International
US Ends 60-Year Policy, Orders Nigerians, Others Home for Green Card Processing
US Ends 60-Year Policy, Orders Nigerians, Others Home for Green Card Processing
United States President Donald Trump has introduced a new immigration policy requiring Nigerians and other foreign nationals seeking green cards to return to their countries of origin to complete the application process, except under extraordinary circumstances. The directive was announced on Friday through a statement released by the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) , effectively ending a longstanding practice that had allowed legal immigrants to apply for and obtain permanent residency from within the United States for over 60 years . According to the agency, the policy is intended to restore what it described as the “original intent” of American immigration laws .
USCIS explained that individuals seeking permanent residency through adjustment of status would now process their applications at US consular offices outside the country under the supervision of the Department of State. The agency stated, “We’re returning to the original intent of the law to ensure aliens navigate our nation’s immigration system properly. From now on, an alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances” . A spokesperson for USCIS, Zach Kahler , said the measure would help reduce the number of immigrants who remain in the United States unlawfully after their residency requests are denied .
“This policy allows our immigration system to function as the law intended instead of incentivising loopholes. When aliens apply from their home country, it reduces the need to find and remove those who decide to slip into the shadows and remain in the U.S. illegally after being denied residency,” Kahler said . The immigration agency noted that the new policy would mainly affect temporary visa holders , including tourists, students, and foreign workers residing in the United States on nonimmigrant visas . “Nonimmigrants, like students, temporary workers, or people on tourist visas, come to the U.S. for a short time and for a specific purpose. Our system is designed for them to leave when their visit is over. Their visit should not function as the first step in the Green Card process,” the statement added.
READ ALSO:
- Iran Accuses US of ‘Excessive Demands’ as Tehran Weighs Fresh Peace Proposal
- Court Sentences Church Usher to Death for Murdering Girlfriend Over Mobile Phone
- Troops Sustain Rescue Operations for Ngoshe Abductees, Kill Several Terrorists
USCIS further argued that handling green card applications through overseas consular offices would allow the agency to redirect resources to other immigration-related responsibilities. According to the statement, greater attention would now be given to applications involving victims of violent crimes, cases linked to human trafficking, naturalisation requests, and related immigration services. “The law was written this way for a reason, and despite the fact that it has been ignored for years, following it will help make our system fairer and more efficient,” the agency stated .
The policy change has drawn sharp criticism from immigrant rights advocates, legal experts, and humanitarian organisations , who warn that it could separate families, create new barriers for applicants, and expose some individuals to long waits or dangers in their countries of origin. World Relief , a humanitarian and refugee resettlement organization, warned in a statement: “If families are told that the non-citizen family member must return to his or her country of origin to process their immigrant visa, but immigrant visas are not being processed there, it’s a Catch-22. These policies will effectively create an indefinite separation of families” .
Jamaican immigration attorney Dahlia Walker-Huntington told The Gleaner that the move is likely headed for a major legal challenge. “I can bet my last dollar that there will be a lawsuit in short order to stop this. As far as immigration lawyers are concerned, this is against existing law. Adjustment of status is not a policy… a discretionary policy, it is factored into law,” she said. She pointed to section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act , which allows certain qualifying immigrants to obtain a green card from within the US . Attorney Oliver J. Langstadt added that this policy memo is going to result in “heavy litigation,” and that his “colleagues are already brewing for a fight” .
The immigration agency noted that officers are now directed to consider all relevant factors and information on a case-by-case basis when determining whether an alien warrants this “extraordinary form of relief” . The memo doesn’t create new law but could influence officers to treat applicants more skeptically, said Rachel Girod , a partner at Eldridge Crandell. “They’re implying that it’s a negative factor to even just be applying for adjustment of status,” Girod said, arguing USCIS selectively cited decades-old case law to justify a more restrictive approach. Legal challenges could emerge if USCIS begins denying applications based heavily on the memo’s discretionary framework, Girod said .
USCIS did not specify when the change would take effect , whether individuals would be required to remain outside the United States throughout the entire processing period, or whether the policy would affect applications already pending. According to an analyst with the Cato Institute, more than 1 million immigrants in the US are waiting on their green cards . The announcement has sent shockwaves through immigrant communities across the United States, including thousands of Nigerians who are currently in the country legally on various visa categories and were pursuing the path to permanent residency .
READ ALSO:
- Insider Betrayal: Farm Worker Arrested After Confessing He Initiated Boss’s Kidnap
- Wife Seeks Divorce, Says Husband Left Wedding Night for Political Meeting
- Oyo Kidnapping: Bandits Insist on Negotiating Only with Makinde
The policy also raises serious concerns for individuals from countries where US consular operations are limited or suspended. Attorney Langstadt noted that with the current pause on immigrant visa processing in 75 countries, insisting that people go overseas means they are “basically walking into a serious problem.” He further stated that there are people who are trying to get their green cards but have overstayed their legal stay in the US, and if they leave and go overseas, they would be subjected to a three or a 10-year bar and will have to file an additional waiver abroad which may or may not be granted .
HIAS , an aid group that provides services to refugees, among other groups of immigrants, said USCIS was forcing survivors of trafficking and abused and neglected children to return to the dangerous countries they fled in order to process their applications for green cards granting them permanent residency in the US . The group argued that this policy could put the most vulnerable migrants at serious risk by forcing them back into harm’s way. The USCIS memo does provide for “extraordinary circumstances” to be considered, but it remains unclear what criteria would qualify for such an exemption .
The latest directive comes amid a broader tightening of immigration policies under the Trump administration. In December 2025, the administration temporarily suspended the processing of green card and citizenship applications submitted by Nigerians and nationals of several other countries that were added to a US travel ban, according to reports by CBS News . The suspension affected legal immigration applications handled by USCIS and largely targeted applicants from selected African and Asian countries. Many of those impacted were already residing legally in the United States and were seeking permanent residency or US citizenship . The administration also instructed USCIS to halt immigration petitions, including applications for permanent residency and naturalisation, from nationals of 19 countries covered by a travel ban announced in June, with Nigeria listed under “partial suspension” alongside Angola, Benin, Senegal, Tanzania, and others .
Friday’s policy change is the latest in a series of steps taken by Donald Trump over the last year to tighten immigration to the United States. Last year, the Trump administration moved to shorten the duration of visas for students, cultural exchange visitors, and members of the media. In January 2026, the state department announced that it had revoked more than 100,000 visas in the second Trump administration . The administration has also attacked other immigrants with legal status in the US, like refugees and other protected immigrants .
The move followed a shooting incident in Washington, D.C., during Thanksgiving week in which two National Guard soldiers were injured. US authorities alleged that the attack was carried out by an Afghan national . The administration has cited security concerns as justification for many of its recent immigration restrictions. The December 2025 suspension of green card processing for nationals of travel ban countries was reportedly linked to this incident .
Immigration attorneys are advising clients to seek legal counsel to understand how the new policy might affect their specific circumstances and to explore whether they might qualify for the “extraordinary circumstances” exemption. Walker-Huntington offered advice to those affected: “It’s rough. And I feel for my people today who are getting word of this, and I really just want to tell them, if you have a lawyer, reach out to your lawyer. If you don’t have a lawyer, reach out to a lawyer” . As legal challenges are expected to be filed in short order, the fate of this policy may ultimately be decided by the federal courts.
US Ends 60-Year Policy, Orders Nigerians, Others Home for Green Card Processing
![]()
International
Trump Links French Protests To Islam ‘Taking Over’ France
Trump Links French Protests To Islam ‘Taking Over’ France
US President Donald Trump has linked the ongoing student protests in France to what he described as “out of control” mass migration and an alleged attempt by Islam to take over the country.
Trump made the claim Tuesday in a post on his Truth Social platform, rejecting the view that the protests are primarily about education and school conditions.
The protests have spread across France since late September, with students, teachers and parents demanding better-funded schools, more teachers, improved infrastructure and action over overcrowded classrooms.
More than 250,000 people took part in demonstrations across the country on Tuesday, according to French authorities, while organisers put the turnout at about 450,000.
Trump wrote that the unrest was “nothing less than out of control mass migration” and claimed: “This isn’t about schools, this is about Islam wanting to take over a once great Country!”
READ ALSO:
- Troops Take Down Zamfara Bandit Kingpins Baban Love, Mai Zamani, Three Others
- FG Gives N250m To Families Of 37 Miners Who Died In NSCDC Custody
- Tompolo’s PBAT Movement Suspends Campaign Over Ondo Military Crash
However, there has been no established link between the protests and religious or identity-based demands. The grievances publicly cited by student groups have centred on teacher shortages, overcrowded classrooms, deteriorating school buildings and inadequate resources.
The demonstrations have nevertheless escalated in some areas, with clashes between protesters and police reported in cities including Paris, Strasbourg, Rennes and Toulouse.
French authorities said hundreds of people were arrested Tuesday, while hundreds of students, school staff and police officers have reportedly been injured during the unrest.
The protests have also become part of a wider debate over France’s public finances, government spending and political direction ahead of the country’s next presidential election.
Trump’s comments add an international political dimension to the crisis, as the US president continues to make migration in Europe a major focus of his political messaging.
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said France was working to present its own account of the unrest rather than allowing foreign governments and political actors to define the narrative around the protests.
For now, the central demands of the protest movement remain focused on education, even as the unrest has become increasingly entangled with broader political disputes over immigration, public spending and France’s future.
Trump Links French Protests To Islam ‘Taking Over’ France
![]()
International
Kemi Badenoch: I Don’t Want Migrants Turning UK Into Nation Of ‘Little Ghettos’
Kemi Badenoch: I Don’t Want Migrants Turning UK Into Nation Of ‘Little Ghettos’
UK Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch has warned against the emergence of what she described as “little ghettos” of separatist migrant communities in Britain, arguing that newcomers must integrate and respect the country’s culture and values.
Badenoch made the remarks while opening the Conservative Party’s annual conference in Birmingham, where she set out her vision for rebuilding the party and Britain.
Speaking about immigration and integration, the Conservative leader said she wanted Britain to remain a “high-trust” society in which people coming into the country accept the social expectations and responsibilities that come with living there.
“I don’t want lots of little ghettos of separatist communities where they are recreating the place that they came from. That will ruin the United Kingdom,” Badenoch said.
She added that Britain was “not a dormitory” or “a hotel” and argued that migrants who come to the country, including those who come primarily to work, should respect British culture and values.
Badenoch stressed that she was not advocating race-based citizenship, saying Britain had never operated such a system. However, she argued that British culture, norms and expectations remained important to maintaining social cohesion.
READ ALSO:
- Trump Approves Firing Squad Execution For Fort Hood Shooter Nidal Hasan
- Nigeria Climbs Africa Investment Ladder, Overtakes Four Nations
- Ogun Crash: Nine Die As Bus Collides With Truck On Ijebu-Ode-Ore Road
“It is not just about the values and the principles,” she said, arguing that the way people conduct themselves and the expectations they share also form part of British culture.
The remarks form part of Badenoch’s broader attempt to establish a tougher Conservative Party position on immigration, integration and national identity as the party seeks to regain political ground.
She has also acknowledged failures by previous Conservative governments to deliver promised reductions in immigration. In her newly published policy document, The Right Way, she argues that the party needs clearer principles and a more consistent approach to government.
The Conservatives are also proposing tougher conditions for migrants seeking permanent settlement in the UK, including changes to the rules governing indefinite leave to remain.
Badenoch’s comments have drawn attention because of the sensitivity surrounding immigration and multiculturalism in Britain, with critics arguing that language about migrant communities risks stigmatising minority groups.
Her supporters, however, say the emphasis on integration rather than race is intended to reinforce a shared national identity and social cohesion.
The debate comes as immigration remains a major political issue in the UK, with the Conservatives facing pressure from Reform UK over migration while the Labour government continues to face questions over legal and irregular immigration.
Badenoch, who became Conservative leader in November 2024, used the conference to present her party as a political alternative focused on economic growth, stronger national security, reduced bureaucracy and stricter immigration policies.
Her comments on migrant communities are expected to remain a significant part of the Conservatives’ political message as the party seeks to redefine its approach to immigration, integration and British identity.
Kemi Badenoch: I Don’t Want Migrants Turning UK Into Nation Of ‘Little Ghettos’
![]()
International
Trump Approves Firing Squad Execution For Fort Hood Shooter Nidal Hasan
Trump Approves Firing Squad Execution For Fort Hood Shooter Nidal Hasan
President Donald Trump has approved the execution by U.S. Army firing squad of former Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, who was sentenced to death for the 2009 mass shooting at Fort Hood, Texas, that left 13 people dead and 32 others wounded.
The Pentagon announced the decision on Monday, saying Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had recommended the firing-squad execution and Trump approved it.
Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said the Secretary of the Army would determine the date and location of the execution.
Hasan, a former Army psychiatrist, opened fire at a medical facility at Fort Hood on November 5, 2009, shortly before he was due to deploy to Afghanistan.
The attack killed 12 active-duty soldiers and one retired serviceman, while 32 others were wounded. Hasan was shot and seriously injured by a responding civilian police officer and has been partially paralysed since the attack.
READ ALSO:
- Nigeria Climbs Africa Investment Ladder, Overtakes Four Nations
- Ogun Crash: Nine Die As Bus Collides With Truck On Ijebu-Ode-Ore Road
- Gunmen Open Fire At Lagos Bus Stop, Kill NURTW Member, Injure Three
A military jury convicted Hasan in 2013 of 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder and sentenced him to death.
During his court-martial, Hasan represented himself and did not call witnesses in his defence. He acknowledged that he carried out the shooting and argued that his actions were intended to protect Muslims whom he believed were being targeted by U.S. military operations.
Hasan has remained on military death row at the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, while pursuing legal challenges to his conviction and sentence.
Trump’s approval does not mean the execution will take place immediately. Further legal and administrative procedures remain, and Hasan could seek relief through the federal courts, potentially delaying the execution.
If carried out, Hasan’s execution would be an extraordinary event in the history of the U.S. military justice system.
The U.S. military has not carried out an execution since 1961, when Army Private John Bennett was hanged. The last known U.S. military execution by firing squad took place in 1945.
The decision also comes amid renewed debate in the United States over methods of execution. The Trump administration has expanded the available methods for carrying out federal executions, while recent difficulties surrounding lethal injection have intensified scrutiny of capital punishment.
Hasan’s case has remained one of the most prominent military death-penalty cases in the United States since the Fort Hood attack nearly 17 years ago.
The Army is now expected to determine when and where the execution will take place, subject to the remaining legal process.
Trump Approves Firing Squad Execution For Fort Hood Shooter Nidal Hasan
![]()
-
metro2 days agoTragedy Strikes FMC: Medical Director Loses Two Daughters—A Doctor and a Pharmacist—Within 48 Hours
-
metro2 days agoTransporters Urge IGP Disu to Arrest Illegal Highway Tax Collectors
-
metro2 days agoArmy, DSS, Amotekun Kill ISWAP Commander Planning Attacks in Southern Nigeria
-
Politics2 days ago2027: Soludo Govt Accuses Peter Obi Of Plot To Destroy APGA
-
News2 days agoBREAKING: Many Feared Dead as Helicopter Crashes in Ondo Community
-
metro2 days agoKidnappers torture abducted corps members, slash ransom to N100m
-
metro3 days agoOjudu Reveals How Tinubu, He Narrowly Escaped Death In Third Mainland Bridge Crash
-
metro2 days agoGrand Chief Imam of Oyoland Urges Rabitah 1964 to Regulate ‘Yorubaland’ Islamic Titles
