Ukraine fears Russian plan to cut power from captured nuclear plant - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Ukraine fears Russian plan to cut power from captured nuclear plant

Published

on

Ukraine’s state nuclear power firm has said it fears that Russia plans to switch off the functioning power units at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, which in normal times provides about one-fifth of the country’s electricity.

If the plant stopped generating electricity, its technicians would have to rely on backup power systems to continue cooling the nuclear reactors, which may raise the risk of accidents.

“The Russian military is looking for suppliers of fuel for diesel generators, which must be turned on after the shutdown of power units and in the absence of external power supply for nuclear-fuel cooling systems,” Energoatom said in a statement.

Ukrainian military intelligence had warned earlier this week that Moscow appeared to be planning a “provocation” at the plant. It has controlled the site since March and stationed troops and military equipment there, leading to urgent calls for it to be demilitarised, including from the UN and Nato.

Even if the reactors remain intact, however, Russia may plan to weaponise the plant simply by disconnecting it. With winter approaching, and Ukraine already concerned about gas supplies, the loss of an important source of electricity could be damaging to the economy and people’s ability to stay warm.

READ ALSO:

On Friday, while the UN secretary general, António Guterres, visited the Black Sea port city of Odesa, Russia reportedly closed the Zaporizhzhia site to most personnel, apart from those operating the power units, Energoatom said. Although Russians control the site, it is still run by Ukrainians.

Energoatom also accused Russia of shelling parts of the plant complex, in false flag attacks that Moscow blamed on Ukrainian forces.

“Once again, we call on the international community to take all necessary measures as soon as possible for the de-occupation of the Zaporizhzhia NPP, because the nuclear and radiation safety of all mankind is at stake!” it said.

Fighting around the plant, and Russian management of the site, have become a focus of intense international concern.

The Conservative MP Tobias Ellwood, who chairs the House of Commons defence select committee, warned on Friday that a nuclear accident at the site risked drawing Nato into the war.

“Let’s make it clear now: ANY deliberate damage causing potential radiation leak to a Ukrainian nuclear reactor would be a breach of Nato’s Article 5,” he said on Twitter.

Guterres, at a news conference on Thursday with the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, said: “The facility must not be used as part of any military operation. Instead, agreement is urgently needed to re-establish Zaporizhzhia’s purely civilian infrastructure and to ensure the safety of the area.”

Zelenskiy said he agreed with Guterres on a framework for a visit by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to inspect the site. “We agreed with the secretary general the conditions of a possible mission by the IAEA to the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, in a legal way, via territory free from occupiers,” Zelenskiy told reporters.

The Guardian

International

Putin Offers Iran Diplomatic Support After Collapse of US–Iran Talks

Published

on

Russian President Vladimir Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin

Putin Offers Iran Diplomatic Support After Collapse of US–Iran Talks

Russian President Vladimir Putin has offered diplomatic support to Iran following the collapse of high-level negotiations between Tehran and the United States, as tensions continue to escalate across the Middle East.

According to a Kremlin readout reported by AFP, Putin held a phone conversation on Sunday with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, during which he expressed Russia’s readiness to help facilitate a political and diplomatic settlement to the crisis.

The Kremlin said Putin emphasized Moscow’s willingness to support efforts aimed at achieving what he described as a “just and lasting peace” in the region, including acting as a mediator if required.

The call came shortly after the breakdown of US–Iran talks, which had been aimed at resolving long-standing disputes over Iran’s nuclear programme and wider regional security issues but ended without agreement.

US–Iran Negotiations Collapse After Months of Tension

The negotiations reportedly involved senior US officials, including lead negotiators Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, but collapsed after prolonged discussions failed to produce meaningful progress.

READ ALSO:

A US official said the delegation withdrew following what it described as unproductive talks, while confirming that no immediate follow-up meeting had been scheduled.

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf blamed Washington for the breakdown, saying US negotiators failed to build trust during the discussions. He added that Iranian proposals were constructive but were not properly considered.

Diplomatic Breakdown Raises Regional Tensions

The collapse of the talks has further deepened uncertainty in the Middle East, where tensions have already been heightened by recent military and political disputes involving Iran, the United States, and Israel.

Analysts warn that continued failure to reach diplomatic compromise could worsen instability in the region and increase pressure on global energy markets, particularly oil and gas supply routes.

Russia Seeks Greater Role in Mediation Efforts

Putin’s engagement with Iran is being viewed as part of Russia’s broader effort to position itself as a key diplomatic actor in the crisis.

The Kremlin said Russia remains open to supporting dialogue between all sides, suggesting Moscow could play a more active role in future mediation efforts if both parties agree.

For now, no new date has been announced for the resumption of US–Iran negotiations, leaving diplomatic efforts at a standstill as international calls for restraint continue.

Putin Offers Iran Diplomatic Support After Collapse of US–Iran Talks

Continue Reading

International

Trump Orders US Navy to Blockade Strait of Hormuz After Iran Talks Collapse

Published

on

US President Donald Trump

Trump Orders US Navy to Blockade Strait of Hormuz After Iran Talks Collapse

Donald Trump has ordered the United States Navy to begin an immediate blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, escalating tensions with Iran after the collapse of critical peace talks in Islamabad.

The directive, announced Sunday via Truth Social, signals a major shift from diplomacy to military pressure in one of the world’s most sensitive geopolitical flashpoints. Trump said U.S. naval forces would intercept all vessels attempting to enter or leave the Strait of Hormuz, particularly those suspected of paying transit tolls to Iran, which he described as “extortion.”

The move follows the breakdown of high-level negotiations between Washington and Tehran, widely seen as a rare attempt to de-escalate tensions. Although Trump acknowledged that discussions were partly productive, he insisted that the core issue—Iran’s nuclear programme—remained unresolved.

Sources familiar with the talks revealed that the مذاکرات collapsed over Iran’s refusal to give up its enriched uranium stockpile and its insistence on maintaining control over shipping activities in the strategic waterway. The Iranian delegation, led by Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf, blamed the United States for failing to build trust during the negotiations.

The Strait of Hormuz blockade carries enormous global implications. The narrow waterway handles roughly 20% of global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments, making it one of the most critical energy chokepoints in the world. Any disruption threatens to send shockwaves through global markets.

READ ALSO:

Indeed, oil prices have already surged amid the crisis, with Brent crude and WTI climbing above $115 per barrel at peak levels. Analysts warn that the blockade could push prices even higher, worsening inflation and straining economies heavily dependent on energy imports.

The escalation comes just a day after the U.S. military intensified operations in the region. The United States Central Command confirmed that American forces had begun mine-clearing operations in the Strait of Hormuz, amid allegations that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps deployed naval mines to restrict shipping.

Two U.S. Navy destroyers, USS Frank E. Peterson and USS Michael Murphy, were spotted transiting the strait as part of efforts to secure maritime routes and ensure safe passage for commercial vessels.

Trump framed the blockade as a defence of global shipping freedom, warning that any Iranian attack on U.S. or allied vessels would be met with overwhelming force. However, the Pentagon has yet to release full operational details, leaving uncertainty around how the blockade will be enforced.

The situation is further complicated by developments involving Israel. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently signalled that Israeli military operations against Iran are ongoing, despite ceasefire discussions. He stressed that Israel would act independently to protect its national interests.

Experts warn that the U.S.-Iran conflict escalation could rapidly spiral into direct military confrontation, with far-reaching consequences for global security. Shipping companies have already begun rerouting vessels, while insurers are raising premiums due to heightened risks in the Gulf.

As of now, Iranian authorities have not issued an official response to the blockade order. Meanwhile, global markets are bracing for volatility as trading resumes, with investors closely monitoring developments in the region.

The unfolding crisis highlights the fragile state of U.S.-Iran relations and underscores the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz to global energy supply and economic stability.

Trump Orders US Navy to Blockade Strait of Hormuz After Iran Talks Collapse

Continue Reading

International

Elon Musk Slams South Africa Over Starlink Ban, Calls Policy ‘Racist’

Published

on

𝗘𝗹𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗸
𝗘𝗹𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗸

Elon Musk Slams South Africa Over Starlink Ban, Calls Policy ‘Racist’

Elon Musk has escalated his criticism of South Africa, accusing the government of racial discrimination following the continued refusal to grant an operating licence to his satellite internet service, Starlink.

In a strongly worded post on X (formerly Twitter) on Sunday, the SpaceX founder claimed that Starlink’s application had been blocked because he is not Black, despite being born in South Africa. The billionaire further alleged that the company was informally offered a workaround involving the appointment of a Black executive to satisfy ownership requirements, a move he said he rejected on principle.

The controversy centres on South Africa’s Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) policy, which requires companies operating in sectors like telecommunications to meet equity thresholds, typically mandating at least 30 percent Black ownership. The policy was introduced to correct deep economic imbalances created during apartheid, but it has increasingly become a point of friction for foreign investors.

South African regulators, including the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa, have consistently maintained that the rules apply uniformly to all operators and are a legal requirement for licensing. Authorities have pushed back against claims of discrimination, insisting that the policy is aimed at economic redress rather than racial exclusion.

READ ALSO:

Musk has repeatedly criticised the framework, describing it as “unashamedly racist” and claiming that such policies contradict the legacy of Nelson Mandela. He has also alleged that numerous laws in the country unfairly disadvantage non-Black citizens, further fuelling the ongoing debate.

Despite the standoff, Starlink has continued its rapid expansion across Africa, now operating in nearly two dozen countries where it provides high-speed internet access to underserved communities, including schools and healthcare centres. South Africa, however, remains one of the few major economies on the continent where the service is unavailable.

Musk had previously proposed initiatives to support connectivity in rural South African communities, including offers to provide internet access to thousands of schools, but those plans have stalled due to regulatory hurdles tied to ownership compliance.

As of now, the South African government has not issued an official response to Musk’s latest remarks. However, previous statements suggest that there is unlikely to be any regulatory concession without full adherence to B-BBEE requirements.

The dispute highlights a broader tension between South Africa’s post-apartheid transformation policies and the expectations of global technology investors. Analysts say the outcome could shape future investment decisions and influence how African nations balance economic redress with the need to attract international business.

Elon Musk Slams South Africa Over Starlink Ban, Calls Policy ‘Racist’

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending