2022 Budget: Research Institute’s Bid To Execute N80bn Constituency Projects Raises Eyebrows - Newstrends
Connect with us

metro

2022 Budget: Research Institute’s Bid To Execute N80bn Constituency Projects Raises Eyebrows

Published

on

An advertisement placed by the Nigerian Building and Road Research Institute (NBRRI) in some Nigerian newspapers on Monday April 18, 2022, calling for bids for ‘2020 direct line capital and zonal intervention projects worth about N80 billion has raised eyebrows, Daily Trust on Sunday can report.

While observers have said it was an aberration for NBRRI to delve into capital projects which are outside their core mandate, the agency said they cannot reject constituency projects brought to them for execution by federal lawmakers.

Daily Trust on Sunday reports that apart from NBRRI, many government MDAs have been running newspaper adverts calling for bids to execute contracts considered to be outside their core mandates.

In the advertisement under reference, the research institute (NBRRI) expressed its desire to execute some capital projects under the 2022 Budget Appropriation.

The scope of work, as contained in the advert, involves the construction of classroom blocks, skills centres/town halls, construction of earth roads, with hydraulic structures, asphalt overlay, solar street lights, motorized boreholes, and supply of goods, among other projects.

This has, however, raised questions as to why an agency of government with the core mandate of conducting research would be involved in executing capital projects. 

NBRRI’s mandate

NBRRI is a parastatal under the Federal Ministry of Science and Technology.

Established in 1978 to carry out research and development activities into the many aspects of the industries in charge of building and construction of roads, its statutory function, according to our findings, is to conduct coordinated applied research and development into the many sections of the building and construction sectors of the economy.

READ ALSO:

Some of the areas in which NBRRI is mandated to conduct research, according to our findings, are the following: Local building and construction materials to determine the most effective and economic methods of their utilization; architectural design of buildings to suit Nigerian climatic conditions with respect to lighting, ventilation, thermal comfort, and humidity; the design and performance of functional units in buildings including electrical installations, plumbing, painting, drainage, ventilation, and air-conditioning system; local construction, foundation and earth-works for buildings and bridges, especially on problem soils.

In 1993, the mandate of the institute was said to have been further expanded to include Research and Development (R&D) into all possible aspects of materials of engineering which are used in relation to the construction industry, our findings reveal.

Questions trail bid for over 500 constituency projects

However, a scrutiny of the advertisement indicates that NBRRI invited bidding for over 500 projects in different parts of the country which were categorized into A, B, C, D and E.

While category ‘A’ sought pre-qualification for 48 projects, including works, goods, and services, category ‘B’ invited bids for 263 projects.

In the same vein, category C invited tenders for 12 projects while categories D and E sought to bid for 6 and 30 projects respectively.

Questions are being raised over the inclusion of 80 per cent of the projects which are constituency related and considered to be outside the mandate of the organization.

For instance, under category A, the research institute plans to execute projects believed to be outside its jurisdiction, among which is the erection of high-intensity solar street lights for surveillance in selected areas of Surulere, Lagos.

Besides calling for bidding to undertake a project for the development of a 150kw solar mini-grid for the off-national grid at Kwalita village, Dobi, Gwagwalada in the FCT, it also sought to undertake the provision of high-efficiency solar street lights within and around some schools and rural communities in North-Central, North-West, and South-West for security surveillance.

Other ‘strange’ projects NBRRI has called for bid to undertake include the procurement of freezers, fridges, generators, grinding machines, vulcanizing machines for youth empowerment in Anambra State, the provision of educational materials in Gindiri, Plateau State, as well as the supply of classroom furniture at Ojokoro, Ashafa, Irepodun communities.

Also, the agency plans to undertake projects for the supply of classroom furniture in the Aiyetoro-Ajeromi and Badagry communities, equipping of the Central Auditorium and Multi-Purpose Hall in Naki Gori and Yola Wakat in the North-Central zone, and the supply of empowerment as well as provision of empowerment items to women at Danmaje and other LGAs.

Similarly, NBRRI is being questioned over its bid to undertake a project for capacity building and empowerment of indigents on cassava value-chain by-products in Anambra North.   

READ ALSO:

Under category ‘B’ as contained in the advert, which is tagged ‘technical and financial bid’, NBRRI invited bid to undertake a project for the installation of its (NBRRI) fabricated solar streetlight in Gombe Sought LGA, provision and installation of NBRRI fabricated integrated solar streetlights to communities in Awe, Doma, Keana Federal Constituency of Nasarawa State, as well as a contract for what it tagged ‘using NBRRI finished products on rural road construction technology in Ikenne LGA of Ogun State.’

While calling for a bid to undertake a project for the provision of health treatment, supply of drugs, and health insurance for the people of Ibadan, the NBRRI advert also sought to supply and install all-in-one solar street lights in all the six geopolitical zones, according to the tender.

This is in addition to seeking bids for the provision of health treatment, supply of drugs, and health insurance for the people of Ibadan, Oyo State, as well as the construction of solar-powered boreholes and solar-powered streetlights in Idemili North and South Federal Constituency of Anambra State.

Also advertised for bidding by NBRRI is a contract for the provision and installation of streetlights at Aiyetoro, Gbede, in Kogi West Senatorial District, and another for the supply and installation of 3-in-1 solar streetlights at various locations in Nasarawa South.

Similarly, the research institute intends to undertake the construction and provision of solar streetlights with lithium-ion battery, 10,000 lumens with PIR in Gunda, Garubla, Borno State, as well as the construction of solar-powered boreholes, the construction of an inner road at Pambara Extension 1 and 2, construction of culverts at Pambara extensions 1 and 2, Ushafa-Abuja.

It’s an aberration – Rafsanjani

Auwal Musa Rafsanjani, the Executive Director of Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC), said it was an aberration for a research-based organisation like NBRRI to be undertaking constituency projects.

“Aside from being a negation of the mandate given to them, it is also a clear case of non-adherence to the Public Procurement law. If the National Assembly lawmakers are asking them to do a wrong thing as in this case, they should reject that and stay within their mandate.

“They (NBRRI) should remain within their research-based mandate and stop aiding corruption while the National Assembly should understand that there is a need for a legal framework to avoid diversion,” Rafsanjani said.

However, another source said the fact that the projects were advertised in the national dailies, meant the due process was followed. “Many government agencies go beyond their mandates to solve problems. I am not saying the NBRRI has the mandate to go into constructing roads or providing boreholes. I am also not saying they don’t have the mandate,” said the source who wished to remain unnamed. 

We can’t stop lawmakers from domiciling constituency projects with us – NBRRI

The management of NBRRI said it cannot stop the National Assembly lawmakers from allocating their projects to them.

READ ALSO:

NBRRI’s Chief Information Officer, Peter Mashem, said: “We have tried several times in the NASS to tell them that this is not within our mandate but they still tell you ‘look, it has been signed already; it is an appropriation.”

He explained that the lawmakers started bringing constituency projects to them when they started promoting some of their technologies by building skills acquisition centres in order to create awareness and promote their activities for people to know what they were doing.

“That promotion of these skills acquisition centres was what these lawmakers began to see and say we can take these to our constituencies; that was how we got involved in all these. So, technically, it is our mandate because we were doing promotion which is good for us also.

“But I can assure you that we do a lot of checking to ensure that the money is utilized and the projects reach conclusion; it is not as if they (lawmakers) use us here. We ensure that the projects get to 100 percent conclusion.

“We supervise and issue out the money; if you come and get the bid, we give you part of the money to start with and when you come back with pictures, we give you the second batch,” Mashem said.   

‘NASS not in a position to react’

When contacted, the Director of Information to the National Assembly, Agada Rawlings Emmanuel, said the matter falls within the purview of the political leadership who passed the bill to law.

“Accordingly, you can reach out to the spokesperson of the Senate for further necessary insights or at best, get to read through the Act, which is now a public document, and have a proper understanding of their mandates to draw necessary conclusions on the issues of your concerns.”

However, a senior official in the National Assembly, who preferred not to be named, said there was no relationship between the federal parliament and the execution of capital projects by government agencies except the constitutional role of oversight.

“The National Assembly has no business with any government agency’s capital projects other than oversight to ensure that Nigerians are not short-changed in whatever they do,” the official said.

Loading

metro

Miyetti Allah President Remanded Over $2.63m Money Laundering, Terrorism Charges

Published

on

Miyetti Allah President Remanded Over $2.63m Money Laundering, Terrorism Charges
National President of Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore, Bello Bodejo

Miyetti Allah President Remanded Over $2.63m Money Laundering, Terrorism Charges

  • Bello Bodejo pleads not guilty to 12-count charge as EFCC opposes bail, citing flight risk and witness interference concerns

The Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the remand of the National President of Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore, Bello Bodejo, in the custody of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over allegations of laundering **$2.63 million** and engaging in transactions linked to the **financing of terrorism**. Justice Inyang Ekwo issued the order on Thursday after Bodejo was arraigned by the anti-graft agency on multiple counts bordering on alleged violations of Nigeria’s money laundering laws and terrorism financing provisions. Bodejo was brought before Justice Inyang Ekwo, where he pleaded **not guilty** to all the counts after the charges, dated June 24 and filed on June 25, 2026, were read to him. The EFCC, represented by its counsel **Wahab Shittu, SAN**, informed the court that the matter was fixed for the defendant to enter his plea, and the defence counsel, **Ahmed Raji, SAN**, did not object, allowing the arraignment to proceed. According to the charge marked FHC/ABJ/CR/375/2026, the EFCC accused the Miyetti Allah leader of laundering approximately $2.63 million, offences said to contravene the provisions of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022, and the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

Following Bodejo’s not-guilty plea, the prosecution urged the court to fix a trial date and order the defendant’s remand pending trial. However, Bodejo’s lawyer, Ahmed Raji, informed the court that he had filed a bail application dated June 30, 2026, and urged the judge to hear the motion immediately. Raji argued that the alleged offences are bailable under the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) and urged the court to grant his client bail on liberal terms, noting that Bodejo had consistently made himself available to law enforcement agencies and posed no flight risk. Opposing the application, the prosecution filed a 28-paragraph counter-affidavit dated July 6, 2026, arguing that the defendant posed a flight risk and could interfere with witnesses. Shittu told the court that the Department of State Services (DSS) was “on the watch out for him” and that, “being an influential person, he may manipulate the witnesses and progress of the case”. The prosecution also dismissed the defendant’s claim of ill health, contending that the injury cited was not recent and that Bodejo did not appear to be in poor health. Justice Ekwo declined to grant bail immediately and subsequently ordered that Bodejo be remanded in the EFCC’s holding facility pending a ruling on his application. The judge adjourned the matter to July 20, 2026, for a ruling on the bail application. In addition to the money laundering allegations, the EFCC also accused the Miyetti Allah leader of engaging in transactions allegedly linked to the financing of terrorism, an accusation that adds a layer of gravity to the proceedings as the court prepares to rule on his bail application next week.

READ ALSO:

According to the charge filed by the EFCC on June 25, Bodejo allegedly accepted cash payments totalling about $2.63 million from **Sa’idu Abubakar**, a former Accountant-General of Bauchi State who is currently in police custody over separate corruption allegations. The anti-graft agency alleged that the transactions, carried out between January 2022 and March 2024 in Abuja, exceeded the statutory cash transaction threshold permitted under Nigeria’s money laundering laws and were not processed through financial institutions as required. The specific allegations include that Bodejo received **$100,000** on January 11, 2022; $200,000** on January 21, 2022; **$100,000 on October 26, 2022; $980,000** on February 7, 2024; **$750,000 on March 3, 2024; and **$500,000** on March 20, 2024. Count one of the charge reads that Bodejo “did knowingly and wilfully, without lawful authority or excuse, accept a cash payment of the sum of One Hundred Thousand United States Dollars (USD $100,000.00) in physical currency from one Sa’idu Abubakar, a former Accountant-General of Bauchi State who is currently in the lawful custody of the Nigeria Police Force, which sum exceeded the statutory cash transaction threshold of Five Million Naira (N5,000,000.00), prescribed under Section 1(a) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended), without routing the said transaction through a financial institution as required by law”. Count four of the charge alleges that Bodejo “did knowingly and wilfully, without lawful authority or excuse, accept a cash payment of the sum of Nine Hundred and Eighty Thousand United States Dollars (USD $980,000.00) in physical currency from one Sa’idu Abubakar, a former Accountant-General of Bauchi State, who is currently in the lawful custody of the Nigeria Police Force, which sum exceeded the statutory cash transaction threshold of Five Million Naira (N5,000,000.00) prescribed under Section 2(1)(a) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022, without routing the said transaction through a financial institution as required by law”. The EFCC said the transactions violated provisions of both the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022, which prohibit cash transactions above the prescribed threshold outside the banking system.

Meanwhile, Sa’idu Abubakar, the former Bauchi State Accountant-General who is alleged to have made the cash payments to Bodejo, is currently facing separate legal troubles. In June 2026, the Bauchi State Government filed a 16-count criminal charge against Abubakar, accusing him of allegedly procuring unauthorised loans and diverting public funds totalling about N11.01 billion. According to the amended charge filed before the Bauchi State High Court, the prosecution alleged that Abubakar, while serving as Accountant-General between 2023 and 2024, fraudulently obtained loan facilities from United Bank for Africa (UBA) and Polaris Bank using forged State Executive Council and House of Assembly resolutions. The prosecution further alleged that the loans were purportedly secured for the supply of thousands of motorcycles to Bauchi State civil servants through Emmanuel Asomugha General Enterprises. Abubakar is currently being held at the Bauchi Correctional Centre following the revocation of his bail. The connection between the two cases raises questions about the source of the funds allegedly paid to Bodejo and whether they may have originated from the diverted public funds Abubakar is accused of misappropriating, though no direct link has been established in court filings.

READ ALSO:

The fresh charges against Bodejo come months after he separately faced prosecution by the Federal Government over the alleged establishment of an unauthorised vigilante outfit. In that case, the Federal Government had accused Bodejo of setting up a group known as the “Nomad Vigilante Group” without lawful authority, an action that generated nationwide debate over community security initiatives and the regulation of private armed groups in Nigeria. Bodejo had pleaded not guilty to that charge as well, and the case has been ongoing. The Miyetti Allah leader has also been a controversial figure in Nigeria’s security discourse, particularly regarding conflicts between herders and farmers in various parts of the country. His arrest and arraignment on money laundering and terrorism financing charges have therefore attracted significant public attention, with many viewing the case as a test of the government’s commitment to tackling high-profile corruption and security-related financial crimes.

As the court prepares to rule on the bail application on July 20, the case continues to draw public attention, particularly given the involvement of a prominent leader of a major herders’ association and the gravity of the allegations of money laundering and terrorism financing. If convicted, Bodejo faces a maximum sentence of 14 years imprisonment for each count, according to the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022. The EFCC has indicated that it will continue to pursue the case vigorously, while Bodejo’s legal team has expressed confidence that their client will be granted bail and ultimately exonerated. The case is expected to proceed to trial once the bail application is determined, with the court set to hear witnesses and examine evidence from both sides. The outcome of the bail application on July 20 will determine whether Bodejo remains in EFCC custody or is released pending trial, a decision that will likely have significant implications for the broader political and security landscape in Nigeria.

 

Miyetti Allah President Remanded Over $2.63m Money Laundering, Terrorism Charges

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

Xenophobia: Youth Group Issues Picketing Notice to MTN Nigeria

Published

on

Xenophobia: Youth Group Issues Picketing Notice to MTN Nigeria

Xenophobia: Youth Group Issues Picketing Notice to MTN Nigeria

The apex Yoruba youth organisation, Oodua Youth Coalition (OYC) , has officially served a notice of intention to picket the offices of telecommunications giant MTN Nigeria over the company’s alleged failure to condemn the ongoing xenophobic attacks against Nigerians and other African nationals in South Africa. This decision follows the expiration of a seven-day ultimatum demanding that the South African-linked company publicly denounce the violence targeting Nigerians in South Africa. The group stated that previous correspondence and direct appeals to the telecom firm had been completely ignored, a response they termed “unacceptable” for an entity reaping immense financial patronage from the Nigerian populace. The coalition confirmed that relevant Nigerian security agencies and the South African diplomatic mission in Nigeria have already been notified of the impending action, though a specific date for the picketing has not yet been announced.

In a statement jointly signed by OYC Vice President, Olatunji Adejuwon, and National Secretary, Olaoye Abolaji, the coalition expressed deep disappointment over MTN Nigeria’s continued silence on the xenophobic violence. The group described the company’s failure to respond as unacceptable, given its South African roots and the patronage it enjoys from millions of Nigerians. “This silence is unacceptable, particularly for a corporate entity whose roots are closely connected to South Africa while enjoying immense patronage and goodwill from the Nigerian people,” the statement read. The OYC emphasised that the planned picketing is aimed at enforcing corporate social responsibility and compelling the company to show moral leadership in condemning acts of xenophobia against fellow Africans. The coalition said it would proceed with a peaceful protest if the telecommunications company continued to ignore its demands, stressing that the demonstration would remain orderly and strictly within the confines of Nigerian law.

READ ALSO:

To resolve the impasse, the coalition demands that MTN Nigeria immediately convene a joint press conference with OYC representatives to unequivocally denounce the violence and reaffirm its commitment to the dignity and safety of all Africans. “We once again call on MTN Nigeria to immediately convene a press conference, with representatives of the Oodua Youth Coalition in attendance, to unequivocally condemn the xenophobic attacks and reaffirm its commitment to the safety, dignity and unity of all Africans,” the statement read. The group maintained that the proposed protest would be peaceful, orderly and in accordance with the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. According to the coalition, relevant security agencies have been notified of the planned action, while appropriate communications have also been sent to the South African diplomatic mission in Nigeria. The group also assured the public that the demonstration would not disrupt business activities unduly but would serve as a symbolic expression of discontent over the company’s perceived indifference to the suffering of Nigerians in South Africa.

The development comes despite comments by MTN Nigeria Chief Executive Officer Karl Toriola, who recently condemned all forms of xenophobia and violence against Africans living in South Africa. Speaking on TVC News’ Beyond the Headlines, Toriola said that although MTN was founded in South Africa, over 11 million Nigerians indirectly own stakes in the company through pension fund investments. “We unequivocally condemn any form of xenophobia, violence or attacks against any community in the world. We’re a Nigerian company, through and through. We’re listed on the stock exchange with over 201,000 retail investors, and 11 million people hold shares through their pension funds in MTN Nigeria,” Toriola said. He added that while the parent company is South African, its shareholder base is international, with investors from the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region. Toriola stressed that MTN Nigeria remains committed to Nigeria and unequivocally condemns xenophobia, violence and attacks against any community. He also noted that the company has invested heavily in Nigeria’s telecommunications infrastructure and remains a key player in the country’s digital economy, contributing significantly to employment and economic growth.

The renewed calls come amid a fresh wave of xenophobic attacks against Nigerians and other African nationals residing in South Africa following the expiration of a June 30 deadline imposed by vigilante groups for foreign nationals to leave the country. The attacks have included violence, looting of foreign-owned businesses, and displacement of African immigrants from various communities across South Africa. The Nigerian Senate has strongly condemned the violence and urged the Federal Government to intensify diplomatic efforts to protect Nigerians in South Africa. The Upper Chamber also rejected calls to nationalise South African-owned businesses, including MTN and DStv, in retaliation for the attacks. Senator Adams Oshiomhole proposed that profits made by South African companies operating in Nigeria be used to compensate affected Nigerians if South Africa failed to do so, but the Senate declined to adopt the recommendation. Deputy Senate President Barau Jibrin cautioned against retaliatory measures, saying, “Nobody in this chamber is happy with what is happening in South Africa… However, we also need to exercise caution.” He emphasised that diplomatic engagement and multilateral cooperation would yield better outcomes than confrontational approaches.

The Senate directed its Committees on Foreign Affairs and Diaspora to submit a report within two weeks on actions taken to address the attacks and recommendations for further intervention. The Federal Government has been evacuating Nigerian nationals from South Africa as part of ongoing efforts to repatriate citizens affected by the violence. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has also summoned the South African High Commissioner to Nigeria to register Nigeria’s strong displeasure over the attacks and demand urgent action to protect Nigerian citizens and their businesses. The OYC’s action represents a growing trend of civil society organisations and youth groups taking a more assertive stance on issues affecting Nigerians abroad, particularly when diplomatic efforts appear insufficient to address the grievances of citizens. The group’s decision to target MTN Nigeria reflects a broader strategy of leveraging economic pressure to compel corporate entities to take moral positions on issues of continental significance, a tactic that has been employed in previous instances of xenophobic violence against Nigerians.

Xenophobia: Youth Group Issues Picketing Notice to MTN Nigeria

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

Flooding, Grid Disruptions Trigger Blackouts Across Lagos, Osun Communities

Published

on

Flooding, Grid Disruptions Trigger Blackouts Across Lagos, Osun Communities

Flooding, Grid Disruptions Trigger Blackouts Across Lagos, Osun Communities

Parts of Lagos and Osun states have been thrown into blackouts following separate disruptions to electricity infrastructure, with the failure of two major transmission lines reducing power supply in Lagos and flooding damaging distribution facilities in parts of Osun. The Eko Electricity Distribution Company (EKEDC) and the Ibadan Electricity Distribution Company (IBEDC) announced on Wednesday that electricity allocation to their networks had been reduced, forcing load shedding across some of their business units. The Eko Electricity Distribution Company and the Ibadan Electricity Distribution Company have announced power outages across several communities under their coverage areas following heavy rainfall that disrupted electricity infrastructure. EKEDC in a statement issued on Wednesday said electricity supply to its network had been reduced after outages on the Oshogbo-Ikeja 330kV and Benin-Egbin 330kV transmission lines, resulting in load shedding across some of its business units. The DisCo said, “Some business units may experience load shedding. Cause: Grid Disruption. Osogbo/Ikeja 330kV line down. The Benin/Egbin 330kV line is down. Impact: Reduction in grid allocation”. The company did not indicate when the transmission lines would be restored but said it was engaging the relevant authorities to normalise electricity supply as quickly as possible.

The power disruption has affected several communities across Lagos, including Chevy View Estate, Chevron Drive, Agungi, Alpha Beach, Ikate, Elegushi, Carlton Gate, Kusenla, Victory Park Estate, Oniru, Maroko, Muri Okunola, Ajose Adeogun, Ligali Ayorinde, and parts of Aboyade Cole. Other affected locations are Morinho Drive, Landmark Road, Igbo Efon, Lekki Tollgate 2, Igbokusu, Gbangbala, Platinum Way, Jakande/Coastal Road, OADC/Mayegun, Ajiran, Chevron Alternative Area, and Osapa London. EKEDC assured customers that it was working with the national grid operator to restore normal electricity supply once the affected transmission lines are returned to service. “We are in constant contact with the national grid operator and will restore supply as soon as the lines are back. Thank you for your patience,” it stated. The company said it was engaging the relevant authorities to normalise electricity supply as quickly as possible, though no specific timeline was provided for full restoration.

READ ALSO:

The power crisis follows an earlier declaration of force majeure by the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) on its Oworonshoki 132/33kV and Lekki 330/132kV transmission substations after severe flooding caused by persistent rainfall in Lagos. In a statement issued by its General Manager, Public Affairs, Ndidi Mbah, TCN said the Oworonshoki substation had been forced out of service after rising floodwaters affected two of its power transformers, while emergency efforts were ongoing to keep the Lekki facility operational. According to the company, the affected transformers at Oworonshoki—TR1 (60MVA) and TR3 (30MVA)—tripped on no-load and could not be restored despite repeated attempts by engineers. TCN explained that all protection and control cables connected to the two transformers had been completely submerged, making it impossible to conduct the necessary integrity tests or restore the equipment while the flooding persists. “Presently, all power protection and control cables of the two power transformers are submerged in water, and efforts to evacuate the water have proved ineffective because the rainfall has continued,” the statement said. The company noted that the Lekki 330/132kV Transmission Substation remained in service, with engineers continuously pumping out floodwater to prevent the facility from suffering a similar shutdown.

The declaration of force majeure became inevitable because the flooding constituted an extraordinary circumstance beyond the company’s control, temporarily preventing normal operations at the affected transmission assets. The declaration of force majeure underscores the severity of the flooding and signals that TCN may be unable to meet certain operational obligations at the affected substations until normal conditions are restored. TCN disclosed that its engineers are working round the clock to evacuate floodwater from the Oworonshoki substation and restore the affected transformers once the site becomes safe for testing and recommissioning. The disruption is expected to impact electricity supply to customers of the Eko Electricity Distribution Company who receive power through the Oworonshoki transmission network. While apologising for the inconvenience, TCN assured electricity consumers that every available resource was being deployed to restore normal operations as quickly as possible. The company also emphasised that the force majeure declaration was a necessary legal step to protect the organisation from liability arising from circumstances beyond its control.

In addition to the Lagos disruptions, the Ibadan Electricity Distribution Company (IBEDC) has acknowledged the intermittent power supply and prolonged outages being experienced across its franchise areas, attributing the situation to a reduction in electricity load allocation from the national grid. The company said the supply constraints affect customers in Oyo, Ogun, Osun, and Kwara states, as well as parts of Ibadan metropolis, noting that the development has significantly limited the quantum of power available for distribution within its network. IBEDC expressed regret over the inconvenience caused to customers, admitting that the reduced allocation has resulted in extended outage periods in several communities. According to the company, it is in active engagement with the Transmission Company of Nigeria and the Nigeria Independent System Operator to address the challenge and improve supply stability across its franchise. The firm said that, pending improvement in load allocation, the limited electricity currently available is being managed carefully to ensure fairness, with power being strategically allocated and equitably distributed across feeders and service bands to balance operational efficiency with customer needs.

The development comes amid widespread flooding in Lagos following prolonged rainfall, which has submerged major roads, disrupted traffic, and affected homes and businesses in several parts of the state. The incident underscores the growing vulnerability of critical electricity infrastructure to extreme weather events, particularly in low-lying areas of Lagos that are prone to flooding during intense rainfall. Minister of Power, Joseph Tegbe, recently called for an end to vandalism of power infrastructure, grid sabotage, energy theft, and estimated billing, insisting that restoring the country’s electricity sector requires collective responsibility from all participants in the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry. He described vandalism, grid sabotage, and energy theft as acts of “economic warfare” against Nigerian households, stating that power infrastructure should be designated and protected as Critical National Assets. The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission, on its part, urged stronger collaboration among operators, strict regulatory compliance, improved customer service, and greater transparency to accelerate reforms in the industry.

TCN apologised for the disruption, expressing regret over the inconvenience to customers of Eko Electricity Distribution Company and other affected DisCos supplied from the affected transmission substations. The company said engineers are working to evacuate the floodwater to allow for further testing of the transformers and possible restoration of operations. The development comes as the government intensifies efforts to improve grid reliability and expand electricity access nationwide. As climate change continues to increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, there are growing calls for investment in climate-resilient infrastructure, including raising substations in flood-prone areas, improving drainage systems, and implementing early warning systems to protect critical assets from flooding. The power sector regulator has also emphasised the need for distribution companies to improve communication with customers during outages and provide timely updates on restoration efforts to manage expectations and reduce frustration among affected households and businesses.

Flooding, Grid Disruptions Trigger Blackouts Across Lagos, Osun Communities

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending