International
Israeli Security Cabinet approves plan to take over Gaza
Israeli Security Cabinet approves plan to take over Gaza
TEL AVIV: Israel’s Security Cabinet has approved a plan to take over Gaza City, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said. The decision taken early Friday marks another escalation of Israel’s 22-month offensive launched in response to Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack.
The war has already killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, destroyed much of Gaza and pushed the territory of some 2 million Palestinians toward famine.
Ahead of the Security Cabinet meeting, which began Thursday and ran through the night, Netanyahu said Israel planned to retake control over the entire territory and eventually hand it off to friendly Arab forces opposed to Hamas.
The announced plans stop short of that, perhaps reflecting the reservations of Israel’s top general, who reportedly warned that it would endanger the remaining 20 or so living hostages held by Hamas and further strain Israel’s army after nearly two years of regional wars. Many families of hostages are also opposed, fearing further escalation will doom their loved ones.
Israel has repeatedly bombarded Gaza City and carried out numerous raids there, only to return to different neighborhoods again and again as militants regrouped. Today it is one of the few areas of Gaza that hasn’t been turned into an Israeli buffer zone or placed under evacuation orders.
A major ground operation there could displace tens of thousands of people and further disrupt efforts to deliver food to the territory.
It’s unclear how many people reside in the city, which was Gaza’s largest before the war. Hundreds of thousands fled Gaza City under evacuation orders in the opening weeks of the war but many returned during a ceasefire at the start of this year.
Expanding war risks countless lives and could further isolate Israel
Expanding military operations in Gaza would put the lives of countless Palestinians and the roughly 20 remaining Israeli hostages at risk while further isolating Israel internationally. Israel already controls around three quarters of the devastated territory.
Families of hostages held in Gaza fear an escalation could doom their loved ones, and some protested outside the Security Cabinet meeting in Jerusalem. Former top Israeli security officials have also come out against the plan, warning of a quagmire with little added military benefit.
READ ALSO:
- US offers $50m reward for arrest of Venezuelan president
- Kenyan pastor, two daughters face deportation after Canadian court rejects asylum claim
- Apprehension as 32 states, 832 communities now on flood alert
An Israeli official had earlier said the Security Cabinet would discuss plans to conquer all or parts of Gaza not yet under Israeli control. The official, speaking on condition of anonymity pending a formal decision, said that whatever is approved would be implemented gradually to increase pressure on Hamas.
Israel’s air and ground war has killed tens of thousands of people in Gaza, displaced most of the population, destroyed vast areas and caused severe and widespread hunger. Palestinians are braced for further misery.
“There is nothing left to occupy,” said Maysaa Al-Heila, who is living in a displacement camp. “There is no Gaza left.”
At least 42 Palestinians were killed in Israeli airstrikes and shootings across southern Gaza on Thursday, according to local hospitals.
‘We don’t want to keep it’
Asked in an interview with Fox News ahead of the Security Cabinet meeting if Israel would “take control of all of Gaza,” Netanyahu replied: “We intend to, in order to assure our security, remove Hamas there, enable the population to be free of Gaza.”
“We don’t want to keep it. We want to have a security perimeter,” Netanyahu said in the interview. “We want to hand it over to Arab forces that will govern it properly without threatening us and giving Gazans a good life.”
The Security Cabinet, which would need to approve such a decision, began meeting Thursday evening, according to Israeli media, and it was expected to stretch into the night.
Israel’s military chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, warned against occupying Gaza, saying it would endanger the hostages and put further strain on the military after nearly two years of war, according to Israeli media reports.
Hamas-led militants abducted 251 people and killed around 1,200 in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack that triggered the war. Most of the hostages have been released in ceasefires or other deals but 50 remain inside Gaza, around 20 of them believed by Israel to be alive.
Almost two dozen relatives of hostages set sail from southern Israel toward the maritime border with Gaza on Thursday, where they broadcast messages from loudspeakers.
Yehuda Cohen, the father of Nimrod Cohen, an Israeli soldier held in Gaza, said from the boat that Netanyahu is prolonging the war to satisfy extremists in his governing coalition. Netanyahu’s far-right allies want to escalate the war, relocate most of Gaza’s population to other countries and reestablish Jewish settlements that were dismantled in 2005.
READ ALSO:
- 6 die in Kenyan plane crash after Ghana helicopter disaster
- Students, parents, educationists berate WAEC over results review
- Prosecute Wasiu Ayinde ‘KWAM1’ for terrorism over Abuja airport misconduct, ADC tells FG
“Netanyahu is working only for himself,” Cohen said.
Palestinians killed and wounded as they seek food
Israel’s military offensive has killed over 61,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, which does not say how many were fighters or civilians. The ministry is part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals who keep and share detailed records.
The United Nations and independent experts view the ministry’s figures as the most reliable estimate of casualties. Israel has disputed them without offering a toll of its own.
Of the 42 people killed on Thursday, at least 13 were seeking aid in an Israeli military zone in southern Gaza where UN aid convoys are regularly overwhelmed by looters and desperate crowds. Another two were killed on roads leading to nearby sites run by the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an American contractor, according to Nasser Hospital, which received the bodies.
GHF said there were no violent incidents at or near its sites on Thursday. There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military. The military zone, known as the Morag Corridor, is off limits to independent media.
Hundreds of people have been killed in recent weeks while heading to GHF sites and in chaotic scenes around UN convoys, most of which are overwhelmed by looters and crowds of hungry people. The UN human rights office, witnesses and health officials say Israeli forces have regularly opened fire toward the crowds going back to May, when Israel lifted a complete 2 1/2 month blockade.
The military says it has only fired warning shots when crowds approach its forces. GHF says its armed contractors have only used pepper spray or fired into the air on some occasions to prevent deadly stampedes.
Israel and GHF face mounting criticism
Doctors Without Borders, a medical charity known by its French acronym MSF, published a blistering report denouncing the GHF distribution system. “This is not aid. It is orchestrated killing, ” it said.
MSF runs two health centers very close to GHF sites in southern Gaza and said it had treated 1,380 people injured near the sites between June 7 and July 20, including 28 people who were dead upon arrival. Of those, at least 147 had suffered gunshot wounds — including at least 41 children.
MSF said hundreds more suffered physical assault injuries from chaotic scrambles for food at the sites, including head injuries, suffocation, and multiple patients with severely aggravated eyes after being sprayed at close range with pepper spray. It said the cases it saw were only a fraction of the overall casualties connected to GHF sites; a nearby Red Cross field hospital has independently reported receiving thousands of people wounded by gunshots as they sought aid.
“The level of mismanagement, chaos and violence at GHF distribution sites amounts to either reckless negligence or a deliberately designed death trap,” the report said.
GHF said the “accusations are both false and disgraceful” and accused MSF of “amplifying a disinformation campaign” orchestrated by Hamas.
The US and Israel helped set up the GHF system as an alternative to the UN-run aid delivery system that has sustained Gaza for decades, accusing Hamas of siphoning off assistance. The UN denies any mass diversion by Hamas. It accuses GHF of forcing Palestinians to risk their lives to get food and say it advances Israel’s plans for further mass displacement.
Israeli Security Cabinet approves plan to take over Gaza
ARAB NEWS
![]()
International
Trump Bans CNN, MS NOW, Politico From White House Over ‘Fake News’
Trump Bans CNN, MS NOW, Politico From White House Over ‘Fake News’
WASHINGTON — United States President Donald Trump has announced restrictions barring CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House, accusing the three media organisations of repeatedly publishing what he described as “fake news” about his administration.
Trump announced the decision on Friday, September 18, 2026, in a post on his Truth Social platform, declaring that the restrictions were effective immediately.
The president accused the organisations of reporting what he called “fiction and lies” about him, his administration and the United States, while warning that other media outlets could also face similar restrictions.
The announcement has opened another confrontation between the Trump administration and the American media, with press-freedom advocates and journalists raising questions about the constitutional limits of presidential control over access to the White House.
The dispute also escalated on Saturday after journalists working for MS NOW were denied entry to the White House grounds, providing the clearest indication that the administration had begun enforcing at least part of Trump’s announced restrictions.
Trump, speaking to reporters in the Oval Office after making the announcement, defended the decision and said the three organisations had engaged in what he regarded as deliberately negative coverage of his administration.
“They’re fake news,” Trump said when asked about the decision, adding that other media organisations could also be affected if they continued with what he described as unfair reporting.
Trump did not identify a single report that prompted the action. Instead, he pointed to what he characterised as the organisations’ overall coverage of his presidency.
He also criticised other major American news organisations, including The New York Times and The Washington Post, suggesting that additional outlets could face restrictions.
However, no ban on either newspaper was immediately announced.
The White House action initially created uncertainty because journalists from the three targeted organisations remained on the White House grounds after Trump’s announcement on Friday.
READ ALSO:
- Jetour Unleashes F700 Hybrid Pickup as Abuja Experience Begins Tuesday
- “She Wanted to Stay Single”: Rema Opens Up About Rejection That Inspired Hit Song ‘Oh No’
- Ronaldo Included in Portugal’s Nations League Squad as Jorge Jesus Begins New Era
CNN journalists were still working from the network’s White House workspace, while CNN also had personnel involved in the television pool covering Vice President JD Vance.
The situation changed on Saturday when MS NOW journalists were denied access to the White House grounds.
The development raised fresh questions about whether the administration intended to apply the restrictions to physical access, press credentials, White House workspaces, presidential events and media pools, or all forms of coverage from the presidential complex.
It was not immediately clear whether CNN journalists had also been denied entry on Saturday, while Politico journalists are generally not based at the White House during weekends.
Trump was spending the weekend at Camp David, the presidential retreat in Maryland.
The president’s action has drawn a strong response from the affected organisations.
CNN rejected the move and said it stood behind its White House reporting team. The network maintained that journalists should be able to report from the White House without government interference and indicated that it would challenge any formal restriction that violated its constitutional protections.
Politico also rejected the president’s allegations and said it would continue covering the Trump administration and future administrations.
The organisation said it would defend its First Amendment rights against attempts to restrict its access to government officials and presidential activities.
MS NOW also condemned the restriction after its journalists were denied entry, saying it would pursue available measures to protect its constitutional rights and the public’s access to information about government activities.
The White House Correspondents’ Association also criticised the administration’s decision.
The association argued that freedom of the press should not depend on whether a president agrees with the coverage produced by a particular news organisation or approves of questions asked by its journalists.
The controversy has also attracted the attention of major press-freedom organisations, which have warned that excluding news organisations because of dissatisfaction with their reporting could raise serious constitutional questions.
The First Amendment protects freedom of the press in the United States, although the government also has authority to regulate access to secure government facilities.
The central legal question is therefore likely to concern whether the White House can selectively exclude particular news organisations because the administration objects to their reporting or perceived editorial position.
The latest dispute follows an earlier confrontation between the Trump administration and the Associated Press over White House access.
In 2025, the White House restricted AP journalists from certain presidential events after the news organisation declined to adopt Trump’s preferred name, “Gulf of America”, for the body of water traditionally known as the Gulf of Mexico.
The AP challenged the restrictions in court, turning the dispute into a wider legal battle over presidential control of press access.
Trump has also had a previous major confrontation with CNN over White House access.
During his first presidency, the White House revoked CNN correspondent Jim Acosta’s press credentials following a contentious exchange between Acosta and Trump at a November 2018 press conference.
CNN challenged the decision in court, and a federal judge temporarily ordered the restoration of Acosta’s access. The White House later restored his credentials permanently.
The latest dispute is therefore occurring against the background of several years of tension between Trump and major American news organisations.
Trump has repeatedly criticised media outlets whose reporting he considers unfair or inaccurate, while journalists and press-freedom groups have argued that government officials should not determine access to the presidency according to whether they approve of news coverage.
Another issue raised by Trump’s latest announcement is the absence of specific reports identified by the president as the basis for the restrictions.
Rather than pointing to one article or broadcast, Trump referred broadly to what he described as the organisations’ continued publication of negative and false reports.
The president also raised the issue of government spending on Politico subscriptions while defending his decision.
Politico has rejected suggestions that its government subscriptions amounted to improper financial support, arguing that such claims were misleading.
Trump’s warning that other media organisations could also be targeted has added another dimension to the dispute.
The president has suggested that additional outlets could be excluded from the White House if he believes they continue to engage in what he considers unfair reporting.
That possibility has heightened concerns among journalists about the future of White House press access and whether the administration could establish different levels of access for media organisations based on their editorial coverage.
The immediate focus, however, is on how the restrictions against CNN, MS NOW and Politico will be implemented.
Questions remain over whether the administration will issue formal rules covering press credentials, presidential events, White House workspaces and press pools.
The organisations affected have indicated that they intend to continue covering the Trump administration and defend their rights to do so.
The confrontation could consequently develop into another major legal battle over the relationship between the White House and the American press, with the outcome potentially affecting how journalists gain access to the presidency.
For now, the denial of entry to MS NOW journalists represents a significant development from Friday’s announcement, when the precise scope of the proposed ban remained unclear.
The unfolding dispute places White House press access, media freedom and First Amendment protections at the centre of another major confrontation between President Trump and the American news media.
Trump Bans CNN, MS NOW, Politico From White House Over ‘Fake News’
![]()
International
Asian Games Organisers Apologise After Blunder Broadcasts North Korean Anthem for South Korea
Asian Games Organisers Apologise After Blunder Broadcasts North Korean Anthem for South Korea
A mistaken stadium audio track following South Korea’s 5-0 hockey win over Bangladesh triggers protests amid wider logistical issues in Japan.
Organisers of the Asian Games in Japan issued a formal apology on Friday after mistakenly playing the North Korean national anthem for South Korea’s men’s hockey team.
The embarrassing mix-up occurred shortly after South Korea secured a commanding 5-0 victory over Bangladesh, leaving players standing perplexed on the pitch as the wrong national anthem echoed through the stadium speakers.
Following the initial blunder, venue operators played the national anthem of Bangladesh before finally broadcasting South Korea’s proper anthem, prompting a stadium announcer to issue an immediate apology over the public address system.
However, South Korea coach Min Tae-seok condemned the oversight as an inexcusable operational failure. Min stated that while tournament officials blamed an individual operator for selecting the wrong audio file, an international competition must never tolerate errors of such sensitive political magnitude.
Furthermore, the anthem blunder compounds wider operational difficulties facing Japanese host venues ahead of Saturday’s official opening ceremony. Several delegations have voiced strong frustration over logistical arrangements, with visiting teams reporting airport delays lasting up to six hours.
In addition, members of South Korea’s basketball squad published videos showing water pouring from broken pipes into their athlete village rooms, intensifying pressure on local organisers to resolve village infrastructure and technical coordination before mainstream competitions begin.
Asian Games Organisers Apologise After Blunder Broadcasts North Korean Anthem for South Korea
![]()
International
BREAKING: Bloodbath at Pakistan Mosque as Suicide Blast Kills 21, Injures 103
BREAKING: Bloodbath at Pakistan Mosque as Suicide Blast Kills 21, Injures 103
KOHAT, Pakistan — Friday prayers turned into a scene of horror in Pakistan on Friday as a powerful suicide attack ripped through a mosque inside a police compound in Kohat, leaving at least 21 people dead and 103 others injured.
The devastating attack, which struck the Old Police Lines in Kohat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, claimed the lives of 15 police personnel and six civilians, while 73 policemen and 30 civilians were injured, according to health officials.
The attack occurred at about 1:20pm local time, when worshippers had gathered for the weekly Friday prayers at the mosque located inside the heavily guarded Police Lines compound.
Eyewitness accounts and initial reports described scenes of panic as a massive explosion tore through the facility, sending debris flying and trapping victims beneath damaged sections of the mosque and surrounding buildings.
According to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Inspector-General of Police Zulfiqar Hamid, an explosives-laden vehicle was rammed into the gate of the old Police Lines before detonating, unleashing the devastating blast.
The explosion caused extensive damage to the police facility and mosque, with parts of the structure collapsing as worshippers and police officers were caught in the blast.
But the nightmare did not end with the explosion.
As rescue workers rushed to evacuate the wounded, gunfire erupted inside the compound after armed militants reportedly attempted to force their way deeper into the police facility.
A further suicide explosion was also reported near the Special Branch building during the ensuing confrontation between the attackers and security forces.
READ ALSO:
- Xenophobia: FG Brings 33 More Nigerians Home From South Africa
- Falconets Thrash England 3-0, Face Colombia in U-20 World Cup Quarter-Finals
- Replace Fuel Subsidy With Vehicle Credit to Drive Mobility, Jobs,LCCI, Ilekuba tell FG
Police said seven armed attackers had entered the compound following the initial assault, triggering a fierce firefight involving police and Counter-Terrorism Department personnel.
Security forces eventually killed the attackers, including a suicide bomber and a sniper, as they battled to regain control of the compound.
The scale of the casualties overwhelmed medical facilities in Kohat, forcing the District Headquarters Hospital to declare an emergency.
Ambulances raced to the scene as doctors and medical workers treated scores of victims suffering blast injuries, gunshot wounds and injuries caused by collapsing structures.
Health authorities put the number of injured at 103, with 73 police personnel and 30 civilians among those receiving treatment.
Some of the wounded were reportedly in critical condition, while rescue teams continued searching the damaged compound for possible survivors trapped under debris.
The heavy police casualties were attributed to the location and timing of the attack, with officers among those gathered inside the mosque for Friday prayers.
Among those reportedly killed were SP Traffic Akbar Shinwari and Dr Israel Orakzai, head of the children’s department at DHQ KDA Kohat, according to Pakistani media reports.
Security forces subsequently cordoned off the area and restricted movement around the Police Lines as investigators began examining the scene and searching for explosives or possible accomplices.
The Kohat-Hangu Road was also closed temporarily as security and rescue operations continued.
The attack triggered widespread outrage across Pakistan, with President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif condemning the bombing and mourning the victims.
Sharif directed authorities to ensure that the injured received immediate and adequate medical treatment while security agencies were ordered to investigate the attack.
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Sohail Afridi also condemned the assault and directed officials to mobilise available resources for the treatment of the wounded.
Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi expressed solidarity with the families of those killed and injured, as condemnation poured in from within and outside Pakistan.
Countries including Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, Russia, Poland, Australia and Jordan also condemned the attack and expressed sympathy with the victims and their families.
The Kohat bombing comes against the backdrop of an escalating militant threat in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, one of Pakistan’s most violence-prone regions.
The province, which shares a border with Afghanistan, has witnessed repeated attacks targeting police, soldiers and civilians.
The latest bloodshed also came shortly after a roadside bombing in neighbouring Hangu district reportedly killed six soldiers, further raising security concerns in the region.
Pakistan has repeatedly accused militants linked to the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) of using hideouts in Afghanistan to launch attacks inside Pakistan. Afghanistan’s Taliban authorities have consistently rejected allegations that they permit their territory to be used for attacks against Pakistan.
Responsibility for the Kohat attack remained disputed in the immediate aftermath.
While later reports attributed a claim to a faction associated with the TTP, other reports said the TTP denied involvement. Security authorities have therefore continued investigations to establish the identity of those behind the attack and determine whether others assisted the attackers.
The deadly incident has also drawn painful memories of the January 2023 Police Lines mosque bombing in Peshawar, in which more than 100 people, mostly police officers, were killed.
For residents of Kohat, Friday’s attack once again turned a place of worship into a battlefield, leaving families searching for loved ones and hospitals struggling to cope with the influx of casualties.
As security agencies combed through the wreckage and investigators worked to establish the circumstances surrounding the assault, the death toll and number of injured remained subject to further updates.
At least 21 people are confirmed dead and 103 injured in the latest official figures, with fears that the casualty figures could change as authorities complete rescue and medical operations.
BREAKING: Bloodbath at Pakistan Mosque as Suicide Blast Kills 21, Injures 103
![]()
-
News2 days agoECOWAS Biometric Card Expands as Seven Countries Begin Rollout
-
metro2 days agoFG Suspends Niger NSCDC Commandant As 37 Suspected Illegal Miners Die In Custody
-
Sports2 days agoBallon d’Or 2026: Mbappe Responds to Yamal’s Bold Claim
-
International2 days agoNinth Body Discovered in South Africa: Nigeria Issues Urgent Safety Alert to Nationals
-
Politics2 days agoToyin Abraham Rejects Lagos APC Campaign Council Inclusion
-
Entertainment3 days agoAdunni Ade Reveals Christian Fans Unfollowed Her After Publicly Identifying as Muslim
-
Politics2 days ago2027: Sowore Says He’d Rather Die Than Travel Abroad For Medical Treatment
-
Politics2 days ago2027: Tinubu May Mediate Wike-APC Governors Rift In France
