International
US Government Accused of Cover-Up in Trump Epstein Sexual Abuse Files
US Government Accused of Cover-Up in Trump Epstein Sexual Abuse Files
Democratic lawmakers have accused the United States government of orchestrating the “largest government cover-up in modern history” over allegations that crucial documents relating to Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein were withheld from the public. The controversy centers on missing FBI interview summaries tied to a 2019 sexual abuse complaint against the former U.S. president.
The House Oversight Committee, led by Representative Robert Garcia, claims that the Department of Justice (DOJ) failed to release more than 50 pages of interview notes with a woman who alleges she was sexually abused by Trump in the mid-1980s, when she was 13 to 15 years old. While the DOJ released millions of pages under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, investigators and media outlets, including NPR, found that only one summary focusing on Epstein’s actions appears publicly, leaving key follow-up materials missing.
“This is the largest government cover-up in modern history. We are demanding answers,” said Democrats on the Oversight Committee in a statement. Garcia confirmed that his team reviewed unredacted DOJ logs and concluded that FBI interviews with the survivor were not properly disclosed. He announced a parallel congressional investigation to ensure all records are produced.
READ ALSO:
- Gunmen Kill 25, Burn Homes in Twin Adamawa Village Attacks
- ‘Peter Obi Fuels Political Tension in Edo’ — Govt Responds After ADC Attack in Benin City
- Tinubu Urges Senate to Amend Constitution for State Police Amid Rising Insecurity
The DOJ has denied any wrongdoing, explaining that some materials may fall under exempt categories, such as duplicates, privileged records, or documents linked to ongoing investigations. Officials added that any documents improperly tagged or temporarily removed for privacy reasons will be restored. The department stated it is reviewing flagged files to ensure compliance with the law.
The woman at the center of the allegations first contacted authorities in July 2019, shortly after Epstein’s arrest on sex trafficking charges. Internal DOJ references describe her claim that Epstein introduced her to Trump, who then allegedly assaulted her. However, the public FBI summary does not evaluate the credibility of these allegations, and follow-up interview notes remain unavailable.
Trump has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, insisting that the release of the Epstein Files exonerates him. White House statements dismissed cover-up claims as politically motivated, asserting that no law enforcement agency has accused Trump of criminal conduct related to Epstein.
Legal experts and transparency advocates warn that withholding such key materials undermines public trust in U.S. institutions, particularly in high-profile cases involving political figures. The unfolding investigation is expected to intensify scrutiny on the DOJ’s handling of sensitive documents and the broader accountability of government agencies in politically charged cases.
US Government Accused of Cover-Up in Trump Epstein Sexual Abuse Files
International
Putin Offers Iran Diplomatic Support After Collapse of US–Iran Talks
Putin Offers Iran Diplomatic Support After Collapse of US–Iran Talks
Russian President Vladimir Putin has offered diplomatic support to Iran following the collapse of high-level negotiations between Tehran and the United States, as tensions continue to escalate across the Middle East.
According to a Kremlin readout reported by AFP, Putin held a phone conversation on Sunday with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, during which he expressed Russia’s readiness to help facilitate a political and diplomatic settlement to the crisis.
The Kremlin said Putin emphasized Moscow’s willingness to support efforts aimed at achieving what he described as a “just and lasting peace” in the region, including acting as a mediator if required.
The call came shortly after the breakdown of US–Iran talks, which had been aimed at resolving long-standing disputes over Iran’s nuclear programme and wider regional security issues but ended without agreement.
US–Iran Negotiations Collapse After Months of Tension
The negotiations reportedly involved senior US officials, including lead negotiators Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, but collapsed after prolonged discussions failed to produce meaningful progress.
READ ALSO:
- BREAKING: Military Intensifies Offensive, Destroys ISWAP Enclave in North-East
- NDLEA Smashes Drug Networks, Arrests Nonagenarian, Doctor in Nationwide Raids
- 17-Year-Old Student Allegedly Hacks Celebrity WhatsApp Accounts, Sells Explicit Content in School
A US official said the delegation withdrew following what it described as unproductive talks, while confirming that no immediate follow-up meeting had been scheduled.
Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf blamed Washington for the breakdown, saying US negotiators failed to build trust during the discussions. He added that Iranian proposals were constructive but were not properly considered.
Diplomatic Breakdown Raises Regional Tensions
The collapse of the talks has further deepened uncertainty in the Middle East, where tensions have already been heightened by recent military and political disputes involving Iran, the United States, and Israel.
Analysts warn that continued failure to reach diplomatic compromise could worsen instability in the region and increase pressure on global energy markets, particularly oil and gas supply routes.
Russia Seeks Greater Role in Mediation Efforts
Putin’s engagement with Iran is being viewed as part of Russia’s broader effort to position itself as a key diplomatic actor in the crisis.
The Kremlin said Russia remains open to supporting dialogue between all sides, suggesting Moscow could play a more active role in future mediation efforts if both parties agree.
For now, no new date has been announced for the resumption of US–Iran negotiations, leaving diplomatic efforts at a standstill as international calls for restraint continue.
Putin Offers Iran Diplomatic Support After Collapse of US–Iran Talks
International
Trump Orders US Navy to Blockade Strait of Hormuz After Iran Talks Collapse
Trump Orders US Navy to Blockade Strait of Hormuz After Iran Talks Collapse
Donald Trump has ordered the United States Navy to begin an immediate blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, escalating tensions with Iran after the collapse of critical peace talks in Islamabad.
The directive, announced Sunday via Truth Social, signals a major shift from diplomacy to military pressure in one of the world’s most sensitive geopolitical flashpoints. Trump said U.S. naval forces would intercept all vessels attempting to enter or leave the Strait of Hormuz, particularly those suspected of paying transit tolls to Iran, which he described as “extortion.”
The move follows the breakdown of high-level negotiations between Washington and Tehran, widely seen as a rare attempt to de-escalate tensions. Although Trump acknowledged that discussions were partly productive, he insisted that the core issue—Iran’s nuclear programme—remained unresolved.
Sources familiar with the talks revealed that the مذاکرات collapsed over Iran’s refusal to give up its enriched uranium stockpile and its insistence on maintaining control over shipping activities in the strategic waterway. The Iranian delegation, led by Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf, blamed the United States for failing to build trust during the negotiations.
The Strait of Hormuz blockade carries enormous global implications. The narrow waterway handles roughly 20% of global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments, making it one of the most critical energy chokepoints in the world. Any disruption threatens to send shockwaves through global markets.
READ ALSO:
- Elon Musk Slams South Africa Over Starlink Ban, Calls Policy ‘Racist’
- Court Orders Forfeiture of Pastor Ebonyi’s Hotel, School, Factory Over Alleged N1.39bn Fraud
- Lagos 2027: APC Succession War Intensifies as Tinubu Reportedly Backs Hamzat
Indeed, oil prices have already surged amid the crisis, with Brent crude and WTI climbing above $115 per barrel at peak levels. Analysts warn that the blockade could push prices even higher, worsening inflation and straining economies heavily dependent on energy imports.
The escalation comes just a day after the U.S. military intensified operations in the region. The United States Central Command confirmed that American forces had begun mine-clearing operations in the Strait of Hormuz, amid allegations that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps deployed naval mines to restrict shipping.
Two U.S. Navy destroyers, USS Frank E. Peterson and USS Michael Murphy, were spotted transiting the strait as part of efforts to secure maritime routes and ensure safe passage for commercial vessels.
Trump framed the blockade as a defence of global shipping freedom, warning that any Iranian attack on U.S. or allied vessels would be met with overwhelming force. However, the Pentagon has yet to release full operational details, leaving uncertainty around how the blockade will be enforced.
The situation is further complicated by developments involving Israel. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently signalled that Israeli military operations against Iran are ongoing, despite ceasefire discussions. He stressed that Israel would act independently to protect its national interests.
Experts warn that the U.S.-Iran conflict escalation could rapidly spiral into direct military confrontation, with far-reaching consequences for global security. Shipping companies have already begun rerouting vessels, while insurers are raising premiums due to heightened risks in the Gulf.
As of now, Iranian authorities have not issued an official response to the blockade order. Meanwhile, global markets are bracing for volatility as trading resumes, with investors closely monitoring developments in the region.
The unfolding crisis highlights the fragile state of U.S.-Iran relations and underscores the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz to global energy supply and economic stability.
Trump Orders US Navy to Blockade Strait of Hormuz After Iran Talks Collapse
International
Elon Musk Slams South Africa Over Starlink Ban, Calls Policy ‘Racist’
Elon Musk Slams South Africa Over Starlink Ban, Calls Policy ‘Racist’
Elon Musk has escalated his criticism of South Africa, accusing the government of racial discrimination following the continued refusal to grant an operating licence to his satellite internet service, Starlink.
In a strongly worded post on X (formerly Twitter) on Sunday, the SpaceX founder claimed that Starlink’s application had been blocked because he is not Black, despite being born in South Africa. The billionaire further alleged that the company was informally offered a workaround involving the appointment of a Black executive to satisfy ownership requirements, a move he said he rejected on principle.
The controversy centres on South Africa’s Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) policy, which requires companies operating in sectors like telecommunications to meet equity thresholds, typically mandating at least 30 percent Black ownership. The policy was introduced to correct deep economic imbalances created during apartheid, but it has increasingly become a point of friction for foreign investors.
South African regulators, including the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa, have consistently maintained that the rules apply uniformly to all operators and are a legal requirement for licensing. Authorities have pushed back against claims of discrimination, insisting that the policy is aimed at economic redress rather than racial exclusion.
READ ALSO:
- Court Orders Forfeiture of Pastor Ebonyi’s Hotel, School, Factory Over Alleged N1.39bn Fraud
- Lagos 2027: APC Succession War Intensifies as Tinubu Reportedly Backs Hamzat
- Machete-Wielding Man Shot Dead After Injuring Three in New York
Musk has repeatedly criticised the framework, describing it as “unashamedly racist” and claiming that such policies contradict the legacy of Nelson Mandela. He has also alleged that numerous laws in the country unfairly disadvantage non-Black citizens, further fuelling the ongoing debate.
Despite the standoff, Starlink has continued its rapid expansion across Africa, now operating in nearly two dozen countries where it provides high-speed internet access to underserved communities, including schools and healthcare centres. South Africa, however, remains one of the few major economies on the continent where the service is unavailable.
Musk had previously proposed initiatives to support connectivity in rural South African communities, including offers to provide internet access to thousands of schools, but those plans have stalled due to regulatory hurdles tied to ownership compliance.
As of now, the South African government has not issued an official response to Musk’s latest remarks. However, previous statements suggest that there is unlikely to be any regulatory concession without full adherence to B-BBEE requirements.
The dispute highlights a broader tension between South Africa’s post-apartheid transformation policies and the expectations of global technology investors. Analysts say the outcome could shape future investment decisions and influence how African nations balance economic redress with the need to attract international business.
Elon Musk Slams South Africa Over Starlink Ban, Calls Policy ‘Racist’
-
metro1 day agoJUST IN: FG Publishes List of 48 Individuals, Groups Linked to Terrorism Financing in Nigeria
-
metro1 day ago42-Year-Old Married Woman Declared Missing Found in Hotel with Man
-
Politics1 day agoDid Faleke Just Reveal Lagos’ Next Governor? Party Moves Begin
-
Education2 days agoGermany Opens Fully Funded Scholarships for Nigerians, Africans
-
Politics1 day ago2027: Oyo APC Governorship Aspirant Saheed Oladele Resigns From Party
-
metro1 day agoADC Threatens Civil Disobedience To Force INEC Chairman To Resign
-
Business2 days agoNigeria May Face ₦2,000 Petrol Price Without Intervention, TUC Warns FG
-
Business2 days agoNaira Strengthens to ₦1,359.31/$ as CBN Data Shows Further Gain in Official Market


