metro

My Prophetess Wife Told Me Two of Our Children Are Not Mine – Husband

Published

5 days ago

June 13, 2026

My Prophetess Wife Told Me Two of Our Children Are Not Mine – Husband

A dramatic marital dispute has unfolded at the Grade A Customary Court sitting in Mapo, Ibadan, Oyo State, where a prophetess named Idowu has approached the court seeking the dissolution of her marriage to her husband, Aaron. The wife cited irresponsibility, neglect, domestic violence, and threats to her life as grounds for divorce. She told the court that their marriage lacked love and affection, accusing Aaron of regular physical abuse, marital rape, and threatening her life with a knife. But in a shocking counterclaim, the husband made a stunning revelation: he told the court that his wife once informed him during an argument that two of their four children are not his biological children.

In her testimony before the court president, Mrs S.M. Akintayo, Idowu painted a grim picture of her 13-year marriage. She stated that she walked out of the marriage when it became obvious her husband would one day make good his threat to kill her. “My husband is inhumane. He never showed me love nor showered affection on me. All he knew to do was to raise arguments, fight, and beat me,” she said. The prophetess further detailed harrowing experiences of abuse: “My husband was in the habit of drawing a knife at me whenever we fought and would threaten to kill me. He also used to have sex with me with force, thus humiliating me.” Idowu also accused Aaron of neglecting her and their four children, stating that he was insensitive to their needs and starved them on a daily basis. She also claimed her husband was indifferent to their children’s education. “I singlehandedly bore the responsibility of our children’s education. I funded their WASSCE and JAMB examination, which they passed in flying colours,” she told the court. “They have been given admission into the higher institution, but he has still refused to make any contributions towards the payment of their tuition fees. He has made zero contribution towards our children’s upkeep since I left home.” Fearing for her safety, Idowu stated that she moved out with their four children (two sets of twins). She is now seeking from the court full custody of their four children, a court order forcing Aaron to pay child upkeep, and a restraining order to protect her privacy and safety.

READ ALSO:

Aaron, in his response, consented to the divorce but made a counter-demand: he wants custody of their first set of twins. He told the court that he was no longer interested in the union but refused to allow his wife to have custody of their older twins. It was during his testimony that Aaron dropped the bombshell. He claimed that his wife once told him during an argument that their second set of twins is not his biological children. He also accused Idowu of poor parenting, citing an incident where one of the younger twins was caught stealing at school, which he said brought shame to the family. “My wife has constantly denied access to our children and has poisoned their minds against me. I request that they pay me visits at weekends twice in a week,” Aaron told the court. Despite his paternity doubts, Aaron offered to pay ₦50,000 per month as a feeding allowance for the children.

After hearing both parties, the court president, Mrs S.M. Akintayo, adjourned the case until August 2, 2026, for judgment. The case highlights a growing trend in Nigerian customary courts where paternity disputes are increasingly becoming a central issue in divorce proceedings. As DNA testing becomes more accessible, more men are coming forward to challenge paternity, leading to the breakdown of marriages and complex custody battles.

The Ibadan case is far from isolated. Across Nigeria, paternity fraud has emerged as a significant social and legal crisis. According to a 2025 report by Smart DNA Nigeria, about 25 per cent of paternity tests return negative results, indicating that one in four tested men are not the biological fathers of the children they believe to be theirs. Industry estimates suggest that roughly 20 to 25 percent of tested cases result in the exclusion of the presumed father. However, experts note that this statistic does not represent the general population, but rather individuals who already have strong doubts or suspicions before seeking testing. The data also reveals a concerning pattern regarding firstborn children. Approximately 64 percent of tested firstborn males do not share biological ties with their presumed fathers, making firstborns particularly vulnerable to paternity fraud. The cost of DNA testing in Nigeria typically ranges from about eighty thousand naira to over five hundred thousand naira (₦80,000 – ₦500,000+), depending on whether the test is for personal confirmation, legal use, or immigration purposes. The growing affordability and accessibility of these services have contributed to a noticeable rise in demand, particularly among younger couples and families.

While paternity disputes dominate headlines, the Idowu and Aaron case also brings to light the pervasive issue of gender-based violence in Nigeria. In Akwa Ibom State alone, between January and May 2026, 161 cases of gender-based violence were recorded, including 61 cases of spousal battery, 46 cases of threats to life and physical assault, 18 cases of abandonment and forceful ejection from homes, and 26 rape cases. Since the enactment of the Violence Against Persons (VAPP) Law in Akwa Ibom State in June 2020, a total of 1,838 cases have been reported, with only 102 convictions secured while several remain pending at various courts. The Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Uko Udom (SAN), noted that the spike in such cases “is proof that victims are gradually finding the courage to speak up and seek justice.”

READ ALSO:

Despite the growing prevalence of paternity fraud, Nigerian law currently does not criminalize the act. According to legal scholars writing in the Nigerian Journal of Law and Contemporary Legal Issues, paternity fraud constitutes a growing but under-regulated challenge within Nigeria’s legal system, raising profound questions of justice, privacy, family integrity, identity rights, and state responsibility. Under Section 165 of the Evidence Act, there is a presumption of legitimacy: where a person was born during the continuance of a valid marriage between his mother and any man, the court shall presume that the person is the legitimate child of that man. This presumption can only be rebutted by evidence proving that the parties to the marriage did not have sexual relations with each other at the material time, or through DNA testing under the Child Rights Act. Key challenges identified by legal experts include constitutional barriers posed by section 37 of the 1999 Constitution against compulsory DNA testing (right to privacy), lack of civil remedies or criminal sanctions for fraudulent mothers, weak birth registration systems, and insufficient protection of a child’s right to identity. Legal experts have called for comprehensive reforms, including a Parentage and Paternity Act, constitutional amendment to permit court-ordered DNA testing, criminalization of deliberate misattribution, robust civil remedies, strengthened forensic infrastructure, and enhanced child-identity protections aligned with international best practices.

Behind the statistics and legal debates are real people carrying deep emotional scars. In February 2026, the Delta State Police Command Public Relations Officer, Bright Edafe, narrated how a man discovered through his wife’s phone that all three children she gave birth to did not belong to him. Mental health professionals have warned that discovering one is not the biological father of a child is not a valid reason to emotionally or physically abandon that child, stressing that such actions could have devastating and long-lasting effects on the children involved.

As the Ibadan customary court prepares to deliver its judgment on August 2, the case serves as yet another reminder of the urgent need for legal reform. Scholars advocate for awareness campaigns, school initiatives, and group therapy to restore trust in families affected by paternity fraud. Until the law catches up with reality, men like Aaron will continue to face the painful question: are the children they love and provide for truly theirs? And women like Idowu will continue to seek protection from abusive marriages, even as their character is called into question. The court’s decision in this case will be closely watched, as it may set a precedent for how Nigerian customary courts balance the competing claims of paternity doubt, child custody, and domestic violence allegations.

My Prophetess Wife Told Me Two of Our Children Are Not Mine – Husband

metro

Libya Arrests Two Nigerians Over “Inciting” Social Media Posts

Published

6 hours ago

June 18, 2026

Trends Admin

Libya Arrests Two Nigerians Over “Inciting” Social Media Posts

Security forces in Tripoli, Libya, have arrested two Nigerian nationals in the coastal town of Qarabouli over allegations of spreading inciting content on social media. The suspects were detained for allegedly circulating videos and other online materials described by authorities as having an “inciting nature” that promoted violence and criminal activity. Libyan authorities said the content violated the country’s laws and posed a risk to public security and social stability, leading to the swift intervention of security forces in the coastal town.

According to security officials, both suspects have been formally charged and all preliminary legal procedures have been completed. They have since been referred to the Public Prosecution Office for further investigation and possible prosecution in accordance with Libyan criminal laws. The identities of the two Nigerians have not been disclosed by authorities at this time, and it remains unclear whether they have legal representation or have been in contact with the Nigerian embassy in Tripoli.

The arrests come amid increased scrutiny of social media activities in Libya, where security agencies have stepped up surveillance of digital platforms in recent years, citing concerns over content that could fuel unrest, promote violence, or undermine public order. In July 2024, the GNU-affiliated Presidential Council established the Public Morality Protection Agency, granting it broad, vaguely defined powers to police social media for content deemed immoral or harmful to Libyan values. According to human rights groups, the move threatens to infringe on Libyans’ freedom of expression online while also hindering online privacy and encouraging self-censorship, creating an environment where citizens are increasingly fearful of expressing their opinions online.

READ ALSO:

Libya’s internet freedom environment has been described as repressive, with citizens practicing self-censorship or risking arrest and harassment for online posts on sensitive topics. Restrictive laws, arbitrary detentions targeting peaceful expression, and physical violence against online activists have been documented. In January 2025, Faisal Rajab al-Shikhi was arbitrarily detained in Benghazi by armed men from the Libyan Arab Armed Forces and forcibly disappeared because of a video he had posted years earlier critical of LAAF commander Khalifa Haftar, highlighting the severe consequences that can arise from online expression in the country.

The country ranks 138th out of 180 nations in the 2026 World Press Freedom Index, with Reporters Without Borders describing Libya as a “veritable information black hole.” Most traditional media outlets have fled the country or aligned with warring factions, leaving Libyans to turn to social media for dialogue—a platform that remains conducive to radicalization and the dissemination of hate speech, but also subject to government crackdown. The Anti-Cybercrime Law No.5-2022 has further extended restrictions to the digital sphere, forcing journalists and citizens to severely self-censor or risk prosecution or arrest, creating a chilling effect on free expression across the country.

This latest case adds to a pattern of legal issues involving Nigerian nationals in Libya. In March 2026, authorities arrested six Nigerians—one male and five females—in Tripoli for alleged drug trafficking, with authorities seizing large quantities of cocaine intended for distribution. The Nigerian government has not yet issued an official statement regarding the latest social media arrests, though the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is expected to engage with Libyan authorities to ensure that the suspects receive fair legal representation and that their rights are protected throughout the judicial process.

Libya Arrests Two Nigerians Over “Inciting” Social Media Posts

metro

Court Declares PENGASSAN Strike Against Dangote Refinery Illegal, Labels Crude Supply Disruption ‘Economic Sabotage’

Published

9 hours ago

June 18, 2026

Trends Admin

Court Declares PENGASSAN Strike Against Dangote Refinery Illegal, Labels Crude Supply Disruption ‘Economic Sabotage’

An industrial court sitting in Garki, Abuja, has declared the nationwide strike embarked upon by the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN) against Dangote Petroleum Refinery illegal, ruling that the union failed to follow due process before commencing the industrial action.

In a landmark judgment delivered on Wednesday, the presiding judge, Justice E.D. Subilim, held that the strike, which disrupted operations at Africa’s largest refinery project, was null and void.

The court also ruled that PENGASSAN had no legal authority to prevent crude oil and gas suppliers from carrying out their contractual obligations to the refinery, describing the union’s actions in cutting off supplies as capable of causing significant economic damage.

Justice Subilim stated that the disruption of crude and gas supply amounted to an act of economic sabotage because it could force suppliers to breach legally binding agreements with the Dangote Refinery.

The suit was instituted by the refinery through its counsel, George Ibrahim (SAN), following the industrial dispute that erupted late last year.

The conflict was triggered by the dismissal of more than 800 Nigerian workers by the refinery. PENGASSAN had alleged that the affected employees were targeted because of their decision to join the union, a claim that sparked nationwide protests and threats to the refinery’s operations.

READ ALSO:

As tensions escalated, the union declared a nationwide strike and moved to pressure suppliers by disrupting crude and gas deliveries to the multi-billion-dollar facility located in the Lekki Free Trade Zone, Lagos.

The dispute quickly drew national attention due to the strategic importance of the refinery to Nigeria’s energy security, fuel supply and foreign exchange earnings.

At the height of the crisis, the Federal Government intervened through a series of marathon negotiations involving the Office of the National Security Adviser and the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment.

The intervention eventually led to the suspension of the strike on October 1, 2025, paving the way for further discussions while the matter remained before the court.

In his judgment, Justice Subilim emphasized that labour unions must operate within the confines of the law when pursuing industrial disputes, stressing that actions capable of disrupting critical national infrastructure and commercial contracts could not be justified outside established legal procedures.

However, the court declined Dangote Refinery’s claim for N50 billion in damages against PENGASSAN. The judge ruled that the company failed to provide sufficient justification for the amount sought, and consequently refused to award the compensation.

Other defendants in the suit included the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd), the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), and the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC).

The ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications for labour relations in Nigeria’s oil and gas industry, particularly regarding the limits of union actions in disputes involving strategic national assets and critical energy infrastructure.

Court Declares PENGASSAN Strike Against Dangote Refinery Illegal, Labels Crude Supply Disruption ‘Economic Sabotage’

metro

Kebbi Police Arrest School Guard for Alleged Defilement of 10-Year-Old Girl

Published

11 hours ago

June 18, 2026

Trends Admin

Kebbi Police Arrest School Guard for Alleged Defilement of 10-Year-Old Girl

The Kebbi State Police Command has arrested a 36-year-old security guard attached to an Islamiyya school in Jega Local Government Area for allegedly defiling a 10-year-old girl. The Commissioner of Police, Umar Hadejia, disclosed the arrest during a press briefing in Birnin Kebbi on Wednesday, June 17, 2026, where he paraded the suspect alongside others arrested for various crimes. The suspect, identified as Faruku Muhammed of Tungar Zabarmawa area in Jega, was arrested following a complaint lodged by the victim’s family. According to police reports, the incident occurred on June 14, 2026, at about 4:30 p.m. when the suspect allegedly lured the girl into his room located within the Islamiyya school premises where he worked as a security guard. The police did not disclose the name of the school involved in the incident.

Reading from the official police report, CP Hadejia detailed the allegations: *“On 14/06/2026 at about 1630hrs one Faruku Muhammed M aged 36yrs of Tungar Zabarmawa area Jega, LGA, lured one Naja’atu Surajo F aged 10yrs of the same address in to his room located inside an Islamiyya School where he works as a Security Guard and had sexual intercourse with her by inserting his finger inside her vagina. Case under investigation and will be prosecuted accordingly.”* The young girl reportedly sustained injuries and was subsequently taken to a medical facility for treatment and evaluation, though the police did not disclose the extent of her injuries or the name of the hospital where she received care.

READ ALSO:

CP Hadejia assured the public that the case is under investigation and the suspect will be prosecuted accordingly if found culpable. He reiterated the command’s commitment to protecting children and other vulnerable members of society, urging parents and guardians to promptly report cases of abuse, exploitation, and other crimes affecting minors. The police commissioner also encouraged residents to continue providing credible information to security agencies, assuring that reports involving child abuse would receive prompt attention and that all information provided would be treated with utmost confidentiality.

The school guard’s arrest was announced during a press briefing that also covered other security breakthroughs in the state. These included the arrest of four suspected members of the Mamudawa group allegedly involved in supplying logistics to terrorists, as well as the rescue of a kidnapped victim. CP Hadejia used the platform to commend the cooperation of security agencies, vigilante groups, and the Civilian Joint Task Force, describing their collaboration as vital to the ongoing fight against insurgency, banditry, and other violent crimes in the state.

The incident has drawn reactions from parents, education stakeholders, and child protection groups, who have called for a thorough investigation and swift justice for the victim. Advocates have urged authorities to strengthen screening and monitoring processes for non-teaching staff working in schools, stressing the need for stricter background checks and improved child protection measures to ensure the safety of pupils. According to child rights experts, many informal learning centers and community-based educational institutions still operate without comprehensive safeguarding frameworks, leaving children vulnerable to abuse in environments where they are expected to learn and receive moral guidance. Child rights organizations have consistently urged school proprietors, religious institutions, and government authorities to strengthen oversight mechanisms and ensure that anyone working closely with children undergoes proper screening and monitoring, including background checks and regular supervision.

The suspect remains in police custody as investigators prepare the case for possible prosecution. Legal experts suggest that if found guilty, the suspect could face severe penalties under Nigerian law, including life imprisonment, as the country’s child protection laws provide for strict punishment for offenders who commit sexual offenses against minors. Meanwhile, child protection advocates have called on the Kebbi State Government to provide counseling and psychological support for the young victim to help her recover from the traumatic experience, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive care that addresses both the physical and emotional wounds of survivors.