'We'll Meet at The Field' – Amaechi Replies Tinubu, Vows to Match Ruling Party's Campaign Tactics - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

‘We’ll Meet at The Field’ – Amaechi Replies Tinubu, Vows to Match Ruling Party’s Campaign Tactics

Published

on

Amaechi: Atiku will restore electricity subsidy if elected in 2027
Vice Presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) for the 2027 election, Rotimi Amaechi

‘We’ll Meet at The Field’ – Amaechi Replies Tinubu, Vows to Match Ruling Party’s Campaign Tactics

The Vice Presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) for the 2027 election, Rotimi Amaechi, has responded to President Bola Tinubu’s recent remarks that anyone seeking to remove him from office must be ready to “wrestle” him until the end, declaring that the opposition is prepared to meet the President “at the field” and match whatever the ruling party brings to the electoral contest. Amaechi made the remarks during an interview on Channels Television’s Politics Today while reacting to the controversy surrounding comments by the Archbishop Emeritus of Abuja, Cardinal John Onaiyekan. The former Minister of Transportation, who contested against Tinubu for the APC presidential ticket in 2022 before defecting to the ADC, dismissed the President’s confidence, stating that the real test will be at the ballot box. “Let the president continue to tell the public that he would win the election at all cost until we get to the field. Whatever the president wants us to do at the field, we will do it. I’m not worried about what he wants to do. We will meet at the field,” Amaechi declared.

Members of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Nigeria had on Tuesday last week met President Tinubu at the State House. During the meeting, Tinubu reaffirmed his determination to seek re-election in 2027, insisting that politics was a contest in which everyone had equal opportunities. “I asked for this job. I’m in it. Those who will take it from me will try. They will try. All is fair in politics, and it’s equal opportunity,” Tinubu said. He also defended the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), describing it as neutral, and added: “I’m ready, but I won’t give them a red carpet. I won’t offer them the leash to tie me and rope me. No, we wrestle each other to the finishing point.”

Amaechi took issue with Tinubu’s assertion that “all is fair in politics,” questioning whether the President’s remark undermines the credibility of the electoral process. The ADC chieftain argued that Tinubu should have used the opportunity of the meeting with the Catholic bishops to reassure Nigerians of a free and fair election rather than making ambiguous statements. “Look at the president’s statement that all is fair in politics. If a thug takes a gun and shoots me where I’m voting, is it fair?” Amaechi asked. “When the president has said to you all is fair in politics, when the Catholic Church is crying about the possibility of having an election that may not be fair, all the president needs to do is to reassure the country that APC, PDP, and ADC will slug it out on an even field, that it will be a free and fair election, let the best team wins.”

READ ALSO:

In a further show of political combativeness, Amaechi warned that his camp would be prepared to match any attacks from the Tinubu administration during the campaign season. “By the time we start the campaign, we will abuse anybody who is ready to abuse anybody. We will descend as low as they want. The president said all is fair in politics; we will descend to that level if that is what they want,” the former Rivers State governor declared. However, Amaechi added that he is currently focused on mourning his late mother and suspended his period of mourning to address what he considered disrespectful comments directed at the Catholic Church by officials of the Presidency. “I came here simply to say, please ask the President to stop insulting the Catholic Church, to stop insulting Christians. They should respect God and respect the Christian faith. They should stop insulting Christians,” Amaechi said.

The ADC vice presidential candidate also came to the defence of Archbishop Emeritus of Abuja, Cardinal John Onaiyekan, who recently came under fire from presidential aides after revealing details of the bishops’ closed-door meeting with Tinubu. Amaechi accused the Presidency of showing disrespect for the Catholic Church and the Christian faith by deploying what he called “attack dogs” to intimidate Cardinal Onaiyekan. “What the president and his men are doing is insulting my faith. They are insulting the Catholic Church,” Amaechi said. He further argued that the Tinubu administration would never have reacted the same way if the Sultan of Sokoto, Muhammadu Sa’ad Abubakar III, had made similar remarks. “If the Sultan had confronted the President, would they have insulted him? We’ve been insulted because we are Christians,” Amaechi asserted. Amaechi maintained that Cardinal Onaiyekan was not aligned with any political party but was genuinely concerned about poverty, corruption, and the welfare of Nigerians. “Cardinal Onaiyekan himself supports nobody. The only thing that pains him is the level of indiscretion and poverty in the country and corruption. He worries about that,” Amaechi said.

Following the meeting with the President, Cardinal Onaiyekan had said Tinubu appeared determined to win the 2027 presidential election “by all means” and that the President disagreed with the bishops’ assessment of the country’s economic situation, insisting that conditions were improving despite the hardship being experienced by many Nigerians. According to the Cardinal, Tinubu’s response suggested that those around him were not giving him an accurate picture of the situation in the country. The Cardinal also said the bishops had no intention of engaging in a public exchange with government spokespersons, stating: “We have no response for them. We have spoken, and the only response we are waiting for is whether it is affecting the way they are governing.” He explained that the audience with President Tinubu was initiated after months of waiting for approval and was not intended as an evangelistic mission, but rather an opportunity to present the bishops’ concerns about governance and welfare of Nigerians. “We didn’t go there just as Catholic bishops pushing the Catholic agenda. No. We went there as people who are with the spiritual mandate to speak to anybody in the name of God,” Onaiyekan said.

Amaechi, who served as Minister of Transportation under former President Muhammadu Buhari, was one of the aspirants who contested the APC presidential primary election in 2022, losing the ticket to Tinubu. He later defected to the ADC and was selected as the running mate to former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, who will fly the ADC’s presidential ticket in the 2027 election. The ADC described the Atiku-Amaechi partnership as a “unity and rescue ticket” aimed at offering Nigerians an alternative platform ahead of the next general election. According to the ADC, Amaechi’s emergence followed broad consultations within the party and reflected his strong performance as runner-up in the party’s presidential primaries, as well as his extensive track record of service as Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, two-term Governor of Rivers State, and Minister of Transportation. The ADC ticket, which brings together two political heavyweights who were once rivals, is positioning itself as a formidable challenger to President Tinubu and the ruling APC in the upcoming election. Amaechi’s latest comments signal that the opposition is gearing up for a fiercely contested political battle.

‘We’ll Meet at The Field’ – Amaechi Replies Tinubu, Vows to Match Ruling Party’s Campaign Tactics

Loading

Politics

Ogun 2027: APC Highlights Adeola’s Projects, Challenges Adebutu

Published

on

Ogun 2027: APC Highlights Adeola’s Projects, Challenges Adebutu

Ogun 2027: APC Highlights Adeola’s Projects, Challenges Adebutu

The All Progressives Congress (APC) Student Affairs Committee of the Ogun State 2027 Campaign Council has challenged the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship candidate, Ladi Adebutu, to present his personal record of public service and verifiable achievements ahead of the 2027 Ogun State governorship election.

The committee said the forthcoming Ogun 2027 governorship election should be centred on ideas, policies, measurable achievements and the capacity of the candidates to address the needs of residents rather than political rhetoric, personal attacks or distractions.

The challenge was contained in a statement issued on Saturday by the committee’s chairman, Comrade Samson Ajasa Adeyemi.

Adeyemi urged Adebutu to bring his record to the table and allow voters to assess what he has personally contributed to the development of Ogun State, particularly in areas affecting students, teachers, young people, artisans, traders and other residents.

According to the APC committee, the election should provide an opportunity for the candidates to explain their previous public service records, policy proposals and plans for the state.

The committee specifically highlighted the activities and interventions of the APC governorship candidate, Senator Solomon Olamilekan Adeola, popularly known as Yayi, as examples of what it described as measurable constituency and community interventions.

It claimed that 5,513 Ogun students benefited from the third edition of Adeola’s scholarship and bursary programme in July 2026.

READ ALSO:

The committee also cited what it said were 53 constituency projects covering areas including roads, education, healthcare, security and commerce during the third anniversary of Adeola’s tenure.

It further claimed that the Oloja Yayi Market Support Fund provided ₦750 million in direct grants to 10,000 traders across Ogun State’s three senatorial districts.

The APC group said such interventions should be subjected to public scrutiny and compared with the records and programmes of other candidates in the 2027 Ogun governorship race.

Adeyemi challenged Adebutu to similarly identify projects, programmes or other measurable interventions he had personally undertaken or facilitated for the people of Ogun State.

He said the committee was not interested in achievements associated with family background or inherited business interests, but wanted the PDP candidate to present his own record of public service and contributions.

The chairman said the challenge was particularly important because students and other young people needed to understand what each candidate had done previously and what they intended to do if elected governor.

The APC committee also called for a campaign focused on issues affecting education, human capital development, infrastructure, economic empowerment and employment opportunities.

The latest exchange is part of the emerging political contest ahead of the 2027 Ogun State governorship election, with Adeola representing the APC and Adebutu representing the PDP.

Questions surrounding political experience, development records, policy proposals and campaign messaging are expected to feature prominently as the election approaches.

The debate has also included arguments over the relevance of ancestry and political identity in the governorship contest. In a separate intervention, APC chieftain Kayode Oladele had urged political parties to focus their campaigns on candidates’ records, policies and programmes rather than ancestry.

Oladele argued that the constitutional qualifications for a governorship candidate do not include belonging to a particular ancestral group or part of a state, while urging political parties to present alternative policies and programmes for voters to assess.

The APC Student Affairs Committee similarly said Ogun residents should be presented with sufficient information to compare the candidates’ records, programmes and development proposals.

The committee’s position, however, represents the campaign council’s political assessment and claims, which remain subject to verification and comparison with the records and policy positions presented by other candidates and political parties.

With the Ogun 2027 election still ahead, the emerging campaign rhetoric is increasingly shifting towards questions of experience, previous performance, development interventions and the policy direction each candidate intends to pursue if elected.

Ogun 2027: APC Highlights Adeola’s Projects, Challenges Adebutu

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

Barau Sacks Aide Over ‘Abba Must Go’ Social Media Posts

Published

on

Barau Sacks Aide Over ‘Abba Must Go’ Social Media Posts
Deputy President of the Senate, Senator Barau I. Jibrin

Barau Sacks Aide Over ‘Abba Must Go’ Social Media Posts

Deputy President of the Senate, Senator Barau I. Jibrin, has terminated the appointment of his Special Legislative Aide, Umar Alhassan, popularly known as King Indara, following social media posts calling for the removal of Kano State Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf.

Alhassan, a popular Kano-based TikToker, was removed from his position with effect from September 18, 2026, according to a statement issued by Barau’s Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, Shitu Madaki Kunchi.

The statement said the decision followed social media posts by Alhassan containing the phrase “Abba Must Go”, which Barau’s office described as an act of indiscipline and disrespect towards the Kano governor.

According to the statement, the posts were considered contrary to the values of respect and decorum expected from the office of the Deputy Senate President.

Barau’s office also said the action was inconsistent with the principles of the All Progressives Congress (APC), the party to which both Barau and Governor Yusuf belong.

“Accordingly, we announce his removal from the position of Special Legislative Assistant (SLA) in the office of the Deputy President of the Senate as of September 18, 2026,” the statement said.

Alhassan had reportedly published the “Abba Must Go” message on Facebook on Friday, alongside other political comments concerning the political situation in Kano.

In another post following the termination of his appointment, Alhassan reportedly stated that Kano belongs to Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, the former Kano governor and political figure associated with the Kwankwasiyya movement.

He also indicated that he remained a member of the APC, despite expressing support for Kwankwaso.

Barau, who represents Kano North Senatorial District, subsequently reaffirmed his commitment to the APC and called for support for the party across all levels.

The Deputy Senate President has been involved in efforts to strengthen the APC structure in Kano following Governor Yusuf’s move from the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP) to the ruling party.

READ ALSO:

Yusuf joined the APC in January 2026 after resigning from the NNPP, the platform on which he won the 2023 Kano State governorship election.

The governor’s movement into the APC brought him into the same political party as Barau and other prominent Kano politicians, while also changing the political alignments surrounding the state ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Barau had previously been associated with political discussions surrounding the Kano governorship, but his office has more recently maintained support for the APC structure and Governor Yusuf’s position within the party.

The termination of Alhassan’s appointment, however, was specifically linked by Barau’s office to the aide’s social media activity and the language used in the posts.

There was no announcement of criminal proceedings against Alhassan in connection with the posts.

The development has attracted attention because Alhassan is a well-known social media personality in Kano and had served in a legislative support role in the office of one of the National Assembly’s senior presiding officers.

His removal also illustrates the political sensitivities surrounding public statements by political appointees and legislative aides, particularly when such statements appear to conflict with the positions of the officials or institutions they serve.

The controversy comes at a time when political activity is increasing in Kano ahead of the 2027 elections, with different political actors positioning themselves within the APC and other political platforms.

Governor Yusuf’s defection to the APC has also altered the relationship between him and his former political allies in the NNPP and the Kwankwasiyya movement.

Kwankwaso, who backed Yusuf’s 2023 governorship campaign, is now associated with the African Democratic Congress (ADC) as part of the opposition political realignment ahead of the 2027 elections.

Alhassan’s reported reference to Kwankwaso after losing his appointment has therefore added another dimension to the political discussion surrounding Kano, although his stated APC membership remains his own position.

For now, the immediate consequence of the controversy is the termination of Alhassan’s appointment as a Special Legislative Aide to the Deputy President of the Senate.

Barau’s office has reiterated its commitment to the APC, while Alhassan has continued to express his political views on social media.

The development is expected to generate further discussion within Kano’s political circles as parties, elected officials and their supporters prepare for the next electoral cycle.

Barau Sacks Aide Over ‘Abba Must Go’ Social Media Posts

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

Keyamo Knocks Atiku for Addressing President Tinubu as ‘Bola’

Published

on

Keyamo Knocks Atiku for Addressing President Tinubu as ‘Bola’
Festus Keyamo, Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development

Keyamo Knocks Atiku for Addressing President Tinubu as ‘Bola’

Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, has criticised former Vice-President and African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar for repeatedly referring to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu simply as “Bola” during a press conference on Nigeria’s rising petrol prices and cost of living.

Keyamo described the reference as “very disrespectful and discourteous”, arguing that political disagreements should not diminish the dignity attached to the office of the President.

The minister made the comments in a post on his X account on Friday, September 18, 2026, shortly after Atiku addressed journalists in Abuja on fuel prices, palliatives, electricity costs and economic hardship.

Keyamo said Atiku should recognise that, regardless of political differences, the office of the President deserved to be accorded the appropriate respect.

“The continuous reference to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu … as ‘Bola’ is very disrespectful and discourteous,” Keyamo said.

He added that Atiku should understand that “no matter your differences with Mr President,” the presidential office should be accorded the dignity it deserves.

Keyamo also accused the former Vice-President of speaking from a position of personal grievance, saying the tone of his remarks “reeks of pain and bitterness in his heart”.

The minister further referred to Atiku’s recent comments about the ages of the two politicians, arguing that it was inconsistent for Atiku to describe Tinubu as older than himself while also addressing him by his first name.

The criticism came after Atiku used his press conference to call on Tinubu to take immediate measures to reduce the price of petrol and diesel and ease the economic pressure on Nigerians.

Atiku argued that the removal of the petrol subsidy in May 2023 had contributed to higher transportation, logistics, food and energy costs, with households, workers, farmers and businesses bearing the consequences.

He said rising fuel costs had effects far beyond filling stations because higher transportation and logistics expenses eventually feed into the prices of food and other goods.

READ ALSO:

Atiku urged Tinubu to reconsider the government’s approach and said the President should be willing to adopt a policy proposal capable of reducing petrol prices even if the idea originated from a political opponent.

“Bola Tinubu should not be ashamed to do what is necessary to lower the price of petrol simply because Atiku Abubakar proposed a government intervention,” he said.

He added that the President could rename the proposal or take credit for it if necessary, stressing that what mattered to him was for Nigerians to pay less for petrol.

Atiku also criticised the continued reliance on government palliatives to cushion the effects of economic hardship.

According to him, emergency assistance cannot substitute for policies that address the underlying causes of rising costs.

He argued that measures such as food distribution and cash support could provide temporary relief but would not restore Nigerians’ purchasing power if the costs of fuel, electricity, transportation and production continued to rise.

Atiku said the government’s economic performance should ultimately be assessed by whether ordinary Nigerians could afford essential goods and services, rather than by increases in government revenue or headline economic figures.

The ADC candidate also raised concerns over the planned phase-out of electricity subsidies from 2027, warning that another increase in energy costs could place additional pressure on households, small businesses and manufacturers.

He said businesses were already spending heavily on electricity, diesel and alternative power sources to remain operational.

Atiku argued that the experience following petrol subsidy removal should inform the government’s approach to electricity pricing and called for measures that would prevent additional pressure on consumers and productive businesses.

The former Vice-President’s intervention has drawn a response from the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

APC National Publicity Secretary Felix Morka said Atiku had not presented what he considered a credible alternative to the economic policies of the Tinubu administration.

Morka said Atiku, as a presidential candidate, should explain to Nigerians what he intended to do differently rather than simply ask the President to adopt his proposals.

Morka also criticised Atiku over his position on fuel subsidy removal, accusing him of supporting the policy during the 2023 presidential campaign before subsequently criticising the Tinubu administration over its implementation.

On electricity, Morka questioned Atiku’s criticism of the planned subsidy phase-out, arguing that the former Vice-President had previously served in government and had an opportunity to address challenges in Nigeria’s power sector.

Atiku’s position, however, is that his current proposal for government intervention is intended to reduce the cost of domestically refined petroleum products and protect consumers from the effects of high energy prices.

He has also argued that the government should focus on policies that increase purchasing power and reduce production costs rather than relying primarily on palliatives.

The competing positions have added to the growing political debate over petrol pricing, fuel subsidy policy, electricity costs and the wider cost of living as political parties prepare for the 2027 general election.

Keyamo’s intervention, however, was specifically focused on Atiku’s manner of addressing Tinubu and the dignity of the presidential office, rather than providing a detailed response to Atiku’s fuel-pricing proposal.

The dispute therefore combines a political disagreement over the appropriate way to address the President with a broader policy debate over how Nigeria should respond to high energy and living costs.

As the 2027 election approaches, fuel prices, electricity tariffs, subsidy policy, domestic refining and purchasing power are expected to remain prominent issues in exchanges between the Federal Government, the APC and opposition parties.

Keyamo Knocks Atiku for Addressing President Tinubu as ‘Bola’

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending