US Court rejects Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose tariffs - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

US Court rejects Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose tariffs

Published

on

U.S President Donald Trump
U.S President Donald Trump

US Court rejects Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose tariffs

A US federal appeals court ruled that most of President Donald Trump’s tariffs are unlawful, dealing a significant blow to one of the defining pillars of his economic policy, Reuters reported.

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in a 7-4 vote on Friday that Trump exceeded his legal authority by imposing wide tariffs under emergency powers.

The verdict is stayed until October 14, giving the Trump administration time to file an appeal with the US Supreme Court.

Trump lambasted the verdict in a post on his Truth Social platform, describing the court as “highly partisan”.

He warned, “If these tariffs ever went away, it would be a total disaster for the country,” but added that he remains confident the Supreme Court will overturn the decision.

READ ALSO:

The levies were imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, which has usually been used to penalise or freeze foreign rivals’ assets.

Trump, on the other hand, used the act to justify imposing broad tariffs on imports from a number of US trading partners, claiming that ongoing trade deficits and the influx of illegal substances such as fentanyl presented national emergencies.

It continued, “It seems unlikely that Congress intended, in enacting IEEPA, to depart from its past practice and grant the President unlimited authority to impose tariffs.”

The verdict applies to two sets of tariffs imposed during Trump’s second term: a set of “reciprocal” tariffs adopted in April as part of a larger trade war and another set imposed in February that targeted China, Canada, and Mexico.

Trump had linked the latter to what he claimed was their failure to stop the flow of illegal fentanyl across US borders, which all three countries have denied.

US Court rejects Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose tariffs

International

Muslim Nations Condemn Israel’s New Death Penalty Law for Palestinians

Published

on

Muslim Nations Condemn Israel’s New Death Penalty Law for Palestinians

Muslim Nations Condemn Israel’s New Death Penalty Law for Palestinians

Several Muslim-majority countries have strongly condemned Israel’s new death penalty law, which reintroduces capital punishment for certain terrorism-related offenses, warning that it could further escalate tensions in the Middle East. The legislation, passed by Israel’s Knesset on March 30, 2026, allows death by hanging as the default sentence for Palestinians convicted in military courts of deadly attacks classified as terrorism, with executions scheduled within 90 days of conviction.

The foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Indonesia, Pakistan, Qatar, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates issued a joint statement criticizing the law, describing it as a discriminatory measure that undermines the fundamental rights of Palestinians in the occupied West Bank. The ministers warned that the legislation reinforces an apartheid-like system and could inflame tensions on the ground.

READ ALSO:

Human rights organizations, including the Association for Civil Rights in Israel and the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute, have opposed the law, filing petitions with Israel’s Supreme Court to block it. Critics argue that the legislation disproportionately targets Palestinians, applying primarily in military courts in the occupied territories, while allowing Israeli civilians discretion in sentencing for terrorism-motivated murder.

The law was introduced by the far-right Otzma Yehudit party, led by National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who argued that stricter penalties are necessary to deter terrorism and protect citizens. However, opponents say that the measure risks undermining the rule of law and exacerbating ongoing conflicts.

The legislation has drawn strong international criticism. The Palestinian Authority condemned the law as a violation of international law, potentially amounting to a war crime under the Fourth Geneva Convention. UN human rights officials have also expressed concern, highlighting the risk to civilian safety, due process, and human rights protections.

Muslim nations and international observers continue to call for restraint and adherence to international legal standards. They emphasize that reinstating the death penalty in a volatile conflict zone could heighten instability and hinder prospects for peace.

Muslim Nations Condemn Israel’s New Death Penalty Law for Palestinians

Continue Reading

International

China Blames US‑Israeli Strikes on Iran for Strait of Hormuz Blockage

Published

on

Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning
Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning

China Blames US‑Israeli Strikes on Iran for Strait of Hormuz Blockage

China has accused the United States and Israel of being the “root cause” of the disruption of shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, following recent military strikes on Iran. Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said on Thursday that the interruption to navigation resulted directly from what Beijing described as “illegal military operations” by Washington and Tel Aviv against Tehran.

The Strait of Hormuz, a crucial maritime corridor connecting the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman, is one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes for crude oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG). Iran has effectively restricted access to the strait in retaliation for the joint strikes, escalating tensions in the Middle East and threatening global energy supply chains.

China, as the largest importer of Iranian crude, has been particularly affected. Mao Ning warned that further military escalation would not resolve the crisis, saying, “Military means cannot fundamentally solve the problem, and the escalation of conflicts is not in the interests of either side.” Beijing called for an immediate ceasefire and de-escalation to restore safe passage and regional stability.

READ ALSO:

The remarks came after U.S. President Donald Trump urged nations dependent on oil shipments through the strait to “take care of that passage” themselves. Trump also indicated that the conflict could continue for another two to three weeks, with potential strikes targeting critical Iranian infrastructure if negotiations fail.

The disruption has already sent shockwaves through global energy markets, with oil prices surging between 40 to 50 percent. Industries reliant on fuel have been hard hit, including airlines such as Air China, which announced increases in fuel surcharges on domestic routes. Analysts warn that sustained instability in the strait could prolong energy price volatility and further strain global supply chains.

Market experts say that reopening the Strait of Hormuz is crucial for stabilising international energy flows. Private and public sectors are closely monitoring developments, with international diplomacy expected to play a key role in resolving the crisis. China’s call for a negotiated solution highlights its strategic interest in protecting maritime energy imports and preventing long-term disruption to global oil supply.

China Blames US‑Israeli Strikes on Iran for Strait of Hormuz Blockage

Continue Reading

International

Qatar Petitions UN Over Iranian Missile Strikes on Maritime Assets

Published

on

Qatar Petitions UN Over Iranian Missile Strikes on Maritime Assets

Qatar Petitions UN Over Iranian Missile Strikes on Maritime Assets

The government of Qatar has formally appealed to Antonio Guterres, strongly condemning what it described as Iranian drone and cruise missile attacks on its territory and maritime infrastructure, calling them clear violations of international law and national sovereignty.

In a detailed communication to the United Nations, Qatari authorities outlined a series of incidents that occurred between March 28 and April 1, 2026, describing them as “unlawful acts” that pose a serious threat to regional stability and global energy security. The letter is part of a broader diplomatic push, with Qatar submitting multiple complaints to the UN and Security Council in recent weeks over what it calls sustained aggression by Iran.

The most recent and severe incident took place on April 1, when three cruise missiles were launched from Iranian territory toward Qatari waters. According to officials, Qatari air defense systems intercepted two of the missiles, while a third struck the Aqua 1 fuel oil tanker operating within Qatar’s territorial waters. The vessel is leased to state-owned QatarEnergy.

QatarEnergy confirmed that all 21 crew members aboard the tanker were safely evacuated. Authorities reported no casualties and no environmental damage, but warned that the attack underscores growing risks to maritime safety and critical energy infrastructure in the Gulf.

READ ALSO:

Qatar invoked Article 51 of the UN Charter, affirming its right to self-defense, and indicated that a full assessment of damages and losses is ongoing. The government also called for urgent international intervention, accountability, and enhanced protection of vital shipping lanes and offshore facilities.

Officials stressed that repeated attacks on commercial vessels and energy assets threaten not only Qatar but also the broader global economy, given the Gulf’s strategic role in oil and gas exports. The incidents have intensified concerns among Gulf states about the vulnerability of energy infrastructure, commercial shipping routes, and key maritime corridors.

The latest escalation comes amid heightened regional tensions involving Iran, the United States, and Israel, with fears growing that continued hostilities could spiral into a wider conflict. Maritime security bodies, including the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations, have continued to monitor the situation closely and warn of increased risks in the Gulf.

Despite the attacks, QatarEnergy stated that operations at affected facilities remain fully operational, signaling resilience in the country’s energy sector. However, analysts warn that sustained threats could disrupt supply chains and shake investor confidence if the situation deteriorates further.

Qatar has repeatedly emphasized that such actions are inconsistent with principles of good neighborliness and international norms, urging the global community to act decisively to prevent further escalation.

As of now, there has been no official response from Iran regarding the latest accusations.

Qatar Petitions UN Over Iranian Missile Strikes on Maritime Assets

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending