Panel chairman regrets signing UNILAG VC reinstatement report – Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Panel chairman regrets signing UNILAG VC reinstatement report

Published

on

The chairperson of Special Visitation Panel set up by President Muhammadu Buhari to probe the  crisis at the University of Lagos, Prof. Tukur Saad, has said he was deceived into signing the report that informed government’s decision to reinstate Prof. Oluwatoyin Ogundipe as the vice chancellor of the university.

A statement by the Director, Press and Public Relations, Ministry of Education, Ben-Bem Goong, on Tuesday, said the FG had reinstated the VC and dissolved the university council.

Saad, in different correspondences to the Chief of Staff to the president, Ibrahim Gambari, and the Minister of Education, Adamu Adamu, cast doubts on the integrity of the report.

According to him, “The recommendation was that the VC should be cautioned against contract splitting. To me this was enough for Government to reject this recommendation and subject the culprit to the consequences.”

Expressing his reservation, Saad said, “The recommendation that the VC should be reinstated was limited to the procedure of his termination. It did not mean he should be absolved of all wrong doing.”

He said the report of the panel was one-sided because majority of the members were biased towards  Ogundipe, adding that the Terms of Reference (ToR) were also skewed against the estranged chairperson of the governing council, Wale Babalakin, who had since resigned his appointment.

According to him, although Ogundipe was wrongly removed, he was not given a clean bill of health as he was indicted for contract splitting.

He also accused Babalakin of “committing hara-kiri” by removing the VC and appointing another one, and by deciding to step down from his position when the crisis got messy.

Saad said he was cajoled into signing the report with the understanding that the content would be subjected to review by the Chancellor of the University, the Shehu of Borno.

He  said he agreed to sign the report to abort another stalemate and  save the government from embarrassment but regretted that he had now been “stabbed on the back” by people he trusted.

“As Chairman, I didn’t want to sign the Final Report but I felt that would be a slap on the face of the government and it would generate so much bad publicity in the public domain, that I would rather sign on the understanding that the matter would be referred to the Shehu of Borno as the Chancellor,” he wrote to Gambari.

The professor of architecture said he felt betrayed by the conclusion reached by government after he was made to believe in a different course of action.

“The final recommendation of the panel was that the matter should be referred back to the Chancellor, irrespective of what the panel recommended.

“As it stands now I feel I was made a fool of and stabbed on the back by people I trusted,” he said.

Drawing attention to some of the recommendations contained in the report submitted by the committee, Saad said it will be impossible for any Council to manage a university in this country, if the recommendations of the panel are implemented in a White Paper.
He complained that “A White Paper based on the report submitted by the panel and neglecting the final recommendation of referring will raise many questions.”

Saad had in a letter to the education minister, dated October 7, 2020 and titled ‘Re: Submission of Report of The Visitation Panel on University of Lagos Crisis to Honourable Minister’, drawn attention to a number of instances where he said the report was skewed to favour  Ogundipe.

“When you read the report, you will notice that it was very one-sided, so to speak, the option was for the chairman to refuse to sign the report and that would have been a slap on the government’s face.

“In any case, the issue is not that the report was false but it contained half truth in order to protect one party and magnified the facts from the other party by pushing the blame to one side, omitting what could have balanced the report.”

On allegation of contract splitting against the VC,  Saad said  the report did not represent the findings and position of the panel on the matter.

“Take the issue of splitting contracts so that the figures would be within his approval limits; in the renovation of his house and that of some principal officers, the evidence was clear, one contractor would be given four contracts on the same project on the same day each packaged to be within VCs approval limit.

“A number of such cases were evident, but the only way the Chairman could get that in the report was to compromise by rendering such as “Contracts were packaged in a way that bordered on contract splitting, in order to keep them within approval limits.”

News

FG declares Tuesday July 15 public holiday to honour Buhari

Published

on

FG declares Tuesday July 15 public holiday to honour Buhari

The Federal Government has declared Tuesday, July 15, a public holiday to honour the late former President Muhammadu Buhari.

Buhari died on Sunday at a clinic in London of protracted illness related to lukemia.

The public holiday is in addition to the seven days of national mourning earlier declared by President Bola Tinubu.

Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, announced the break in a statement released on Monday through the ministry’s Permanent Secretary. Magdalene Ajani,

Tunji-Ojo said the holiday is a gesture of respect for Buhari’s contributions to Nigeria’s democracy and development.

“President Muhammadu Buhari served Nigeria with dedication, integrity, and an unwavering commitment to the unity and progress of our great nation,” the minister said.

This public holiday provides an opportunity for all Nigerians to reflect on his life, leadership, and the values he upheld.”

Tunji-Ojo asked Nigerians to use the day to promote peace, patriotism, and national unity in line with Buhari’s vision.

 

FG declares Tuesday July 15 public holiday to honour Buhari

Continue Reading

News

Two Nigerians on list of America’s richest immigrants in 2025

Published

on

Two Nigerians on list of America’s richest immigrants in 2025

Two Nigerian-born billionaires, Adebayo “Bayo” Ogunlesi and Tope Awotona, have been named in Forbes’ 2025 list of America’s Richest Immigrants.

The list features 125 billionaires from 41 countries, who collectively make up 14% of all billionaires living in the U.S. and control 18% of the country’s total billionaire wealth.

Top on the list are three South Africans, including Elon Musk ($393.1bn, Tesla, SpaceX); Patrick Soon-Shiong ($5.6bn, pharmaceuticals), and Rodney Sacks ($3.6bn, energy drinks).

They are closely followed by Ogunlesi, with a net worth of $2.4 billion, ranked 77th and recognized for his success in private equity, while Awotona, known for founding scheduling software company, Calendly, sits at 106th with a $1.4 billion net worth.

READ ALSO:

Other African-born billionaires on the list include Haim Saban from Egypt ($3.1B, TV and investments); Marc Lasry from Morocco ($1.9B, hedge funds); and Bharat Desai from Kenya ($1.6B, IT consulting).

Forbes noted that a remarkable 93% of them were self-made, having built their fortunes primarily in industries such as technology and finance.

The growing number of immigrant billionaires, up from 92 in 2022 to 125 in 2025, reflects a shifting demographic and reinforces what Forbes describes as the “immigrant mindset”: a blend of resilience, innovation, and the drive to seize opportunity that continues to shape America’s economic landscape.

Forbes also released a list of top 10 America’s richest immigrants to include Elon Musk, net worth: $393.1bn; Sergey Brin, net worth, $139.7bn; Jensen Huang, net worth, $137.9bn; Thomas Peterffy, net worth, $67.9bn; and Miriam Adelson & Family, net worth, $33.4bn.

Others are Rupert Murdoch & Family, net worth, $24bn; Peter Thiel, net worth, $21.8bn; Jay Chaudhry, net worth, $17.9bn; Jan Koum, net worth, $16.9bn; and John Tu, net worth, $14.1bn

Two Nigerians on list of America’s richest immigrants in 2025

Continue Reading

News

Reps move for review of INEC chairman appointment process

Published

on

Reps move for review of INEC chairman appointment process

The power of the President to unilaterally appoint Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) may be whittled down in a constitutional review proposal. 

The House of Representatives Committee on Constitution Review is currently considering the proposal to bring the National Judicial Council (NJC) into the process.

According to a report by PUNCH, the amendment seeks to reduce the influence of the executive arm by enhancing the transparency and impartiality of INEC leadership appointments.

This proposed shift follows long-standing calls for electoral reform, including the recommendations made in 2007 by the late Chief Justice of Nigeria, Muhammadu Uwais, who led the Electoral Reform Committee.

The Uwais-led panel had advised that the NJC, rather than the President, should be responsible for nominating INEC board members, and that the commission’s funding should come directly from the Consolidated Revenue Fund to safeguard its autonomy.

Former INEC Chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega, said that the proposed change was a positive development.

“It is a welcome development. It is one of the many good recommendations on how to insulate the position of whoever is chairman of INEC from political and executive pressures, as well as curing the deep-seated impression that ‘he who pays the piper dictates the tune.’”

Executive Director of YIAGA Africa, Samson Itodo, echoed this support, though he raised concerns about the NJC’s neutrality.

“The proposal by the National Assembly to amend the constitution to involve the NJC in the appointment of the INEC chairman is in line with Justice Uwais’ recommendation because over time, we have seen how presidents appointed their protégés and cronies, including people with a clear partisan background, into INEC.

“It is because of this that YIAGA Africa called it institutional capture, that is, INEC captured by the executive arm.

READ ALSO:

“Is the NJC independent enough to manage the appointment of the INEC chairman in view of the fact that the CJN has overbearing powers in determining the members and the composition of its members?”

While backing the intention behind the reform, Itodo advocated a more inclusive approach.

He said, “I don’t know if this proposal to have the NJC manage the appointment process is a welcome development or if it would inspire confidence on the part of Nigerians.

“It is good to remove the power of appointing the INEC chairman from the President, but is it possible to set up a multi-stakeholder committee to manage this process and then send nominations or those who successfully passed the interview process to the National Assembly for screening before appointments by the President?

“There has to be a way of ensuring that whoever is responsible for any action in the appointment value chain is independent, so that we don’t have partisan people getting appointed to the electoral commission.”

Auwal Rafsanjani, Executive Director of the Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre, also supported the involvement of the NJC, suggesting it could help rehabilitate the image of the judiciary.

“If the National Assembly can amend the constitution to allow the NJC to have a say in the selection process of the INEC chairman, it will be a good development. It will enhance the integrity and credibility of the NJC because Nigerians are beginning to question the character of the judiciary. Nigerians are losing confidence in the judiciary because of their perception of injustice perpetrated by that arm of government.

READ ALSO:

“Hopefully, NJC members who will be involved in selecting the INEC chairman, as well as the Commissioners, will help the image of the judiciary. Our constitution does not allow partisan persons to head the electoral commission, but successive presidents have been ignoring this constitutional provision. So, NJC members who are expected to be non-partisan would assist in selecting a good person to head INEC,” Rafsanjani said.

Reps move for review of INEC chairman appointment process

Continue Reading

Trending