Agunbiade fires back at Deji Yesufu: Don’t mistake Boko Haram for Islam

 

• Says ‘Islam began with Iqra, not ignorance’
• Rejects claim Muslims use taqiyyah to deceive Christians
• Defends peaceful practice of Shari’a in Oyo
• Says Nigeria belongs equally to Muslims, Christians

 

An Islamic scholar and member of Rabwa Islamic Propagation, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Mallam Ibrahim Agunbiade, has fired back at Deji Yesufu over his recent commentary on Islam, warning against using the activities of Boko Haram and other extremist organisations to define the religion.

 

Agunbiade, in a strongly worded response issued on Thursday, said equating Islam with terrorism amounted to what he described as a dangerous distortion of the religion.

 

He said while he welcomed Yesufu’s call for dialogue and peaceful coexistence, he disagreed with what he regarded as the attempt to portray Islam through the actions of violent groups that had “abused the name of Islam.”

 

The response followed Yesufu’s write-up titled, “Islam: An Open Letter to Edmund Obilo.”

 

Agunbiade argued that the proper way to understand Islam, the Qur’an and Shari’a was through knowledge, context and intellectual honesty, rather than through the activities of extremist organisations.

 

“Boko Haram does not represent Islam, and terrorism cannot be used as the standard by which Islam is judged,” he declared.

 

‘Islam began with Iqra, not ignorance’

 

Taking his argument to what he described as the foundation of Islam, Agunbiade pointed to the first revelation received by Prophet Muhammad, saying the first command from Allah was Iqra—“Read”.

 

Quoting Qur’an 96:1, he said, “Read in the name of your Lord who created.”

 

He also cited Qur’an 39:9, where Allah asks whether those who possess knowledge can be equated with those who do not.

 

Agunbiade said the emphasis was significant because Boko Haram had become notorious for violence associated with hostility towards Western education.

 

“How, then, can an organisation associated with attacking schools, teachers and education be presented as the authentic Islam whose first revealed command was Iqra?” he asked.

 

He added: “Islam began with Iqra, not ignorance. It began with knowledge, not the destruction of schools.”

 

According to him, Boko Haram should be understood as a violent extremist organisation and not as the embodiment of Islamic teachings.

 

‘Don’t rip Qur’an verses out of context’

 

The Islamic scholar also took aim at the use of selected Qur’anic verses to portray Islam as inherently hostile to Christians and Jews.

 

He specifically referenced Qur’an 5:51 and 9:29, arguing that presenting the verses as blanket commands for Muslims to hate or kill Christians and Jews ignored the historical and textual circumstances surrounding them.

 

Agunbiade urged critics of Islam to approach the Qur’an as a complete text rather than extracting individual verses and presenting them in isolation.

 

He pointed to Qur’an 2:256, which states that there is “no compulsion in religion”, as well as Qur’an 60:8, which instructs Muslims to act kindly and justly towards those who do not fight them because of their religion.

 

He argued that such verses demonstrated the need to examine the Qur’an within its broader context.

 

According to him, the same principle should apply to hadiths dealing with Jews and Christians.

 

He said a hadith relating to a specific historical conflict, territory or circumstance should not automatically be transformed into a universal instruction governing peaceful Muslim-Christian relations in contemporary Nigeria.

 

Agunbiade rejects ‘taqiyyah’ deception claim

 

The scholar also rejected the claim that Muslims practise taqiyyah as a general religious licence to deceive Christians and other non-Muslims.

 

He described the claim as a serious misrepresentation of the concept.

 

Agunbiade explained that taqiyyah had a particular theological and historical context, especially within Shi’a thought, relating to concealment of faith under persecution.

 

He therefore challenged the portrayal of taqiyyah as a universal Islamic doctrine authorising Muslims to lie to Christians.

 

‘Millions of Muslims live peacefully with Christians’

 

Agunbiade further dismissed the argument that there was no such thing as a moderate Muslim.

 

He said the daily reality of Nigeria contradicted such a claim.

 

According to him, millions of Muslims and Christians across the country work together, trade together, attend schools together and live as neighbours without allowing their religious differences to degenerate into violence.

 

He argued that judging an entire religion by the actions of extremists was fundamentally unfair.

 

“To label all Muslims as potential extremists because some criminals claim Islamic justification for their crimes is no more reasonable than judging Christianity by the actions of every violent person who claims to be a Christian,” he said.

 

‘Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis are not Islam’

 

Agunbiade also cautioned against lumping Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis together as if they represented Islam as a whole.

 

He said the Muslim world comprised different schools of thought, political systems, cultures and movements.

 

He argued that Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis had different histories, political objectives and circumstances and should therefore be assessed individually.

 

He, however, drew a line at attacks on innocent civilians.

 

“Most importantly, deliberate attacks on innocent civilians cannot be justified by Islamic principles, regardless of who commits them,” he said.

 

‘Shari’a is not being introduced into Oyo’

 

The scholar also challenged concerns over the alleged “introduction” of Shari’a into Oyo State.

 

Agunbiade insisted that Shari’a was not new to the state, arguing that Muslims had practised aspects of Islamic law peacefully for decades.

 

He cited the existence of a Shari’a arbitration panel at Oja’Oba Central Mosque in Ibadan, where, according to him, Muslims voluntarily take disputes for resolution according to Islamic principles.

 

He said such voluntary religious arbitration should not be confused with terrorism or extremist activity.

 

“This is not Boko Haram. It is not terrorism. It is peaceful religious dispute resolution,” he stressed.

 

Agunbiade also pointed to Section 275 of the 1999 Constitution, which provides for the establishment of a Sharia Court of Appeal in a state subject to the constitutional requirements.

 

He said discussions about Shari’a should therefore be separated from discussions about terrorism.

 

According to him, Muslims, like Christians, are entitled to practise their religion within the provisions of Nigerian law.

 

‘Nigeria is not the property of one religion’

 

Agunbiade also rejected any suggestion that Nigeria’s development could be credited to one religious community.

 

He declared that Nigeria belonged to all Nigerians, regardless of religious affiliation.

 

He said Muslims and Christians had contributed significantly to the country’s development in education, medicine, law, politics, business, science, agriculture, security and public service.

 

The scholar maintained that the country’s problems would not be solved by turning Muslims against Christians or Christians against Muslims.

 

Instead, he urged Nigerians to unite against corruption, insecurity, poverty, injustice, poor governance and extremism.

 

‘Condemn Boko Haram, not Islam’

 

Agunbiade ended his response with a call for religious tolerance and responsible public discourse.

 

He said Nigerians must learn to distinguish between a religion and individuals or organisations that commit crimes while claiming religious justification.

 

“Let us condemn Boko Haram without condemning Islam.

 

“Let us oppose terrorism without demonising Muslims.

 

“Let us defend Christians without portraying Muslims as their enemies.

 

“Let us defend Muslims without excusing criminals who misuse the name of Islam,” he said.

 

He urged Nigerians to approach sensitive religious issues with knowledge, context and intellectual honesty.

 

Returning to the first revelation of the Qur’an, Agunbiade said Iqra should serve as a guide for contemporary debates about Islam.

 

“The first command of the final revelation was Iqra. Read. Let that command guide our discussion of Islam,” he said.

 

He added: “Nigeria needs knowledge, justice, dialogue and mutual respect. It does not need religious caricature.”

 

Agunbiade’s position, he said, was ultimately a call for Nigerians to reject religious stereotyping and choose dialogue over confrontation in addressing differences between the country’s two major faith communities.

 

Agunbiade fires back at Deji Yesufu: Don’t mistake Boko Haram for Islam

A 24-year-old Nigerian national, Gift Oladele, dragged a young woman into woodland and violently raped her has been jailed for 17 years after a judge described his actions as “truly depraved”.

Gift Oladele carried out the attack in Wrexham, North Wales, in September last year after approaching the victim, who was 19 at the time, as she walked home from a night out.

Oladele was convicted of rape and sexual assault at Mold Crown Court in March. He was sentenced on Thursday.

 

How the Attack Happened

The court heard that Oladele approached the woman and her friends outside a takeaway in Wrexham city centre. He initially appeared friendly and flirtatious before offering to walk home with her.

According to prosecutor James Coutts, Oladele accompanied the woman until they reached an isolated area, where he grabbed her by the mouth and forced her into the woods.

He then carried out a violent rape.

“She described being terrified,” Coutts told the court. “She did what she thought she needed to do to get through the attack.”

Oladele threatened to find and harm the victim if she reported the rape. He also threatened to take photographs of her and post them online.

Despite the threats, the woman returned home and immediately told her parents, who contacted the police.

Oladele was arrested the following day at his cousin’s home in Wrexham. Officers said he had attempted to hide a mobile phone, which contained searches relating to sexual attacks.

The court heard that Oladele had a “fascination in forced sexual abuse and rape” and that he appeared to be acting out a fantasy shown in the videos he had searched for.

 

Victim Describes Lasting Trauma

In a victim impact statement, the woman told the court that she continued to wake up from nightmares in which Oladele had tracked her down.

“I’m petrified,” she said.

She also described taking medication to prevent HIV infection after the assault and suffering long-term emotional and psychological effects.

 

“I feel ashamed, and somehow damaged, since what he did to me,” she said.

“The emotional impact has been very significant.

“I can’t go anywhere on my own anymore.

“I feel unsafe.”

Judge Simon Mills praised the woman for her courage during and after the attack.

“You showed exceptional courage during the incident and afterwards,” he told her.

 

Previous Conviction and Deportation Appeal

At the time of the Wrexham attack, Oladele was already on bail over another rape allegation in Manchester dating from November 2024.

He had also been jailed in 2022 for a sexually motivated attack.

The court heard that Oladele was later due to be deported to Nigeria but successfully challenged the decision on human rights grounds.

An immigration tribunal judge described the deportation case as “finely balanced”, acknowledging the seriousness of Oladele’s previous offence and the public interest in deporting foreign criminals.

However, the tribunal also considered his ties to the United Kingdom, where he had grown up, and the consequences of relocating to Nigeria.

The Home Office made two attempts to appeal the decision, but both appeals were rejected.

 

Judge Calls Defendant Dangerous

During sentencing, The Judge described Oladele’s actions as “truly depraved”.

 

“You subjected her to a terrible violation,” he said.

“You are a dangerous offender.”

The judge said Oladele posed an exceptionally high risk of harm to young women and had shown “absolutely no remorse whatsoever”.

The Home Office described the case as horrific and said Oladele’s imprisonment was the right outcome.

The victim’s account has highlighted not only the brutality of the attack but also the lasting fear and emotional damage that sexual violence can cause long after the offender has been convicted.

Nigeria’s federal lawmakers are putting the downstream energy sector under the microscope after audit records revealed that state oil firm NNPCL and private fuel marketers have piled up at least ₦432 billion in unpaid regulatory obligations.

The House of Representatives Public Accounts Committee (PAC) confirmed the formal probe this week, following persistent warnings raised in the Auditor-General’s 2023 and 2024 annual reports.

 

Regulatory Levies Left Unpaid

The mountain of debt has accumulated over a six-year period from 2017 to 2023, remaining largely uncollected despite the country’s tight fiscal squeeze.

READ ALSO:

Cheap Alcohol Fuels Banditry NAFDAC Chief Stands Firm on Sachet Ban

Fresh Blackout Hits Abuja as Apo Substation Transformer Trips

More Than 1,000 Migrants Rescued Off West Africa in One Week

 

The liabilities consist of statutory fees meant to fund national energy infrastructure, including the 1% Midstream and Downstream Gas Infrastructure Fund, National Transport Average fees, Balancing Allowances, and lingering credit balances from import and coastal operations.

 

Audit records track a steep rise in default:

• The 2023 audit initially captured ₦392 billion in total arrears, with NNPCL carrying over ₦162 billion and commercial marketers responsible for ₦230 billion.
• The 2024 report revealed that private marketer debt alone had swelled to ₦432 billion, separate from state-owned NNPCL liabilities.
• Regulatory data from the NMDPRA confirms that 146 companies affiliated with DAPPMAN and MEMAN owed ₦327 billion by 2025.

 

No Hiding Place for Defaulters

PAC Chairman, Rep. Bamidele Salam, made it clear that parliament expects compliance from corporate leaders, issuing a firm directive against corporate stonewalling.

Salam emphasized that the committee will scrutinize why statutory revenues were permitted to sit idle without vigorous enforcement from the NMDPRA. Defaulters will be forced to present audit trails detailing every transaction, outstanding balances, and proof of any remittances made to date.

For lawmakers, the objective is unambiguous: plug commercial leakages, enforce fiscal discipline, and recover every outstanding naira owed to the federation.