PDP Crisis: Turaki-Led Faction Asks Court to Order Police to Unseal Party Secretariat Nationwide - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

PDP Crisis: Turaki-Led Faction Asks Court to Order Police to Unseal Party Secretariat Nationwide

Published

8 months ago

on

PDP Crisis: Turaki-Led Faction Asks Court to Order Police to Unseal Party Secretariat Nationwide

The Kabiru Turaki (SAN)-led faction of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has approached the Federal High Court in Abuja, seeking an order compelling the Inspector-General of Police and the Nigeria Police Force to immediately unseal and vacate the party’s national secretariat and all its offices across the country.

The request is contained in a Motion on Notice filed by the plaintiffs through their lead counsel, Chief Chris Uche (SAN), asking the court to grant a mandatory injunction directing the police to remove all barricades and withdraw from the PDP national headquarters in Abuja.

The PDP secretariat at Wadata Plaza, Wuse Zone 5, was sealed in November 2025 following clashes between two rival factions of the party — one led by Turaki, recently elected as national chairman, and the other aligned with the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike.

The crisis erupted when both factions scheduled meetings at the party headquarters on the same day, prompting police intervention and the deployment of tear gas, after which the premises were barricaded with barbed wire. The action reportedly prevented the Turaki-led National Working Committee from holding its rescheduled inaugural meeting.

Turaki was elected chairman at a PDP national convention held in Ibadan, Oyo State, on November 15 and 16, 2025. However, the Wike-backed faction rejected the convention, arguing that it violated earlier court orders restraining the party from holding the exercise.

READ ALSO:

While Federal High Court judges, Justices James Omotosho and Peter Lifu, had restrained the PDP from conducting the convention, a High Court in Ibadan later granted an ex parte order allowing the exercise to proceed.

At the Ibadan convention, the party announced the removal of Nyesom Wike, national secretary Samuel Anyanwu, factional chairman Mohammed Abdulrahman, and eight others over alleged anti-party activities.

In a related suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/252/2025, the PDP, Turaki, and the party’s Board of Trustees Chairman, Senator Adolphus Wabara, are asking the court to restrain the police from sealing, occupying, or restricting access to any PDP office in the 36 states of the federation, including the Abuja headquarters and its annex, Legacy House, Maitama.

Specifically, the plaintiffs urged the court to order the police to “immediately remove all barricades, unseal, and vacate” the party’s offices pending the determination of the suit.

An affidavit in support of the application was sworn to by PDP National Secretary, Taofik Arapaja, who stated that the party duly notified the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of the outcome of the Ibadan convention via a letter dated November 17, 2025.

Arapaja alleged that instead of providing security for an emergency stakeholders’ meeting scheduled for November 18, police officers led by the Commissioner of Police, FCT, fired over 200 tear gas canisters, sealed the secretariat, and barred party officials, staff, and visiting governors from accessing the premises — all without a valid court order.

The plaintiffs argued that the continued sealing of the secretariat has crippled the party’s administrative functions, policy coordination, and election planning, adding that the police must remain neutral under the Nigeria Police Act 2020.

They urged the court to grant the reliefs sought, insisting that the balance of convenience favours the PDP and that monetary compensation would not adequately remedy the damage caused by the police action.

PDP Crisis: Turaki-Led Faction Asks Court to Order Police to Unseal Party Secretariat Nationwide

Loading

Related Topics:
Advertisement

Politics

Adeleke Wins Polling Unit, Boasts of Wide Margin Victory as APC Trails

Published

10 hours ago

on

August 15, 2026

By

Adeleke Wins Polling Unit, Boasts of Wide Margin Victory as APC Trails

Adeleke Wins Polling Unit, Boasts of Wide Margin Victory as APC Trails

Incumbent governor holds 50.5% of collated votes as INEC continues result upload from 3,763 polling units

Osun State Governor and Accord Party candidate, Ademola Adeleke, has declared that he is winning Saturday’s governorship election by wide margins, while raising serious allegations that the All Progressives Congress (APC) is plotting to manipulate the outcome through result swapping. Speaking shortly after casting his ballot at Ward 2, Unit 9, Sagba Abogunde, Ede, Adeleke expressed confidence in securing a second term based on his administration’s performance and urged voters to remain vigilant throughout the electoral process. “I am winning this election with wide margins. I have God and the people,” the governor told supporters at the polling unit.

As collation of results from the state’s 3,763 polling units continued, Adeleke maintained a significant lead over his challengers. With results from 303 of the state’s 332 wards collated, the incumbent governor had amassed 177,572 votes, representing 50.5 per cent of the votes counted. His closest challenger, the APC candidate, Bola Oyebamiji, trailed with 158,588 votes (45.1 per cent), while the African Democratic Congress (ADC) candidate, Najeem Salaam, occupied a distant third position with just 5,917 votes. Data from the collation exercise showed that of the 845,100 registered voters in Osun State, only 361,500 were accredited, putting voter turnout at 42.8 per cent. A total of 351,500 valid votes had been recorded, while 7,200 ballots were rejected. As of Saturday evening, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had uploaded over 2,700 polling unit results to its Result Viewing Portal (IReV), representing more than 72 per cent of the expected total.

READ ALSO:

In a dramatic turn, Adeleke raised serious allegations against the Osun APC, claiming the party had written fake results in a bid to replace official outcomes. “We have it on good authority that fake results have been prepared for some local governments. There are concerns about attempts to replace genuine results during collation,” the governor stated. He alleged that the APC planned to move some local government collation centres to the state capital to facilitate the swap. “There are plans to move some local government collation centres to the state capital, but we will resist such moves and ensure that established procedures are respected,” Adeleke declared. The governor further appealed to INEC to ensure that results from all Local Government Areas were collated at designated centres rather than moved elsewhere after voting. “All collation must be done at each local government. Under no circumstances should local government collation be taken to the state capital,” he insisted.

Governor Adeleke also warned against any attempt to transmit election results directly from local government areas to the state capital, describing any bypass of the established collation process as “a form of rigging.” He said results should move from polling units to wards and then to local government areas before reaching the state level, and that the standard procedure must be respected to ensure transparency. “The pattern of voting should be from units to ward and to local government. Not that they will take local government collation straight to state capital. That’s not acceptable,” Adeleke said.

The governor also accused some security personnel of aiding alleged attempts by the APC to intimidate voters and manipulate the election. He called on the Inspector-General of Police and other security agencies to investigate the situation and ensure that security personnel remained neutral throughout the election. “I just received a call in Modakeke and Obaagun that police is aiding them to teargas them so that people can run away. People are resolute. They just want to perform their civic duty,” Adeleke said. He also alleged that a police officer from Port Harcourt, identified by the nickname “London,” had been brought to Ede to disrupt the election. “He’s here in Ede hiding. His own job is to come and destroy Ede and then avoid so that he can scare people, shooting so that they will not vote,” the governor claimed. Despite the allegations, Adeleke expressed confidence in his chances of winning the election. “But I can assure you, at the end of the day, I have God on my side and I have my people on my side. I am going to win this election,” the governor said.

The election results delivered early setbacks for the APC, including defeats at the polling units of two prominent party figures. At Polling Unit 003, Ife Ward 1 (Moore), St. Gabriel Primary School, Ife East Local Government Area, the Accord Party secured 131 votes against the APC’s 85 at the polling unit of former Osun Deputy Governor and ex-APC National Secretary, Senator Iyiola Omisore. Similarly, the Accord Party won at the polling unit of former Osun Governor, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola, in Okuku, Odo-Otin Local Government Area, polling 125 votes against the APC’s 85. The ADC managed only five votes in that polling unit.

Voters reportedly turned out in large numbers across Osun to participate in the election, despite reports of isolated incidents in some areas. Reports from several Local Government Areas indicated that voting progressed smoothly at many polling units, with electoral officials conducting the exercise as residents exercised their civic rights. The election is being conducted across the state’s 30 Local Government Areas, with results expected to be collated at designated centres after voting. INEC cleared 14 political parties to contest the poll after the PDP and Labour Party failed to field candidates. Adeleke, who is seeking re-election, defected from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the Accord Party ahead of the election. He is running with Kola Adenusi as his deputy, while Oyebamiji, a former Managing Director of the National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA), has Benjamin Adereti as his running mate. The final result is expected to be formally declared by INEC’s Returning Officer at the state collation centre after all outstanding results have been received and verified.

Adeleke Wins Polling Unit, Boasts of Wide Margin Victory as APC Trails

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: Atiku’s suit seeking Tinubu’s disqualification meets deadline, faces procedural hurdle

Published

10 hours ago

on

August 15, 2026

By

2027: Atiku’s suit seeking Tinubu’s disqualification meets deadline, faces procedural hurdle
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Alhaji Atiku Abubakar

2027: Atiku’s suit seeking Tinubu’s disqualification meets deadline, faces procedural hurdle

Former Vice President’s certificate forgery challenge may be “dead on arrival” due to choice of Originating Summons, legal experts say

The suit filed by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar seeking President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s disqualification from the 2027 presidential race met the constitutional deadline for pre-election matters, but the procedure used to bring the case may expose it to a strong legal challenge, according to a review of the filing and established case law. Atiku personally appeared at the Federal High Court registry in Abuja on Friday, August 14, 2026, to depose to an affidavit backing the suit, which he filed alongside his party, the African Democratic Congress (ADC) , against Tinubu, the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) . The action rests on Sections 137(1)(j), 139(1)(a)(i) and 285(14)(c) of the 1999 Constitution as amended, along with relevant provisions of the Electoral Act 2026. At its core is an allegation that the NYSC discharge certificate Tinubu submitted to INEC bears a name that differs from his own—”Tinubu Bola Adekunle” rather than “Bola Ahmed Tinubu”.

Legal analyst Ekene Aninze, reviewing the timing of the filing, noted that Atiku fell squarely within the 14-day window set by Section 285(9) of the Constitution for pre-election matters. INEC had displayed the personal particulars of presidential candidates, including Tinubu’s, on Saturday, August 1, 2026, in line with its published election timetable. Counting from that date, Atiku’s filing on August 14 came on the 13th day, within the statutory limit. This timing is critical, as Nigerian courts have repeatedly dismissed pre-election cases filed outside the 14-day window. In the Edo State governorship dispute, the Court of Appeal held that a case challenging candidate credentials was statute-barred when filed beyond the stipulated period. Similarly, courts have affirmed that the reckoning date is the occurrence of the event complained of, not when the aggrieved person became aware of it.

READ ALSO:

Where the case may run into difficulty, according to Aninze, is the format in which it was brought. The suit was filed by way of Originating Summons, a procedure typically reserved for disputes over the interpretation of documents rather than contested facts. Nigerian courts have repeatedly held that allegations bordering on forgery cannot be resolved on affidavit evidence alone and require a Writ of Summons, which allows for oral testimony and cross-examination. That principle traces back to the Supreme Court’s handling of the Delta State PDP governorship tussle between Sheriff Oborevwori and David Edevbie, where the apex court held that Edevbie’s forgery allegations against Oborevwori could not be resolved through Originating Summons and ought to have been commenced by Writ of Summons, since only oral and documentary evidence tested in open court could settle such claims. Justice Tijani Abubakar, who delivered the judgment of the panel, held that the grievous allegations of supply of false information and certificate forgery brought against the Speaker cannot be proved beyond reasonable doubt with the use of Originating Summons. A similar reasoning shaped the Court of Appeal’s earlier intervention in the same dispute, which faulted Edevbie for not calling the institution alleged to have issued the disputed document as a witness. The same logic featured in the long-running feud between Godwin Obaseki and his APC rivals, where the University of Ibadan had to be drawn into proceedings to speak to the authenticity of a contested credential, and in Bashir Machina’s dispute with the APC over the Yobe North senatorial primaries, often cited as a cautionary tale on the risks of using Originating Summons for a contentious matter. Applying that pattern to the Atiku suit, Aninze argued that questions over the authenticity of the NYSC certificate would likely require testimony from the NYSC itself to confirm or deny that it issued the document, something an Originating Summons process, built on affidavits, is not designed to accommodate. Activist lawyer Maduabuchi Idam went further, describing the suit as “dead on arrival.” He explained that the judicial system lacks the courage to allow justice to be done in such a matter, adding that “whether the action succeeds or fails, it will continue to expose the weaknesses of our institutions, lampoon the system, and subject it to public scorn and ridicule.”

Atiku’s decision to personally appear at the court registry was deliberate, according to his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu. The former vice president stated: “I came here personally because the issues before the court go to the heart of our Constitution and the integrity of the office of President. I cannot ask Nigerians to respect the Constitution while treating a matter of this magnitude casually. I have therefore put my name, my signature and my oath behind the facts we are presenting to the court. Now it is President Tinubu’s turn to answer them.” Atiku emphasized that the matter should be settled through evidence rather than political arguments or social media exchanges. “We are not asking Nigerians to decide this matter on social media,” he said. “We are asking the institution holding the records to produce them and the judiciary to examine the evidence and pronounce on it.” He added: “If the certificate belongs to Bola Ahmed Tinubu, let that be established before the court. If ‘Tinubu Bola Adekunle’ and ‘Bola Ahmed Tinubu’ are one and the same person for the purpose of that certificate, let the evidence establish it. These are questions that deserve answers, not political insults or presidential silence.”

READ ALSO:

Beyond the certificate dispute, Atiku and the ADC are also challenging provisions of the Electoral Act 2026 which, according to their written address, effectively restrict who may challenge the qualification of a candidate at pre-election stage and the removal of qualification as a ground for questioning an election as envisaged by Section 139(a)(i) of the Constitution. Their argument is that legislation cannot be used to shut the door against enforcement of an express constitutional provision. They contend that where an Act of the National Assembly conflicts with the Constitution, the Constitution must prevail. “This case therefore raises a fundamental question for our democracy,” Atiku said. “Can an Act of the National Assembly be used as a shield against an express provision of the Constitution? Can we write into ordinary legislation an escape route from a constitutional standard applicable to everyone seeking the Presidency? Our position is that the Constitution remains supreme.”

In a parallel development, a legal counsel and chieftain of the ADC, Kalu Agu, submitted a petition against Tinubu to the European Commission in Brussels, Belgium, for allegedly submitting a forged certificate to INEC. Agu was captured in a video shared on X by Paul Ibe, Atiku’s media aide, while submitting the petition. He alleged that Tinubu presented false academic credentials to INEC as part of the constitutional requirements for the 2027 election, asking the EU to intervene over what he described as the alleged subversion of constitutional order in Nigeria.

Reacting to the suit, the APC described it as an exercise in futility. The National Secretary of the APC, Ajibola Basiru, said: “Atiku should go and brace for another defeat in the general election. The President is qualified to contest the election; nothing is disqualifying him, and the matter has been settled by the Supreme Court.” Basiru added: “Atiku has nothing to offer Nigerians, and he knows that he will be rejected at the poll. That is why he is looking for a shortcut. But there’s no shortcut to power. He should go and mobilise for the poll, where he will be rejected by Nigerians as usual. That will end his political misadventure into the presidency.”

Neither Tinubu’s legal team nor the APC had filed a response to the suit as of the time of this report. The originating summons asks the Federal High Court to determine whether the statutory restrictions complained of can prevent the plaintiffs from invoking Section 137(1)(j), and ultimately whether Tinubu and the APC should be disqualified from participating in the 2027 presidential election if the plaintiffs’ case is established. Among the substantive reliefs sought is an order disqualifying Tinubu and the APC from participating in the 2027 presidential election on the grounds pleaded by the plaintiffs. Atiku has also placed INEC on notice to produce Tinubu’s Form CF001 submitted in connection with the 2023 and 2027 presidential elections. The affidavit states that Atiku had applied for certified true copies of the relevant form before filing the suit but had received no response at the time the processes were prepared. Atiku concluded: “Nobody should misunderstand what is at stake. Nigerian graduates cannot complete NYSC documentation with one identity and simply ask employers to ignore discrepancies. Young Nigerians seeking ordinary jobs are subjected to rigorous scrutiny of their certificates. The Presidency is not an immunity certificate against constitutional scrutiny.”

2027: Atiku’s suit seeking Tinubu’s disqualification meets deadline, faces procedural hurdle

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

APC Humiliates Aregbesola, Wins His Polling Unit in Osun Governorship Election

Published

10 hours ago

on

August 15, 2026

By

APC Humiliates Aregbesola, Wins His Polling Unit in Osun Governorship Election
Former Minister of Interior and ex-Osun State Governor, Rauf Aregbesola

APC Humiliates Aregbesola, Wins His Polling Unit in Osun Governorship Election

Former Governor loses to APC at home turf as ADC suffers early setback in Saturday’s gubernatorial contest

The All Progressives Congress (APC) has delivered a stunning blow to former Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola, defeating his African Democratic Congress (ADC) at his own polling unit in Saturday’s Osun governorship election, results have confirmed. In what political analysts are calling a significant early setback for the ADC, where Aregbesola serves as National Secretary, the former Minister of Interior failed to deliver his immediate polling environment to his party’s candidate, Najeem Salaam—despite his decades-long political influence in the Ilesa region.

At Polling Unit 001, Cooperative Building Junction, Isare, Ward 08, Ilesa East Local Government Area—where Aregbesola cast his ballot earlier in the day—the APC candidate, Bola Oyebamiji, emerged victorious with a commanding 256 votes. The incumbent governor and Accord Party candidate, Ademola Adeleke, secured 43 votes, while the ADC’s Salaam managed a disappointing 13 votes—a humbling outcome for a party banking on Aregbesola’s political machinery.

The ADC suffered yet another embarrassing loss at Polling Unit 007, Elegant D.C. (Agbon Arugbo), also in Isare, Ward 08, Ilesa East LGA—a location in close proximity to Aregbesola’s family compound. Here, the APC secured 202 votes, followed by the Accord Party with 110 votes, while the ADC could only muster 12 votes.

READ ALSO:

This outcome represents more than just a numerical defeat—it signals potential fragility in the ADC’s campaign strategy, which had heavily relied on Aregbesola’s political pedigree and grassroots connections. Aregbesola, who governed Osun State from 2010 to 2018—first under the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) and later the APC, a party he helped establish in 2013—left the ruling party to join the ADC in a political realignment that many viewed as a game-changer for Osun politics. He subsequently served as Minister of Interior under the APC-led federal administration. His defection was meant to position the ADC as a credible third force in Osun’s political landscape, with Salaam’s candidacy drawing strength from Aregbesola’s widespread name recognition and political network. However, the results from these two polling units in Ilesa East suggest that the APC’s grassroots appeal remains formidable—even in territories considered Aregbesola’s stronghold.

Aregbesola’s defeat is not an isolated incident in Saturday’s election, as other prominent political figures also failed to secure victories at their respective polling units. Senator Iyiola Omisore, former Osun Deputy Governor and ex-APC National Secretary, lost his polling unit to the Accord Party, which polled 131 votes against the APC’s 85. Similarly, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola, another former Osun Governor, also lost his polling unit in Okuku to the Accord Party. These results suggest a broader political realignment across Osun State, with voters appearing to make independent choices rather than following party loyalists.

Meanwhile, there was jubilation in Ede North Local Government Area after Governor Adeleke secured a landslide victory at his own polling unit. At Ward 02, Polling Unit 009, Abogunde Compound, Ede North, the Accord Party candidate polled an overwhelming 421 votes, while the APC managed only 29 votes. The announcement triggered celebrations among the governor’s supporters, who had gathered at the polling unit as votes were counted and declared.

Voting in Saturday’s governorship election commenced as early as 9:00 a.m. and concluded around 2:30 p.m. at many polling units across the state. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is in the process of uploading results from Osun’s 3,763 polling units to its Result Viewing Portal (IReV). As of the time of this report, a significant percentage of results had been uploaded, with collation ongoing across the state’s local government areas. The election featured candidates from 15 political parties, following a last-minute court order that added the Social Democratic Party (SDP) candidate to the ballot.

For Aregbesola, the inability to deliver his home polling unit—and indeed, his family compound—raises serious questions about the ADC’s ground game and the effectiveness of his political machinery in Osun. Political observers note that while the ADC sought to position itself as a viable alternative to both the APC and the Accord Party, Saturday’s results indicate that the party still struggles to translate its leadership’s stature into votes—even in familiar territory. For the APC, the victory at Aregbesola’s polling unit provides an early morale boost and serves as a symbolic reclaiming of territory formerly held by one of its founding members. As collation continues across the state, all eyes remain on INEC’s official declaration, which will determine whether Governor Adeleke secures a second term or the APC manages a historic comeback.

APC Humiliates Aregbesola, Wins His Polling Unit in Osun Governorship Election

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending