INEC rejects parties request for adjustment of polls timetable - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

INEC rejects parties request for adjustment of polls timetable

Published

on

Ex-INEC Chairman Yakubu Officially Assumes Office as Nigeria’s Ambassador to Qatar
INEC Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) yesterday turned down a request by the 18 political parties to alter the timetable for the 2023 general elections.

The commission said acceding to the request would affect its “other activities” and create “unnecessary tension” that could negatively affect the general election scheduled to commence February 25, next year.

“The commission will not review the timelines,” INEC Chairman Mahmood Yakubu said during a meeting with Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC), the umbrella body of the registered parties in Abuja.

The meeting was attended by All Progressives Congress (APC) National Chairman Abdullahi Adamu and National Secretary, Iyiola Omisore; Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) National Chairman, Iyorcha Ayu and National Secretary Samuel Anyanwu; All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) National Chairman Victor Oye and IPAC Chairman Yabagi Sani.

In justifying its call for an alteration to the timetable, IPAC said it discovered that the schedule of activities for the general election was  based on “certain circumstances and developments that have hampered timely and strict compliance with the timelines.”

READ ALSO:

The council specifically urged that the deadline for primaries be extended by 37 days from June 3.

It argued that an adjustment to the timetable would not significantly affect the conduct of the general election.

IPAC Chairman Sani said: “It is within the framework of the enduring bond between the INEC and IPAC in service to the country, that all the 18 registered political parties on the platform of IPAC are joint, without exception, requesting the INEC to consider a slight adjustment to the recently announced timetable and schedule of activities for the 2023 general elections.

“In summary, the general assembly of IPAC …requests for an extension by 37 days to the deadline of the time frame for the conduct of party primaries and resolution of conflicts arising from the primaries:

“By implication, the IPAC leadership is appealing to the INEC to extend the deadline for the conduct of party primaries and resolution of ensuing conflicts from the present INEC given date of June 3, 2022 to 4th August 2022.

“Some of the issues considered by the IPAC general assembly which necessitated the call for extension in the timeframe of the present INEC timetable and schedule of activities are based on certain circumstances and developments that have hampered timely and strict compliance by the political parties to the timetable.

“Some of the constraining developments which, we believe were not considered and therefore, not factored in by NEC while drawing up its schedule of activities include the following; the Christian Lenten season and the Muslim fasting in the month of Ramadan respectively followed by the celebrations of Easter and Eid El Fitr, (Sallah), in which the vast majority of party members were involved.

“It is also, noteworthy that, the scenario was the first time that the two major events in the Christian and Muslim calendars would be occurring around the period of general elections.”

Sani also cited the forthcoming governorship elections in Ekiti and Osun states within the timeline of the INEC as “additional distractions and constraints that obviously affect the political parties.”.

READ ALSO:

He added that “IPAC general assembly regards the time allotted by INEC for the conduct of primaries as too short in view of the efforts required by the parties for effective and scrupulous screening and selection of qualified and quality flag bearers.”

The IPAC boss said that the parties were “ not unmindful of the provisions of the 1999 Constitution and the Electoral Act 2022 with respect to timelines in the electoral process” in making the request for an adjustment.

But the INEC chairman reminded the parties that the period earmarked for the conduct of their primaries commenced April 4, 2022, and would end June 3.

“Any review to extend the timeline for one activity will affect other activities and put unnecessary pressure on political parties and the commission,” Yakubu said.

He however acknowledged the fact that the parties had forwarded to INEC, the schedules for their primaries.

His words: “This meeting is the first since the Electoral Act 2022 came into force on February 25 2022. It is also our first meeting since the commission released the timetable and schedule of activities for the 2023 general election over two months ago.

“Already, all 18 political parties have forwarded the schedules of their primaries to the Commission, and some have commenced the process of choosing their candidates by conducting ward and local government congresses.

“The period earmarked for the conduct of primaries by political parties commenced on April 4, 2022, and will end 24 days from today(yesterday.).

“Twice in the last two weeks, the commission had cause to remind political parties of the necessity for strict compliance with the timelines for party primaries. I hereby reiterate the position of the commission that there will be no review of the timelines.

“There are so many inter-related activities that are associated with the timelines which must be carried out. Any review to extend the timeline for one activity.will ultimately result in more complications than what the extension seeks to achieve.

“Therefore, the commission will not review the timelines. Working together, we should ensure fidelity to the timelines in conducting transparent and democratic primaries for the purpose of electing candidates for the 1,491 constituencies for which elections will be held on 25th February and 11th March 2023.

“In the spirit of working together to comply with the requirements of the law, the commission has prepared a document to guide political parties in the conduct of primaries and nomination of candidates for election, including a checklist of the documentation required for a successful nomination..

“Similarly, the commission has prepared a calendar of party primaries for presidential, governorship, national and state assembly seats based on the proposals submitted by political parties as at May 6, 2022.”

Yakubu charged the parties to be committed to “promoting inclusivity in the electoral process” by giving more opportunities to women, youths and Persons with Disabilities (PWDs).

THE NATION

Loading

Politics

‘My History Is Traceable’: Atiku Fires Back at Tinubu Over University Funding

Published

on

‘My History Is Traceable’: Atiku Fires Back at Tinubu Over University Funding
Former Vice President and African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate, Atiku AbubakarFormer Vice President and African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar

‘My History Is Traceable’: Atiku Fires Back at Tinubu Over University Funding

Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar has fired back at President Bola Ahmed Tinubu over comments questioning how he financed the establishment of his university, insisting that his business and educational investment records are traceable.

Atiku, the presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), said his investment in education began long before he became vice-president, accusing Tinubu of attempting to divert public attention from the economic challenges facing Nigerians by questioning his business history.

The exchange followed Tinubu’s remarks at an All Progressives Congress (APC) campaign rally in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, on Saturday, November 7, 2026.

The President had challenged Atiku to explain how he established the American University of Nigeria (AUN) in Yola, Adamawa State, while serving as vice-president under former President Olusegun Obasanjo between 1999 and 2007.

Tinubu alleged that public resources were used to establish the institution, asking who financed the university and questioning Atiku’s moral integrity to seek the presidency.

In response, Atiku, through his Director of Strategic Communication, Phrank Shaibu, said his investment in education predated his entry into public office.

He maintained that he laid the foundation for ABTI Academy in 1993, arguing that the project later developed into the American University of Nigeria.

Atiku said: “The answer is simple: my investment in education predates my time in public service. In 1993, while a US court ordered the forfeiture of funds in an account in your name, describing them as proceeds of narcotics trafficking or funds involved in unlawful financial transactions, I was laying the foundation for ABTI Academy. That Academy has since grown into the American University of Nigeria.”

READ ALSO:

The former vice-president described his business history as open to scrutiny, declaring that he could explain how he built his businesses and entered public leadership.

“That moment captures the difference between us. My history is traceable. I can show Nigerians how I built my name, achieved success in business and entered public leadership,” he said.

Atiku also revived the controversy surrounding the forfeiture of $460,000 in the United States involving an account in Tinubu’s name in 1993, using the development to challenge the President’s criticism of his own financial history.

He accused Tinubu of focusing on his educational investment to avoid addressing questions about the performance of his administration.

The ADC candidate argued that the more important issue ahead of the 2027 presidential election should be how to address the country’s economic difficulties, including rising living costs, poverty, unemployment and insecurity.

Atiku also criticised the President’s position on the removal of the petrol subsidy, saying Nigerians were yet to experience the promised economic benefits of the policy.

He challenged Tinubu’s argument that the country could not return to subsidised petrol prices, promising that an Atiku-led government would introduce what he described as a transparent, production-based subsidy linked to local refining.

According to him, the proposed arrangement would reduce the cost of energy, including petrol and diesel, while ensuring that Nigerians benefit directly from the country’s refining capacity.

He also promised to expand social welfare programmes and address what he described as an opaque system for distributing funds meant for economically vulnerable citizens.

Atiku said his Affordable Life campaign was designed to provide an alternative to the economic policies of the Tinubu administration, insisting that criticism of his campaign would not stop him from pursuing his presidential ambition.

He further declared that he would remain on the ballot for the 2027 election, expressing confidence in his chances against the incumbent President.

However, the timeline surrounding the establishment of Atiku’s university has also become part of the controversy.

While Atiku says he laid the foundation for ABTI Academy in 1993, information published on the American University of Nigeria’s website, as reported by THISDAY, states that he first established ABTI Academy, now known as AUN Academy, in 2002.

The university was licensed as ABTI University in 2003, while construction of its buildings began in October 2004. Its first students were admitted in the 2005/2006 academic session.

The difference between Atiku’s claimed 1993 beginning of his education investment and the university’s published establishment timeline is therefore an important detail in the dispute.

Tinubu has not, in the reports cited, provided documentary evidence to substantiate his allegation that public resources were used to finance the university. Atiku, for his part, maintains that his investment in education began before he became vice-president.

The exchange has added to the growing political confrontation between the President and the ADC presidential candidate as political activities ahead of the 2027 general election intensify.

 

‘My History Is Traceable’: Atiku Fires Back at Tinubu Over University Funding

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: Tinubu Challenges Atiku to Explain How He Financed University

Published

on

2027: Tinubu Challenges Atiku to Explain How He Financed University
Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar and President Bola Tinubu

2027: Tinubu Challenges Atiku to Explain How He Financed University

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has challenged former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar to explain how he financed the establishment of his university, alleging that public resources may have been used to build the institution while Atiku was serving in government.

Tinubu made the remarks on Saturday, November 7, 2026, at the All Progressives Congress (APC) presidential campaign rally held at the Adokiye Amiesimaka Stadium in Port Harcourt, Rivers State.

The President, who is seeking re-election in 2027, was responding to opposition criticism of his administration over the rising cost of living, hunger and economic hardship when he turned his attention to Atiku’s business and political record.

He accused the former vice-president of being part of the political leadership responsible for Nigeria’s economic difficulties and questioned how he established the American University of Nigeria (AUN) in Yola, Adamawa State, while serving under former President Olusegun Obasanjo between 1999 and 2007.

Tinubu told the rally that Nigerians should ask Atiku how he acquired the resources to establish the institution while holding public office and overseeing aspects of the country’s economy.

The President also questioned the former vice-president’s moral standing to criticise his administration, accusing him of lacking the integrity expected of someone seeking the nation’s highest political office.

Tinubu, however, did not present evidence at the rally to substantiate his allegation that public funds were used to finance the university.

Atiku responded to the President’s remarks later on Saturday, insisting that his investment in education began before he became vice-president.

READ ALSO:

In a statement issued by his Director of Strategic Communication, Phrank Shaibu, the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate said he laid the foundation for ABTI Academy in 1993, six years before becoming vice-president.

He argued that his business activities and investment in education predated his entry into public service, adding that his financial and business history could be scrutinised.

Atiku also turned the accusation against Tinubu, referring to the 1993 United States civil forfeiture case involving funds held in bank accounts in the President’s name.

He cited the case while arguing that his own investment in education had started long before the period Tinubu questioned.

Atiku accused the President of using attacks on his personal business history to divert attention from the economic difficulties facing Nigerians.

He also criticised the administration’s handling of the economy, alleging that its policies had worsened poverty, unemployment, insecurity and the cost of living.

The former vice-president further challenged Tinubu’s position on petrol subsidy, promising that an Atiku-led government would introduce what he described as a transparent, production-based subsidy tied to local refining.

He said the proposed arrangement would be designed to reduce energy costs, including the prices of petrol and diesel, while also pledging increased investment in social welfare programmes.

However, the timeline of the university’s establishment presents an important detail in the exchange.

According to the American University of Nigeria’s official history, Atiku first established ABTI Academy, now known as AUN Academy, in 2002. The university was licensed as ABTI University in 2003, construction began in October 2004, and its first students were admitted in the 2005/2006 academic session.

The university’s official account therefore places the formal establishment of ABTI Academy and the development of the university project within Atiku’s years as vice-president.

Atiku’s latest statement, however, distinguishes his claimed 1993 foundation of ABTI Academy from the later development of the institution into a university.

The university’s published history does not independently confirm the 1993 date cited by Atiku. The distinction between his claim about the beginning of his education investment and the institution’s documented establishment milestones is therefore central to the dispute.

The President’s allegation and Atiku’s response have reopened questions about the business records and public-service histories of the two political figures as the 2027 presidential campaign gathers momentum.

Atiku served as vice-president from 1999 to 2007 under Obasanjo and has remained a prominent figure in Nigeria’s opposition politics. He is seeking the presidency under the ADC, although a recent Federal High Court judgment has thrown his party’s leadership structure and presidential nomination into legal uncertainty. The ADC has rejected the ruling and indicated that it would challenge it.

The latest exchange between Tinubu and Atiku adds another dimension to the political contest, with both camps using questions about personal integrity, economic management and their records in public office to challenge each other’s credibility.

2027: Tinubu Challenges Atiku to Explain How He Financed University

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

How Buhari’s Promise Cost Me 2022 APC Presidential Ticket – Amaechi

Published

on

How Buhari's Promise Cost Me 2022 APC Presidential Ticket – Amaechi
Former Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi and late President Muhammadu Buhari
How Buhari’s Promise Cost Me 2022 APC Presidential Ticket – Amaechi

Former Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, has blamed his defeat in the 2022 All Progressives Congress (APC) presidential primary on his decision to follow the advice of the late President Muhammadu Buhari, who allegedly promised to make him the party’s preferred candidate.

Amaechi said Buhari assured him that he would announce him as his preferred successor and instructed him not to campaign or engage in political negotiations ahead of the party’s presidential primary.

The former Rivers State governor disclosed this during an interview on Mainland 98.3FM’s The Situation Room programme in Lagos on Friday.

According to Amaechi, trusting Buhari’s assurance was the biggest mistake he made during the contest, as it prevented him from building the political alliances and securing the support of influential party stakeholders needed to win the ticket.

He said, “The first mistake that I made at that primary was that I listened to President Buhari. He said to me, ‘Don’t campaign. Don’t do anything. I will announce you as my candidate.’

“He told me that. He put it in writing. When I write my book, I’ll put it out.”

Amaechi explained that he obeyed Buhari because the former president was his boss and believed his endorsement would give him an advantage over other presidential aspirants.

He said his decision not to negotiate political positions with governors and other influential APC members weakened his chances, giving President Bola Tinubu an opportunity to build alliances ahead of the primary.

READ ALSO:

The ADC vice-presidential candidate admitted that he could have offered influential party figures political positions, including the vice-presidency and Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), in exchange for their support.

“Now, I didn’t do deals. So I would have promised you vice-president, promised you SGF, and then would have gone for this primary, I would have possibly won. I would have had governors on my side.

“Because I didn’t do deals, Tinubu had the chance to do deals,” he said.

Amaechi also alleged that religious considerations played a role in Tinubu’s emergence as the APC presidential candidate in 2022.

He claimed that a delegation of Yoruba Muslims from the South-West approached governors in the North-West and appealed to them to support Tinubu on religious grounds.

According to him, the delegation argued that northern Muslims had supported southern Christian candidates in previous elections and should reciprocate by backing Tinubu, who is also a Muslim.

Amaechi further mentioned former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai, whom he said initially supported his presidential ambition but later backed Tinubu.

“El-Rufai was my supporter. El-Rufai, in a viral video, said this is done for the faith,” he said.

However, Amaechi maintained that he would not exploit religious identity to mobilise political support, insisting that doing so could deepen divisions in the country.

He cited the Catholic community as an example, arguing that he would not approach the church to direct its members to vote for him simply because they shared the same religious identity.

“I wouldn’t want to run that kind of federation. Catholics are 35 million in Nigeria. I wouldn’t want to go to the Catholic Church and say, please announce me. Tell them that all Catholics must go out and vote Amaechi.

“It will cause confusion. It will cause problems in the country. That makes me a nationalist,” he said.

At the APC presidential primary held at Eagle Square, Abuja, on June 8, 2022, Tinubu defeated 13 other aspirants to secure the party’s ticket for the 2023 presidential election.

Tinubu polled 1,271 votes, while Amaechi finished second with 316 votes. Former Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo came third with 235 votes, while former Senate President Ahmad Lawan secured 152 votes.

Amaechi, who resigned as Minister of Transportation to pursue his presidential ambition, had previously served as Director-General of Buhari’s 2015 presidential campaign and was one of the prominent members of the former president’s administration.

He is now the running mate to former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar on the African Democratic Congress (ADC) platform ahead of the 2027 presidential election.

Amaechi said he intends to make public the alleged written assurance from Buhari when he publishes his memoir. He did not present the document during the interview.

 

How Buhari’s Promise Cost Me 2022 APC Presidential Ticket – Amaechi

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending