In Texas, pro-Palestine university protesters clash with state leaders - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

In Texas, pro-Palestine university protesters clash with state leaders

Published

on

Protesters gather at Texas universities to call for divestment from firms linked to Israeli weapons [Tyler Hicks/Al Jazeera]

In Texas, pro-Palestine university protesters clash with state leaders

Austin, Texas – “It didn’t feel real.” That’s how Alishba Javaid, a student at the University of Texas at Austin, describes the moment when she saw roughly 30 state troopers walk onto the campus lawn.

Javaid and hundreds of her classmates had gathered on the grass, in the shadow of the campus’s 94-metre limestone tower, as part of a walkout against Israel’s war in Gaza.

They were hoping that their school would divest from manufacturers supplying weapons to Israel. Instead, law enforcement started to appear in increasing numbers.

By Javaid’s count, the state troopers joined at least 50 fellow officers already in place, all dressed in riot gear. The protest had been peaceful, but nerves were at a high. The troopers continued their advance.

“That was the first moment I was genuinely scared,” said Javaid, 22.

Dozens of students were ultimately arrested on April 24, as the officers attempted to disperse the protesters. Footage of the clashes between police and demonstrators quickly spread online, echoing images from other campus protests across the United States.

Yet, Texans face a unique challenge, as they contend with a far-right state government that has sought to limit protests against Israel.

READ ALSO:

In 2017, Governor Greg Abbott signed a law that prohibits government entities from working with businesses that boycott Israel, and the state has since taken steps to tighten that law further.

Abbott has also cast the current protests as “hate-filled” and “anti-Semitic”, amplifying misconceptions about demonstrators and their goals.

In addition, a state law went into effect earlier this year that forced public universities to shutter their diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) offices.

Multiple students and employees told Al Jazeera that campuses have become less safe for people of colour as a result of the law, which forced the departure of staff DEI advocates.

‘Using violence to subvert minorities’

The violence has continued at University of Texas campuses as students press forward with their protests.

On the final day of class, April 29, police used pepper spray and flash-bang devices to clear a crowd at the Austin campus, while dozens more were encircled by troopers and dragged away screaming.

Hiba Faruqi, a 21-year-old student, said her knee “just kept bleeding” after she was knocked over during a pushing-and-shoving match between students and police.

Student protesters applaud one another as they are released from the Travis County Jail in Austin, Texas, on April 30 [Nuri Vallbona/Reuters]

Yet she counts herself lucky for not sustaining worse injuries. It was surreal, she said, to think that her own university called in state troopers — and then had to deploy medical personnel to assist students who were hurt.

“There’s a racist element people don’t want to talk about here,” she said. “There’s a xenophobic element people don’t want to acknowledge. There are more brown protesters, which maybe emboldens the police to do things a certain way.”

As calls for divestment continue, students, lawyers and advocates told Al Jazeera they have been forced to navigate scepticism and outright hostility from the Texas government.

READ ALSO:

“Texas is known for using violence to subvert minorities,” Faruqi said. “The reason this is shaking people this time is because it’s not working.”

Scrutiny over university endowments

Many of the protests have zeroed in on the University of Texas’s endowment, a bank of funds designed to support its nine campuses over the long term.

The University of Texas system has the largest public education endowment in the country, worth more than $40bn.

Some of that money comes from investments in weapons and defence contractors, as well as aerospace, energy and defence technology companies with deep ties to Israel.

ExxonMobil, for example, is one of the biggest beneficiaries of the system’s investments, and the company has supplied Israel with fuel for its fighter jets.

Those ties have fuelled the protests across the state’s public university campuses, including a May 1 demonstration at the University of Texas at Dallas.

Fatima — who only shared her first name with Al Jazeera, out of fear for her safety — was among the demonstrators. She wiped sweat from her brow as a young child led the crowd of about 100 in a series of chants: “Free, free, free Palestine!”

The divestment protests have largely been peaceful, Fatima explained, raising her voice to be heard above the noise.

“Over 30,000 people have been murdered,” she said, referring to the death toll in Gaza, where Israel’s military campaign is entering its eighth month.

“And our university is investing in weapons manufacturing companies that are providing Israel with these weapons. We’re going to stay here until our demands are met.”

Twenty-one students and staff members were arrested that day in Dallas. Members of the group Students for Justice in Palestine, of which Fatima is a member, spent the night outside the county jail, waiting for their friends to be released.

A little boy speaks into a microphone at a pro-Palestinian protests, as "Free Palestine" flags wave.

One protester wryly noted outside the jail that they had been arrested for trespassing on their own campus, a seemingly nonsensical offence.

READ ALSO:

In the background, a thunderstorm was beginning to rear its head, so the protesters huddled closer together under the awning.

Protesters receive community support

Texas officials and university administrators have justified the police crackdowns, in part, by citing the presence of outsiders with no present affiliation with the campuses involved.

But 30-year-old activist Anissa Jaqaman is among those visiting the university protests, in an effort to lend supplies and support.

Everyone has a role to play, Jaqaman explained: Her role is sometimes that of the communicator, but more often that of the healer.

She has brought water to the student demonstrators at the University of Texas at Dallas and hopes to provide a space for people to “come over and talk about how we heal”.

“This is a healing movement,” she said time and again as she spoke to Al Jazeera. “We have to carry each other.”

Jaqaman is Texas through and through: She was raised in the Dallas suburbs and is a strong advocate for her state.

“I’m a proud Texan,” she said. “I actually think that Texans are some of the nicest people in the country.”

But back when she was in college, from 2012 to 2016, Jaqaman started to use her voice to bring awareness to the plight of Palestinians.

Rights groups have long warned that Israel has imposed a system of apartheid against the ethnic group, subjecting its members to discrimination and displacement.

In college, Jaqaman’s friends often laughed at her passion. She often smiles, exuding optimism, but her voice grows serious as she talks about Palestine, as well as other issues like the scourge of single-use plastics.

“They just thought I was a tree-hugger, but for human rights,” she explained, speaking in a soft yet confident voice.

But the current war has amplified her concerns. The United Nations has signalled famine is “imminent” in parts of Gaza, and rights experts have pointed to a “risk of genocide” in the Palestinian enclave.

Jaqaman has sported her keffiyeh scarf ever since the war began on October 7, despite feeling anxious that it could attract violence against her.

“I wear it because I feel like it protects my heart, honestly,” she said. “I feel like I’m doing the Palestinian people injustice by not wearing it.”

But she has struggled to get public officials to engage with her concerns about the war and divestment from industries tied to Israel’s military. For months, she attempted to persuade her local city council that “this is a human issue, an everyone issue”, to little avail.

“Everything that we’re seeing right now is about shutting down the discussion,” she said. “If you say anything about Palestine, you’re labelled anti-Semitic. That’s a conversation-ender.”

Youth protesters look to the future

Students like Javaid, a journalism major in her final semester, told Al Jazeera that they are still trying to figure out what healing looks like — and what their futures might hold. In many ways, she and her friends feel stuck.

They recognise they need to take a break from scouring social media for information about the war, and yet it is all they can think about.

The usual college rites of passage — final exams, graduation and job hunting — just don’t seem as important any more.

“How are we supposed to go back to work now?” Javaid asked after the protests.

While she has treasured her time at the university, she is also highly critical of its actions to stamp out the protests. Part of the blame, she added, lies with the government, though.

“The root issue in Texas is that the state government doesn’t care,” she said.

Born and raised in the Dallas area, Javaid plans to stay in Texas for at least a little while after she graduates this month. She has mixed feelings about staying long term, though.

She would like to work in social justice, particularly in higher education, but she worries such a job would be tenuous in her home state.

Still, she feels a sense of responsibility tying her to the state. The political climate in Texas may be challenging, she said, but she has a duty — to her fellow protesters and to Palestine — to keep playing a role.

“I don’t want to jump ship and just say, ‘Texas is crazy’,” Javaid said. “I want to be a part of the people trying to make it better. Because if not us, who?”

In Texas, pro-Palestine university protesters clash with state leaders

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA

Loading

International

Pentagon Confirms 153 Civilians Killed in US Military Operations in 2025

Published

on

Pentagon Confirms 153 Civilians Killed in US Military Operations in 2025

Pentagon Confirms 153 Civilians Killed in US Military Operations in 2025

A Pentagon assessment submitted to Congress has formally acknowledged that US military operations killed 153 civilians and wounded 243 others in 2025, a sharp increase from the previous year. All documented casualties were linked to three strikes in Yemen during Operation Rough Rider, the US campaign against Iran-backed Houthi rebels.

The Pentagon has formally acknowledged that US military operations in 2025 killed 153 civilians and wounded 243 others, according to a report submitted to Congress on August 10, 2026. The figures represent a dramatic increase from 2024, when the Pentagon assessed that two civilians were killed and two were injured by US military operations. The report was submitted to the Senate Armed Services Committee as required by Section 1057 of the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act.

The report found that all civilian deaths and injuries recorded in 2025 resulted from three US strikes in Yemen in April 2025. The US Central Command assessed that the three strikes “more likely than not” resulted in civilian harm. The strikes were part of Operation Rough Rider, the US military campaign against Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi militia group, aimed at preventing attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea.

READ ALSO:

According to the Pentagon assessment, the three deadly strikes occurred at specific locations across Yemen in April 2025. On April 6, a US strike hit a residence near the Yemeni capital, Sanaa, killing five civilians and injuring 25. The April 17 attack targeted Ras Isa Port, where the Pentagon assessed that 80 civilians were killed and 171 injured. Human Rights Watch had separately reported a comparable death toll and raised concerns about the attack’s potential violation of international humanitarian law, noting that port workers were among those killed. A third strike near Saada on April 28 killed between 47 and 68 civilians and injured 68, according to the assessment. Amnesty International’s investigation into the migrant detention centre said the attack killed and injured “dozens” of African migrants and should be probed as a war crime.

The military relied on US intelligence, imagery, and public reporting rather than conducting site visits or interviews to make the assessment. As of February 2026, the US Central Command was still assessing 15 other incidents in Yemen following reports received through non-governmental organisations.

The Pentagon assessment stands in contrast to significantly higher estimates from independent monitoring groups. Airwars, an organisation tracking civilian harm in conflicts, reported that at least 258 civilians may have been killed in Operation Rough Rider. The Yemen Data Project documented at least 238 civilian deaths, including 24 children, and 467 injuries across 339 strikes during the campaign. Officials who spoke to The Intercept on condition of anonymity described the 153 figure as “lowball numbers,” with one calling the report “a fucking joke” and a “total whitewash”.

The report notably does not include casualties from US strikes on vessels in the Caribbean Sea and Eastern Pacific Ocean, which the Trump administration has carried out against what it describes as “narco-terrorists”. As of February 1, 2026, the US Southern Command assessed that “there were no incidents in which civilian casualties more likely than not resulted from US military operations in the USSOUTHCOM area of responsibility in 2025”. However, independent tallies indicate US military strikes on such vessels have killed more than 200 people since September 2025. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International consider such strikes unlawful extrajudicial killings, and the American Civil Liberties Union has cast the administration’s assertions against those targeted as “unsubstantiated, fear-mongering claims”.

The disclosure comes as the Pentagon prosecutes a broader military operation against Iran that began in February 2026, and follows significant cuts to civilian harm mitigation programmes. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly overruled top military officials, including then-Central Command chief Erik Kurilla and Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. C.Q. Brown, who pushed against slashing the Civilian Protection Center of Excellence and similar initiatives. Hegseth instead reduced personnel working on civilian harm issues from approximately 200 to fewer than 40, with Central Command’s civilian harm team slashed from 10 personnel to just one. The administration’s 2026 budget proposed the “disestablishment” of the Civilian Protection Center of Excellence, reducing personnel funding by over $2 million and mission support funding by more than $9.5 million, amounting to roughly a 90 per cent reduction in personnel since March 2025. Congress has since launched investigations into the cuts, with lawmakers accusing the Pentagon of gutting a congressionally mandated effort to reduce civilian harm despite a legal requirement to maintain it. A May 2026 Inspector General report found that the Department of Defense may have violated federal law by defunding and blocking civilian protection efforts.

Pentagon Confirms 153 Civilians Killed in US Military Operations in 2025

Loading

Continue Reading

International

US, Iran Nearing Peace Agreement, Pakistan Defence Minister

Published

on

Iranian FM Abbas Araghchi and US President Donald Trump

US, Iran Nearing Peace Agreement, Pakistan Defence Minister

Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif has stated that the United States and Iran are close to reaching “some sort of an arrangement,” pointing to renewed diplomatic momentum as Islamabad continues its mediating role between the two longstanding adversaries. Asif made the comments in an interview with Bloomberg News in Islamabad on Tuesday, saying recent signals indicated that Washington and Tehran were moving closer to a deal that could ease tensions in the Middle East. “Things are shaping up again in favor of a peace arrangement or a deal,” Asif said, adding that “the signals in the last two three days are that we are close to some sort of an arrangement.” His remarks come as Pakistani Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi is currently meeting Iranian leadership in Tehran as part of Islamabad’s renewed push for resolution of the standoff, particularly concerning the strategic Strait of Hormuz. A Pakistani government source told Anadolu Agency that Naqvi would share “some new proposals” with the Iranian leadership to resolve the impasse, though details of the proposals were not disclosed. Asif emphasised that a long-term peace agreement between the United States and Iran would be beneficial not only to both countries but to the broader Middle East region. He said the emerging signals were favourable to peace, but cautioned that further negotiations would be required before any agreement could be considered final. His remarks did not amount to an announcement of a completed deal, and there has been no official confirmation from Washington or Tehran that a final agreement has been signed.

The latest indications follow months of conflict and repeated diplomatic efforts aimed at securing a durable settlement. Pakistan has positioned itself as a potential bridge between Washington and Tehran, using its relations with both countries to support negotiations. In June 2026, Pakistan facilitated the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the United States and Iran, with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif signing as mediator. The MoU entered into force with immediate effect, with Iran agreeing to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and the United States committing to lift its naval blockade as a first step. However, subsequent talks stalled over disagreements on security guarantees and freedom of navigation through the strategic waterway, through which a fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas flowed before the war. Pakistan’s National Assembly unanimously passed a resolution in June recognising the country’s efforts in facilitating the peace agreement, describing Pakistan as a “trusted and neutral mediator on the global stage.” The resolution appreciated the role played by PM Shehbaz Sharif, Deputy PM Ishaq Dar, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi, and Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir in the negotiations. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif previously told parliament that Chief of Defence Forces Field Marshal Asim Munir had played “the most crucial role” in securing the peace agreement and had worked tirelessly over several months. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian reportedly telephoned Sharif to thank Pakistan and specifically acknowledged Munir’s role.

READ ALSO:

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said on August 8 that Iran would continue pursuing a “path of peace” with the United States under the MoU, but stressed that Tehran’s participation in negotiations would depend on Washington creating an atmosphere of trust. “We are determined to use the MoU as the basis provided that the United States lets go of the atmosphere of distrust it has created, and an atmosphere of trust is formed,” Pezeshkian said at a press conference. US Vice President JD Vance also acknowledged “some progress” in talks with Iran, telling Fox News that Washington is focused on maximizing the amount of oil and gas coming out of the Strait of Hormuz. Vance noted that Iranians and Gulf countries, particularly Oman, have been discussing how to ensure the safe flow of traffic through the waterway. A Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesperson said Tuesday that talks between Iran and Oman about reopening the Strait of Hormuz to some maritime shipping have reached an “advanced stage.” However, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that reopening the strait would depend on other conditions, including “compensation” from the United States for “violating” the MoU.

Despite the diplomatic progress, Israel has explicitly rejected Pakistan’s involvement in regional peace efforts, citing deep-seated distrust. Israeli Ambassador to India, Reuven Azar, told ANI: “We don’t trust the Pakistanis. I think that their behaviour has been reprehensible, their approach towards Israel, the anti-Semitic remarks of their defence minister, etc.” The comments came after Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif made controversial remarks on social media in April 2026, labelling Israel as “evil” and a “curse for humanity,” and referring to the country as a “cancerous state.” Israel’s National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir also declared that Israel is not bound by the US-brokered agreement, stating: “Trump’s agreement does not bind us. Israel is not subject to the United States, and we are an independent and sovereign nation!”

The reported progress comes amid continuing regional tensions, with the US and Iran having exchanged military strikes in July 2026. A successful agreement could ease those tensions and create the basis for a longer-term diplomatic settlement between Washington and Tehran, though several significant obstacles remain. These include Israel’s opposition to Pakistan’s involvement and to the broader agreement, unresolved issues over Iran’s nuclear program, disagreements on security guarantees and freedom of navigation, and a lack of trust between the parties, with Iran demanding compensation from the US.

Asif said the emerging signals were favourable to peace, but further negotiations would be required before any agreement could be considered final. For now, however, there has been no indication from the United States or Iran that a final agreement has been signed, leaving the reported progress subject to further negotiations. Pakistan’s involvement has given Islamabad a prominent diplomatic role in the efforts, with Pakistani officials repeatedly expressing support for a negotiated settlement. The reported progress comes amid continuing regional tensions and wider concerns over the impact of the US-Iran confrontation on security and stability across the Middle East.

US, Iran Nearing Peace Agreement, Pakistan Defence Minister

Loading

Continue Reading

International

University Student Stabbed to Death Over Alleged £3,000 Debt, Fake Rolex

Published

on

University Student Stabbed to Death Over Alleged £3,000 Debt, Fake Rolex

University Student Stabbed to Death Over Alleged £3,000 Debt, Fake Rolex

A De Montfort University student was fatally stabbed in the heart while on the phone to his girlfriend after a falling out with a friend over an alleged £3,000 debt and a fake Rolex watch, a murder trial has heard. Khaleed Oladipo, 20, was walking home from his girlfriend’s flat in Leicester on February 3 when he was attacked by Harper Dennis, 18, a first-year student at the University of Leicester, prosecutors told Leicester Crown Court. The two had been friends through online gaming and were part of a Snapchat group, but their relationship soured over money.

Oladipo was on the phone with his girlfriend when he was stabbed five times in the chest, with one wound penetrating his heart. His girlfriend heard him say, “Why did you come up and stab me?” before he asked her to call an ambulance. The stabbing was captured on a passing car’s dashcam, which showed the two men engage in a “short struggle” before falling to the ground. A witness recalled seeing “a snowstorm of feathers” from their puffer jackets during the attack. Prosecutors said the defendant’s arm movement was “consistent with the stab wounds inflicted to the left hand side of Khaleed’s chest.” The attack lasted “in reality, seconds,” according to prosecutor Jane Osborne KC. Oladipo collapsed and never regained consciousness. A post-mortem examination found he had suffered six wounds, five to the chest, with the fatal stab wound being 13cm deep. He was pronounced dead just over an hour later at Leicester Royal Infirmary.

READ ALSO:

The court heard that Dennis perceived Oladipo owed him £3,000. The dispute was fueled by an incident involving a fake Rolex watch that Oladipo had given Dennis to sell. Oladipo had allegedly advised Dennis not to go to certain jewellers because the watch was counterfeit. When Dennis attempted to sell it at a jeweller’s in Hatton Garden, London, he was “laughed at” and left “embarrassed and angry.” Messages between the two showed the deteriorating relationship, with Dennis sending a Snapchat message on Boxing Day saying he would “dedicate his life to making sure you suffer for what you did.” On Christmas Day 2025, Dennis allegedly made two anonymous threatening phone calls to Oladipo’s girlfriend, saying Oladipo was “a bad guy” who owed £3,000, and intimating he would come to her if the money was not paid. Financial records showed a final transfer of 60p from Oladipo to Dennis on Christmas Day with the reference “5999 to go.”

Dennis was arrested at his accommodation later that evening. Police seized his mobile phone, but he refused to provide the PIN code. A search of his flat found four knives, including a Kombat Tactical knife with serration. He had also given a flatmate a black bin bag containing the clothing he was seen wearing in CCTV footage at the time of the attack. Dennis, who denies murder, claims he acted in self-defence. He is also charged with possession of a bladed article and failing to provide the PIN for his phone. The trial, expected to last three weeks, continues.

University Student Stabbed to Death Over Alleged £3,000 Debt, Fake Rolex

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending