Understanding the concept and implications of Tawassul – Newstrends
Connect with us

Opinion

Understanding the concept and implications of Tawassul

Published

on

Bismillaahir Rahmaanir Raheem. In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Exceptionally Merciful.

(a). Meaning of التَّوَسُّلْ

التَّوَسُّلُ
is an Arabic word which connotes التقرُّب إلى الله تعالى بما يحبُّه ويرضاه “Seeking closeness to Allāh, the Most High through means that are beloved and acceptable to Him.” It is a variation of الوسيلة which, literally implies “means”, “a pathway”, “access”, or “nearness.”

(b). Legality of التَّوَسُّلُ

التَّوَسُّلْ
is a form of Ibādah (worship) in Islām. This is because one of the features of Ibādāt (acts of devotion) is that, ” Allah loves it, and is pleased with it.” This is evident in the definition of the term عبادة by شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية رحمه الله تعالى When he said:

العبادة اسم جامع لكل ما يحبه الله ويرضاه من الأقوال والأعمال الظاهرة منها والباطنة

“Ibādah is is a compound word that connotes everything that is beloved and pleasant to Allāh, be it spoken words or actions, the apparent and the hidden.”

Whenever Allāh loves a thing, and He is pleased with it, He recommends it to His servants as an act of worship. It is for this reason that we find in Qur’an 5:35 the command to seek الوسيلة “closeness” to Allāh. He says:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اتَّقُوا اللَّهَ وَابْتَغُوا إِلَيْهِ الْوَسِيلَةَ
وَجَاهِدُوا فِي سَبِيلِهِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُفْلِحُون

“O you who have believed, fear Allāh and seek nearness to Him, and strive in His cause that perchance you may be prosperous.”

Similarly, while condemning the actions of unbelievers who abandon Allāh (who is closer to them than their jugular veins) and invoke others than Him (that are far away, weak and incapable of anything), Allāh says:

أُولَٰئِكَ الَّذِينَ يَدْعُونَ يَبْتَغُونَ إِلَىٰ رَبِّهِمُ الْوَسِيلَةَ أَيُّهُمْ أَقْرَبُ وَيَرْجُونَ رَحْمَتَهُ وَيَخَافُونَ عَذَابَهُ ۚ إِنَّ عَذَابَ رَبِّكَ كَانَ مَحْذُورًا

“Those (deities) whom they invoke (other than Allāh) seek closeness to (Allāh) their Lord, (striving as to) which of them is closer? And they hope in His mercy and fear His punishment. Surely, the punishment of your Lord is greatly feared.” (Qur’an 17:57)

READ ALSO:

In the hadīth, the Prophet ﷺ urge the believers to plead with Allāh to grant him (the Prophet ﷺ) الوسيلة. He said:

من قال حين يسمع النداء اللهم رب هذه الدعوة التامة، والصلاة القائمة، آت محمد الوسيلة والفضيلة وابعثه مقاماً محموداً الذي وعدته، حلت له شفاعتي يوم القيامة( رواه البخاري في صحيحه) زاد البيهقي في آخره )إنك لا تخلف الميعاد( بإسناد حسن)

“Whoever says, after the completion of the Adhān: “O Allāh, Lord of this most perfect call, and of the Prayer that is about to be established, grant to Muhammad the favor of nearness (to You) and excellence and a place of distinction, and exalt him to a position of glory that You have promised him.”, my intercession is guaranteed for him on the day of recompense. (Al-Bayhaqee added the statement “Surely, You do not break your promise” in his own narration)

(c). Permissible forms of التَّوَسُّلْ

The manner in which people make التَّوَسُّلُ today has made it imperative to distinguish between what is permitted as a form of التَّوَسُّلُ and what is not permitted, so that truth seekers may stick to that which is correct based on available proofs.

i. التوسل بالشهادة والإيمان Seeking closeness to Allāh with one’s faith and belief (in all the articles of faith): It is permissible in Islām, to seek closeness to Allāh using one’s faith and belief in Him, and in all the articles of faith. For instance, while making supplication, one is permitted to say, O Allāh, accept my supplication because I believe in You, or Your Prophet(s), Book(s), the Day of Judgement, or Qadar. One can also make التَّوَسُّلُ with one his belief in the oneness of Allāh and Messengership of Muhammad (upon him be peace). That is, one can say, “Yā Allāh, grant my request because I believe that You are one, without any partner. Or because of my belief in the Messengership of Muhammad, et cetera.

The evidence for this abound in the Qur’ān. Some of the supplications made using this criteria include:

(رَبَّنا آمَنَّا فاكتبنا مع الشاهدين)

“Our Lord! We believe, so write us down with the witnesses (of truth) Q. 5:83

الذين يقولون ربنا إننا آمنا فاغفر لنا ذنوبنا وقنا عذاب النار

“Those who say: Our Lord! Surely we believed, therefore forgive us our sins and save us from the chastisement of the fire.” Q. 3:16

Other examples are in Q. 3:53, 193, 10:85, 23:109, 28:53, et cetera.

From the hadīth, it was narrated on the authority of بُرَيدة بن الحصيب that the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ once heard heard a Sahābi (companion) supplicating and saying:

اللهم إني أسألك بأني أشهد أنك أنت الله لا إله إلا أنت الأحد الصمد الذي لم يلد ولم يولد ولم يكن له كفوا أحد.

“O Allāh! I ask thee because I testify that thou art Allāh, there is no deity worthy of worship except thee, the One and independent that neither begot nor is begotten, and there is none like Him.”

The Prophet ﷺ said:

لقد سأل الله باسمه الذي إذا سئل به أعطى وإذا دُعي به أجاب

“Indeed, he has supplicated to Allāh with His name which, if used to invoke Him, he responds and grants requests.”

ii. التوسل بأسماء الله وصفاته: Making التوسل with the names and attributes of Allāh سبحانه وتعالى. In the noble Qur’ān, we are told that Allāh has beautiful names and attributes, and that we should use them to invoke Him. In Qur’an 7:180, Allāh, our Lord says:

وَلِلَّهِ الْأَسْمَاءُ الْحُسْنَىٰ فَادْعُوهُ بِهَا ۖ وَذَرُوا الَّذِينَ يُلْحِدُونَ فِي أَسْمَائِهِ ۚ سَيُجْزَوْنَ مَا كَانُوا يَعْمَلُونَ

“And to Allāh belong the beautiful names, invoke Him with them. And leave (the company of) those who practice deviation concerning His names. They will be recompensed for what they’ve been doing.”

READ ALSO:

What the above verse implies is that one can invoke Allāh using either His names or attributes as mentioned in the Qur’ān and Sunnah. This is why our pipus predecessors would say in their Qunūt:

اللَّهُمَّ إِنّا نَسْأَلُكَ بِكُلِّ اسْمٍ هُوَ لَكَ، سَمَّيْتَ بِهِ نَفْسَكَ، أَوْ أَنْزَلْتَهُ فِي كِتَابِكَ، أَوْ عَلَّمْتَهُ أَحَداً مِنْ خَلْقِكَ، أَوْ اسْتَأْثَرْتَ بِهِ فِي عِلْمِ الغَيْبِ عِنْدَكَ

“O Allāh! We ask You with all the names that belong to You: The ones that You named Yourselves with, or revealed in Your Book, or taught any of Your servants, or kept in the knowledge of the unseen with You… ”

However, there is a need to make a clarification here. Some Muslims have completely misunderstood and misconstrued the injunction in this verse to mean chanting a particular name of Allāh several ten, hundred or thousand times. E.g. Yā Allāh! Yā Allāh!! Yā Allāh!!! (one or ten or hundred thousand times)! Or simply Allāhu! Allāhu!! Allāhu !!!

This is unfounded and preposterous. It’s like one’s children gathering themselves together and shouting “daddy”!” daddy”!! “daddy”!!! several times without saying anything, while one is seated directly in front of them. Thus, the most appropriate manner is to say something like, “Yā Allāh! I seek your intervention in this matter because you’re my creator who has power over all things.” or “Yā Razzāq (the provider)” urzuqnī” (provide for me) because none can provide for me except thee!

iii. Making التوسل with one’s incapacity, fault, remorse, weakness and dire need of the mercy of Allāh. This implies praying to Allāh citing one’s urgent need of His favours, mercies and blessings as means of appealing to Him. This is done mostly when one is in a precarious situation such as poverty, sickness, fear of evil, calamity of death, hopelessness, et cetera. In the noble Qur’ān, we find several examples of this form of التَّوَسُّلُ especially among the Prophets and Messengers of Allāh. For instance, when Prophet Ādam عليه السلام was tricked by the Shaytān to disobey Allāh, he sought Allāh’s forgiveness by showing remorse and distress. Allāh says:

قَالَا رَبّنَا ظَلَمْنَا أَنْفُسنَا وَإِنْ لَمْ تَغْفِر لَنَا وَتَرْحَمنَا لَنَكُونَنَّ مِنْ الْخَاسِرِين

“Both (Ādam and his wife) cried out: ‘Our Lord! We have wronged ourselves. If You do not forgive us and do not have mercy on us, we shall surely be among the losers.” (Q.7:23)

Two things can be deduced here: One, they both showed remorse, and two, they exposed their dire need for Allāh’s forgiveness and mercy. Making التوسل in this manner is one of the most pleasing deeds to Allāh because it shows one’s utmost humility and weakness in front of the ultimate power of Allāh.

Another example is the case of Prophet Zakariyyah عليه السلام when he was in dire need of an heir to inherit him and continue with his Da’wah. He prayed to Allāh, using his physical weakness due to old age, as well as his fears as التَّوَسُّلُ. He said:

قَالَ رَبِّ إِنِّي وَهَنَ الْعَظْمُ مِنِّي وَاشْتَعَلَ الرَّأْسُ شَيْبًا وَلَمْ أَكُن بِدُعَائِكَ رَبِّ شَقِيًّا وَإِنِّي خِفْتُ الْمَوَالِيَ مِن وَرَائِي وَكَانَتِ امْرَأَتِي عَاقِرًا فَهَبْ لِي مِن لَّدُنكَ وَلِيًّا يَرِثُنِي وَيَرِثُ مِنْ آلِ يَعْقُوبَ ۖ وَاجْعَلْهُ رَبِّ رَضِيا

He said, “My Lord, indeed my bones have weakened, and my head has filled with white, and never have I been in my supplication to You, my Lord, unhappy. And indeed, I fear the successors after me, and my wife has been barren, so give me from Yourself an heir. Who will inherit me and inherit from thefamily of Jacob. And make him, my Lord, pleasing (to You.)” (Q. 19-4-6)

READ ALSO:

A third example is that of Prophet Yūnus عليه السلام who abandoned his people even before Allāh commanded him to leave. As a punishment, Allāh got him trapped in the belly of a whale until he cried out using his remorse and weakness as التَّوَسُّلُ. Allāh says:

وَذَا النُّونِ إِذ ذَّهَبَ مُغَاضِبًا فَظَنَّ أَن لَّن نَّقْدِرَ عَلَيْهِ فَنَادَىٰ فِي الظُّلُمَاتِ أَن لَّا إِلَٰهَ إِلَّا أَنتَ سُبْحَانَكَ إِنِّي كُنتُ مِنَ الظَّالِمِينَ

And (mention) the man of the fish, when he went off in anger and thought that We would not decree anything upon him. And he called out within the darknesses, “There is no deity except You; exalted are You. Indeed, I havebeen of the wrongdoers.” (Q.21:87)

A fourth example was when Prophet Nūh عليه السلام was belied and threatened by his people, and he invoked Allāh, using his distressed condition as التَّوَسُّلُ to Him. Allāh says:

كَذَّبَتْ قَبْلَهُمْ قَوْمُ نُوحٍ فَكَذَّبُوا عَبْدَنَا وَقَالُوا مَجْنُونٌ وَازْدُجِرْ فَدَعَا رَبَّهُ أَنِّي مَغْلُوبٌ فَانتَصِرْ

“The people of Noah denied before them, and they denied Our servant and said, “A madman,” and he was repelled. So he invoked his Lord, “Indeed, I am overpowered, so help.” (Q.54:9-10)

From the hadīth, we find the narration by Shaddād bn ‘Aws as a very relevant example here. The Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم said:

سَيِّدُ الِاسْتِغْفَارِ أَنْ تَقُولَ اللَّهُمَّ أَنْتَ رَبِّي لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا أَنْتَ خَلَقْتَنِي وَأَنَا عَبْدُكَ وَأَنَا عَلَى عَهْدِكَ وَوَعْدِكَ مَا اسْتَطَعْتُ أَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنْ شَرِّ مَا صَنَعْتُ أَبُوءُ لَكَ بِنِعْمَتِكَ عَلَيَّ وَأَبُوءُ لَكَ بِذَنْبِي فَاغْفِرْ لِي فَإِنَّهُ لَا يَغْفِرُ الذُّنُوبَ إِلَّا أَنْتَ

“The greatest form of seeking Allāh’s forgiveness is to say, ‘O Allāh, You are my lord, there’s no deity but You. You are my Creator, and I am Your servant. You…forgive me. No one forgives sins except You”

In summary, it is permissible to invoke Allāh with prayers like, “Yā Allāh! Grant my request because none but You can grant it.” Or “pave a way for me out of this predicament because I am weak and incapable of anything.” etc

This is why we say the following prayer in our Qunūt:

ونؤمن بك ونتوكل عليك ، أنت الغني ونحن الفقراء إليك ، أنت القوي ونحن الضعفاء إليك

“… We believe in You and rely on You. You’re the Self-Sufficient and we are in dire need of Your wealth. You’re the Powerful, and we are weak unto thee. . . ”
[08:16, 21/10/2022] Sirnucy Lafiagi: iv. Making Tawassul with righteous deeds: This is another form of permissible invocation sanctioned by the Prophet ﷺ. As Muslims, we firmly believe that all our deeds, whether good or bad are being recorded by angelic scribes who have been assigned by Allāh to do so. Allāh says:

وَإِنَّ عَليكُمْ لَحافِظِينَ كِرامًا كاتِبِين يَعْلَمُونَ ما تَفْعَلُون

“And most surely, there are keepers over you; honourable scribes; they know all that ye do.”

أَمْ يَحْسَبُونَ أَنَّا لَا نَسْمَعُ سِرَّهُمْ وَنَجْوَاهُمْ ۚ بَلَىٰ وَرُسُلُنَا لَدَيْهِمْ يَكْتُبُون

“Or do they think that We do not know what they conceal and their secret discourses? Nay! Our Apostles are with them writing down (their deeds).

مَّا يَلْفِظُ مِن قَوْلٍ إِلَّا لَدَيْهِ رَقِيب عَتِيد

“He utters not a word, but there is with him a watcher at hand.” (Q. 50:18)

The implication of the verses quoted above is that none of our deeds is done in vain. They are all documented in a divine record book by perfect writers who can never make mistakes. It is this same record that shall be brought before every being on the day of resurrection as a proof for or against.

These deeds are credited into our respective SAVINGS ACCOUNT with Allāh, the Most High. He observes us closely, and considers our requests before Him based on our piety, sincerity and uprightness. Although sometimes, He ignores all of those and blesses us anyways, despite our gross inadequacies. Such is the incomprehensible nature of Allāh. يَفعلُ ما يَشاء (He does what He wills). He is فَعَّالٌ لِما يُريد.

When Prophet Yūnus عليه السلام invoked Allāh from the belly of the whale in which he was trapped, Allah says:

“Had he not been one of those that glorify (my exalted name), he would have been trapped in its belly till the day of resurrection.” (Q. 37:143-144)

What this implies is that, Yūnus benefitted from his previous deeds. Imagine if he had nothing in his account of deeds with Allāh? Could he have been saved from this calamity?

It is for this reason that it is permitted for a Muslim to occasionally draw from this account whenever he is in need. It is similar to taking loan from a cooperative society or bank where one keeps money for the rainy day. However, one fundamental difference between this aspect and the cooperative/bank example is that in the former, drawing such loans does not diminish nor exhaust one’s deeds/rewards لا في الدنيا ولا في الآخرة (neither in this world, nor in the hereafter).

A Muslim can consistently invoke Allāh, using his good deeds as الوسيلة: means. For instance, one can say,

اللهم إني أسألك بإيماني بك، وبتوكلي عليك، وبثقتي بك، وببري لوالدي، وبأدائي الأمانة، وما أشبه ذلك

“Ya Allah! I ask Thee with my firm belaying You, my reliance on You, my trust in You, my obedience to my parents, my trustworthiness, et cetera.”

The evidence for this is found in Sahīh Al-Bukhārī in a long hadīth popularly known as حديث أصحاب الغار “hadīth of the companions of the cave/hole”. In summary, three people were trapped in a cave where they had hidden because of wind and downpour. No sooner than they entered the cave had a huge stone rolled from top of the mountain and blocked the entrance. So, after the rains had stopped, each of them had to invoke Allāh, using his good deeds as means of drawing closer to Him.

The first man used his obedience and servitude to his parents as الوسيلة; the second man used his leaving of Zinā for the sake of Allah; and the third man used his trustworthiness. In the end, all were saved.

In summary, it is proper for a Muslim to pray to Allāh saying something like, “I have just offered Subh prayer for Your sake, kindly grant my request.” Or “Accept my request because I have fasted/am fasting for your sake.” Or “save me from this calamity because of the Sadaqah which I gave this morning to the less privileged.” Or “make my children righteous because I was/am righteous to my parents.”, et cetera.

Dr. Sanusi Lafiagi is a lecturer in Department of Islamic Studies, Al-Hikmah University Ilorin

Advertisement

Opinion

Tinubu’s Buharization of NNPC By Farooq Kperogi

Published

on

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and former President Muhammadu Buhari

Tinubu’s Buharization of NNPC by Farooq Kperogi

After the sustained, unwarranted personal attacks I endured for eight years from northerners for unswervingly calling out what I called the “embarrassingly undisguised Arewacentricity of Buhari’s appointments” in a February 2, 2019, column titled “Even Ahmadu Bello Would Be Ashamed of Buhari’s Arewacentricity,” I promised that I would look the other way if a southern president returned the favor after Buhari’s tenure.

But promises made in the heat of disillusionment often crumble under the weight of principle.

Ironically, this column was inspired by a well-regarded Yoruba supporter of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu who is worried, in fact embarrassed, by the optics of what he says is Tinubu’s relentless Yorubacentric take-over of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC).

His concern wasn’t just partisan discomfort; it was a profound unease about how this nepotistic approach undermines national cohesion.

I frankly hadn’t been paying attention to the internal dynamics at the NNPC, but the acquaintance pointed out that Yoruba people now occupy major positions at the NNPC and that a certain (person) is “being proposed as GMD after Mele Kyari’s term expires” early next year.

I haven’t independently confirmed the accuracy of this claim but given the closeness of the source of information to people in the circles of power, it’s probably best to not dismiss this with the wave of the hand.

His concern is that Tinubu, from the Southwest, is already the minister of petroleum. Senator Heineken Lokpobiri, the Minister of State for Petroleum and Chairman of the NNPC, is from the South-South. Chief Pius Akinyelure from the Southwest is NNPC’s Non-Executive Board Chairman.

READ ALSO:

The head of the NNPC Upstream Investment Management Services (NUIMS), Mr. Bala Wunti, my acquaintance pointed out, has been replaced by one Seyi Omotowa. Gbenga Komolafe is the chief executive officer of the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC), making him the highest-ranking upstream regulator.

“If a Yoruba man were to be the GMD, another Yoruba man is the Chairman, and yet another Yoruba man is the regulator, that’s extreme lopsidedness,” and other parts of Nigeria would be justified to feel uncomfortable, my acquaintance said.

As with issues of this nature, the reality may be more complex that the surface-level impressions that I have been presented with. Of the 12-member non-executive Board of Directors, I counted at least four names that I recognize as northern, and that includes Kyari, the outgoing GMD.

The 7-member Senior Management Team on NNPC’s website has three northerners (if Kyari is included). That seems fair. Plus, Buhari actually appointed many of the Yoruba people in high places at the NNPC. By these metrics, one might argue that there’s a semblance of balance.

However, Tinubu’s broader public image tells a different story. His administration is rapidly cementing a reputation for Yorubacentric provincialism. Like the late Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, who governed Nigeria as if he were still a Katsina governor, Tinubu appears to be governing Nigeria as though he were still the governor of Lagos.

Just like Yar’adua was elected a Nigerian president but operated like a Katsina governor in Abuja, Tinubu is also, so far, a Nigerian president only in name. His mindset is still that of the governor of Lagos.

With a few notable (and in some cases unavoidable) exceptions, Tinubu’s government is largely the re-enactment of his time as the governor of Lagos. It is, for all practical purposes, an unabashed Lagos-centric Yorubacracy.

To be fair, though, with the possible exception of Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration, all civilian regimes since 1999 have been insular ethnocracies.

My source reminded me of a viral social media post I wrote on January 14, 2019, titled “New IGP: Why Progressive Northerners Should be Embarrassed” where I gave four reasons for being insistently censorious of Buhari’s Arewacentric appointments in response to southerners who asked why I was bothered since I was a northern Muslim who was “favored” by such appointments—“favored,” that is, on the emotional and symbolic plane.

READ ALSO:

I pointed out that I criticized similar such parochial appointments by previous presidents from the South and that it would be hypocritical to look the other way because I was now “favored” by such appointments.

I said people from my region and religion won’t always be in power, and I wanted to be able to stand on a firm moral pedestal when I criticize future presidents who replicate Buhari’s (and previous presidents’) provincialism.

Most importantly, I said, I was personally embarrassed by Buhari’s insularity and that every progressive northerner should be. I described it as the sort of embarrassment you feel when your best friend who thinks highly of your mother visits you in your home and your mother, during a family dinner, gives you a considerably bigger food portion size and choicer pieces of meat than your friend.

“You feel like screaming: ‘Mom, I know you love me, but you’re embarrassing me by showing overt preferential treatment to me in the presence of my friend’,” I wrote.

The Yoruba acquaintance of mine who alerted me to the creeping Yoruba-centric take-over of the NNPC said he was doing so out of a feeling of the same sense of embarrassment that inspired my rage against Buhari’s appointments that favored the North unfairly, especially in the areas of security.

Tinubu is doing in the economy sector what Buhari did in the security sector. The minister of finance, the governor of the central bank, and every other consequential agency in finance is headed by a Yoruba man. I am not sure Nigeria has ever seen this level of extreme, state-sanctioned ethnocentric domination of a critical segment of national life.

Appointing another Yoruba individual as the head of the NNPC would complete what many already perceive as the ethnic capture of Nigeria’s economic nerve center. It would not only cement Tinubu’s image as an insensitive ethnocrat but also exacerbate public discontent and foster deeper divisions in an already polarized nation.

If Tinubu is unaware of this burgeoning perception, he needs to awaken to its reality. Leadership is not just about policies and actions; it’s also about managing optics and inspiring confidence in a nation’s collective identity.

In a September 5, 2015, column titled “Buhari is Losing the Symbolic War,” where I railed against the exclusion of Igbo people in Buhari’s first appointments, I wrote:

“Symbolism isn’t the same thing as substance. Appointing people to governmental positions does nothing to improve anybody’s lot—except, perhaps, the people so appointed and their immediate families.

“Jonathan’s disastrous 5-year presidency couldn’t even bring basic infrastructure like boreholes to his hometown of Otueke, yet his people derive vicarious satisfaction from the fact of his being Nigeria’s former president.

“Human beings are animated by a multiplicity of impulses, including rational and emotional impulses, both of which are legitimate. When we turn on our rational impulses, we may ask: What would appointing an Igbo man as SGF, for instance, do to Igbo people? The answer is ‘nothing.’

“But we are more than rational beings: we are also emotional beings. That’s why people are invested in symbolism. Appointing someone from the southeast or the deep south is merely a symbolic gesture, but it inspires a sense of inclusion in the minds of many people from that region; it serves as a symbolic conduit through which people vicariously connect with the government.”

This cycle of ethnic favoritism must end if Nigeria is to realize its full potential as a nation. To grow and thrive, we need leaders who can transcend the narrow confines of ethnocracy.

We need leadership that embraces diversity and inclusion, not as buzzwords but as guiding principles for governance. Only then can we begin to heal the fractures that divide us and build a nation that serves all its citizens, regardless of ethnicity or region.

Farooq Kperogi is a renowned Nigerian columnist and United States-based Professor of Media Studies.

Tinubu’s Buharization of NNPC by Farooq Kperogi

Continue Reading

Opinion

Ademola Lookman showed Davido and Kemi Badenoch that wisdom is not by age – Omokri

Published

on

Reno Omokri, Ademola Lookman, Davido and Kemi Badenoch

Ademola Lookman showed Davido and Kemi Badenoch that wisdom is not by age – Omokri

Recently, the singer David Adeleke was given a global stage to do whatever he wanted and deliver any message.

Sadly, Mr. Adeleke used the opportunity to speak in an American accent. Not only that, he used that American accent to talk down on Nigeria and tell the world not to invest in Nigeria because, as he put it, Nigeria’s “economy is in shambles”.

Coincidentally, a month after his faux pas, Kemi Badenoch, probably inspired by Davido, used her British accent to talk down Nigeria, calling us “a very poor country” where the police rob citizens.

But the interesting thing about her own case is that the next day, the BBC featured a panel of Conservative Party big shots, and one of them, Albie Amankona, a party chieftain from Chiswick, who is also a celebrity broadcaster, said, and this is a direct quote:

“If you are a Brexiteer, and you are saying we need to be expanding our global trade beyond the European Union, we want to be looking at emerging markets for growth, don’t slag off one of the fastest growing economies in Africa.”

Is it not strange that it took the BBC and a British politician to promote Nigeria as one of the fastest-growing economies in Africa?

And just when we thought it was all bad news, God gave us a breath of fresh air in the youthful Ademola Lookman, who used the global podium granted to him by his winning the 2024 African Footballer of the Year award to promote and project Nigeria and the Lukumi Yoruba language to the world.

READ ALSO:

Wisdom is not by age. If not, Ademola Lookman, who is just twenty-seven, will not have displayed greater wisdom than David Adeleke, who is thirty-two, and Kemi Badenoch, at forty-four.

Mr. Lookman proved that the age of Methuselah has nothing to do with the wisdom of Solomon.

And it is not as though other ethnicities with global icons do not also project Nigeria. They do.

Dr. Mrs. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala spoke Igbo on the podium of the WTO in Geneva. In terms of prestige, she is FAR above Lookman.

My campaign is not for the Lukumi Yoruba alone. It is for all sub-Saharan Black Africans to learn to speak their language and not use ability to speak English or another colonial language as a measure of intelligence.

Besides Lukumi Yoruba and Hausa, every other Nigerian language, including Fulfulde, is gradually dying out.

General Buhari is half Fulani and half Kanuri. Yet, he cannot speak either Fuifulde or Kanuri. But he speaks Hausa and English.

Fact-check me: In 2012, UNESCO declared Igbo an endangered language.

However, the Lukumi Yoruba are to be commended for their affirmative actions to advance their language and culture.

Let me give you an example. All six Governors of the Southwest bear full Lukumi names: Jide Sanwa-Olu, Seyi Makinde, Dapo Abiodun, Ademola Adeleke, Abiodun Oyebanji, and Orighomisan Aiyedatiwa.

No other zone in Nigeria has all its governors bearing ethnic Nigerian names as first and second names. They either bear Arabic or European names as first names or even first and second names.

If we truly want to be the Giant of Africa, we must take affirmative steps to preserve our language and culture so we can have children like Ademola Lookman.

Teach your language to your children before you teach them English. They will learn English at school. Being multilingual is scientifically proven to boost intelligence.

Fact-check me: In the U.S., Latino kids do not speak English until they start school. They learn Spanish as a first language.

Even if you relocate to the UK, the best you can be is British. You can never be English. And if your choice of Japa is the U.S., the highest you can be is an American citizen. You will never become a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant WASP.

Your power lies in balancing ancient and modern, Western and African, English (or other colonial languages) and your native tongue.

That is the way to reverse language erosion, like the Lukumi Yoruba.

Ademola Lookman showed Davido and Kemi Badenoch that wisdom is not by age – Omokri

Continue Reading

Opinion

Kemi Badenoch’s Hate for Nigeria – Femi Fani-Kayode

Published

on

Femi Fani-Kayode

Kemi Badenoch’s Hate for Nigeria – Femi Fani-Kayode

“I find it interesting that everyone defines me as a Nigerian. I identify less with the country than with my specific ethnic group. I have nothing in common with the people from the north of the country, the Boko Haram, where Islamism is. Being Yoruba is my true identity and I refuse to be lumped with the northern people of Nigeria who were our ethnic enemies, all in the name of being called a Nigerian”- @KemiBadenoch.

Dangerous rhetoric

Kemi Badenoch, MP, the leader of the British Conservative Party and Opposition in the @UKParliament, has refused to stop at just denigrating our country but has gone a step further by seeking to divide us on ethnic lines.

She claims that she never regarded herself as being a Nigerian but rather a Yoruba and that she never identified with the people from the Northern part of our country who she collectively describes as being “Boko Haram Islamists” and “terrorists”.

This is dangerous rhetoric coming from an impudent and ignorant foreign leader who knows nothing about our country, who does not know her place and who insists on stirring up a storm that she cannot contain and that may eventually consume her.

It is rather like saying that she identifies more with the English than she does with the Scots and the Welsh whom she regards as nothing more than homicidal and murderous barbarians that once waged war against her ethnic English compatriots!

All this coming from a young lady of colour that is a political leader in a multi-ethnic, multi-religious and multi-cultural country that lays claim to being the epitome of decency and civilisation! What a strange and inexplicable contradiction this is.

READ ALSO:

Her intentions are malevolent and insidious and her objective, outside of ridiculing and mocking us, is to divide us and bring us to our knees.

I am constrained to ask, what on earth happened to this creature in her youth and why does she hate Nigeria with such passion?

Did something happen to her when she lived here which she has kept secret?

Kemi Badenoch’s Hate for Nigeria – Femi Fani-Kayode

Continue Reading

Trending