Israel Questions Pakistan’s Credibility as Mediator in US‑Iran Ceasefire Talks

Israel has publicly doubted Pakistan’s role as a mediator in the ongoing United States–Iran ceasefire negotiations, describing Islamabad as “not a credible player” in the diplomatic process. The comments from Israel’s ambassador to India, Reuven Azar, come ahead of scheduled direct talks between U.S. and Iranian officials in Islamabad on April 11, reportedly to be attended by U.S. Vice President JD Vance.

Azar acknowledged that the United States may have strategic reasons for using Pakistan’s facilitation, but he emphasized that Israel’s primary concern remains the removal of Hezbollah’s terrorist infrastructure in southern Lebanon. He highlighted recent Israeli air operations that reportedly eliminated over 250 Hezbollah operatives and reiterated that disarming the group south of the Litani River is essential to protect Israeli communities.

READ ALSO:

• Making Up for Lost Sleep Might Be Healthier Than Experts Once Believed — What Science Says
• Sleeping Positions: How They Affect Your Health and Which Ones to Avoid
• Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei

Drawing parallels with past U.S. diplomatic efforts, Azar compared Pakistan’s mediation to previous roles played by Qatar and Turkey in negotiating truces in Gaza, suggesting such mediators were sometimes selected for convenience rather than effectiveness. He stressed that Israel’s objective is to remain closely aligned with the United States on the substance and outcome of any regional agreement.

Regarding the U.S.–Iran ceasefire, Azar expressed support for the two-week truce while noting that Israel considers Lebanon outside its scope. He warned that continued Iranian and Israeli military actions in Lebanon could jeopardize the fragile agreement, potentially destabilizing the Strait of Hormuz and broader Middle East security.

The ceasefire talks themselves remain delicate. While Pakistan has positioned itself as a facilitator, Tehran has acknowledged Islamabad’s role but continues to insist on substantive agreements over nuclear development, missile programs, and regional security obligations. Meanwhile, Israel maintains a firm stance that its operations in southern Lebanon are necessary to neutralize threats from Hezbollah.

The diplomatic dispute over Pakistan’s credibility highlights deep divisions among key stakeholders in the region, underscoring the challenges in maintaining a fragile truce while addressing the security concerns of multiple actors. Observers will closely monitor whether the upcoming Islamabad talks can reconcile these differences and produce a sustainable agreement.

Israel Questions Pakistan’s Credibility as Mediator in US‑Iran Ceasefire Talks

Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei

Thousands of Iranians took to the streets across major cities, including Tehran, Urmia, and Gorgan, on Thursday to honour the late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. His death has become a pivotal moment in the ongoing Middle East conflict, and the rallies combined mourning, political messaging, and public solidarity.

The nationwide tribute began precisely at 9:40 a.m. local time, the exact moment Khamenei was killed on February 28 at his Tehran residence in what Iranian authorities described as U.S.–Israeli airstrikes. The attack also claimed the lives of several senior Iranian figures and triggered a series of retaliatory actions, escalating tensions across the Gulf and involving multiple regional actors.

Crowds carried portraits of the long-serving leader, who presided over Iran’s political and ideological direction for nearly four decades. Analysts note that the rallies were not only acts of public mourning but also demonstrations of internal cohesion and state continuity during a period of geopolitical strain. The displays served to reinforce loyalty and resilience in the eyes of both domestic audiences and external observers.

READ ALSO:

• UN Chief Condemns Israeli Airstrikes in Lebanon
• Iran Warns of Sea Mines in Strait of Hormuz, Offers Alternative Routes for Ships
• ADC Leadership Crisis Deepens as Rival Faction Protests at INEC Headquarters

Despite these public displays, there is uncertainty surrounding Iran’s leadership visibility. His successor, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, has yet to make a public appearance since before the conflict escalated. This absence has raised questions within diplomatic and political circles about the consolidation of authority in Tehran and the future direction of the country’s leadership.

The absence of a formal state funeral further underscores the disruption caused by the war. Security conditions and ongoing military tensions have prevented Iran from organising a centralised burial ceremony, highlighting the impact of the conflict on domestic affairs and governance.

The rallies thus served a dual purpose: beyond mourning the late leader, they acted as a strategic show of unity, signalling resilience to external adversaries while reinforcing internal political continuity. Public mobilisations like these remain a critical indicator of Tehran’s ability to maintain cohesion during times of crisis.

As the conflict continues, Iran’s internal dynamics, leadership visibility, and public mobilisation will be closely watched by analysts as key measures of stability and state authority. The commemorations demonstrate that, even amid uncertainty and regional tension, the government can still orchestrate nationwide expressions of solidarity.

Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei

Iran Warns of Sea Mines in Strait of Hormuz, Offers Alternative Routes for Ships

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has issued a serious maritime warning, stating that sea mines may be present in the main shipping lanes of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints for global oil and gas shipments. The advisory comes even as a fragile ceasefire between Tehran and Washington is being observed.

In a statement released late Wednesday, the IRGC navy warned all vessels intending to transit the strait to avoid the traditional main routes due to the risk of collision with potential sea mines. A designated danger zone has been marked on navigation maps, heightening concerns about maritime safety in the Persian Gulf.

The Iranian authorities recommended an alternative passage running closer to Iran’s southern coast near Larak Island. Ships are advised to coordinate with the IRGC Navy to ensure safe transit through these new routes. This guidance is intended to prevent incidents in the narrow 55‑kilometre-wide corridor, which normally handles a significant portion of global seaborne oil.

READ ALSO:

• ADC Leadership Crisis Deepens as Rival Faction Protests at INEC Headquarters
• 12-Year-Old Dies After Alleged Bullying at FGC, Ikot Ekpene
• JAMB Urges Candidates, Parents to Protest Admission Bias as CAPS Ensures Transparency

The Strait of Hormuz remains a vital energy artery, carrying nearly 30 percent of global seaborne oil supplies. Disruptions in the waterway, whether from mines or other security threats, can have major implications for global energy prices, shipping insurance, and international supply chains.

Since the ceasefire took effect, shipping traffic through the strait remains limited, with maritime tracking data indicating fewer vessels are transiting compared to normal operations. Some reports suggest Iran may also be seeking to impose tolls on vessels using routes close to its coastline, adding another layer of concern for international shipping operators.

Maritime experts warn that, despite the ceasefire, the situation remains highly unstable, with vessels exercising extreme caution. The IRGC’s advisory highlights the ongoing security challenges in one of the world’s most strategically important waterways, even during periods of reduced hostilities.

Iran Warns of Sea Mines in Strait of Hormuz, Offers Alternative Routes for Ships