metro
CCT chair removal: Civil groups sue Tinubu, Akpabio, others
CCT chair removal: Civil groups sue Tinubu, Akpabio, others
President Bola Tinubu, Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, and Senate President Godswill Akpabio, have been taken to court over the alleged unlawful removal of Justice Danladi Umar as Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT).
The lawsuit, filed by two civil society groups, Community Rescue Initiative and Toro Concerned Citizens Relief Foundation, alongside an Abuja-based lawyer, Comrade Nasir Bala, claims the removal process bypassed constitutional provisions and due process.
The plaintiffs are praying the court to restrain the Clerk of the National Assembly from transmitting to Tinubu, the concurrent resolution of the Senate and House of Representatives which removed Umar as Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal. They are also praying the court to stop the President from giving effect to the resolution of the two chambers of the National Assembly, on the grounds that clear provisions of the law, especially the 1999 Constitution, were not followed in the purported removal of the CCT boss.
Among others, the plaintiffs are seeking seven declarative reliefs against the President and the other defendants. The suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1796/2024, was instituted on behalf of the plaintiffs by Mahmoud M. Maidoki Esq., A.G Salisu Esq., Jibrin S. Jibrin Baq., and Abubakar S. Idris Bag.
READ ALSO:
- New President-General of Ohanaeze Chukwu to reign for 27 days
- Economy: I derive no pleasure in causing Nigerians pain, says Tinubu
- More trouble for Simon Ekpa as Finland freezes his assets
In faulting the action of the National Assembly, the plaintiffs asked the Federal High Court to determine whether the provisions of Sections 1(1) and (3) , 6(5), 153 (1) (e) & (i) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) as well as Paragraph 13 (a) (vii) and (b) of the Third Schedule thereof, the purported removal of the chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal by the 4th Defendant is illegal, void, unconstitutional and of no effect whatsoever same having been made pursuant to the provisions of section 157 (1) of the 1999 Constitution or any other law for that matter.
They also asked the court to determine whether the purported concurrence by the 6th Defendant with the decision/resolution of the 4th Defendant purportedly removing the chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal taken at 4th Defendant’s plenary of the 20th November 2024 or any other date for that matter which said concurrence was taken at the 6th Defendant’s Plenary of 26th November 2024 is illegal, void, unconstitutional and of no effect whatsoever same having been founded on a faulty legal foundation and in breach/violation of section 22 (3) of the Code of Conduct Bureau & Tribunal Act and paragraph 17 (3) of the 5th Schedule of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).
The plaintiffs noted that if the above questions are answered in the affirmative, the court should declare that by virtue of the provisions of Sections 1(1) and (3), 6(6), 153 (1) (e) & (i) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) as well as Paragraph 13 (a) (vii) and (b) of the Third Schedule thereof, the purported removal of the Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal by the 4th Defendant is illegal, void, unconstitutional and of no effect whatsoever, same having been made pursuant to the provisions of section 157 (1) of the 1999 Constitution or any other law for that matter.
Justice James Omotosho, who is to adjudicate in the matter, has ordered that the process in respect be served by substituted means through pasting at the notice board of the court, the APC secretariat and Office of Secretary to the Government of the Federation.
The suit has been adjourned to January 14, 2025, for hearing.
CCT chair removal: Civil groups sue Tinubu, Akpabio, others
![]()
metro
Grand Chief Imam Denies Involvement in Prayer Event for Oyo APC Governorship Candidate
Grand Chief Imam Denies Involvement in Prayer Event for Oyo APC Governorship Candidate
OYO – The Grand Chief Imam of Oyo Land, Sheikh Al-Imam Barrister Bilal Husayn Akinola Akeugberu, has distanced himself from a recent prayer gathering reportedly organised in Oyo Town in honour of the All Progressives Congress (APC) governorship candidate in Oyo State, Senator Sharafadeen Abiodun Alli.
In a statement issued on Wednesday by his Director of Media and Publicity, Mallam Ibrahim Agunbiade, the Islamic leader said he was neither informed, invited nor represented at the event where his name was allegedly associated with the gathering.
The statement noted that while the Grand Chief Imam appreciated Senator Alli’s thanksgiving visit to Oyo Town and acknowledged his expression of gratitude to Allah and the people of Oyo State following his emergence as the APC flag bearer, such engagements should be conducted with proper consultation and respect for established religious leadership.
According to the statement, other recognised Islamic leaders in Oyo Land were also reportedly unaware of the prayer programme.
“The Grand Chief Imam of Oyo Land, Sheikh Bilal Akinola Akeugberu, was neither informed, invited, nor represented at any prayer gathering where his name was reportedly associated with the event,” the statement said.
The office of the cleric stressed that Islam places significant importance on accountability, consultation and respect for legitimate leadership, warning against the use of the names of religious leaders and institutions without prior communication and approval.
It further expressed concern that the incident was not an isolated case, alleging that there had been previous instances in which announcements and representations involving Islamic institutions were made without the knowledge of the recognised leadership.
The statement warned that such actions could create confusion and misrepresentation within the Muslim community.
Consequently, the office cautioned individuals and organisations against impersonating or falsely presenting themselves as representatives of the Grand Chief Imam without official authorisation.
“The Office therefore cautions individuals and organisations against impersonating, misrepresenting, or presenting themselves as representatives of the Grand Chief Imam when no official mandate has been given,” the statement added.
Despite the controversy, the Grand Chief Imam reaffirmed his commitment to promoting unity, peaceful coexistence and collaboration with political leaders, religious organisations and community stakeholders for the development of Oyo State and Nigeria.
The statement also called for greater respect for traditional and religious institutions in Oyo Land, noting that such structures have played vital roles in maintaining peace, harmony and social stability in the ancient town.
Grand Chief Imam Denies Involvement in Prayer Event for Oyo APC Governorship Candidate
![]()
metro
Iyabo Obasanjo Secures PDP Senate Ticket After Party Switch
Iyabo Obasanjo Secures PDP Senate Ticket After Party Switch
Former Nigerian senator, Iyabo Obasanjo, has reportedly secured the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) senatorial ticket for Ogun Central shortly after rejoining the party, marking a major political comeback ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Reports from party sources in Ogun State indicate that the former lawmaker emerged as the PDP candidate following her return to the opposition party after a brief period in the All Progressives Congress (APC).
Her return to the PDP came days after she resigned from the ruling APC, citing alleged internal party disagreements, lack of inclusion, and what she described as disrespect within the party structure.
Party insiders say her emergence as the PDP senatorial flagbearer reflects ongoing realignments within the opposition party in Ogun State, as political actors position themselves ahead of the next election cycle.
READ ALSO:
- P-Square Feud: Peter Okoye’s Absence Delays Jude Okoye’s N1.3bn Fraud Trial
- 2027: I’ll Negotiate With Bandits Who Seek Peace, Fight Those Who Choose Violence — Peter Obi
- Ivory Coast Footballer Arrested Over Spot-Fixing Allegations
Iyabo Obasanjo, daughter of former President Olusegun Obasanjo, previously served as senator representing Ogun Central between 2007 and 2011, during which she was active in legislative debates and governance issues at the national level.
Her return to frontline politics has been described by supporters as a strategic comeback, with expectations that she will leverage her experience as a former federal lawmaker and former state commissioner for health.
The development is expected to intensify political competition in Ogun Central Senatorial District, where parties are already strengthening structures ahead of the 2027 elections.
The PDP is yet to officially release a comprehensive list of its confirmed candidates for the forthcoming general elections, but internal party sources suggest more nominations will be finalised and announced in the coming weeks as preparations continue nationwide.
Iyabo Obasanjo Secures PDP Senate Ticket After Party Switch
![]()
metro
P-Square Feud: Peter Okoye’s Absence Delays Jude Okoye’s N1.3bn Fraud Trial
P-Square Feud: Peter Okoye’s Absence Delays Jude Okoye’s N1.3bn Fraud Trial
The N1.3 billion fraud trial involving former P-Square manager Jude Okoye suffered a setback on Wednesday after his younger brother and key prosecution witness, Peter Okoye, failed to appear before the Federal High Court in Ikoyi, Lagos, for cross-examination.
Jude Okoye and his company, Northside Music Limited, are facing a seven-count charge filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over allegations involving N1.38 billion, $1 million and £34,537.59. Both defendants have pleaded not guilty to the charges.
At the resumed hearing before Justice Alexander Owoeye, EFCC counsel G.C. Akaogu informed the court that Peter Okoye, popularly known as Mr P, could not attend the proceedings because his flight from Abuja to Lagos had been rescheduled.
According to Akaogu, the development was communicated to the defence team before the commencement of the hearing.
However, defence counsel, Clement Onwuewunor (SAN), disputed the explanation, telling the court that information available to the defence suggested that Peter was already in Lagos and had not travelled as claimed by the prosecution.
READ ALSO:
- Ivory Coast Footballer Arrested Over Spot-Fixing Allegations
- ‘They Assigned One Girl to 3 or 4 Men Daily’: Survivor Recounts 20 Days of Rape, Torture in Bandits’ Den
- BREAKING: UK Court Clears Diezani Alison-Madueke of All Bribery Charges
The senior advocate further lamented that he had cancelled other professional engagements outside Lagos in preparation for the hearing, only to be informed of the witness’s absence.
Following submissions from both parties, Justice Owoeye adjourned the matter until September 21, 2026, for the continuation of trial and Peter Okoye’s cross-examination.
The high-profile case stems from a petition filed by Peter Okoye against his elder brother, accusing him of financial misconduct and the alleged diversion of revenues generated from the former P-Square music catalogue.
Peter had earlier testified that concerns about the management of the group’s finances emerged after the brothers reunited following their initial split. According to him, investigations into the operations of companies linked to the group’s business affairs prompted him to report the matter to the anti-graft agency.
During his testimony, Peter alleged that certain royalty payments and music revenues were channelled through entities that were unknown to him, leading to questions about the handling of earnings generated by the duo’s music business.
The trial has attracted significant public attention due to revelations made during earlier proceedings. Under cross-examination, Peter reportedly admitted that he was a co-signatory to the bank account of Northside Entertainment Limited, a development that defence lawyers argued contradicted suggestions that Jude had sole control over the company’s finances.
The defence has continued to challenge aspects of Peter’s testimony, relying on financial documents and corporate records presented before the court.
Despite the allegations, Jude Okoye has consistently denied any wrongdoing and has maintained his innocence since the commencement of the trial.
The court is expected to hear further evidence when proceedings resume in September, with Peter Okoye anticipated to return to the witness box for continued cross-examination.
The case remains one of the most closely watched legal disputes in Nigeria’s entertainment industry, given its connection to the long-running P-Square feud and the involvement of two of Africa’s most successful music stars.
P-Square Feud: Peter Okoye’s Absence Delays Jude Okoye’s N1.3bn Fraud Trial
![]()
-
Politics3 days agoBREAKING: Court Orders Deregistration of ADC, Four Other Political Parties
-
News2 days agoShot by Bandits, Saved by Soldiers: Dramatic Rescue of General’s Wife in Katsina
-
metro2 days agoDrugged, Beaten, Forced to Sleep with 60 Men Daily: Teenage Girl’s Harrowing Escape from Lagos Traffickers
-
Politics2 days agoBREAKING: Kenneth Okonkwo Withdraws Support for Atiku
-
Opinion2 days agoIf Nigeria Is Not Divided, We Will Never Have Any Sense in the North
-
metro11 hours agoBREAKING: UK Court Clears Diezani Alison-Madueke of All Bribery Charges
-
Politics3 days agoJust in: ADC Formally Unveils Atiku-Amaechi Presidential Ticket
-
Politics2 days agoAtiku Camp Rejects Court-Ordered ADC Deregistration, Alleges Plot to Cripple Opposition
