Pro-Tinubu group urges court to remove Buni as APC caretaker chairman - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Pro-Tinubu group urges court to remove Buni as APC caretaker chairman

Published

on

Abiodun Nejo

Ekiti State All Progressives Congress members loyal to former Lagos State Governor Bola Tinubu have urged the court to sack Governor Mai Mala Buni as Chairman, Caretaker Committee of the party.

The members, under the aegis of South West Agenda for Asiwaju 2023, a group rooting for Tinubu’s rumoured presidential bid, also urged the court to nullify all actions taken by Buni as APC Caretaker Committee Chairman and as well annul the July 31 ward congresses of the party in Ekiti State.

The SWAGA members made the prayers in a suit number FHC/AD/CS/21/2021 filed at the Federal High Court, Ekiti State Division, where it had also sought an interlocutory injunction stopping the conduct of the local government congress which held in Saturday “or an order declaring the outcome illegal”.

Joined in the suit deposed to by 36 SWAGA members and contestants in the ward congresses on behalf of over 3,650 members of the group in Ekiti was filed by their lawyers, Barrister Ayodeji Odu and five others for the plaintiffs, are APC (1st defendant), Mai Mala Buni(2nd defendant), Ekiti APC Chairman, Paul Omotoso (3rd defendant), Chairman, Ekiti Congress Screening Committee, Samuel Abejide (4th defendant) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (5th defendant).

Among others, the applicants are seeking from the court “a declaration that the 2nd defendant (Buni) cannot hold the position of Chairman, Caretaker Extraordinary Convention Committee of the 1st defendant (APC) as such appointment/role is a constitutional violation of Section 187 of the 1999 Constitution as amended and Article 8 of the 1st defendant’s constitution.

“A declaration that all actions or steps taken by the 1st defendant (APC) under the control, supervision, direction of the so called caretaker Extraordinary Convention Planning Committee of APC, headed by the 2nd defendant, including the conduct of ward congresses across Nigeria and Ekiti State on 31st July, 2021 was illegal and unconstitutional on the ground that the 2nd defendant (Buni) under whose such steps or actions were taken was ineligible to superintend over 1st defendant party affairs while still serving in office as a Governor.

“A declaration that all committee/Ward congress committees set up by the 3rd defendant pursuant to the Ward Congress of 31st July 2021 was unconstitutional, illegal, null and void and in total violation of the guidelines of the 1st defendant on conduct of the congress”.

The SWAGA members also sought “a declaration that no congress was held in Ekiti-State chapter of the 1st defendant as no result has been declared in respect of the congress as at the date of filing this case”.

They also sought “an order declaring the congress of the 1st defendant purportedly held on the July 31 and organized and conducted by or under the instruction/supervision of 2nd and 3rd defendants in Ekiti State as unconstitutional, illegal, null and void”.

They also prayed the court to declare that the congress of the 1st defendant purportedly held in Ekiti-State on the 31st day of July 2021 was in total breach of democratic norms and practices and violation of the Constitution and guidelines issued by the 1st defendant for the conduct of the 2021 ward congresses.

They also sought “an injunction restraining the 1st and 3rd defendants from conducting any further congresses into local government and state offices of 1st defendant in Ekiti State pending the determination of the substantive matter”.

The plantiffs asked for an injunction restraining the 5th defendant (INEC) from recognizing or dealing with any ward executive or officers purportedly produced from the purported ward congress of 31st July, 2021 in Ekiti State.

SWAGA State Chairman, Senator Tony Adeniyi, who said INEC and APC had been duly served, accused Buni, Omotoso and Abejide of evading service.

Adeniyi said, “Having realised that these defendants are trying to obstruct justice by evading service of papers, we are going to file a motion for substituted service on Monday September 6 before the court to make the service easier and for expeditious trial of the case”.

But the Secretary of Congress Committee in Ekiti, Femi Akindele, said whoever approached the court without exhausting internal mechanism to seek redress would be doing such in flagrant violation of the party’s constitution and guidelines.

Akindele said that the local government congress conducted in Ekiti on Saturday was undertaken without violating the constitution of the party and the 1999 constitution of Nigeria, saying the suit did not vitiate the process already undertaken.

Source: https://punchng.com

News

Human Rights Lawyer Warns Against Targeting Children, Hospitals in U.S – Israel Military Action

Published

on

Human rights lawyer Deji Adeyanju
Human rights lawyer Deji Adeyanju

Human Rights Lawyer Warns Against Targeting Children, Hospitals in U.S – Israel Military Action

Human rights lawyer Deji Adeyanju has urged the United States and Israel to fully respect international humanitarian law and the Geneva Conventions in their ongoing military action against Iran, warning that targeting civilians, children, hospitals and other protected populations constitutes a serious violation of the laws of war.

Speaking in a statement on Monday, Adeyanju said that even amid heightened conflict, combatants have clear legal obligations under international law to distinguish between military targets and civilians. He noted that deliberate attacks on non‑combatants and protected infrastructure such as hospitals and schools are prohibited under global legal norms aimed at minimizing human suffering during armed conflict. This framework is central to the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, which require parties to a conflict to take all feasible precautions to safeguard civilians and avoid harm to civilian objects.

“The United States and Israel must respect the Geneva Convention in their war with Iran. Children, hospitals, the civil population and vulnerable people must not be targeted,” Adeyanju said, emphasizing that failure to uphold these principles could amount to serious violations under international law.

READ ALSO:

International humanitarian law (IHL) — the body of legal rules that govern armed conflict — protects those who are not taking part in hostilities, including civilians, medical personnel and humanitarian workers, and restricts how warfare may be conducted. Under IHL, parties must always distinguish between combatants and civilians and refrain from deliberate attacks on civilian objects even if military activity is occurring nearby.

Adeyanju’s appeal comes amid sharp escalations in the Middle East, where recent U.S. and Israeli military strikes inside Iran have sparked retaliatory attacks by Tehran and heightened fears of a wider regional conflict involving multiple state and non‑state actors. Various international actors, including the European Union, have called for “maximum restraint” and full compliance with international law in responding to the crisis, urging the protection of civilian lives and strict adherence to humanitarian norms.

Similarly, international legal and humanitarian organisations, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the United Nations human rights chief, have reiterated that the laws of war apply regardless of the political objectives of the parties involved, and that the safety of civilians must remain paramount. They have called for all sides to uphold the rules of armed conflict and protect medical personnel, hospitals, homes and schools from attack.

Critics of the escalation have underscored the devastating toll that indiscriminate or disproportionate use of force can have on civilian populations, not only in the immediate conflict zone but also across neighbouring regions struggling with displacement, economic instability and humanitarian needs.

Adeyanju stressed that adherence to international humanitarian law and the Geneva Conventions is not merely aspirational but a legal and moral obligation for all parties in hostilities. He reiterated that the protection of innocent lives, especially children and vulnerable civilians, should remain central to any legitimate military action and urged greater international accountability for violations.

Human Rights Lawyer Warns Against Targeting Children, Hospitals in U.S – Israel Military Action

Continue Reading

News

Presidency Denies Alleged Poison Plot Against President Tinubu, Calls Viral Report Fake

Published

on

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu

Presidency Denies Alleged Poison Plot Against President Tinubu, Calls Viral Report Fake

The Presidency of Nigeria has firmly denied claims circulating online that a chef at the Aso Rock Presidential Villa attempted to poison President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, describing the viral report as false, misleading, and fabricated.

In a statement released on Sunday, the Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, dismissed the social media video suggesting that security operatives had arrested a kitchen staff member in connection with an alleged poisoning attempt. The statement emphasised that the report is “fake news” with no credible source or evidence.

The viral video, which gained significant traction across social media platforms, alleged that intelligence reports uncovered suspicious activities in the presidential kitchen, prompting the deployment of special security units and the launch of a covert investigation. However, the Presidency categorically refuted these claims, stating:

“There was no attempt to poison the President, and no kitchen staff member was arrested in connection with any such plot. The story being circulated is entirely fabricated and should be disregarded.”

READ ALSO:

Officials clarified that the video consisted of unrelated clips combined with a dramatic voice-over, likely aimed at creating panic and generating online engagement. The statement urged members of the public, journalists, and media outlets to verify information through official channels before sharing sensitive claims, particularly those involving national security.

Security analysts noted that misinformation targeting high-profile political figures can spread rapidly online, often fueled by sensational narratives, and warned that such false reports could undermine public trust in national institutions.

As of the filing of this report, no security agency has independently confirmed the alleged incident. Multiple reputable news outlets have reinforced the official denial, highlighting that the alleged poisoning attempt did not occur.

The Presidency reiterated its commitment to transparency and responsible communication, assuring Nigerians that any genuine security threats involving the President would be addressed through proper official channels. Citizens are advised to remain calm and avoid amplifying unverified information capable of causing panic or destabilising public discourse.

Presidency Denies Alleged Poison Plot Against President Tinubu, Calls Viral Report Fake

Continue Reading

News

INEC: Perfect Election Not Possible in 2027, but Poll Will Be Nigeria’s Best — Amupitan

Published

on

Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Chairman Prof. Joash Ojo Amupitan
Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Chairman Prof. Joash Ojo Amupitan

INEC: Perfect Election Not Possible in 2027, but Poll Will Be Nigeria’s Best — Amupitan

The Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Joash Ojo Amupitan, has said the commission cannot guarantee a completely flawless election in 2027, especially with regard to real-time electronic transmission of results, but assured Nigerians that the polls would mark a major improvement over previous elections.

Amupitan spoke at a Citizens’ Townhall Meeting organised by the Civil Society Network on Election Integrity in Abuja, where he acknowledged logistical, technical, and human limitations in large-scale elections, stressing that absolute perfection is unrealistic anywhere in the world.

He explained that while INEC has the capacity to electronically transmit results, delays may still occur due to network and operational factors. Using a banking analogy, he said results may be successfully transmitted even if they do not appear instantly, warning against interpreting such delays as evidence of manipulation.

Reflecting on the 2023 general elections, Amupitan admitted that while INEC tested its technology during state and off-cycle polls, it failed to adequately test nationwide, simultaneous transmission during the presidential election. He said this gap has now been identified and would be fully addressed before 2027 through extensive system testing and stress simulations.

READ ALSO:

He added that the credibility of any election depends largely on logistics and result management, citing the recent FCT Area Council elections, where results were declared promptly in five councils, while delays occurred in one ward in Kuje. According to him, an election should be judged successful if it starts on time, is peaceful, and results are transparently managed and declared according to law.

Amupitan also called for simpler language in the Electoral Act 2026, arguing that clearer provisions would help citizens better understand electoral rules and reduce post-election disputes.

Despite the challenges, the INEC chairman expressed optimism that the 2027 elections would be Nigeria’s most credible yet, noting that voters are more informed, politically aware, and technologically savvy than ever before.


Reactions from Civil Society and Political Parties

Reacting to Amupitan’s comments, civil society organisations welcomed INEC’s admission of past shortcomings but urged the commission to translate promises into concrete reforms.

The Executive Director of YIAGA Africa, Samson Itodo, said acknowledging limitations was a positive step, but warned that public trust hinges on consistent transparency, especially around result transmission and communication with voters on election night.

Similarly, the Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD) said INEC must prioritise logistics, voter education, and accountability for electoral offenders to avoid a repeat of controversies seen in previous elections.

From the political space, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) said INEC’s statement reinforced the need for stronger legal safeguards and independent oversight, warning that technological failures could be exploited by desperate politicians.

The ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), however, urged Nigerians to focus on reforms already underway, saying early preparation and improved testing could restore confidence in the electoral process.

INEC: Perfect Election Not Possible in 2027, but Poll Will Be Nigeria’s Best — Amupitan

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending