New York Times labels Trump an autocrat, lists 12 reasons - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

New York Times labels Trump an autocrat, lists 12 reasons

Published

on

Trump Links French Protests To Islam ‘Taking Over’ France
U.S President Donald Trump

New York Times labels Trump an autocrat, lists 12 reasons

No previous American President has wielded power as Donald Trump, according to New York Times Editorial Board.

In a piece entitled: “Are We Losing Our Democracy?”, the Editorial Board of the publication said the incumbent American President has acted in defiance of the law.

A list of 12 markers of democratic erosion were highlighted with detailed explanation on each.

“Our country is still not close to being a true autocracy, in the mold of Russia or China. But once countries begin taking steps away from democracy, the march often continues. We offer these 12 markers as a warning of how much Americans have already lost and how much more we still could lose,”it read.

NO. 1

An authoritarian stifles dissent and speech. Trump has started to.

Authoritarian takeovers in the modern era often do not start with a military coup. They instead involve an elected leader who uses the powers of the office to consolidate authority and make political opposition more difficult, if not impossible. Think of Vladimir Putin in Russia, Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela and, to lesser degrees, Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Turkey, Viktor Orban in Hungary and Narendra Modi in India. These leaders have repressed dissent and speech in heavy-handed ways.

Over the past year, President Trump and his allies have impinged on free speech to a degree that the federal government has not since perhaps the Red Scare of the 1940s and 1950s. His administration pressured television stations to stop airing Jimmy Kimmel’s talk show when Mr. Kimmel criticized Trump supporters after the murder of Charlie Kirk; revoked the visas of foreign students for their views on the war in Gaza; and ordered investigations of liberal nonprofit groups. Mr. Trump so harshly criticizes people who disagree with him, including federal judges, that they become targets of harassment from his supporters.

Many forms of speech and dissent remain vibrant in the United States. But the president has tried to dull them. His evident goal is to cause Americans to fear they will pay a price for criticizing him, his allies or his agenda.

NO. 2

An authoritarian persecutes political opponents. Trump has.

In addition to restricting speech and dissent, autocrats use the immense power of law enforcement to investigate and imprison people who have fallen out of favor. Mr. Trump’s Justice Department has become an enforcer of his personal interests, targeting people for legally dubious reasons while creating a culture in which his allies can act with impunity.

READ ALSO:

Following the president’s demands, his appointees have secured indictments of a few critics (including Attorney General Letitia James of New York and the former F.B.I. director James Comey) and ordered investigations of others (including Senator Adam Schiff of California). Some of these appointees were once Mr. Trump’s personal lawyers. Mr. Trump has also used executive orders to go after perceived enemies, including law firms representing his critics. And he has systematically fired government employees who played roles in earlier investigations of him or his allies.

“We are all afraid,” Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, a Republican, said this spring. “It’s quite a statement. But we are in a time and a place where I certainly have not been here before. I’ll tell you, I’m oftentimes very anxious myself about using my voice, because retaliation is real.”

Mr. Trump has simultaneously shielded his own supporters from legal consequences for their actions, including through his blanket pardon of the Jan. 6 rioters.

True authoritarians go much further than Mr. Trump has, but he has already targeted his opponents with legal persecution in shocking ways.

NO. 3

An authoritarian bypasses the legislature. Trump has started to.

When a democracy slides toward autocracy, the leader often finds ways to neuter the legislature, turning it into a body that rubber stamps his decisions. Congress has started down this path. The Constitution makes clear, in Article I, that Congress alone has the power of the purse. Mr. Trump is undermining this system.

His administration has violated federal law at least six times by withholding funding authorized by Congress for libraries, preschools, scientific research and more, the Government Accountability Office found. He has gutted or dismantled congressionally authorized agencies like the Department of Education and U.S.A.I.D. He has also imposed new taxes — his tariffs — without congressional approval. Since the current government shutdown began, he has used donations from billionaires to pay troops and finance the construction of a ballroom at the White House.

Some of the blame lies with the Republican leaders of Congress, who have failed to fight his power grabs. Their complicity does not change the fact that these power grabs have been illegal.

Mr. Trump has defied the Constitution by trampling on Congress’s power of the purse. In full autocracies, legislatures often formally transfer some of their authority to the executive, and some congressional Republicans have proposed such changes.

NO. 4

An authoritarian uses the military for domestic control. Trump has started to.

Even democracies occasionally use their militaries on home soil. The military can keep order and protect citizens after a devastating storm. In extreme and rare circumstances, troops can enforce the law when local authorities refuse to do so, as happened in the segregated South in the 1950s and 1960s.

READ ALSO:

Authoritarians use the military much more frequently and performatively — to suppress dissent, instill fear and convey supreme power. Mr. Trump deployed the National Guard in Los Angeles to crack down on protests, despite local officials’ insistence that they had the situation under control. He attempted the same in Portland, Ore., and Chicago, before being restrained by federal courts. He has also begun to treat the military as an extension of himself, firing several high-ranking officials without good reason and summoning hundreds of leaders to Virginia to listen to overtly political speeches by him and his appointees.

Mr. Trump’s use of the military for domestic control has been limited. But his willingness to use it as he has — and his threats to expand that use, through the invocation of the Insurrection Act and with troops beyond the National Guard — is extremely worrisome.

NO. 5

An authoritarian defies the courts. Trump has started to.

Would-be authoritarians recognize that courts can keep them from consolidating power, and they often take steps to weaken or confront judges.

Mr. Trump has baldly defied federal judges on several occasions. In March, for instance, his administration ignored a federal judge’s order to turn around airplanes that were deporting migrants to El Salvador. More often, the Trump administration has engaged in gamesmanship, going around orders rather than directly disobeying them. One example: After a federal judge blocked his deployment of the Oregon National Guard, the administration moved to deploy National Guards from other states instead.

So far, Mr. Trump has defied no Supreme Court orders and has pledged not to. But the justices have too often played into his strategy by failing to stand up for lower courts.

It is a hopeful sign that he has not ignored the Supreme Court, and the court may yet block his most blatant power grabs. Still, the court’s reluctance to restrain him appears to have emboldened him to sidestep lower court orders he does not like.

NO. 6

An authoritarian declares national emergencies on false pretenses. Trump has.

Authoritarians often curtail democracy by declaring an emergency and arguing that the threat requires them to exercise unusual degrees of power.

Mr. Trump’s recent predecessors were not perfect on this issue. They sometimes declared questionable emergencies. He has gone to another level. He has used manufactured emergencies to sidestep Congress and impose tariffs, deregulate the energy industry, intensify immigration enforcement and send the National Guard into Washington. Chillingly, he has claimed that a Venezuelan gang invaded the United States to justify the killing of foreign civilians in international waters, in defiance of U.S. and international law.

READ ALSO:

Mr. Trump’s willingness to kill people without due process, through the blowing up of boats that American officials could instead stop and search, represents one of his most extreme abuses of power. It raises the prospect that he may expand the use of emergency power to other areas, including domestic law enforcement.

NO. 7

An authoritarian vilifies marginalized groups. Trump has.

Authoritarians tend to demean minority groups, trying to turn them into a perceived threat that provides a justification for a leader to amass power. Mr. Trump has repeatedly suggested that marginalized groups are responsible for the nation’s problems.

Immigrants have topped his list. Mr. Trump has blamed them for destroying communities and his administration has tried to dehumanize them by posting mocking videos of shackled immigrants. In response, many Latinos have stopped speaking Spanish in public and started carrying their passports to prove citizenship.

He has vilified transgender Americans and barred them from military service. He has fired women and people of color from leadership posts and ended programs that promote workplace diversity. His administration has attempted to erase aspects of Black history, including by removing books on slavery and segregation from military libraries and pressuring Smithsonian museums to minimize those subjects. At the same time, he has suggested that white people and Christians are victims, which echoes the autocratic habit of claiming that majority groups are in fact oppressed.

Mr. Trump is borrowing from the autocrats’ playbook by suggesting that some citizens are legitimate and others are second-class.

NO. 8

An authoritarian controls information and the news media. Trump has started to.

Democratic governments prize accurate information as a guide to decision-making. Authoritarians seek to suppress inconvenient truths.

Mr. Trump has sought to manipulate government information in several ways. He fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after the agency reported disappointing job growth this summer. He shut down federal data collection efforts related to climate change, presumably because the information might encourage people to take action.

He has also taken steps to control the media, both traditional forms and new ones. He arranged for the sale of TikTok from a Chinese company to investors with ties to his political allies. He pushed Congress to end funding for public radio and television. He extracted multimillion-dollar payments from ABC, Paramount (which owns CBS), YouTube and Meta to settle baseless claims that he has been treated unfairly, and he is pursuing lawsuits against The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. All of these moves are meant to reduce coverage that does not parrot his views.

In place of an independent and free press, Mr. Trump evidently hopes to create a shadow ecosystem willing to promote his interests and talking points.

NO. 9

An authoritarian tries to take over universities. Trump has started to.

Authoritarians, recognizing that universities are hotbeds of independent thought and political dissent, often single them out for repression. Mr. Putin and Mr. Erdogan have closed universities. Mr. Modi’s government has arrested dissident scholars, while Mr. Orban has appointed loyalist foundations to run universities.

READ ALSO:

A signature policy of Mr. Trump’s second term has been his attack on higher education. He has cut millions of dollars of research funding, tried to dictate hiring and admissions policies and forced the resignation of the University of Virginia’s president. It is a sustained campaign to weaken an influential sector home to many political progressives who do not support him — and to many young people, who typically form the crux of anti-authoritarian protest movements.

Because the federal government finances so much academic research, it has considerable power over universities. Initially, some universities seemed as if they might simply submit to Mr. Trump’s demands. More recently, several showed more willingness to resist, rejecting a proposal that would have rewarded them financially for adopting Trump-friendly policies.

NO. 10

An authoritarian creates a cult of personality. Trump has.

Emperors and kings often glorified themselves by displaying their portraits everywhere. The American tradition has rejected that kind of hagiography for living presidents. Our leaders haven’t needed to puff themselves up this way, until now.

Huge banners with Mr. Trump’s face hang from government buildings. He posts memes in which he wears a crown, including an A.I.-generated video that depicted him flying a jet that dropped fecal matter on protesters. He held a lavish military parade on his birthday. At televised meetings, members of his cabinet gush sycophantic praise. He announced the creation of a meme coin with his likeness. To celebrate the country’s 250th birthday next year, the Treasury Department plans to put his face on a physical coin.

The Trump cult of personality plays into his claims — common among autocrats — that he possesses a unique ability to solve the country’s problems. As he put it, “I alone can fix it.” He seeks to equate himself with the federal government, as if it does not exist without him.

NO. 11

An authoritarian uses power for personal profit. Trump has.

Authoritarians often turn the government into a machine for enriching themselves, their families and their allies. Mr. Trump glories in his administration’s culture of corruption.

He openly uses the presidency as an opportunity to pad his bottom line, in ways that range from the comically petty (like charging the Secret Service up to $1,200 per night for rooms at his hotels) to the shamelessly greedy (like the $40 million that Amazon paid for the rights to a Melania Trump documentary or his recent demand that the government pay him $230 million because he was investigated for breaking the law). He solicits favors from foreign governments, including an airplane from Qatar. His children also profit from their father’s position, through real-estate deals, crypto, a private club in Washington and more. And he rewards those who enrich them, recently pardoning the head of a cryptocurrency firm who worked with the Trump family.

In the first six months of this year, the Trump Organization’s income soared to $864 million, up from just $51 million a year earlier, according to a recent Reuters analysis. It’s worth noting that recent Supreme Court decisions have made corruption harder to police.

Mr. Trump’s culture of corruption may resemble the behavior of foreign autocrats more closely than any other category on this list. He is using what rightly belongs to American citizens — the power and resources of our democratic government — to enrich himself, and he is not trying to hide it.

NO. 12

An authoritarian manipulates the law to stay in power. Trump has started to.

Authoritarians change election rules to help their party, and they rewrite laws — or violate their spirit — to ignore term limits.

Mr. Trump’s biggest attempt to follow this playbook failed, when he was unable to undo his election defeat to Joe Biden in 2020. But that effort showed Mr. Trump’s willingness to break the law to remain in power.

In his second term, he has shown worrisome signs of using his power to entrench the Republican Party’s hold on the government. He has pressed Republicans to take gerrymandering to a new extreme. He issued an executive order in March that seeks to interfere with how states run their elections. These moves increase the chances that Republicans will keep control of Congress even if most voters want to oust them.

Mr. Trump has not taken concrete steps to remain in power for a third term, which the 22nd Amendment of the Constitution was written to forbid. He has alternated between floating the idea and suggesting he understands that he must leave the presidency for good on Jan. 20, 2029.

Even if he backs away from any scheme to serve more than two presidential terms, Mr. Trump’s attempts to tilt the electoral field in favor of Republicans is anti-democratic and could pervert American elections for years.

The clearest sign that a democracy has died is that a leader and his party make it impossible for their opponents to win an election and hold power. Once that stage is reached, however, the change is extremely difficult to reverse. And aspiring authoritarians use other excesses, like a cowed legislature and judiciary, to lock in their power.

The United States is not an autocracy today. It still has a mostly free press and independent judiciary, and millions of Americans recently attended the “No Kings” protests. But it has started down an anti-democratic path, and many Americans — including people in positions of power — remain far too complacent about the threat.

The 12 benchmarks in this editorial offer a way to understand and measure how much further Mr. Trump goes in the months and years ahead. We plan to update this index in 2026.

Methodology: In the scales above, the points on the left indicate roughly where the United States, flawed though it was, had been before Mr. Trump took office. Moving even one notch toward autocracy on these scales is a worrisome sign.

New York Times labels Trump an autocrat, lists 12 reasons

 

New York Times Editorial Board

Loading

International

US Midterm Elections: Democrats Outpace Republicans as Early Voting Hits Record 48 Million

Published

on

US Midterm Elections: Democrats Outpace Republicans as Early Voting Hits Record 48 Million
US Midterm Elections: Democrats Outpace Republicans as Early Voting Hits Record 48 Million

Nearly 48 million Americans have cast their ballots ahead of the November 3, 2026, United States midterm elections, setting a new early-voting record as registered Democrats maintain a significant lead over Republicans in states that track voters’ party affiliations.

Figures released by the University of Florida‘s Election Lab showed that 47,922,669 Americans had voted by midday on Friday, October 30, surpassing the previous midterm early-voting record of 45.9 million recorded in 2022.

The surge in participation has been particularly pronounced in several politically competitive states, where voters are preparing to decide closely contested Senate, House of Representatives and gubernatorial races.

The election is expected to be a major test of President Donald Trump’s political standing and the Republican Party’s control of Congress, with Democrats hoping to regain majorities in both chambers.

According to the figures, Democrats account for approximately 44 per cent of early voters in states that report party affiliation, compared with 31 per cent for Republicans and 25 per cent for independent and minor-party voters.

The early-voting figures represent a substantial increase in participation compared with the 2022 midterm elections, when approximately 45.9 million Americans voted before Election Day.

In Texas, one of the most closely watched battleground states, more than six million people had voted by October 28. In-person early voting was approximately 50 per cent higher than at the same stage of the 2022 elections.

READ ALSO:

North Carolina also recorded a significant increase, with early voting rising by nearly 37 per cent compared with the corresponding period four years ago.

South Carolina had already surpassed its entire 2022 midterm early-voting total by October 26, despite having five additional days of early voting remaining.

In Kansas, where Republican Senator Roger Marshall is facing a challenging re-election contest, advance voting was also substantially ahead of the 2022 figures.

The increases have reinforced attention on the Senate contests, particularly in states where Democrats are seeking to make gains against Republican candidates.

The latest figures suggest stronger early-voting participation among registered Democrats than Republicans.

University of Florida political scientist Michael McDonald, who oversees the Election Lab, has also highlighted increased participation among Black and Hispanic voters in states that provide racial and ethnic voting information.

He pointed to particularly strong turnout in predominantly Hispanic communities along the Texas-Mexico border.

Georgia has also recorded a major milestone, with in-person early voting surpassing the state’s previous midterm record on October 29.

Women accounted for approximately 56 per cent of ballots cast in Georgia by that date, compared with 44 per cent for men.

The state’s top elections official, Brad Raffensperger, attributed the record participation to voters’ confidence in the electoral process.

Despite the Democratic advantage in early voting, election analysts have warned against interpreting the figures as an indication of the eventual winner.

Party registration does not necessarily reveal which candidates voters support, while millions of Americans are still expected to cast their ballots on Election Day.

Republicans have historically recorded stronger participation on Election Day in several recent elections, a pattern that could reduce or potentially reverse the Democrats’ current advantage.

There are also differences in voting patterns across states, as some rely more heavily on mail-in ballots while others record greater participation through in-person voting.

Consequently, the early-voting figures provide an indication of voter participation and party mobilisation rather than a reliable prediction of the final results.

The November 3 midterm elections will determine the political balance of power in the United States Congress during the final two years of Trump’s current presidential term.

Republicans currently control both chambers, holding a 53-47 majority in the Senate and a narrow majority in the House of Representatives.

Democrats are seeking to win enough seats to take control of Congress, a development that could significantly affect the president’s legislative agenda and the direction of federal policymaking.

The midterm elections, traditionally held halfway through a president’s four-year tenure, are widely viewed as a referendum on the performance of the sitting administration.

The outcome will therefore provide an important indication of public sentiment towards Trump’s presidency, although the final results will depend on turnout across the country and the outcome of closely contested races.

US Midterm Elections: Democrats Outpace Republicans as Early Voting Hits Record 48 Million

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Romance Scam: FBI Declares Nigerian Woman Wanted, Offers ₦6.7m Reward

Published

on

Romance Scam: FBI Declares Nigerian Woman Wanted, Offers ₦6.7m Reward
Emuobosan Emanuella Hall
Romance Scam: FBI Declares Nigerian Woman Wanted, Offers ₦6.7m Reward

The United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has announced a $5,000 (approximately ₦6.7 million) reward for information leading to the arrest of a Nigerian woman, Emuobosan Emanuella Hall, who disappeared after failing to report to prison to begin serving an eight-year sentence for her involvement in a romance scam and financial fraud.

Hall, 46, was sentenced to 96 months in federal prison in January 2026 after pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud.

The FBI listed her among its wanted persons, saying she violated her bond conditions by failing to surrender to the designated correctional facility to serve her sentence.

According to information released by the FBI, Hall was initially charged in April 2024 over her role in a criminal network that defrauded victims through online romantic relationships before laundering the proceeds.

Members of the syndicate reportedly approached victims through social media platforms, including Facebook and Instagram, posing as military generals, philanthropists and wealthy entrepreneurs living outside the United States.

After establishing romantic relationships and gaining the victims’ trust, the fraudsters allegedly persuaded them to send money under various false pretences, including claims that the funds were needed for charitable projects or medical expenses involving sick relatives.

Hall and her co-defendant, Kenneth G. Akpieyi, allegedly used a company identified as Le Beau Monde LLC to facilitate the operation.

READ ALSO:

Court records indicated that Hall deposited money obtained from victims into bank accounts operated in the company’s name before transferring the funds to other financial institutions, including foreign banks.

Hall admitted responsibility for approximately $851,207 in financial losses suffered by victims.

Her co-defendant, Akpieyi, was found responsible for losses exceeding $3.5 million. He was sentenced to 25 years in prison in 2025 following his conviction.

Hall was arrested in Georgia after the initial charges were filed but was subsequently released on bond while the case proceeded.

In January 2026, a federal judge sentenced her to eight years in prison and directed her to surrender to a designated correctional facility in Minnesota by March 2026.

However, she failed to report as ordered.

According to the FBI, information from her electronic monitoring device showed that her last known location was Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport on March 24, 2026, where the device stopped transmitting.

Hall had reportedly informed her probation officer that she intended to travel to Minnesota to begin serving her sentence. However, airline records indicated that she did not board the scheduled flight.

Following her disappearance, a federal arrest warrant was issued against her on March 31, 2026, by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in New Orleans.

She was subsequently charged with failure to appear for service of a sentence on April 14, 2026.

A federal grand jury indicted her on the additional charge on October 23, 2026.

The FBI identified the wanted woman as a Nigerian-born national who also uses the names Emuobosan E. Hall, Emuobosan Emanuella Erih and the nickname “Mobo”.

The agency disclosed that she has connections to Warri and Oleh in Delta State, as well as Abuja.

Her reported international connections include London, Gloucester and Croydon in England, and Atlanta, Georgia, in the United States.

The FBI described Hall as approximately 5 feet 6 inches tall, weighing about 87 kilogrammes, with black hair and brown eyes. She speaks English and some Yoruba.

The agency is offering up to $5,000 for credible information that directly leads to her arrest.

Anyone with information about her whereabouts has been urged to contact the FBI through its toll-free telephone number, 1-800-CALL-FBI, or submit information through its official tips website at https://tips.fbi.gov.

If convicted of the additional failure-to-report offence, Hall could face up to 10 more years in federal prison, a fine of up to $250,000 and supervised release, in addition to her existing sentence.

 

Romance Scam: FBI Declares Nigerian Woman Wanted, Offers ₦6.7m Reward

Loading

Continue Reading

International

TRAGEDY: Three Killed As Two Helicopters Collide Midair Near US Airport

Published

on

TRAGEDY: Three Killed As Two Helicopters Collide Midair Near US Airport

 

Three people have been killed after two helicopters collided midair and crashed into a field near an airport in Oregon, United States, triggering an emergency response and the closure of a major highway.

 

The fatal incident occurred on Thursday afternoon, October 29, 2026, near McMinnville Municipal Airport, approximately 35 miles southwest of Portland, Oregon.

 

According to reports, the collision involved a Robinson R22 helicopter and an Airbus H125. The aircraft reportedly collided at about 2:15 p.m. local time before crashing into a field near Highway 233.

 

The Yamhill County Sheriff’s Office confirmed that all three people aboard the two helicopters died in the crash.

 

The victims were identified as 22-year-old Maddie Aasbo, a flight instructor from Texas; Tyler Delane Sturdevant, 38, a pilot from Newberg, Oregon; and a student pilot from the United Kingdom whose identity was withheld pending notification of next of kin.

 

Emergency responders, including police officers, firefighters and medical personnel, rushed to the scene following reports of the collision.

 

Authorities said the crash site was located near the intersection of Southeast Amity-Dayton Highway and surrounding local roads.

 

One of the helicopters was reportedly associated with Jerry Trimble Helicopters, an aviation training school based at McMinnville Municipal Airport.

 

The school expressed sadness over the incident and confirmed that it was cooperating with law enforcement agencies and aviation investigators.

 

Meanwhile, the crash forced authorities to shut down part of Highway 233, approximately one mile west of Dayton, while emergency personnel conducted recovery operations.

 

Motorists were advised to avoid the affected area and use alternative routes as rescue and investigation activities continued.

 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) have launched an investigation to establish the circumstances surrounding the midair collision.

 

The NTSB is expected to lead the investigation, with officials examining the aircraft and other available evidence to determine what caused the helicopters to collide.

 

As of the latest reports, authorities had not established the cause of the accident.

 

The incident has renewed attention on aviation safety, particularly the risks associated with helicopter operations and flight training.

 

The investigation is ongoing.

 

TRAGEDY: Three Killed As Two Helicopters Collide Midair Near US Airport

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending