International

US Under Fire Over Alleged $1bn Immigration Fees Without Services

Published

3 months ago

March 25, 2026

Ceasefire Near Collapse as US Launches Second Night of Strikes on Iran

U.S President Donald Trump

US Under Fire Over Alleged $1bn Immigration Fees Without Services

The United States government is facing growing scrutiny over allegations that more than $1 billion in immigration-related fees have been collected without corresponding services being delivered to applicants, raising concerns about fairness, transparency, and compliance within the immigration system.

The controversy was highlighted during a Senate hearing by policy analyst David J. Bier, who argued that processing delays and policy restrictions have effectively stalled many immigration applications while fees continue to be collected.

“This is the largest fraud in the history of the US immigration system,” Bier told lawmakers, adding that the situation represents “the first $1 billion theft of processing fees for services never rendered.”

The claims come amid broader debates over immigration policies introduced and enforced under the administration of Donald Trump, which critics say have contributed to widespread backlogs and processing freezes across multiple visa and residency categories.

According to the allegations raised, applicants from several countries—including Nigeria, Iran, and Haiti—have been affected by entry restrictions and visa limitations. In some cases, individuals reportedly proceed through application stages, including interviews, without being informed of their ineligibility in advance, leading to non-refundable fees being paid for applications that are ultimately denied or left unresolved.

READ ALSO:

Additional concerns have been raised over policies affecting individuals already residing in the United States. Reports indicate that certain immigration benefits, such as work permits and permanent residency applications, have faced indefinite delays or suspensions regardless of applicants’ length of stay or eligibility status.

The United States Department of State has also been cited in discussions surrounding the suspension of immigrant visa processing for nationals of multiple countries, reportedly over concerns related to public welfare dependency and security screening. Critics argue that such broad measures may conflict with immigration laws requiring case-by-case adjudication rather than nationality-based restrictions.

The Diversity Visa (DV) lottery programme has also been impacted, with applicants still able to submit entries and attend interviews, but experiencing delays or non-issuance of visas in certain instances, further contributing to frustration among applicants.

Immigration fees in the United States are typically structured across multiple stages, including petition filing, biometric services, visa processing, and work authorisation. For example, sponsoring a spouse can cost several thousand dollars when all required fees are combined, making the alleged lack of service delivery particularly significant for applicants.

Lawmakers have begun expressing concern over the situation. Senator John Kennedy described the reports as alarming, while calling for greater oversight and accountability in how immigration services are administered and funded.

Bier has urged Congress to intervene, recommending the immediate resumption of application processing and clearer adherence to statutory requirements governing immigration adjudication. He argued that while applicants who do not meet eligibility criteria can lawfully be denied, fees should not be collected without the provision of meaningful processing services.

“If someone cannot establish their eligibility, they can be denied under the law,” he said. “But there is no reason to take people’s fees and fail to provide the service the law entitles them to.”

The debate adds to ongoing national discussions about immigration reform in the United States, particularly around processing efficiency, administrative transparency, and the balance between national security concerns and fair access to legal immigration pathways. Observers say the issue could prompt further congressional scrutiny and potential policy reviews in the coming months.

US Under Fire Over Alleged $1bn Immigration Fees Without Services

Related Topics:Featured Immigration Fees US

Up Next

Military Plane Crash in Colombia Kills 66, Dozens Rescued (video)

Don't Miss

Court Orders Meta to Pay $375m Over Child Safety Misleading Claims

International

‘Britain Is Not Ungovernable’ — Badenoch Attacks Starmer Following Resignation

Published

1 day ago

June 23, 2026

Trends Admin

‘Britain Is Not Ungovernable’ — Badenoch Attacks Starmer Following Resignation

Leader of the UK Conservative Party, Kemi Badenoch, has launched a blistering attack on outgoing Prime Minister Keir Starmer, describing him as “a terrible Prime Minister” following his shock resignation after less than two years in office. Starmer announced his resignation on Monday, June 22, after months of mounting political pressure, poor electoral performances, and growing public dissatisfaction. The announcement came after Labour suffered heavy losses in local council elections in May, shedding more than 1,000 seats, and following intense pressure from senior cabinet ministers urging him to set out an exit timetable. Starmer’s departure makes him the sixth UK prime minister in a decade to announce a premature departure from office.

Reacting in a post on X, Badenoch blamed Starmer’s administration for what she described as a series of policy failures, insisting Britain was “not ungovernable.” She accused the Labour government of hiking National Insurance contributions, introducing what she called the “Family Farm Tax,” abandoning meaningful welfare reforms, underfunding defence, failing to expand domestic oil and gas production, and appointing Peter Mandelson before allegedly misleading the public about the circumstances. “Hiking national insurance. The Family Farm Tax. Giving up on real welfare reform. Not funding our defence. Not drilling our own oil and gas. Appointing Peter Mandelson… then lying about what had happened,” she wrote. “Britain is not ungovernable. Keir Starmer is a terrible Prime Minister,” she declared.

READ ALSO:

The Conservative leader argued that the problem extended beyond Starmer personally, accusing Labour lawmakers of prioritising higher taxes to fund increased welfare spending. “But the problem isn’t just Starmer. Labour MPs only want higher taxes to hand out more benefits, as the Welfare Secretary has pointed out. These are Labour’s choices and their values, regardless of who is running the party,” Badenoch added. She called for a return to Conservative leadership, saying, “We need to get Britain working again. We need the Conservatives.”

In his resignation speech outside 10 Downing Street, the outgoing prime minister said every decision he took had been motivated by putting Britain first and pledged to remain in office until Labour elects a new leader. He became emotional and broke down in tears as he finished his speech, thanking his wife, Vic, for her support and expressing his desire to spend more time with his family. “The question my party is asking now is whether I am best placed to lead us into the next general election,” Starmer said. “I have heard the answer of my parliamentary party to that question, and I accept that answer with good grace.” He revealed that nominations for the Labour leadership would open on July 9 and close before Parliament’s summer recess on July 16, with the transition expected to be completed by September.

Former Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham, who was sworn in as MP for Makerfield hours after Starmer’s resignation, has already announced he will put himself forward for the leadership. His main rival, former Health Secretary Wes Streeting, has withdrawn from the race and endorsed Burnham, clearing his path to become the next Prime Minister. Burnham, 56, has pledged to focus on economic growth, the cost-of-living crisis, public services, housing, and opportunities for younger generations. If elected, he would have to resign as mayor of Greater Manchester, a post he has held since 2017, triggering an early election for that office. Britain is set to have its seventh prime minister in a decade, underlining the political instability that has characterised the country since the Brexit referendum in 2016.

‘Britain Is Not Ungovernable’ — Badenoch Attacks Starmer Following Resignation

International

Andy Burnham Declares Bid to Succeed Keir Starmer as UK Prime Minister

Published

2 days ago

June 22, 2026

Trends Admin

Andy Burnham Declares Bid to Succeed Keir Starmer as UK Prime Minister

Former Greater Manchester mayor launches leadership bid after Starmer’s resignation, with Wes Streeting backing him and a radical plan to reverse privatisation.

Andy Burnham has formally declared his candidacy to succeed Keir Starmer as Leader of the Labour Party and Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, hours after being sworn into the House of Commons on Monday. In a post on X, Burnham thanked Starmer for his service and said his resignation “marks the beginning of a transition and it is important that this process is conducted in an orderly and responsible way. I will put myself forward as part of this process.” He further stated that “the country expects stability, seriousness and a continued focus on the issues that matter most,” specifically citing progress on economic growth, the cost of living, public services, housing, and opportunities for the next generation. He emphasised that political change should never distract from the responsibility to improve people’s lives.

The path to a coronation appeared to clear further on Monday after former Health Secretary Wes Streeting, until recently considered a leading contender for the leadership, announced he would back Burnham rather than mount a rival challenge. Streeting said he was convinced that Burnham “is committed to building an inclusive party that draws on the best of our political traditions and that he can win the fight of our lives against the force of nationalism.” Calling for unity, Streeting urged the party to avoid spending the summer exaggerating small differences and instead roll up their sleeves to help Burnham deliver the change the party and the country need.

Burnham, 56, secured his return to Parliament last Thursday after decisively winning the Makerfield by-election in north-western England, a seat he needed to mount a formal leadership bid. He had signalled his intentions in his victory speech, warning that Labour had a “final chance to change” and pledging to “lay out a new path for Britain.” Under Labour rules, Starmer will remain caretaker Prime Minister until the new leader is chosen, with the leadership process expected to launch in July and a successor in place by September ahead of the party’s annual autumn conference. Should Burnham prevail, he would become the United Kingdom’s seventh prime minister since the Brexit vote in 2016.

READ ALSO:

At the heart of Burnham’s political platform is “Manchesterism,” an approach centred on local delivery, integrated public services, and a more active state. Drawing on his record as Mayor of Greater Manchester—where he introduced the Bee Network to re-regulate buses and standardise fares—Burnham argues that reasserting public control over essential services can deliver better outcomes for less money. A policy paper titled The Productive State, released on Monday by the Labour group Mainstream, provides a detailed blueprint for this agenda. It argues for a framework to reverse 40 years of privatisation, particularly in failing utilities, through measures such as special administration regimes, where the government steps in when companies like Thames Water face financial distress; bond-for-share exchanges, which would allow the state to bring healthy utility companies into public control without a massive upfront cash expense (though this would require legislation and likely face legal challenges); and establishing state competitors by setting up public corporations to compete with private providers. The essay argues that privatisation has led to a “privatisation premium”—a regressive hidden tax embedded in everyday bills that transfers wealth from households to investors. The state is then forced to subsidise inflated costs with welfare transfers, such as housing benefit or energy bill support. The paper contends that for millions of households, the basic non-negotiable expenses of life—rent, energy bills, water charges, transport fares, the cost of care—now consume so large a share of their income that insecurity has become a permanent condition. The ultimate goal, the paper states, is “an economy … in which the essentials of life are treated as rights rather than revenue streams”.

The Labour leadership contest appears increasingly likely to be uncontested, with Streeting’s endorsement removing Burnham’s most prominent rival. Reports indicate Burnham has secured the backing of over 200 MPs, with some allies suggesting the number could be closer to 300. Under Labour Party rules, a challenger needs nominations from at least 20% of the parliamentary party (currently 81 MPs) to force a contest. With Streeting withdrawing and Burnham’s support surging, a “coronation”-style transfer of power is now the most probable outcome. However, some MPs have expressed a desire for Burnham’s ideas to face “scrutiny” through a contested race.

Burnham’s policy platform can be broken down across several key areas. On utilities and privatisation, he proposes reversing 40 years of privatisation through bond-for-share exchanges and special administration regimes to bring failing utilities under public control, arguing that privatisation has created a “privatisation premium” that makes essentials unaffordable and drains public finances. On housing, he advocates a massive expansion of social housing and reform of the housing market to tackle the housing crisis and reduce the cost of housing benefit. On the economy and taxation, he proposes exploring a wealth tax, offering tax cuts for small businesses, and borrowing for investment, seeking to stimulate economic growth while addressing inequality. On devolution and governance, he champions radical devolution of powers to local governments and reform of the first-past-the-post voting system, aiming to address resentment towards the “London-centric” establishment and give more power to communities.

Looking ahead, the Labour Party’s leadership contest is expected to be formally triggered in July, with a new leader in place by September. If Burnham is the sole candidate, he could potentially take over sooner. However, the political climate remains turbulent, with Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party posing a significant challenge, particularly in the “Red Wall” seats that Labour needs to retain. Burnham’s ability to navigate the fiscal constraints of the Treasury, market concerns, and the threat from the right will be crucial to his success if he enters No 10. For now, his “Manchesterism” pitch has put him firmly in the driver’s seat to become the UK’s next Prime Minister.

Andy Burnham Declares Bid to Succeed Keir Starmer as UK Prime Minister

International

Trump Predicts Starmer’s Resignation, Blames UK PM’s Immigration, Energy Policies

Published

3 days ago

June 21, 2026

Trends Admin

United States President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer

Trump Predicts Starmer’s Resignation, Blames UK PM’s Immigration, Energy Policies

United States President Donald Trump has sparked fresh political debate in Britain after predicting that UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer will eventually resign from office, citing what he described as failures in tackling two of the country’s most pressing challenges — immigration and energy policy.

Trump made the remarks in a post published on his Truth Social platform, where he criticised Starmer’s handling of border control and the British government’s approach to energy production.

“Keir Starmer will resign as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. He failed badly on two very important subjects – immigration and energy (open North Sea oil!). I wish him well!” Trump wrote.

The statement marks the latest in a series of public criticisms directed by the American president at the British leader and comes at a time when Starmer is facing growing political scrutiny at home.

Trump has repeatedly argued that Britain should increase oil and gas exploration in the North Sea, insisting that greater domestic energy production would strengthen the economy, improve energy security and reduce dependence on external energy sources.

READ ALSO:

The US president has also been vocal in his criticism of policies aimed at accelerating the transition to renewable energy, warning that excessive reliance on green energy initiatives could weaken industrial competitiveness and drive up costs for consumers and businesses.

His latest comments reflect a broader disagreement between Washington and London over energy priorities. While the Starmer government has maintained its commitment to achieving net-zero carbon emissions and expanding clean energy infrastructure, Trump has consistently advocated for increased fossil fuel production and energy independence.

The American leader’s intervention comes as political pressure continues to mount on the Labour government.

In recent weeks, reports from British media have pointed to increasing concerns within the ruling Labour Party over the government’s performance, electoral standing and long-term political direction.

Several ministers have reportedly stepped down from government positions in recent months, while growing calls have emerged from within Labour ranks for greater clarity regarding Starmer’s future leadership plans.

The pressure intensified following a strong by-election performance by Labour figure Andy Burnham, whose political success has fuelled speculation about possible leadership changes within the party.

Supporters of Burnham argue that his electoral appeal demonstrates an ability to reconnect with voters and challenge the growing influence of rival political movements, particularly Reform UK, which has continued to gain traction among disaffected voters.

Reports in the British press have suggested that some Labour lawmakers have privately encouraged discussions about a future leadership transition, while others have urged Starmer to provide assurances regarding his political intentions ahead of future elections.

Despite the speculation, there has been no official indication from Downing Street that the Prime Minister intends to resign.

Starmer has publicly maintained that he remains committed to leading the government and continuing the implementation of Labour’s policy agenda.

Political analysts note that Trump’s remarks are unusual because they go beyond criticism of government policy and directly predict the departure of a sitting foreign leader.

The comments have also reignited debate about the future of Britain’s energy strategy, immigration policies and the political challenges facing the Labour government as it seeks to maintain public support amid economic and social pressures.

Observers say the Prime Minister’s ability to manage internal party concerns, address voter dissatisfaction and deliver on key policy promises could prove crucial in determining the stability of his leadership in the months ahead.

For now, Starmer remains in office, but Trump’s intervention has added a new international dimension to an already intense political debate over the future direction of British politics.

As discussions over immigration, energy security and economic growth continue to dominate public discourse, the exchange between the two leaders is likely to remain a major talking point on both sides of the Atlantic.