Adeyanju hits back at Obi over defamation charge - Newstrends
Connect with us

metro

Adeyanju hits back at Obi over defamation charge

Published

on

Adeyanju hits back at Obi over defamation charge

Lawyer and political activist Deji Adeyanju has opened up on his past encounters with Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, Peter Obi, describing him as a “political fraud” while reacting to a defamation suit filed against him.

Adeyanju made the revelation on Friday morning during Channels Television’s Morning Brief programme, where he narrated how his early excitement about Obi’s candidacy later turned into disappointment.

“I’m just expressing my thoughts about why the opposition should come together and unite against the criminal APC and roguish APC government that always rig elections, that if the opposition is divided, that there’s no way they can win,” Adeyanju said.

He explained that the idea of Obi’s candidacy initially appealed to him.

“The idea of the Obi candidacy excited me, and I said that he needed a buy-in of Atiku and Konkosu. I even urged Konkosu to deputize Obi. I urged Atiku to step down for Peter Obi,” he stated.

According to Adeyanju, Obi persistently sought to meet with him after his comments.

“So then Peter Obi, all of a sudden, started trying to reach out to me, to meet me. But at that time, I was out of the country… So he was persistently reaching out to me, and I was avoiding him,” he said.

READ ALSO:

Adeyanju said he eventually met Obi through one of his aides but was left unimpressed by Obi’s defense over corruption allegations.

“I now made some observations about the things that he has been accused of doing in the past… Then I also raised the issue about these issues of him using state resources in Anambra to invest in his family business. His explanation to me in his defense was that he had resigned from the company before he became a governor. I was flabbergasted… I was completely disgusted.”

He further alleged that Obi attempted to offer him an envelope during the meeting.

“Then he got into a room and said, oh, please, he’s coming. That he wants to go inside the room and he has something for me. So he brought one envelope or something like that. And said, no, this is just a small thing. It’s just for company. I said, oh, I laughed… I said, God forbid.”

The activist also criticized Obi’s political judgment during the Ekiti election, alleging that his supporters responded with online attacks.
“I criticized and said, you should be in Ekiti and not in Egypt. And I said, because you want to be president, you must go and campaign for your candidate and try to win… Some of these young boys that are around him… they insulted me… I said, me?”

He accused Obi’s supporters, popularly known as Obidients, of political intolerance.

“We cannot have a situation in our country or in our polity where political extremism becomes the order of the day… After the Buharis, the obedient mob is the most toxic political movement that we have ever witnessed in this country. They’re threatening Supreme Court judges, Court of Appeal court judges, threatening artists, threatening Professor Wole Showinka, insulting everybody in this country. Because of Peter.”

On Obi’s political character, Adeyanju maintained,
“What are the things I said? I said he’s a political fraud. That he’s parading himself as a messiah. Of course he is a political fraud… The only thing that I forgot to say, among the things that he should not add to his defamation suit, is that he’s a political prostitute. He’s a political prostitute.”

He added that Obi’s current political moves contradict his earlier stance.

“Look at what he said about the people that he wanted to defeat in the last election. He said they operate a structure of criminality. But today he’s with them. He has one leg in PDP, they are discussing with him. Another leg in ADC. And he’s still a member of a Labour Party. So if you do, it’s worse.”

Adeyanju insisted that his remarks were truthful and therefore defensible.

“In a civil suit or criminal suit of defamation, justification, truth is a defense,” he said.

Adeyanju hits back at Obi over defamation charge

Loading

metro

Kwankwaso’s Daughter, Kano Governor’s Wife, Files for Divorce, Offers to Refund Dowry

Published

on

Kwankwaso’s Daughter, Kano Governor’s Wife, Files for Divorce, Offers to Refund Dowry

 

ABUJA — Zainab Musa Kwankwaso, the wife of Kano State Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf and daughter of former Kano State Governor Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, has reportedly approached an Abuja court seeking the dissolution of her marriage to the governor.

 

Zainab, who is the governor’s second wife, reportedly instituted the divorce proceedings at the Upper Area Court sitting in Gudu, Abuja, in a case marked CV/97/26.

 

In her application, she reportedly expressed her willingness to refund the dowry paid by Governor Yusuf as part of the process of ending their marriage.

 

Reasons Behind Divorce Application

 

According to details contained in the court filings, Zainab cited an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, alleging that the relationship had lost the love, affection, care and emotional connection necessary for a successful marital union.

 

She also reportedly expressed concern that continuing in the marriage could make it difficult for her to observe the limits and obligations prescribed by Islamic injunctions governing marital relationships.

 

The couple reportedly got married on July 29, 2006, when Zainab was serving as an aide to her father, Senator Kwankwaso.

 

Their marriage has produced six children.

 

Court Summons Governor Yusuf

 

Following the filing of the divorce suit, the Upper Area Court in Gudu reportedly issued a summons directing Governor Yusuf to appear before it on November 17, 2026, in connection with the proceedings.

 

The development is attracting attention because of the political relationship between the governor and his father-in-law, Senator Kwankwaso, who was instrumental in Yusuf’s emergence as governor.

 

The relationship between the two political figures has reportedly become strained amid political disagreements surrounding the future of the Kwankwasiyya political movement and the governor’s political direction.

 

The divorce proceedings have now introduced a family dimension to the already widely discussed relationship between the two political camps.

 

However, the legal action should be treated separately from the political disagreements, as no established evidence in the reported court filings has linked the divorce application directly to the political differences.

 

As of the time of filing this report, neither the Kano State Government nor Governor Yusuf had issued an official statement concerning the reported divorce proceedings.

 

The court is expected to hear the matter on November 17, 2026.

 

 

Kwankwaso’s Daughter, Kano Governor’s Wife, Files for Divorce, Offers to Refund Dowry

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

“I Cheated Because I’m Human Too” — Divorced Restaurant Owner Accuses Ex-Husband of Sleeping With Over 16 Women

Published

on

“I Cheated Because I’m Human Too” — Divorced Restaurant Owner Accuses Ex-Husband of Sleeping With Over 16 Women

 

A divorced restaurant owner has ignited heated discussions on social media after publicly accusing her former husband of having affairs with more than 16 women during their relationship, alleging that two of the women became pregnant for him.

The woman, whose Facebook post has attracted considerable attention, also admitted that she eventually cheated on her husband, insisting that she was not prepared to shoulder all the blame for the collapse of their marriage.

In a bold defence of her actions, she declared: “Yes, I cheated because I’m human too,” questioning why her own infidelity appeared to attract condemnation while her former husband’s alleged relationships with multiple women were being overlooked.

According to her account, the former couple met in 2019, and she claimed to have remained faithful during the early years of their relationship.

However, she alleged that things took a different turn in 2023 when she began uncovering what she described as repeated acts of infidelity by her husband.

The restaurant owner claimed that her former husband was involved with more than 16 women during their marriage. She further alleged that two of the women became pregnant for him, describing the discoveries as deeply painful and emotionally devastating.

The allegations, if established, point to the extent of the marital difficulties she says she endured before the relationship eventually collapsed.

Explaining how she eventually became involved with another person, the woman suggested that her decision was influenced by the emotional pain and betrayal she experienced over her husband’s alleged affairs.

She questioned the apparent double standards in how society judges men and women over marital infidelity, arguing that she should not be singled out for condemnation without considering the circumstances surrounding her marriage.

Her declaration, “I cheated because I’m human too,” has become a major talking point among social media users, with many debating whether repeated betrayal can explain, although not necessarily justify, a partner’s decision to retaliate through infidelity.

The revelation has also reopened conversations about trust, forgiveness, revenge, marital responsibility and the emotional consequences of unfaithfulness.

While some commenters have sympathised with the woman, arguing that nobody should be expected to endure repeated betrayal in a marriage, others have maintained that cheating remains wrong regardless of which partner commits it.

Others have questioned whether responding to infidelity with another affair only deepens the damage and makes reconciliation more difficult.

The controversy has also highlighted the different standards sometimes applied to men and women when allegations of extramarital relationships emerge.

As discussions continue, neither the former husband nor the women allegedly involved in the reported affairs have publicly responded to the accusations.

For now, the claims remain the restaurant owner’s account of what she says happened in her marriage, with no independent confirmation of the allegations.

 

“I Cheated Because I’m Human Too” — Divorced Restaurant Owner Accuses Ex-Husband of Sleeping With Over 16 Women

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

Bandits Collect ₦56m Ransom, Three Phones Before Returning Abducted Kaduna Farmer’s Corpse

Published

on

Bandits Collect ₦56m Ransom, Three Phones Before Returning Abducted Kaduna Farmer’s Corpse
Abducted farmer, Ibrahim Kadafa, popularly known as Ibro or K9

Bandits Collect ₦56m Ransom, Three Phones Before Returning Abducted Kaduna Farmer’s Corpse

KADUNA, Nigeria — Residents have been thrown into mourning and outrage after armed bandits reportedly collected a staggering ₦56 million ransom before handing over the lifeless body of an abducted farmer, Ibrahim Kadafa, popularly known as Ibro or K9, to his family.

The tragic incident occurred along the Kaduna-Abuja highway corridor, where Kadafa and his friend, Mustapha Shelpidi, were reportedly kidnapped while harvesting soybeans on a farm about two weeks ago.

According to accounts from family sources, Kadafa sustained a gunshot injury to his leg while attempting to escape during the attack.

Rather than receiving medical attention, the abducted farmer was allegedly left without treatment throughout his captivity, as his family struggled to negotiate his release.

After weeks of negotiations and efforts to raise the money, the family reportedly met the kidnappers’ demands, paying ₦56 million in ransom, alongside three brand-new Samsung mobile phones and ₦20,000 worth of airtime.

However, what the family had hoped would be a joyful reunion turned into an unimaginable tragedy on Wednesday, November 11, 2026.

When relatives arrived at the agreed location to receive Kadafa, the bandits reportedly handed them his corpse instead of the living man they had spent millions of naira trying to rescue.

READ ALSO:

The circumstances surrounding his death remain unclear, although relatives suspect that complications arising from the untreated gunshot wound may have contributed to his death while in captivity.

Meanwhile, the fate of his friend and fellow abductee, Mustapha Shelpidi, remains unknown, raising further concerns about his safety and the possibility that he is still being held by the kidnappers.

Friends and associates of the deceased have continued to express grief over the incident, describing Kadafa as a dependable friend, responsible family member and respected figure in his community.

One of his grieving associates recalled how the late farmer regularly sought his advice on important personal decisions, describing their relationship as that of brothers.

“He was someone who believed in me enough to seek my advice whenever he needed to make important decisions. He was my brother and friend. This is wrong, in all shades,” the associate lamented.

Kadafa was reportedly the first son of his mother, who is now left to mourn his death, while several of his siblings reside in Abuja.

His killing has renewed concerns over the worsening security situation along the Kaduna-Abuja highway and surrounding rural communities, where farmers, travellers and other residents remain vulnerable to attacks and abductions.

The incident has also raised fresh questions about the effectiveness of security operations in the area, particularly as kidnapping victims and their families continue to face devastating consequences despite paying huge sums to secure their freedom.

As of the time of filing this report, security agencies had yet to issue an official statement on Kadafa’s death or provide details about efforts to rescue Shelpidi.

The family and community are now left mourning a man whose relatives reportedly paid millions of naira in the hope of bringing him home alive.

Bandits Collect ₦56m Ransom, Three Phones Before Returning Abducted Kaduna Farmer’s Corpse

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending