US Blockade Tightens As CENTCOM Redirects 100 Commercial Ships From Iranian Ports - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

US Blockade Tightens As CENTCOM Redirects 100 Commercial Ships From Iranian Ports

Published

on

US Blockade Tightens As CENTCOM Redirects 100 Commercial Ships From Iranian Ports

US Blockade Tightens As CENTCOM Redirects 100 Commercial Ships From Iranian Ports

American forces say no vessel has crossed blockade without permission as tensions mount around Strait of Hormuz

The United States has stepped up its maritime pressure on Iran, with the US Central Command (CENTCOM) announcing that American forces have redirected 100 commercial vessels in the past 60 days as part of a blockade targeting Iranian ports.

CENTCOM disclosed the figure on Saturday, September 12, amid escalating tensions between Washington and Tehran and growing disruption to commercial shipping in the Gulf region.

The development represents a significant escalation in the enforcement of the US maritime blockade, which has increasingly affected commercial vessels operating around Iran and the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

CENTCOM said its forces were enforcing the blockade and preventing vessels from entering or leaving Iranian ports without American authorisation.

According to the command, no ship had passed through the blockade without US forces allowing it, underscoring the extent to which Washington says it has tightened control over maritime traffic linked to Iran.

The latest announcement means that the number of commercial vessels redirected by US forces has continued to climb rapidly. Earlier in September, CENTCOM said it had redirected 94 commercial vessels. By September 11, the figure had risen to 99 before reaching 100 the following day.

The vessels are understood to have been ordered to alter course rather than proceed towards Iranian ports. US authorities have previously said the blockade is aimed at restricting maritime trade with Iran and cutting off revenue to Tehran.

READ ALSO:

The US Central Command has also documented cases in which American forces boarded or otherwise intercepted vessels suspected of attempting to violate the blockade.

The blockade has been backed by American naval and military assets operating in the region. US forces have reportedly boarded commercial vessels suspected of attempting to reach Iranian ports in violation of the restrictions.

In one reported case, an Iranian-flagged tanker was boarded after failing to comply with repeated warnings and was subsequently released after being searched and directed to change course.

Another commercial vessel was reportedly boarded in the Arabian Sea after American forces suspected it was attempting to transit to Iran. The vessel was later released after US authorities determined that its voyage would not include an Iranian port call.

The incidents demonstrate that Washington’s strategy goes beyond issuing warnings, with American forces prepared to intercept vessels suspected of breaching the restrictions.

The latest development has heightened concerns over the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most strategically important maritime routes.

The waterway connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and serves as a major corridor for international energy shipments.

Shipping traffic through the strait has already fallen sharply amid the conflict. Reports indicate that only a small number of commodity vessels have been passing through the waterway compared with normal traffic levels.

The disruption has triggered concerns about the global supply of crude oil and liquefied natural gas, with the Strait of Hormuz normally carrying a substantial portion of global energy supplies.

The intensifying confrontation has also sent shockwaves through international energy markets. Oil prices have moved sharply higher as traders assess the possibility of prolonged disruption to tanker traffic around the Gulf.

The situation has raised fears that a wider confrontation involving Iran, the United States and other regional actors could further restrict energy supplies and push fuel prices higher globally.

For oil-dependent economies, including Nigeria, sustained disruption in the Gulf could have significant consequences through changes in crude prices, freight costs, inflation and domestic fuel prices.

The blockade is also placing additional pressure on Iran’s already strained economy. Reports from the Iranian port city of Bandar Abbas indicate that the maritime restrictions have affected commercial activity, with businesses, dock workers and other residents reportedly experiencing declining trade and worsening economic conditions.

The restrictions have reportedly affected imports, port operations and businesses dependent on maritime commerce. Washington’s broader strategy appears designed to increase the economic cost of Iran’s continued confrontation with the United States.

The latest US announcement comes against the backdrop of a much wider military confrontation involving Iran and the United States.

American forces have carried out attacks against Iranian military and oil-related targets, while Iran has retaliated against US interests in the region. The maritime dimension of the confrontation has further complicated the movement of commercial vessels through the Gulf.

With commercial vessels caught in the middle, shipping companies face increasing risks, while insurers and energy traders continue to closely monitor developments around the region.

The possibility of further restrictions around the Strait of Hormuz has become one of the biggest concerns for international shipping and energy markets.

For now, Washington says its forces will continue enforcing the blockade, while the latest figure from CENTCOM — 100 commercial vessels redirected in 60 days — signals that the maritime confrontation is showing no immediate sign of easing.

US Blockade Tightens As CENTCOM Redirects 100 Commercial Ships From Iranian Ports

Loading

International

UK Threatens to Expel 27 Israeli Diplomats as Jerusalem Consulate Standoff Escalates

Published

on

UK Threatens to Expel 27 Israeli Diplomats as Jerusalem Consulate Standoff Escalates

UK Threatens to Expel 27 Israeli Diplomats as Jerusalem Consulate Standoff Escalates

The UK-Israel diplomatic crisis has escalated to its most dangerous level in decades, with Britain threatening to expel 27 Israeli diplomats if Israel proceeds with its plan to shut down the British consulate in East Jerusalem this Thursday. The extraordinary standoff—sparked by UK sanctions on illegal Israeli settlements—now threatens to sever one of the West’s most strategically important bilateral relationships. According to reports confirmed by The Jerusalem Post and The New Arab, British Ambassador to Israel Simon Walters personally delivered the warning to Israeli officials: for every British diplomat forced out of the East Jerusalem consulate, London will expel one Israeli diplomat from its embassy in London. With 27 British staff members facing expulsion, Israel’s London embassy—which has already been without an ambassador since September 2025—could be effectively gutted. The UK Foreign Office declined to comment on the reported threat, while Israeli diplomatic sources told The Jerusalem Post there was “no reason for us to address speculation regarding decisions other countries might make in the future.”

Behind the scenes, UK National Security Adviser Jonathan Powell made a quiet visit to Israel last week in a desperate attempt to prevent the closure, three sources told Reuters. The talks failed to produce an agreement to keep the consulate open, and the British government did not disclose the visit.

The confrontation traces back to September, when UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband announced sweeping trade sanctions on goods from illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. In a dramatic statement to Parliament, Miliband accused the Israeli government of turning a “blind eye” to what he called “ethnic cleansing” by settler terrorists. “The British government agrees that there is ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank, perpetrated by settler terrorists,” Miliband said. “All too often the Israeli government has turned a blind eye to this, and worse members of it have made statements and taken actions to support the forced displacement of Palestinians.” The UK settlement sanctions, announced in coordination with France and Canada, will ban imports from illegal settlements and target companies and individuals providing “construction, infrastructure, financing, or real estate for settlement expansion.” According to the House of Commons Library, the measures will take effect within six to nine months, with the import ban applied geographically based on settlement postcodes. Britain specifically cited the Israeli government-backed E1 settlement project—which would effectively sever the West Bank from East Jerusalem—as a key factor undermining the two-state solution.

READ ALSO:

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar announced a series of countermeasures on September 8, calling the UK sanctions “morally distorted” and accusing Britain’s ruling Labour Party of interfering in Israel’s upcoming October 27 general election. The Israeli retaliation included closing the British Consulate General in East Jerusalem within 30 days, removing British representatives from the US-led International Gaza Support Center in Kiryat Gat, ending British participation in training Palestinian Authority security forces in Ramallah, and barring 12 British officials deemed “anti-Israel” from entering Israel, including 11 MPs and a lawyer. Sa’ar framed the measures as a necessary response to what he called a “hostile Labour government.” “Israel has nothing against the British people,” he said. “Unfortunately, a hostile Labour Government is in office, systematically acting against the State of Israel, and it has left us with no choice but to finally respond.”

The British Consulate General in East Jerusalem is not a routine diplomatic post. Established in 1838—110 years before the founding of Israel—it operates separately from the UK embassy in Tel Aviv and handles relations with Palestinians in East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza. The consulate is located in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood. The UK, like most of the international community, does not recognize Israeli sovereignty over East Jerusalem, which Israel occupied in 1967 and later annexed in a move not recognized internationally.

The UK sanctions on Israel have drawn fierce criticism from within the British Jewish community. Chief Rabbi Sir Ephraim Mirvis called the measures a “dark day for British Jews,” warning they could “embolden those, at home and abroad, who use hatred as a weapon against Jews.” Miliband, who describes himself as a “proud British Jew,” rejected the chief rabbi’s claim directly. Asked on BBC Radio 4 whether Mirvis was wrong, Miliband replied: “Yes, I am saying I don’t agree with the chief rabbi, somebody over whom I have great respect.” He added: “Anyone who holds British Jews, or indeed Jews around the world, responsible for the actions of the Israeli government is engaging in antisemitism, pure and simple.” The Board of Deputies of British Jews said it followed the announcement with “deep regret,” warning that deteriorating UK-Israel relations could “further inflame community tensions.”

The standoff has been further inflamed by domestic political developments in Britain. On Sunday, the UK Green Party voted to declare Zionism a form of racism, passing the motion by 1,022 votes to 813 at its annual conference. Israel’s foreign ministry declared the resolution “a clear antisemitic text” and announced that Foreign Minister Sa’ar was barring Green Party leader Zack Polanski from entering Israel. Israeli President Isaac Herzog called the Green Party decision “a disgrace,” while Labour Party chair Bridget Phillipson described it as “shameful.”

With the consulate closure deadline set for Thursday, both sides appear entrenched. Israel’s Foreign Ministry has confirmed the consulate will close “as announced.” Two sources told Reuters that while talks were still ongoing, an agreement before the deadline was unlikely. If Israel proceeds and the UK follows through on its threat, the expulsion of 27 Israeli diplomats would mark an unprecedented rupture in British-Israeli relations. Israel’s embassy in London has already been without an ambassador since September 2025. The loss of 27 additional diplomats would effectively gut the mission. A Western diplomat told The Guardian that the closure would set a “dangerous precedent” for the status of diplomatic missions monitoring the status quo in Jerusalem, emphasizing that the UK does not recognize Israeli sovereignty over the city under international law. The coming days will determine whether this UK-Israel diplomatic crisis escalates further—or whether a last-minute compromise can pull both nations back from the brink.

UK Threatens to Expel 27 Israeli Diplomats as Jerusalem Consulate Standoff Escalates

Loading

Continue Reading

International

2026 Nobel Prize: Three Scientists Win Medicine Award for Optogenetics

Published

on

2026 Nobel Prize: Three Scientists Win Medicine Award for Optogenetics
American scientist Karl Deisseroth, German scientists Peter Hegemann and Georg Nagel

2026 Nobel Prize: Three Scientists Win Medicine Award for Optogenetics

American scientist Karl Deisseroth, German scientists Peter Hegemann and Georg Nagel have won the 2026 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for discoveries that led to optogenetics, a technology that allows scientists to control the activity of nerve cells using light.

The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet announced the award on Monday, October 5, recognising the trio for their discoveries concerning light-gated ion channels and optogenetics.

Their work has transformed neuroscience, giving researchers a highly precise way to switch individual nerve cells on or off and study how the brain controls functions such as movement, memory, emotions and behaviour.

The breakthrough began with research into how microscopic algae respond to light. Peter Hegemann studied the light-sensitive mechanisms of algae in the 1990s, while Georg Nagel helped demonstrate that a light-sensitive protein known as channelrhodopsin could function as an ion channel.

Their work showed that light could be used to trigger electrical activity in cells. The discovery eventually provided the foundation for optogenetics, which combines genetics and optics to manipulate specific cells with pulses of light.

READ ALSO:

Karl Deisseroth, a neuroscientist at Stanford University, subsequently demonstrated that the technology could be used in nerve cells. His research showed that light-sensitive proteins could be introduced into neurons and used to control their activity.

The technique has since become an important research tool worldwide. Scientists can genetically make selected populations of neurons sensitive to light and then use precisely delivered light to activate or silence them.

The Nobel Assembly said optogenetics has made it possible to switch individual nerve cells on or off in a living brain, allowing researchers to investigate the complex networks underlying brain function.

Beyond basic research, the technology is also being investigated for potential medical applications. Researchers are exploring optogenetic approaches to restore vision in people affected by certain forms of blindness, while other studies are examining whether the technology could contribute to future treatments for neurological disorders.

Deisseroth is based at Stanford University in the United States, while Hegemann is affiliated with Humboldt University of Berlin and Nagel with the University of Würzburg in Germany.

The three laureates will share the 2026 Nobel Prize award of 12 million Swedish kronor.

The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine traditionally opens the annual Nobel announcements, with the prizes for physics, chemistry, literature, peace and economic sciences following during Nobel week.

The 2026 medicine award highlights a scientific breakthrough that has fundamentally changed how researchers study the brain, particularly their ability to examine the role of specific nerve cells with unprecedented precision.

2026 Nobel Prize: Three Scientists Win Medicine Award for Optogenetics

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Israeli Forces Reportedly Destroy School, Burn Homes in Southern Lebanon

Published

on

Israeli Forces Reportedly Destroy School, Burn Homes in Southern Lebanon

Israeli Forces Reportedly Destroy School, Burn Homes in Southern Lebanon

Israeli forces reportedly destroyed a school and set fire to several homes in southern Lebanon as military operations, including airstrikes, artillery fire and demolitions, continued across the region.

The reported incident occurred in Houla, in the Marjayoun district, where Lebanese media said Israeli troops placed explosives inside the Jabal Amel Intermediate School before detonating them.

Local reports said the school was destroyed in an early-morning blast, while further demolitions were reportedly followed by fires in residential buildings in the town.

The reports could not be independently verified, and the Israeli military had not immediately provided a specific response to the allegations concerning the school and homes.

The reported destruction in Houla came amid wider Israeli military operations in southern Lebanon.

Lebanon’s National News Agency reported artillery fire around Khiam, while Tallouseh and Bani Hayyan were also reportedly targeted. Airstrikes were reported in Bani Hayyan and Kfar Tibnit, while artillery fire affected areas around Mayfadoun and Zawtar al-Sharqiyah.

READ ALSO:

Further demolitions and explosions were also reported in parts of southern Lebanon, including Beit Yahoun, Qantara and Mansouri.

The latest developments have renewed concerns over damage to civilian infrastructure in southern Lebanon, particularly schools and residential buildings.

The reported destruction of the Houla school comes against a wider backdrop of disruption to education in the region. Previous reporting has indicated that dozens of schools in Lebanon have been damaged or destroyed during the conflict, while thousands of students have been displaced from their communities.

The latest military activity is also occurring amid continuing tensions along the Israel-Lebanon border, despite diplomatic efforts aimed at reducing hostilities.

Israel has previously said its military operations in southern Lebanon are intended to counter Hezbollah infrastructure and security threats near the border. Lebanese authorities and Hezbollah have disputed aspects of Israel’s military activities and their justification.

The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) continues to monitor developments and maintain contact with the parties as part of efforts to prevent further escalation.

The renewed violence has added to concerns over the safety of civilians in southern Lebanon, where communities have already experienced displacement and extensive damage to homes and public infrastructure.

As tensions persist, the situation remains volatile, with further military activity potentially threatening efforts to maintain calm along the border.

Israeli Forces Reportedly Destroy School, Burn Homes in Southern Lebanon

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending