several other threats to contend again for the White House.

His come-from-behind win against Hillary Clinton in 2016, by claiming outsider status and promising to bring a businessman’s acumen for dealmaking to the White House, shocked the U.S. political system and fundamentally changed the Republican party.

In 2024, four years after losing to Joe Biden, he still casts himself as the man to shake up U.S. politics by taking on the corrupt elites.

All the while he has kept his brash campaign style, prone to riffing on theories well outside the mainstream, and rarely shying away from an opportunity to personally insult or belittle his opponents.

If Trump wins, the 78-year-old would be the oldest person in U.S. history elected president.

Born June 14, 1946, he was the fourth of five children of Frederick Trump, a real estate magnate who bequeathed a small New York empire to his family.

At age 13, Trump’s parents sent him to a military academy.

The future president went on to study at Fordham University and then the University of Pennsylvania’s prestigious Wharton School of Business.

After graduating from Wharton, he joined his father’s business and, in 1974, became its president and renamed it the Trump Organisation.

Investments in hotels, casinos, golf courses, luxury apartments, and beauty pageants followed.

As the star of the TV reality show “The Apprentice,” he relished delivering bad news to failed contenders, telling them curtly, “You are fired.”

Trump dipped into politics from time to time but seemed galvanised under the administration of Barack Obama and morphed into a right-wing populist.

He loudly peddled the lie that Obama was not born in the United States.

Trump’s critics, which include several high-profile members of his first administration, have cast him as chaotic, divisive, and a threat to democracy.

General John Kelly, his former chief of staff, recently likened him to a “fascist.”

His rhetoric has been crude and dark at rallies, veering from crass insults to false claims and menacing warnings, like his suggestion this month he could use the military to handle what he called “the enemy from within.”

Like in 2016, his 2024 campaign has put an anti-immigration stance front and centre.

In 2016, he said some Mexican immigrants were rapists and murderers; this year he baselessly accused Haitian immigrants of eating pets in the town of Springfield, Ohio.

A line repeated by his vice presidential pick, Ohio Senator J. D. Vance.

How Electoral College, not popular votes, picks US president

(NANFeatures)

International

Syria not threat to world, rebel leader al-Sharaa tells BBC

Published

on

Ahmed al-Sharaa

Syria not threat to world, rebel leader al-Sharaa tells BBC

The de facto leader of Syria, Ahmed al-Sharaa, has said the country is exhausted by war and is not a threat to its neighbours or to the West.

In an interview with the BBC in Damascus, he called for sanctions on Syria to be lifted.

“Now, after all that has happened, sanctions must be lifted because they were targeted at the old regime. The victim and the oppressor should not be treated in the same way,” he said.

Sharaa led the lightning offensive that toppled Bashar al-Assad’s regime less than two weeks ago. He is the leader of the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the dominant group in the rebel alliance, and was previously known by his nom de guerre of Abu Mohammed al-Jolani.

He said HTS should be de-listed as a terrorist organisation. It is designated as one by the UN, US, EU and UK, among many others, as it started as a splinter group of al-Qaeda, which it broke away from in 2016.

Sharaa said HTS was not a terrorist group.

They did not target civilians or civilian areas, he said. In fact, they considered themselves to be victim of the crimes of the Assad regime.

He denied that he wanted to turn Syria into a version of Afghanistan.

READ ALSO:

Sharaa said the countries were very different, with different traditions. Afghanistan was a tribal society. In Syria, he said, there was a different mindset.

He said he believed in education for women.

“We’ve had universities in Idlib for more than eight years,” Sharaa said, referring to Syria’s north-western province that has been held by rebels since 2011.

“I think the percentage of women in universities is more than 60%.”

And when asked whether the consumption of alcohol would be allowed, Sharaa said: “There are many things I just don’t have the right to talk about because they are legal issues.”

He added that there would be a “Syrian committee of legal experts to write a constitution. They will decide. And any ruler or president will have to follow the law”.

Sharaa was relaxed throughout the interview, wearing civilian clothes, and tried to offer reassurance to all those who believe his group has not broken with its extremist past.

Many Syrians do not believe him.

The actions of Syria’s new rulers in the next few months will indicate the kind of country they want Syria to be – and the way they want to rule it.

Syria not threat to world, rebel leader al-Sharaa tells BBC

BBC

Continue Reading

International

Israel hits ports, energy sites in Yemen after missile intercepted

Published

on

Israel hits ports, energy sites in Yemen after missile intercepted

JERUSALEM: Israel said Thursday it struck ports and energy infrastructure it alleges are used by Houthi militants, after intercepting a missile fired by the group.

Israel’s military said it “conducted precise strikes on Houthi military targets in Yemen — including ports and energy infrastructure in Sanaa, which the Houthis have been using in ways that effectively contributed to their military actions.”

The announcement came shortly after Israel said it had intercepted a missile fired from Yemen.

Al-Masira, a media channel belonging to the Houthis, said a series of “aggressive raids” were launched in the Yemeni capital of Sanaa and the port city of Hodeidah.

It reported raids that “targeted two central power plants” in Yemen’s capital Sanaa, while in Hodeidah it said “the enemy launched four aggressive raids targeting the port… and two raids targeting” an oil facility.

The strikes were the second time this week that Israel’s military has intercepted a missile from Yemen.

On Monday, the Houthis claimed a missile launch they said was aimed at “a military target of the Israeli enemy in the occupied area of Yaffa” — a reference to Israel’s Tel Aviv area.

READ ALSO:

Also Monday, an Israeli navy missile boat intercepted a drone in the Mediterranean after it was launched from Yemen, the military said.

The Houthi militants have said they are acting in solidarity with Palestinians and pledged Monday to continue operations “until the aggression on Gaza stops and the siege is lifted.”

On December 9, a drone claimed by Houthis exploded on the top floor of a residential building in the central Israel city of Yavne, causing no casualties.

In July, a Houthi drone attack in Tel Aviv killed an Israeli civilian, prompting retaliatory strikes on the Yemeni port of Hodeidah.

The Houthis have also regularly targeted shipping in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, leading to retaliatory strikes on Houthi targets by United States and sometimes British forces.

Israeli military spokesman Daniel Hagari said the group had become a “global threat,” pointing to Iran’s support for the militants.

“We will continue to act against anyone, anyone in the Middle East, that threatens the state of Israel,” he said.

 

Israel hits ports, energy sites in Yemen after missile intercepted

Continue Reading

International

Gaza mediators intensify ceasefire efforts, Israeli strikes kill 20 people

Published

on

A Palestinian boy looks as others inspect the damage at a tent camp sheltering displaced people, following an Israeli strike, amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, in Al-Mawasi area, in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, December 18, 2024. (Reuters)

Gaza mediators intensify ceasefire efforts, Israeli strikes kill 20 people

CAIRO: The United States, joined by Arab mediators, sought on Wednesday to conclude an agreement between Israel and Hamas to halt the 14-month-old war in the Gaza Strip where medics said Israeli strikes killed at least 20 Palestinians overnight.

A Palestinian official close to the negotiations said on Wednesday that mediators had narrowed gaps on most of the agreement’s clauses. He said Israel had introduced conditions which Hamas rejected but would not elaborate.

On Tuesday, sources close to the talks in Cairo, the Egyptian capital, said an agreement could be signed in coming days on a ceasefire and a release of hostages held in Gaza in return for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel.

Medics said an Israeli airstrike killed at least 10 people in a house in the northern town of Beit Lahiya while six were killed in separate airstrikes in Gaza City, Nuseirat camp in central areas, and Rafah near the border with Egypt.

In Beit Hanoun in the northern Gaza Strip, medics said four people were killed in an airstrike on a house. There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military spokesman.

Israeli forces have operated in the towns of Beit Hanoun and Beit Lahiya as well as the nearby Jabalia camp since October, in a campaign the military said aimed to prevent Hamas militants from regrouping.

Palestinians accuse Israel of carrying out acts of “ethnic cleansing” to depopulate the northern edge of the enclave to create a buffer zone. Israel denies it.

READ ALSO:

Hamas does not disclose its casualties, and the Palestinian health ministry does not distinguish in its daily death toll between combatants and non-combatants.

On Wednesday, the Israeli military said it struck a number of Hamas militants planning an imminent attack against Israeli forces operating in Jabalia.

Later on Wednesday, Muhammad Saleh, director of Al-Awda Hospital in Jabalia, said Israeli shelling in the vicinity damaged the facility, wounding seven medics and one patient inside the hospital.

The Israeli military had no immediate comment.

In the Central Gaza camp of Bureij, Palestinian families began leaving some districts after the army posted new evacuation orders on X and in written and audio messages to mobile phones of some of the population there, citing new firing of rockets by Palestinian militants from the area.

CEASEFIRE GAINS MOMENTUM

The US administration, joined by mediators from Egypt and Qatar, has made intensive efforts in recent days to advance the talks before President Joe Biden leaves office next month.

In Jerusalem, Israeli President Isaac Herzog met Adam Boehler, US President-elect Donald Trump’s designated envoy for hostage affairs. Trump has threatened that “all hell is going to break out” if Hamas does not release its hostages by Jan. 20, the day Trump returns to the White House.

CIA Director William Burns was due in Doha on Wednesday for talks with Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani on bridging remaining gaps between Israel and Hamas, other knowledgeable sources said. The CIA declined to comment.

Israeli negotiators were in Doha on Monday looking to bridge gaps between Israel and Hamas on a deal Biden outlined in May.

There have been repeated rounds of talks over the past year, all of which have failed, with Israel insisting on retaining a military presence in Gaza and Hamas refusing to release hostages until the troops pulled out.

The war in Gaza, triggered by a Hamas-led attack on communities in southern Israel that killed some 1,200 people and saw more than 250 abducted as hostages, has sent shockwaves across the Middle East and left Israel isolated internationally.

Israel’s campaign has killed more than 45,000 Palestinians, displaced most of the 2.3 million population and reduced much of the coastal enclave to ruins.

 

Gaza mediators intensify ceasefire efforts, Israeli strikes kill 20 people

ARAB NEWS

Continue Reading

Trending