Lawyer: We have CCTV evidence of how Kanu was abducted from Kenya - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Lawyer: We have CCTV evidence of how Kanu was abducted from Kenya

Published

on

Details of a N5 billion suit filed by the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) against the Kenyan government have hinted on the torture the IPOB leader allegedly went through in the custody of security agents in the East African country.

Kanu’s lawyer, George Wajackoyah, claimed in an audio tape that he had CCTV and other evidence of how his client was abducted in Nairobi, Kenyan capital by the Muhammadu Buhari government.

“We have copies of his passport and a stamp that he was indeed in Kenya. We also have evidence he was in his residence on a particular day.

“We also have material proof that he was at the airport on a particular day to meet a friend and there he was arrested.

“Definitely, he was kidnapped,” Wajackoyah said.

The Kenyan government had strongly denied involvement in the process that led to the arrest and repatriation of Kanu back to Nigeria, with its High Commissioner to Nigeria, Wilfred Machage, describing the claim that Kanu was arrested in the East African country as “deliberately concocted to fuel antagonistic feelings in the minds of certain sections of the Nigerian people against the people of Kenya.”

The high point of Kanu’s ugly experience, according to the law suit, was that he got his body smeared with his own urine and faeces because the security agents allegedly denied him permission to use the toilet.

The suit, which was filed in Umuahia, Abia State by Kanu’s counsel Aloy Ejimakor on September 7, revealed that Kanu was beaten severely until he fainted and was revived with cold water.

The suit is seeking to enforce Kanu’s right to life, dignity of the human person, personal liberty and fair hearing.

The affidavit in support of the originating motion, which was done by Kanu’s brother, Emmanuel, stated: “That the facts and violations deposed to in this affidavit started at the applicant’s residence in Isiama Afaraukwu Ibeku, Umuahia North Local Government Area of Abia State; to wit; the military invasion of the applicant in September 2017 by a combined team of Ohafia-based 14 Brigade of the Nigerian Army, the Abia State Command of Nigeria Police Force and the Abia State Directorate of the State Security Service.”

“That it was the said invasion that nearly took the life of the applicant that caused him to seek refuge abroad which ultimately to Kenya, where the respondents lawfully pursued him, abducted him, disappeared with him and ultimately brought him to Nigeria and detained him.

“That in October 2015, the applicant was arrested in Lagos upon his return from the United Kingdom, detained in Abuja and ultimately charged for certain offences Charge No: FHC/ABJ/CR/383/2015 (Federal Republic of Nigeria vs Nnamdi Kanu).

“That the applicant was detained for 18 months, but was later released on bail whereupon he returned to his home in Isiama Afaraukwu Ibeku, Umuahia North, Abia State, and there awaiting his next trial date set for October 2017.

“That on or about 10 September, while the applicant was resting at home with some family members and friends, the Ohafia-based Nigerian Army, police and DSS launched military invasion and assaults at the applicant’s residential building and premises.

“That in the course of the military action, 28 people were killed and several others, including the applicant, were wounded. Both of the applicant’s parents sustained grave injuries from the military invasion and both of them eventually succumbed to those injuries and are now late.

“That in the course of the invasion, the applicant managed to escape to a safe location from where he managed to flee overseas to save his life. That there was neither a court order revoking the applicant’s bail nor any arrest warrant that could have justified the deadly military assault.

“That had the President implemented the provisional measures, the applicant would have felt safe enough to voluntarily end his exile and return to Nigeria to face prosecution in the said charge under reference therein.

“That in the course of his exile, the applicant on or about May 5, 2021, entered the Republic of Kenya on his British passport and was admitted as such at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, Nairobi. After his admission, the applicant settled in at a temporary location in Nairobi, Kenya.”

Giving details of the alleged abduction of Kanu from the East African country as well as his ordeal at the hands of the Nigerian security operatives at a private residence where he was taken to, Emmanuel said: “That on June 19, 2021, the applicant drove himself and without any companion to Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, to drop off a friend at the airport.

“That as soon as the applicant pulled to stop at the parking lot and alighted from his vehicle, about twenty respondent’s agents (hereafter abductors) violently accosted and abducted the applicant, handcuffed and blindfolded him, bundled him in a vehicle and sped away, while telling onlookers that the applicant is a “terrorist separatist.”

“That the applicant’s abductors took him to a nondescript private house (not a police station) somewhere in Nairobi, Kenya, and chained him to the floor. That while chained to the floor, the applicant’s abductors took turns to beat him torturing him to a point that he fainted several times and was intermittently revived when they poured cold water on him.

“That to prevent the applicant’s anguished screaming from being heard in the vicinity, the applicant’s abductors tied a cloth over his mouth and so close to covering his nostrils that the applicant struggled to breathe.

“That the applicant remained chained to the floor for eight days and was thus forced to relieve himself of urine and excrement where he was chained with same being smeared all over his body.”

That throughout the duration of the applicant’s captivity, he was not allowed to bathe and was fed only on bland bread once a day and given non-sanitary water to drink.”

Loading

Advertisement

News

Senior Lawyers Drag NYSC to Court Over Deployment of Corps Members to Insecure States

Published

on

NYSC Releases Call-Up Letters for 2026 Batch B Stream I (How to Print NYSC Call-Up Letter)

Senior Lawyers Drag NYSC to Court Over Deployment of Corps Members to Insecure States

WARRI — Two prominent legal practitioners, Olukunle Ogheneovo Edun (SAN) and John Aikpokpo-Martins, have instituted a Fundamental Rights Enforcement action before the High Court of Delta State, Warri Judicial Division, challenging the continued deployment of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members to states and communities affected by severe insecurity across Nigeria.

The suit seeks judicial intervention against what the applicants describe as the persistent posting of corps members to areas plagued by terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, armed attacks and other forms of violent criminality, despite widespread concerns over the safety of young graduates participating in the national service scheme.

According to the applicants, the deployment of corps members to locations where lives are constantly under threat amounts to a violation of their constitutionally guaranteed rights to life, dignity of the human person, personal liberty and security.

The legal action comes amid growing public anxiety over the security of NYSC members, following several incidents in recent years involving the abduction, harassment and killing of corps members in different parts of the country.

Edun, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, and Aikpokpo-Martins contend that the authorities responsible for administering the NYSC scheme have a legal and constitutional duty to protect participants from foreseeable dangers. They argue that compelling or assigning corps members to regions with known security challenges exposes them to unnecessary risks and undermines the government’s obligation to safeguard citizens.

The applicants are asking the court to determine whether the continued deployment of corps members to areas designated as security flashpoints is compatible with the provisions of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and Nigeria’s obligations under relevant human rights instruments.

READ ALSO:

They are also seeking orders that would compel the NYSC and other relevant government agencies to review and reform deployment policies in a manner that prioritises the safety and welfare of corps members.

Observers say the case could have far-reaching implications for the future of the NYSC scheme if the court rules in favour of the applicants. A favourable judgment may require the scheme to establish stricter security benchmarks before deploying corps members and could potentially limit postings to locations considered unsafe.

The lawsuit has already generated significant interest among stakeholders, including parents, civil society organisations and youth groups, many of whom have repeatedly raised concerns about the safety of participants in the mandatory one-year national service programme.

Security experts have also argued that the increasing wave of insecurity in parts of the country necessitates a review of policies affecting young Nigerians serving under the NYSC scheme.

As of the time of filing this report, neither the NYSC Directorate Headquarters nor relevant federal authorities had issued an official response to the suit.

The case is expected to test the extent of the government’s constitutional responsibility to protect corps members and may shape future policies regarding the deployment of young graduates under the nation’s compulsory service programme.

Senior Lawyers Drag NYSC to Court Over Deployment of Corps Members to Insecure States

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ‘He Has Done Nothing Wrong’

Published

on

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ‘He Has Done Nothing Wrong’
Peter Obi

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ‘He Has Done Nothing Wrong’

The 2027 presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, has declared that he would release Nnamdi Kanu and engage separatist agitators in dialogue if elected president of Nigeria. Speaking during an interaction with Nigerians in Washington, the former Anambra State governor argued that Kanu should not be detained over comments he allegedly made on Radio Biafra, insisting that criticism of political leaders should not be criminalised.

“There’s no reason for keeping Nnamdi Kanu. I will free Nnamdi Kanu as President. He has done nothing wrong; the government has no reason to arrest him because he was speaking and calling people names on radio,” Obi said. The former Labour Party presidential candidate maintained that public officials are often subjected to criticism and insults, which, according to him, should not constitute an offence. “Anybody can tell you anything. I’m a politician and people call me all sorts of names and I don’t think calling me names is an offence,” he added. Obi also pledged to adopt dialogue as a strategy for addressing separatist agitations and other grievances across the country. “If I am in government today, I will discuss with all agitators because I believe that they have a reason for whatever they want to do and it’s only by engaging them that we would learn,” he said.

Obi reiterated his commitment to pursuing a political solution to the case involving the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader, stating that dialogue remains the most effective path to resolving longstanding grievances and tensions. According to him, governments achieve more lasting results when they address the root causes of agitations through dialogue, justice, and inclusive governance rather than relying solely on coercive measures. The former governor maintained that national unity is better strengthened through reconciliation and mutual understanding, stressing that democratic societies should create avenues for citizens to express grievances while preserving law, order, and national stability.

READ ALSO:

This is not the first time Obi has spoken on the IPOB leader’s detention. In November 2025, following Kanu’s conviction and life imprisonment sentencing by a Federal High Court in Abuja, Obi described the development as a “failure of leadership” that risked aggravating national tension. At the time, Obi posted on his verified X handle: “I have always maintained that Mazi Kanu should never have been arrested. For years, I have consistently argued that dialogue, constructive engagement, and inclusive governance offer the path to lasting peace. Coercion becomes necessary only when reason has been exhausted.” He further argued that the government’s approach had only deepened mistrust, stating: “The handling of Kanu’s case mirrors the government as a man trapped in a hole but who, instead of looking for a way out, keeps digging deeper.” In July 2025, Obi had told Channels Television’s Sunday Politics that the continuous detention of Nnamdi Kanu “does not make sense” . Asked whether he would advocate for a political solution, Obi responded: “For every one of them, I mean, why is he still being held? It does not make sense to me.”

Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of IPOB, has remained in the custody of the Department of State Services since his controversial rendition from Kenya to Nigeria in June 2021. In November 2025, Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja convicted him on seven terrorism-related charges and sentenced him to life imprisonment. Kanu has since filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal challenging both his conviction and sentence. According to his legal consultant, Alloy Ejimakor, the appeal process is already “live,” with multiple stages involved. Kanu has provided 22 grounds for his appeal, and the Court of Appeal has not yet fixed a date for hearing the matter. In a significant development, IPOB claimed in June 2026 that the Federal Government’s cross-appeal against Kanu’s sentencing amounts to an admission that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to impose life sentences. IPOB spokesperson Emma Powerful stated that the government’s filing declared that “the trial court acted without jurisdiction when it imposed life imprisonment on Counts 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6.” IPOB argued that if the court lacked jurisdiction at the sentencing phase, “the entire sentencing exercise is a nullity ab initio.”

READ ALSO:

International pressure continues to mount on the Nigerian government over Kanu’s conviction. A group of international legal experts under the banner of Pan African Forum Ltd & Associates, based in London, has issued a legal notice warning Nigeria that it would commence legal action in a UK Court if the government does not immediately and unconditionally release Kanu. The group bases its demand on Opinion No. 25/2022 issued on July 20, 2022, by the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, which found that Kanu’s arrest and extraordinary rendition were unlawful and ruled that his continued detention is arbitrary. The Nigerian government has consistently maintained that Kanu is facing serious terrorism and security-related charges and that due judicial process must be allowed to run its course.

Meanwhile, the apex Igbo socio-cultural organization, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, has called on President Bola Tinubu to grant amnesty to Nnamdi Kanu on or before June 12, 2026, as part of efforts to promote national reconciliation and strengthen unity across the country. The group emphasized that Kanu’s release, preferably timed to coincide with Nigeria’s Democracy Day, would signal a bold commitment to justice, inclusion, and healing decades-old grievances in the Southeast. Ohanaeze also dismissed fears that Kanu’s release could destabilize the country, arguing that such a move would demonstrate leadership anchored on reconciliation.

Obi’s latest comments come amid his political realignment ahead of the 2027 presidential election. After the collapse of an earlier opposition coalition, Obi secured the presidential ticket of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) at a special convention in Abuja in May 2026. He was unanimously endorsed by delegates following a motion moved by Senator Victor Umeh and seconded by former Deputy Senate President Ovie Omo-Agege. Shortly after accepting the nomination, Obi announced former Kano State Governor Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso as his running mate. In his acceptance speech, Obi pledged a technology-driven and intelligence-led security framework, promising to address both immediate threats and root causes such as poverty and unemployment. He recently dismissed claims that he was avoiding former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, stating: “There are very few human beings who are as close as I am to Atiku. So I can’t be running from him.”

As the 2027 election approaches, Obi’s campaign continues to gain momentum, particularly among young Nigerians and diaspora communities. His message of inclusive governance, dialogue over coercion, and political solutions to national crises resonates with voters frustrated by the status quo. His pledge to release Nnamdi Kanu and engage all agitators in dialogue represents a sharp departure from the current administration’s security approach. Whether this stance will translate into electoral success remains to be seen, but it has undoubtedly positioned Obi as a candidate willing to take bold, unconventional positions on Nigeria’s most contentious issues. The Nigerian government has consistently maintained that Kanu is facing serious terrorism and security-related charges and that due judicial process must be allowed to run its course. However, with international pressure mounting, an active appeal process, and major political figures like Obi calling for Kanu’s release, the case continues to be a defining issue in Nigeria’s political landscape.

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ‘He Has Done Nothing Wrong’

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Published

on

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Imo State Governor, Senator Hope Uzodimma, has approved a N300 million financial intervention for Imo indigenes studying at the Nigerian Law School and citizens of the state recently returned from South Africa.

The intervention is designed to provide relief to beneficiaries facing economic hardship, rising living costs, and reintegration challenges.

According to the Imo State Commissioner for Information, Public Orientation and Strategy, Hon. Declan Emelumba, the package will benefit two categories of people: law students and South African returnees.

Under the arrangement, 250 Imo indigenes who returned from South Africa will receive N1 million each as a reintegration fund to help them resettle and rebuild their lives after being forced to return to Nigeria.

In addition, 100 Imo students at the Nigerian Law School will receive N500,000 each to help cushion the impact of inflation and rising cost of living while pursuing their legal education.

READ ALSO:

Emelumba explained that the governor was moved to approve the intervention following appeals from the law students and concerns over the difficult circumstances facing the returnees.

“The law students made a passionate appeal to His Excellency to support them to cushion the global inflation as regards cost of living. As a caring father, he responded promptly,” he said.

He added that the support for the returnees was driven by empathy, noting that many of them went through difficult experiences that forced them to return to Nigeria.

“The governor felt that the traumatised returnees needed a helping hand from government. Hence, he approved what can be described as a re-integration fund to enable them settle down with minimal discomfort,” Emelumba stated.

The commissioner further noted that the initiative aligns with the administration’s Shared Prosperity Agenda, which focuses not only on infrastructure development but also on human capital development and social welfare.

He also recalled that this is not the first time the state government has supported law students, stating that many of them are already beneficiaries of government scholarship programmes and periodic financial assistance.

The latest intervention has been described as part of ongoing efforts by the Uzodimma administration to ease economic pressure on students and vulnerable citizens, especially in the face of national inflation and unemployment challenges.

Stakeholders say the initiative could help provide temporary relief to beneficiaries as they continue their education or reintegrate into society after returning from abroad.

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending