International
Trump Mar-a-Lago home searched over ‘likely’ efforts to hide files, DoJ says
The FBI searched Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida after it obtained evidence there was probably an effort to conceal classified documents in defiance of a grand jury subpoena and despite Trump’s lawyers suggesting otherwise, the Department of Justice said in a court filing late on Tuesday night.
The filing, opposing Trump’s request for an independent review of materials seized, amounted to the most detailed picture of potential obstruction of justice yet outlined by the DoJ.
“Efforts were likely taken to obstruct the government’s investigation,” the filing alleged.
Among new revelations in the 36-page filing were that agents recovered three classified documents from desks in Trump’s office and additional classified files from a storage room, contrary to what Trump’s lawyers indicated.
The DoJ suggested the effort to conceal documents started on 3 June, as Trump’s representatives produced a single legal envelope, double-taped, in response to a subpoena for materials removed from the White House.
The file was given to Jay Bratt, the chief DoJ counter-intelligence official, by a Trump lawyer and his records custodian, who signed a letter certifying a “diligent search” had been conducted and all documents responsive to the subpoena were being returned.
The lawyer also told Bratt all records in the envelope had come from one storage room, that there were no other records elsewhere at Mar-a-Lago, and that all boxes brought from the White House had been searched, the DoJ said.
READ ALSO:
- Katsina Records 57 Cases of Monkeypox, Cholera
- Protests As Over 80 Houses Are Demolished In Edo Community
- Visiting Jonathan to seek support shows you are shameless, Niger Delta activist blasts Tinubu
A copy of the letter reproduced in the filing redacted the custodian’s name. Two sources familiar with the matter identified the custodian as Christina Bobb, a member of Trump’s legal team.
According to the filing, the FBI uncovered evidence through multiple sources that classified documents remained at Mar-a-Lago in defiance of the subpoena, and that other records were “likely” removed from the storage room and concealed.
The DoJ said the evidence – details of which were redacted in an affidavit unsealed last week – allowed it to obtain a warrant to enter Mar-a-Lago, where FBI agents found more classified documents in Trump’s office.
“The government seized 33 items of evidence, mostly boxes,” the filing said. “Three classified documents that were not located in boxes, but rather were located in the desks in the ‘45 Office’ were also seized.”
In an exhibit resembling how the justice department would show the results of a drug bust, the filing included a photo of retrieved documents emblazoned with classification markings including “top secret” and “secret” designations.
The DoJ said the documents collected most recently included “sensitive compartmented information”, while other documents were so sensitive that counterintelligence agents reviewing them needed additional security clearances.
The filing said: “That the FBI recovered twice as many documents with classification markings as the ‘diligent search’ that the former president’s counsel and other representatives had weeks to perform, calls into serious question the representations made in the 3 June certification.”
Trump responded on Wednesday with a post on his social media platform, alleging without evidence that the photo of documents was staged and that the documents were supposedly declassified.
“Terrible the way the FBI, during the Raid of Mar-a-Lago, threw documents haphazardly all over the floor (perhaps pretending it was me that did it!), and then started taking pictures of them for the public to see,” Trump said. “Thought they wanted them kept Secret? Lucky I Declassified!”
Trump and allies have insisted he issued some sort of a standing order when he was president that any materials he took to the White House residence were declassified. He has produced no paperwork that might confirm that claim.
READ ALSO:
- 115 Killed, 73,379 Displaced As Floods Hit 22 States, FCT
- Those Calling For My Resignation Are Kids, Ayu Bombs Wike’s Camp
- Osinbajo leaves for US seeking global energy support
In a subsequent post, Trump wrote: “Whatever happened to NUCLEAR, a word that was leaked early on by the FBI/DOJ to the Fake News Media!” – a reference to a news report that the FBI sought materials relating to nuclear weapons.
The justice department appears to have asked Trump representatives in the June subpoena to return documents marked as “S/FRD”, short for “Secret/Formerly Restricted Data”, a control relating to nuclear weapons information designated by the Atomic Energy Act.
Trump has never addressed the central question of why he had classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, why they were in his private office, and why the documents were not surrendered when he was subpoenaed in June.
On Wednesday morning, Liz Cheney, the Wyoming Republican who is vice-chair of the House January 6 committee and a leading Trump critic, tweeted the picture of documents on the floor at Mar-a-Lago and condemned “yet more indefensible conduct by Donald Trump”.
Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who chairs the House intelligence committee, said: “The government’s brief is devastating. The legal arguments are compelling, but what is most striking are the facts outlining how the former president and his team knowingly put our national security at risk.”
In the DoJ filing, after painting an extraordinary portrait of the hurdles the DoJ had to overcome to recover documents that belong to the government, prosecutors argued Trump had no basis to seek the appointment of a so-called special master to review the files.
The request fails, the filing argued, because Trump is attempting to use the potential for executive privilege to withhold documents from the executive branch – which the supreme court decided in Nixon v GSA did not hold.
The DoJ added that even if Trump could successfully assert executive privilege, it would not apply because the documents marked classified were seized as part of a criminal investigation into the handling of the documents themselves.
Trump is expected to press on with his request for a special master and to obtain a more detailed list of materials taken, a source close to his legal team said, also disputing that the DoJ filing raised the likelihood of an obstruction charge.
On Tuesday morning, Trump added a third lawyer, the former Florida solicitor general Christopher Kise, to his legal team, said two sources with direct knowledge of the matter.
International
Israel Questions Pakistan’s Credibility as Mediator in US‑Iran Ceasefire Talks
Israel Questions Pakistan’s Credibility as Mediator in US‑Iran Ceasefire Talks
Israel has publicly doubted Pakistan’s role as a mediator in the ongoing United States–Iran ceasefire negotiations, describing Islamabad as “not a credible player” in the diplomatic process. The comments from Israel’s ambassador to India, Reuven Azar, come ahead of scheduled direct talks between U.S. and Iranian officials in Islamabad on April 11, reportedly to be attended by U.S. Vice President JD Vance.
Azar acknowledged that the United States may have strategic reasons for using Pakistan’s facilitation, but he emphasized that Israel’s primary concern remains the removal of Hezbollah’s terrorist infrastructure in southern Lebanon. He highlighted recent Israeli air operations that reportedly eliminated over 250 Hezbollah operatives and reiterated that disarming the group south of the Litani River is essential to protect Israeli communities.
READ ALSO:
- Making Up for Lost Sleep Might Be Healthier Than Experts Once Believed — What Science Says
- Sleeping Positions: How They Affect Your Health and Which Ones to Avoid
- Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei
Drawing parallels with past U.S. diplomatic efforts, Azar compared Pakistan’s mediation to previous roles played by Qatar and Turkey in negotiating truces in Gaza, suggesting such mediators were sometimes selected for convenience rather than effectiveness. He stressed that Israel’s objective is to remain closely aligned with the United States on the substance and outcome of any regional agreement.
Regarding the U.S.–Iran ceasefire, Azar expressed support for the two-week truce while noting that Israel considers Lebanon outside its scope. He warned that continued Iranian and Israeli military actions in Lebanon could jeopardize the fragile agreement, potentially destabilizing the Strait of Hormuz and broader Middle East security.
The ceasefire talks themselves remain delicate. While Pakistan has positioned itself as a facilitator, Tehran has acknowledged Islamabad’s role but continues to insist on substantive agreements over nuclear development, missile programs, and regional security obligations. Meanwhile, Israel maintains a firm stance that its operations in southern Lebanon are necessary to neutralize threats from Hezbollah.
The diplomatic dispute over Pakistan’s credibility highlights deep divisions among key stakeholders in the region, underscoring the challenges in maintaining a fragile truce while addressing the security concerns of multiple actors. Observers will closely monitor whether the upcoming Islamabad talks can reconcile these differences and produce a sustainable agreement.
Israel Questions Pakistan’s Credibility as Mediator in US‑Iran Ceasefire Talks
International
Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei
Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei
Thousands of Iranians took to the streets across major cities, including Tehran, Urmia, and Gorgan, on Thursday to honour the late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. His death has become a pivotal moment in the ongoing Middle East conflict, and the rallies combined mourning, political messaging, and public solidarity.
The nationwide tribute began precisely at 9:40 a.m. local time, the exact moment Khamenei was killed on February 28 at his Tehran residence in what Iranian authorities described as U.S.–Israeli airstrikes. The attack also claimed the lives of several senior Iranian figures and triggered a series of retaliatory actions, escalating tensions across the Gulf and involving multiple regional actors.
Crowds carried portraits of the long-serving leader, who presided over Iran’s political and ideological direction for nearly four decades. Analysts note that the rallies were not only acts of public mourning but also demonstrations of internal cohesion and state continuity during a period of geopolitical strain. The displays served to reinforce loyalty and resilience in the eyes of both domestic audiences and external observers.
READ ALSO:
- UN Chief Condemns Israeli Airstrikes in Lebanon
- Iran Warns of Sea Mines in Strait of Hormuz, Offers Alternative Routes for Ships
- ADC Leadership Crisis Deepens as Rival Faction Protests at INEC Headquarters
Despite these public displays, there is uncertainty surrounding Iran’s leadership visibility. His successor, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, has yet to make a public appearance since before the conflict escalated. This absence has raised questions within diplomatic and political circles about the consolidation of authority in Tehran and the future direction of the country’s leadership.
The absence of a formal state funeral further underscores the disruption caused by the war. Security conditions and ongoing military tensions have prevented Iran from organising a centralised burial ceremony, highlighting the impact of the conflict on domestic affairs and governance.
The rallies thus served a dual purpose: beyond mourning the late leader, they acted as a strategic show of unity, signalling resilience to external adversaries while reinforcing internal political continuity. Public mobilisations like these remain a critical indicator of Tehran’s ability to maintain cohesion during times of crisis.
As the conflict continues, Iran’s internal dynamics, leadership visibility, and public mobilisation will be closely watched by analysts as key measures of stability and state authority. The commemorations demonstrate that, even amid uncertainty and regional tension, the government can still orchestrate nationwide expressions of solidarity.
Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei
International
UN Chief Condemns Israeli Airstrikes in Lebanon
UN Chief Condemns Israeli Airstrikes in Lebanon
The United Nations has strongly condemned a wave of Israeli airstrikes in Lebanon that killed and injured hundreds, including civilians, amid a fragile ceasefire in the Middle East. UN Secretary‑General António Guterres expressed deep concern over the mounting civilian toll and warned that ongoing military activity threatens efforts to maintain peace and stability in the region.
In a statement released Wednesday, Guterres offered condolences to the people of Lebanon and wished a swift recovery to the injured. He emphasized that international humanitarian law must be respected, urging all parties to halt hostilities and pursue diplomatic solutions. “There is no military solution to the conflict,” he said, stressing the importance of protecting civilians and infrastructure.
The airstrikes on April 8, 2026, marked some of the heaviest bombardments in Lebanon since tensions escalated between Israel and Hezbollah in recent weeks. Lebanese authorities reported hundreds of casualties in Beirut’s southern suburbs, the Bekaa Valley, and southern towns, with significant civilian losses.
READ ALSO:
- Iran Warns of Sea Mines in Strait of Hormuz, Offers Alternative Routes for Ships
- ADC Leadership Crisis Deepens as Rival Faction Protests at INEC Headquarters
- 12-Year-Old Dies After Alleged Bullying at FGC, Ikot Ekpene
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, described the attacks as “nothing short of horrific” and called for independent investigations into potential violations of international law, highlighting the devastating impact on civilians and infrastructure.
The strikes occurred shortly after a US‑Iran ceasefire took effect, which did not formally include the Lebanon theater, raising fears that hostilities could escalate further. International reactions have been swift, with countries such as Spain condemning Israel’s actions and urging adherence to international law.
The UN has called for immediate restraint and stressed that protecting civilian lives and upholding humanitarian standards must remain a priority as tensions continue to simmer in the region.
UN Chief Condemns Israeli Airstrikes in Lebanon
-
metro3 days agoFG Deports US Missionary Alex Barbir Over Alleged Role in Nigeria Insecurity
-
Entertainment3 days agoVeteran Nollywood Actor Davis Ofor ‘Clarus’ of New Masquerade Dies at 85
-
metro2 days ago2026 NYSC Batch A Stream II: Registration, Swearing-In Dates Announced
-
Africa19 hours agoECOWAS Recruitment 2026: Over 30 Job Vacancies Open for Nigerians (How to Apply)
-
metro3 days agoLagos Announces Partial Road Closures for Project Commissioning
-
Entertainment2 days agoSaheed Osupa Defends Juju Use Amid Backlash From Islamic Clerics
-
Politics23 hours agoCourt Stops ADC Congress, Orders Status Quo in Leadership Row
-
News3 days agoIran Lists Tough Conditions for Peace Talks with US


