Afghanistan: Biden defends US pullout, warns Taliban leaders - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Afghanistan: Biden defends US pullout, warns Taliban leaders

Published

on

President Joe Biden says he has no regrets in withdrawing the United States troops from Afghanistan despite searing images of chaos in Kabul that exposed the limits of US power and plunged him into the worst crisis of his presidency.

He spoke Monday on the US pullout after scenes of bedlam dominated television news channels for days.

Biden blamed the Taliban’s takeover in Afghanistan on Afghan political leaders who fled the country and the unwillingness of the US-trained Afghan army to fight the militant group.

He warned Taliban leaders that they would face “devastating force” should they interfere with the US pullout.

“I’m deeply saddened by the facts we now face. But I do not regret my decision to end America’s war-fighting in Afghanistan and maintain a laser focus on our counterterrorism mission,” he said.

Biden was forced to send US troop reinforcements to Kabul to ensure a safe withdrawal of American diplomatic personnel and civilians as well as Afghan citizens who worked with the United States and could face reprisals.

Full speech of Joe Biden’s remarks on Afghanistan

Good afternoon.

I want to speak today to the unfolding situation in Afghanistan, the developments that have taken place in the last week and the steps we’re taking to address the rapidly evolving events.

My national security team and I have been closely monitoring the situation on the ground in Afghanistan and moving quickly to execute the plans we had put in place to respond to every contingency, including the rapid collapse we’re seeing now.

I’ll speak more in a moment about the specific steps we’re taking. But I want to remind everyone how we got here and what America’s interests are in Afghanistan.

We went to Afghanistan almost 20 years ago with clear goals: get those who attacked us on Sept. 11, 2001, and make sure Al Qaeda could not use Afghanistan as a base from which to attack us again. We did that. We severely degraded Al Qaeda and Afghanistan. We never gave up the hunt for Osama bin Laden and we got him.

That was a decade ago. Our mission in Afghanistan was never supposed to have been nation-building. It was never supposed to be creating a unified, centralized democracy. Our only vital national interest in Afghanistan remains today what it has always been: preventing a terrorist attack on the American homeland.

I’ve argued for many years that our mission should be narrowly focused on counterterrorism, not counterinsurgency or nation-building. That’s why I opposed the surge when it was proposed in 2009 when I was vice president. And that’s why as president I’m adamant we focus on the threats we face today, in 2021, not yesterday’s threats.

Today a terrorist threat has metastasized well beyond Afghanistan. Al Shabab in Somalia, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, Al Nusra in Syria, ISIS attempting to create a caliphate in Syria and Iraq and establishing affiliates in multiple countries in Africa and Asia. These threats warrant our attention and our resources. We conduct effective counterterrorism missions against terrorist groups in multiple countries where we don’t have permanent military presence. If necessary, we’ll do the same in Afghanistan. We’ve developed counterterrorism over-the-horizon capability that will allow us to keep our eyes firmly fixed on the direct threats to the United States in the region, and act quickly and decisively if needed.

When I came into office, I inherited a deal that President Trump negotiated with the Taliban. Under his agreement, U.S. forces would be out of Afghanistan by May 1, 2021, just a little over three months after I took office. U.S. forces had already drawn down during the Trump administration from roughly 15,500 American forces to 2,500 troops in country. And the Taliban was at its strongest militarily since 2001.

The choice I had to make as your president was either to follow through on that agreement or be prepared to go back to fighting the Taliban in the middle of the spring fighting season. There would have been no cease-fire after May 1. There was no agreement protecting our forces after May 1. There was no status quo of stability without American casualties after May 1. There was only a cold reality of either following through on the agreement to withdraw our forces or escalating the conflict and sending thousands more American troops back into combat in Afghanistan and lurching into the third decade of conflict.

I stand squarely behind my decision. After 20 years, I’ve learned the hard way that there was never a good time to withdraw U.S. forces. That’s why we’re still there. We were clear about the risks. We planned for every contingency. But I always promised the American people that I will be straight with you.

The truth is, this did unfold more quickly than we had anticipated. So what’s happened? Afghanistan political leaders gave up and fled the country. The Afghan military collapsed, sometimes without trying to fight. If anything, the developments of the past week reinforced that ending U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan now was the right decision.

American troops cannot and should not be fighting in a war and dying in a war that Afghan forces are not willing to fight for themselves. We spent over a trillion dollars. We trained and equipped an Afghan military force of some 300,000 strong. Incredibly well equipped. A force larger in size than the militaries of many of our NATO allies. We gave them every tool they could need. We paid their salaries, provided for the maintenance of their air force, something the Taliban doesn’t have. Taliban does not have an air force. We provided close air support. We gave them every chance to determine their own future. What we could not provide them was the will to fight for that future.

There are some very brave and capable Afghan special forces units and soldiers. But if Afghanistan is unable to mount any real resistance to the Taliban now, there is no chance that one year — one more year, five more years or 20 more years — that U.S. military boots on the ground would have made any difference.

Here’s what I believe to my core: It is wrong to order American troops to step up when Afghanistan’s own armed forces would not. The political leaders of Afghanistan were unable to come together for the good of their people, unable to negotiate for the future of their country when the chips were down. They would never have done so while U.S. troops remained in Afghanistan bearing the brunt of the fighting for them. And our true strategic competitors, China and Russia, would love nothing more than the United States to continue to funnel billions of dollars in resources and attention into stabilizing Afghanistan indefinitely.

When I hosted President Ghani and Chairman Abdullah at the White House in June, and again when I spoke by phone to Ghani in July, we had very frank conversations. We talked about how Afghanistan should prepare to fight their civil wars after the U.S. military departed. To clean up the corruption in government so the government could function for the Afghan people. We talked extensively about the need for Afghan leaders to unite politically. They failed to do any of that. I also urged them to engage in diplomacy, to seek a political settlement with the Taliban. This advice was flatly refused. Mr. Ghani insisted the Afghan forces would fight, but obviously he was wrong.

 

So I’m left again to ask of those who argue that we should stay: How many more generations of America’s daughters and sons would you have me send to fight Afghanistan’s civil war when Afghan troops will not? How many more lives, American lives, is it worth, how many endless rows of headstones at Arlington National Cemetery? I’m clear on my answer: I will not repeat the mistakes we’ve made in the past. The mistake of staying and fighting indefinitely in a conflict that is not in the national interest of the United States, of doubling down on a civil war in a foreign country, of attempting to remake a country through the endless military deployments of U.S. forces. Those are the mistakes we cannot continue to repeat because we have significant vital interest in the world that we cannot afford to ignore.

 

I also want to acknowledge how painful this is to so many of us. The scenes that we’re seeing in Afghanistan, they’re gut-wrenching, particularly for our veterans, our diplomats, humanitarian workers — for anyone who has spent time on the ground working to support the Afghan people. For those who have lost loved ones in Afghanistan, and for Americans who have fought and served our country in Afghanistan, this is deeply, deeply personal. It is for me as well.

I’ve worked on these issues as long as anyone. I’ve been throughout Afghanistan during this war, while the war was going on, from Kabul to Kandahar, to the Kunar Valley. I’ve travelled there on four different occasions. I’ve met with the people. I’ve spoken with the leaders. I spent time with our troops, and I came to understand firsthand what was and was not possible in Afghanistan. So now we’re focused on what is possible.

We will continue to support the Afghan people. We will lead with our diplomacy, our international influence and our humanitarian aid. We’ll continue to push for regional diplomacy and engagement to prevent violence and instability. We’ll continue to speak out for the basic rights of the Afghan people, of women and girls, just as we speak out all over the world.

I’ve been clear, the human rights must be the centre of our foreign policy, not the periphery. But the way to do it is not through endless military deployments. It’s with our diplomacy, our economic tools and rallying the world to join us.

 

Let me lay out the current mission in Afghanistan: I was asked to authorize, and I did, 6,000 U.S. troops to deploy to Afghanistan for the purpose of assisting in the departure of U.S. and allied civilian personnel from Afghanistan, and to evacuate our Afghan allies and vulnerable Afghans to safety outside of Afghanistan. Our troops are working to secure the airfield and ensure continued operation on both the civilian and military flights. We’re taking over air traffic control. We have safely shut down our embassy and transferred our diplomats. Our diplomatic presence is now consolidated at the airport as well.

 

Over the coming days we intend to transport out thousands of American citizens who have been living and working in Afghanistan. We’ll also continue to support the safe departure of civilian personnel — the civilian personnel of our allies who are still serving in Afghanistan. Operation Allies Refuge, which I announced back in July, has already moved 2,000 Afghans who are eligible for special immigration visas and their families to the United States. In the coming days, the U.S. military will provide assistance to move more S.I.V.-eligible Afghans and their families out of Afghanistan.

We’re also expanding refugee access to cover other vulnerable Afghans who work for our embassy. U.S. nongovernmental organizations and Afghans who otherwise are a great risk in U.S. news agencies — I know there are concerns about why we did not begin evacuating Afghan civilians sooner. Part of the answer is some of the Afghans did not want to leave earlier, still hopeful for their country. And part of it because the Afghan government and its supporters discouraged us from organizing a mass exodus to avoid triggering, as they said, a crisis of confidence.

American troops are performing this mission as professionally and as effectively as they always do. But it is not without risks. As we carry out this departure, we have made it clear to the Taliban: If they attack our personnel or disrupt our operation, the U.S. presence will be swift, and the response will be swift and forceful. We will defend our people with devastating force if necessary. Our current military mission is short on time, limited in scope and focused in its objectives: Get our people and our allies as safely and quickly as possible. And once we have completed this mission, we will conclude our military withdrawal. We will end America’s longest war after 20 long years of bloodshed.

The events we’re seeing now are sadly proof that no amount of military force would ever deliver a stable, united, secure Afghanistan, as known in history as the graveyard of empires. What’s happening now could just as easily happen five years ago or 15 years in the future. We have to be honest, our mission in Afghanistan made many missteps over the past two decades.

I’m now the fourth American president to preside over war in Afghanistan. Two Democrats and two Republicans. I will not pass this responsibility on to a fifth president. I will not mislead the American people by claiming that just a little more time in Afghanistan will make all the difference. Nor will I shrink from my share of responsibility for where we are today and how we must move forward from here. I am president of the United States of America, and the buck stops with me.

I’m deeply saddened by the facts we now face. But I do not regret my decision to end America’s war-fighting in Afghanistan and maintain a laser focus on our counterterrorism mission, there and other parts of the world. Our mission to degrade the terrorist threat of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and kill Osama bin Laden was a success. Our decades-long effort to overcome centuries of history and permanently change and remake Afghanistan was not, and I wrote and believed it never could be.

I cannot and will not ask our troops to fight on endlessly in another country’s civil war, taking casualties, suffering life-shattering injuries, leaving families broken by grief and loss. This is not in our national security interest. It is not what the American people want. It is not what our troops who have sacrificed so much over the past two decades deserve. I made a commitment to the American people when I ran for president that I would bring America’s military involvement in Afghanistan to an end. While it’s been hard and messy and, yes, far from perfect, I’ve honoured that commitment.

More importantly, I made a commitment to the brave men and women who serve this nation that I wasn’t going to ask them to continue to risk their lives in a military action that should’ve ended long ago. Our leader did that in Vietnam when I got here as a young man. I will not do it in Afghanistan.

I know my decision will be criticized. But I would rather take all that criticism than pass this decision on to another president of the United States, yet another one, a fifth one. Because it’s the right one, it’s the right decision for our people; the right one for our brave service members who risked their lives serving our nation. And it’s the right one for America.

Thank you. May God protect our troops, our diplomats and all brave Americans serving in harm’s way.

Loading

News

Presidency announces arrest of suspect linked to fake Tinubu audio fraud

Published

on

Presidency announces arrest of suspect linked to fake Tinubu audio fraud
Ifechukwu Dennis

Presidency announces arrest of suspect linked to fake Tinubu audio fraud

The Presidency has announced the arrest of a suspect allegedly linked to the circulation of a fake AI-generated audio message purportedly featuring President Bola Tinubu’s voice.

Presidential spokesperson, Bayo Onanuga, disclosed the development in a post on his official Facebook and X (formerly Twitter) accounts on Thursday, June 4, 2026, stating that the suspect was apprehended by a crack team of the Inspector-General of Police in Benin City, Edo State. According to Onanuga, the suspect has been identified as Ifechukwu Dennis. He also noted that the Nigeria Police Force would issue an official statement providing further details of the investigation and arrest. “The IGP crack team has arrested Ifechukwu Dennis who originated the fake voice that he passed on to his gullible targets as President Tinubu’s voice. Dennis was arrested in Benin. The police will issue an official statement,” Onanuga wrote on X.

The AI-generated voice notes falsely attributed to President Tinubu went viral on social media starting May 27, 2026. The manipulated clip, which was overlaid onto a video of social media activist Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM) , contained several inflammatory statements that sparked widespread outrage and concern. The fake audio falsely claimed that President Tinubu deliberately allowed insecurity to persist in parts of the country for political reasons. It also alleged that the president had asked former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi to step down in his favour ahead of the 2023 presidential election and threatened to worsen insecurity in the South-East. “I’ve begged Peter Obi to step down for me. He refused. Now I will make sure the insecurity affects only South East,” the voice note claimed. The audio sparked widespread reactions on social media, with many users initially believing it to be an authentic leaked recording of the President. However, government officials quickly rejected the authenticity of the recording, insisting that it was deliberately created using artificial intelligence technology to mislead the public and damage the image of the President.

Presidential media aide Bayo Onanuga had initially shared the AI video and threatened legal action against VDM, describing the incident as “a clear case of egregious abuse of the social media platform.” In a post at the time, Onanuga wrote: “This VDM needs to face the weight of the law for being the conveyor and disseminator of a fake audio of President Tinubu.” However, subsequent investigations and fact-checks by multiple media organisations established that VDM had not posted the doctored audio. Premium Times reported that the newspaper fact-checked the voice notes and found that an unknown person had manipulated them, further establishing that the voice notes didn’t originate from VDM’s original video. Reports indicated that an unidentified individual had extracted footage from VDM’s original Instagram video and superimposed the AI-generated voice notes before recirculating the manipulated version online, creating the false impression that the activist had shared or endorsed the content. Despite reports that the manipulated audio did not originate from VDM, the Presidency had initially called for his prosecution, a position that attracted criticism after fact-checkers confirmed that VDM’s original video contained none of the fabricated audio. The arrest of Ifechukwu Dennis has now shifted attention to the individual police believe originated the fake voice recording before it was circulated online.

The arrest has sparked widespread reactions on social media, with many Nigerians questioning the priorities of security agencies amid rising insecurity across the country. Many netizens expressed concern that security agencies appeared to have acted more swiftly in tracking the creator of a fake audio than in apprehending kidnappers and bandits responsible for recent attacks across the country. Reacting to the announcement, a Facebook user, Akeodi Ali wrote, “What about the kidnappers on TikTok?” Another commenter, Araba Yemi Banjo, criticised the celebration of the arrest in the face of the country’s worsening security challenges. “Sir, in all that is happening in this country, is this what you can gloat about? One would have expected you to be showcasing arrested kidnappers who for over two weeks held innocent schoolchildren hostage in an evil forest. But alas you are here, sir, massaging the ego of your benefactor who has failed to perform his duty,” Banjo wrote. Also reacting, Chidubem Ukamaka compared the speed of the arrest to the response against kidnappers who have openly posted videos online. “He was tracked down and arrested before the bandits posting videos on TikTok… We are taking notes,” the commenter wrote. In a similar vein, Abdulrahman Isah questioned why the suspect was located before those responsible for recent mass abductions of students in parts of the country. “So he has been tracked before the Oyo bandits. Una weldone Mr spokesperson,” he wrote. For Daramola Stephen, the announcement raised further questions: “This is ridiculous, why can’t the crack team crack the people behind the Oriire kidnap?”

Onanuga also revealed that another individual was arrested over a social media post that allegedly raised false security concerns about Abuja, saying the action underscored the consequences of spreading unverified information capable of causing public panic. “The police have also arrested this Nigerian who made an alarming post about Abuja’s security, spreading fear among citizens. By arresting him, the police have sent the clear message that reckless users of the social media won’t go free,” Onanuga stated. The presidential spokesman stressed that security agencies are committed to tackling the spread of false content capable of undermining public confidence and order. He noted that the arrests demonstrate the determination of law enforcement agencies to hold individuals accountable for the reckless use of social media platforms.

The incident has reignited concerns about the growing use of artificial intelligence to create realistic deepfake content capable of misleading the public and influencing political discourse. Such technology can imitate the voices and appearances of public figures, making it difficult for ordinary citizens to distinguish between genuine and manipulated content. In Nigeria, concerns over misinformation and fake news have grown sharply in recent years as social media platforms become a major source of information for millions of people. Government agencies, civil society groups and technology experts have frequently urged citizens to verify information before sharing it online. The arrest has also raised questions about the earlier accusations directed at VeryDarkMan, with critics arguing that the emergence of a new suspect appears to contradict initial claims about the source of the audio. The case has reignited debate over misinformation, digital manipulation and the risks posed by AI-generated content, particularly when public figures are wrongly implicated before investigations are concluded.

As of the time of filing this report, the Nigeria Police Force was yet to issue any formal statement providing further details about the arrest, possible charges, or the next steps in the investigation. According to the Presidency, the police will release an official statement detailing the allegations against Dennis and the findings of their investigation. Observers expect the case to draw attention to the need for stronger regulations and public awareness regarding the use of artificial intelligence technologies in Nigeria. Further details regarding the circumstances surrounding Dennis’s arrest and the charges he may face were not immediately available at the time of this report. With the suspect now in police custody, attention is expected to shift to the outcome of the investigation and whether additional persons linked to the production or circulation of the disputed audio clip will be identified.

Presidency announces arrest of suspect linked to fake Tinubu audio fraud

Loading

Continue Reading

News

 State Police Framework Ready Soon, Presidency Tells Nigerians

Published

on

 State Police Framework Ready Soon, Presidency Tells Nigerians
L-R: IGP Olatunji Disu, Deputy Senate President, Jibril Barau, Chief of Staff to the President Femi Gbajabiamila, Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu and Attorney-General and Minister of Justice Lateef Fagbemi

State Police Framework Ready Soon, Presidency Tells Nigerians

The presidency said Thursday that a constitutional amendment to establish state police will soon happen following months of consultations between the executive, the National Assembly, and security authorities.

President Bola Tinubu’s Chief of Staff, Femi Gbajabiamila, briefed correspondents after a consultative meeting at the State House, Abuja, on Thursday, June 4, 2026. According to Gbajabiamila, discussions on the proposed state police framework began several months ago following a directive by President Bola Tinubu, and substantial progress has been achieved in developing the legal and constitutional pathways required for implementation.

“We started deliberations in the last three or four months on how to go about the establishment of state police as directed by Mr President,” he said. “Establishing state police is not something that you do with the snap of the fingers. There is a lot involved in terms of constitution and legalities, and thank God we have now gained a lot of traction.” Gbajabiamila expressed optimism that the constitutional amendment required to create state police would be introduced soon. “Hopefully, the amendment will come shortly, and the details of the amendment will come after that,” he added.

According to the Chief of Staff, the current focus is on the constitutional amendment itself, while enabling legislation would follow afterwards to define operational procedures and administrative frameworks for state police across the country. “Right now, what we are looking at is the constitutional amendment itself, and then the enabling law would follow thereafter. That is what we have been deliberating on in the last couple of hours,” Gbajabiamila stated. He further noted that there is now broad national consensus on the need for state police, stressing that discussions had evolved beyond the question of whether state police should exist. He said the focus had shifted toward ensuring the establishment of an effective legal and institutional framework capable of guaranteeing accountability and efficient operations.

READ ALSO:

President Tinubu will receive a full report on the meeting’s outcome. He has consistently backed decentralised policing as a necessary response to Nigeria’s evolving security challenges, maintaining that such a structure would improve grassroots security, enhance intelligence gathering, and better protect lives and property across the country.

The consultative meeting was attended by a cross-section of senior government officials, demonstrating the administration’s commitment to the initiative. Those present included Deputy Senate President Jibrin BarauDeputy Speaker of the House of Representatives Benjamin KaluAttorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) , and Inspector-General of Police Tunji Disu. The meeting formed part of ongoing consultations by the Federal Government aimed at developing a workable and nationally acceptable framework for state police to enhance internal security and improve the ability of sub-national governments to tackle emerging security challenges.

The Thursday meeting followed recent kidnappings across the country that have reignited calls for security sector reforms. In May 2026, armed gunmen on motorcycles attacked schools in the Ahoro Esinle community of Oriire Local Government Area in Oyo State and abducted at least 39 pupils and 7 teachers. The assailants eventually killed one of the teachers in captivity. According to reports, the attackers stormed three schools on May 15, 2026 — Baptist Nursery and Primary School, Yawota; Community Grammar School, Esiele; and L.A. Primary School, Esiele — in what has been described as a highly organized operation. The attack marked one of the first mass school abductions of its scale in the South-West, a region previously considered relatively insulated from the mass kidnapping crises that have plagued Northern Nigeria.

Governor Seyi Makinde reported 32 total abductions and took decisive action in response to the crisis. The Oyo State Government ordered the immediate suspension of all school excursions, field trips, inter-school sports competitions, and any extracurricular activities that require students to leave school premises. The Ministry of Education issued a circular directing all school administrators to comply with the suspension until further notice, citing growing security concerns across the state.

The abduction took a tragic turn when reports emerged that a mathematics teacher, Michael Oyedokun, was later beheaded by his captors. Another teacher, identified as Joel Adesiyan (also reported as Adesiyan Adegboye), was killed during the initial raid on the schools. The deaths have sparked national outrage and triggered protests by teachers across the country. In a message marking Eid-al-Adha and National Children’s Day, Governor Makinde expressed deep solidarity with the families of the abducted school children and teachers. “As we mark this year’s Eid and Children’s Day, our thoughts are with every family awaiting the return of their loved ones, and with security agencies working to keep our communities safe,” he wrote on his official X handle. He reassured the state of his administration’s efforts to resolve the crisis, stating, “We are working to ensure the safe return of those who were kidnapped in Oriire LGA.”

The Oyo school abduction has triggered nationwide protests by the Nigeria Union of Teachers (NUT) . Members of the NUT, Kwara State wing, joined the nationwide solidarity rally organised by the national body of the union to protest the abduction and continued captivity of teachers and pupils. The rally, held in Ilorin, the Kwara State capital, saw teachers marching with placards bearing inscriptions such as “From Chibok to Oriire: Our children are still crying,” “We say no to attacks on schools,” and “Stop the killing and maiming of teachers in Nigeria.” The Deputy Secretary-General of the NUT in Kwara State, Mike Modesty, lamented that the victims had remained in captivity since May 15, adding that the continued attacks on teachers and learners showed that the government had not done enough to protect schools. “They have been abducted since May 15. One teacher has been killed and the remaining ones are still in captivity. And we are hearing that the bandits want to negotiate. Negotiate what? The lives of our children and the teachers?” he said.

The push for state police has gained renewed momentum amid growing concerns over insecurity and increasing calls for a more decentralised policing structure capable of addressing local security challenges across the federation. Supporters of the initiative have argued that Nigeria’s centralised policing structure has become overstretched amid rising security concerns including insurgency, banditry, kidnapping, and communal violence. Some states have already established regional and local security outfits, such as Amotekun in the South-West, but these operate without full constitutional backing. However, opponents have continued to raise concerns about possible political interference and the potential misuse of state police by state administrations, urging the inclusion of robust legal safeguards to prevent abuse. The state police bill has been one of the most contentious constitutional matters since 1999, with northern governors and some civil society groups previously expressing reservations. Nonetheless, Gbajabiamila expressed confidence that there is now a national consensus on the necessity of the reform.

The constitutional amendment, once finalised, will be presented to the National Assembly for consideration before the enabling legislation that will define the operational procedures and administrative frameworks for state police across the country. President Tinubu will receive a comprehensive briefing on the outcome of the meeting and the progress made toward actualising the long-awaited security reform. According to the administration, a decentralised policing structure would strengthen grassroots security, improve intelligence gathering, and enhance protection of lives and property across the country.

 State Police Framework Ready Soon, Presidency Tells Nigerians

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu Approves One-Year Salary Gratuity for Retiring Federal Workers

Published

on

Tinubu Approves One-Year Salary Gratuity for Retiring Federal Workers

Tinubu Approves One-Year Salary Gratuity for Retiring Federal Workers

ABUJA — Retiring personnel of the State House will be among the first federal workers to benefit from the newly approved gratuity scheme for civil servants introduced by the administration of President Bola Tinubu, the Permanent Secretary of the State House, Mr. Temitope Fashedemi, has revealed.

Fashedemi made the disclosure on Thursday during a send-off ceremony organised in Abuja to honour two retiring directors and two deputy directors, describing the initiative as a major milestone in the Federal Government’s efforts to strengthen the welfare of public servants before and after retirement.

According to a statement issued by the Director of Information and Public Relations, State House, Mr. Abiodun Oladunjoye, the Permanent Secretary praised President Tinubu for approving the return of gratuity payments for retiring federal workers in addition to pensions and other retirement entitlements.

The development follows the approval of a new federal civil service gratuity scheme by the Federal Executive Council (FEC) in March 2026. Under the policy, officers who have completed a minimum of 10 years in service will be entitled to a gratuity equivalent to one year of their total annual emolument upon retirement, with effect from January 1, 2026.

The scheme was introduced following recommendations by an inter-ministerial technical committee established by the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation in collaboration with key government agencies. It is designed to complement the Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS) introduced in 2004, which largely eliminated gratuity payments for federal civil servants.

READ ALSO:

Speaking at the ceremony, Fashedemi noted that some of the retiring officers being honoured would be among the first beneficiaries of the new retirement package.

“Mr President approved the introduction of gratuity for retiring civil servants, and some of you are among the first set of civil servants that will benefit from it,” he said.

He explained that the policy reflects the Federal Government’s commitment to ensuring that workers who dedicate decades of service to the nation are properly rewarded and supported after leaving active service.

The Permanent Secretary described retirement after 35 years of service or upon attaining the age of 60 as a significant milestone that deserves recognition and celebration.

“We take it that when people work hard for government and put in all these years of service, they need to be recognised and celebrated,” he added.

Fashedemi further linked the initiative to the implementation of the Federal Civil Service Strategy and Implementation Plan (FCSSIP 25), which prioritises employee welfare, productivity and institutional reforms across the public service.

According to him, the State House has institutionalised programmes aimed at recognising exceptional officers during active service and celebrating them upon retirement.

He also commended the retirees for their professionalism, discipline, integrity and commitment to national service throughout their careers.

“It is not easy to do all this work and retire peacefully. All of you have successfully achieved that, and it is no mean feat,” he stated.

The approval of the gratuity scheme has been widely welcomed by civil servants and labour groups, many of whom had long advocated the restoration of gratuity payments to improve the welfare of retirees under the contributory pension system.

Observers say the policy is expected to boost morale within the Federal Civil Service, provide greater financial security for retirees and strengthen confidence in government efforts to improve workers’ welfare.

Also speaking at the event, the Permanent Secretary of the General Services Office in the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Dr. Ibrahim Kana, praised the retiring officers for their dedication and service to the country.

Former Permanent Secretary of the General Services Office, Dr. Nnamdi Mbaeri, also highlighted the importance of commitment, professionalism and hard work in public service.

Earlier, the Director of Administration, State House, Alhaji Abdulkadir Idris, described the ceremony as a celebration of distinguished officers who had rendered meritorious service to Nigeria and wished them a fulfilling retirement.

The officers honoured included Mr. Francis Wasa, Director of ICT; Mrs. Adenike Akintola, Director of Internal Audit; and Mr. Esiyede Godwin, Deputy Director, Library and Archives.

Another retiree, Bukar Usman Goni, a Deputy Director in the Finance and Accounts Department who was absent from the ceremony, was also recognised for his contributions.

Speaking on behalf of the retirees, Wasa thanked the State House management for the honour and prayed that serving officers would enjoy successful careers and retire in good health, peace and fulfilment.

With the implementation of the new gratuity scheme for federal civil servants, the Federal Government hopes to provide additional financial support for retirees and reinforce the value of long-term public service.

Tinubu Approves One-Year Salary Gratuity for Retiring Federal Workers

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending